Olivia Freynet

Progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: lessons from asymmetrical disease

Background In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) the distribution and spatial-temporal progression of fibrotic changes may be influenced by general or locoregional conditions. From this perspective, patients with asymmetrical disease (AIPF) may be unique. Methods This retrospective study included 32 patients (26 men, mean±SD age 69±7 years) with AIPF, as defined by an asymmetry ratio (most affected – least affected fibrosis score)/(most affected + least affected fibrosis score) >0.2. The global fibrosis score was the average of the right and left scores. Patients with AIPF were compared with 64 matched controls with symmetrical IPF. Results Patients with AIPF did not differ from controls in global fibrosis score and forced vital capacity, but carbon monoxide transfer factor was less decreased (52±19% vs 43±13%, p=0.009). The rate of gastro-oesophageal reflux and acute exacerbations was significantly higher in patients with AIPF (62.5% vs 31.3%, p=0.006 and 46.9% vs 17.2%, p=0.004, respectively). In patients with AIPF the right side was more likely to be involved (62.5%); the median asymmetry ratio was 0.5 (range 0.24–1). Although the global fibrosis score worsened significantly in all 23 patients with AIPF with serial high-resolution CT scans (p<0.0001), pulmonary fibrosis remained asymmetrical in all except three. During follow-up, 15 patients with AIPF experienced 18 acute exacerbations. The first episode was virtually unilateral, occurring in the most affected lung in 10 patients (66.7%). Survival was similar between patients with AIPF and controls. Conclusion AIPF may be related to locoregional factors including gastro-oesophageal reflux which may be responsible for both disease expansion and the occurrence of acute exacerbations.

Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Outcome and Prognostic Factors

Background: Acute exacerbation is a substantial cause of death in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with poorly described prognostic factors. Objectives: To review the features associated with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and assess its prognostic factors. Methods: Thirty-seven occurrences of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were retrospectively reviewed in the medical records of 27 patients. Clinical presentation, radiographic studies, pulmonary function tests, laboratory data, treatment, and outcome were analyzed. Results: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis occurred more frequently between December and May (75.7%) than between June and November (24.3%) (p = 0.01). In-hospital mortality was 27% and median survival was 4.2 months (range 0.2–36.6). Significant differences between nonsurvivors and survivors included the time elapsed between their admission and the initiation of treatment for acute exacerbation (6 vs. 3.1 days, p = 0.04), lactate dehydrogenase levels at admission (801 vs. 544.6 IU/l, p = 0.002), impairment of the prior forced vital capacity (51.2 vs. 65%, p = 0.01) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (21.7 vs. 34%, p = 0.01). Furthermore, the evolution of gas exchange in the first 10 days after the initiation of treatment was associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality. Conclusions: Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis are more frequent during winter and spring. The time between admission and initiation of treatment is a new reported prognostic factor that should be investigated further. This finding highlights the need for a fast diagnostic approach that should probably be standardized. Early gas exchange modifications reflect the response to treatment and predict the prognosis.

Imagerie des pneumopathies infiltrantes diffuses

Subacute and chronic diffuse interstitial lung diseases Computed tomography (CT) plays an important role in all stages of management: positive diagnosis, etiological diagnosis, evaluation of lesions, ongoing monitoring, screening for complications, and prognosis. The etiological diagnosis is based on the imaging and analysis of patterns or groups of basic lesions often characteristics of a disease. Assessment of the images, the patient history, and the epidemiologic, clinical, laboratory, functional and cytologic data generally make it possible to reach a diagnosis. A pulmonary biopsy is rarely necessary. Acute diffuse interstitial lung diseases In the absence of an obvious clinical direction, CT, electrocardiography, and echocardiography are the first-line examinations to identify or rule out cardiogenic edema. CT can be used to guide bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), widely used when the patients respiratory condition permits. BAL can provide a diagnosis of diverse infections or help determine the cytologic type of alveolitis. CT also makes it possible to evaluate the lesions and plays a role in assessing severity. It makes it possible to choose the best sampling method and in principle directs sampling towards the most useful areas. It allows monitoring of disease course, screening of some complications, and precise localizing of tubes, drains, and catheters. Finally, it is used to assess the sequelae.

Management of sarcoidosis in clinical practice.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown cause with very diverse presentation, outcome, severity and need for treatments. While some presentations may be very typical, for many patients, the presentation is nonspecific, with shared associations with other diseases at times being by far more frequent or misleading, which can be a cause of significant delay and often several consultations before a diagnosis of sarcoidosis can be confirmed. This is particularly the case when pulmonary manifestations are in the forefront. The diagnosis relies on three well-known criteria. In clinical practice, these criteria are not easily implemented, particularly by physicians without expertise in sarcoidosis, which can lead to a risk of either under- or over-diagnosis. Qualifying the presentation according to sarcoidosis diagnosis is essential. However, it is often not easy to classify the presentation as typical versus compatible or compatible versus inconsistent. Further investigations are needed before any other hypothesis is to be considered. It is important to detect events and to determine whether or not they are indicative of a flare of sarcoidosis. Eventually, treatment needs to be related to the correct indications. The evaluation of the efficacy and safety of treatments is crucial. To address such issues, we present five emblematic cases that illustrate this. Showing emblematic cases is the best way to illustrate the multiple conditions to deal with for managing sarcoidosis http://ow.ly/10A5Yv