Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Olivia Pagani is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Olivia Pagani.


Annals of Oncology | 2014

ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)†

Fatima Cardoso; Alberto Costa; Larry Norton; Elżbieta Senkus; M. Aapro; Fabrice Andre; Carlos H. Barrios; Jonas Bergh; L. Biganzoli; Kimberly L. Blackwell; Maria João Cardoso; Tanja Cufer; N. El Saghir; Lesley Fallowfield; D. Fenech; Prudence A. Francis; K. Gelmon; Sharon H. Giordano; Joseph Gligorov; A. Goldhirsch; Nadia Harbeck; Nehmat Houssami; C. Hudis; Bella Kaufman; Ian E. Krop; Stella Kyriakides; U.N. Lin; Musa Mayer; S.D. Merjaver; E.B. Nordström

Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) is a treatable but still generally incurable disease. The goals of care are to optimize both length and quality of life. Due to continuous research, several advances have been made, particularly for the HER-2-positive and for Luminal-like subtypes. Notwithstanding these advances, median overall survival of patients with ABC is still only 2–3 years, although the range is wide [1–5], and survival may be longer for patients treated in specialized institutions [6]. Implementation of current knowledge is highly variable among countries and within each country.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2014

Adjuvant Exemestane with Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer

Olivia Pagani; Meredith M. Regan; Barbara Walley; Gini F. Fleming; Marco Colleoni; István Láng; Henry Gomez; Carlo Tondini; Harold J. Burstein; Edith A. Perez; Eva Ciruelos; Vered Stearns; Hervé Bonnefoi; Silvana Martino; Charles E. Geyer; Graziella Pinotti; Fabio Puglisi; Diana Crivellari; Thomas Ruhstaller; Manuela Rabaglio-Poretti; Rudolf Maibach; Barbara Ruepp; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Karen N. Price; Jürg Bernhard; Weixiu Luo; Karin Ribi; Giuseppe Viale; Alan S. Coates; Richard D. Gelber

BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor improves outcomes, as compared with tamoxifen, in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. METHODS In two phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer to the aromatase inhibitor exemestane plus ovarian suppression or tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression for a period of 5 years. Suppression of ovarian estrogen production was achieved with the use of the gonadotropin-releasing-hormone agonist triptorelin, oophorectomy, or ovarian irradiation. The primary analysis combined data from 4690 patients in the two trials. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 68 months, disease-free survival at 5 years was 91.1% in the exemestane-ovarian suppression group and 87.3% in the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group (hazard ratio for disease recurrence, second invasive cancer, or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.85; P<0.001). The rate of freedom from breast cancer at 5 years was 92.8% in the exemestane-ovarian suppression group, as compared with 88.8% in the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group (hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.80; P<0.001). With 194 deaths (4.1% of the patients), overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (hazard ratio for death in the exemestane-ovarian suppression group, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.51; P=0.37). Selected adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported for 30.6% of the patients in the exemestane-ovarian suppression group and 29.4% of those in the tamoxifen-ovarian suppression group, with profiles similar to those for postmenopausal women. CONCLUSIONS In premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with exemestane plus ovarian suppression, as compared with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, significantly reduced recurrence. (Funded by Pfizer and others; TEXT and SOFT ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00066703 and NCT00066690, respectively.).


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2012

CYP2D6 Genotype and Tamoxifen Response in Postmenopausal Women with Endocrine-Responsive Breast Cancer: The Breast International Group 1-98 Trial

Meredith M. Regan; Brian Leyland-Jones; Mark Bouzyk; Olivia Pagani; Weining Tang; Roswitha Kammler; Patrizia Dell’Orto; Maria Olivia Biasi; Beat Thürlimann; Maria Bibi Lyng; Henrik J. Ditzel; Patrick Neven; Marc Debled; Rudolf Maibach; Karen N. Price; Richard D. Gelber; Alan S. Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; James M. Rae; Giuseppe Viale

BACKGROUND Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is effective for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme metabolizes tamoxifen to clinically active metabolites, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms may adversely affect tamoxifen efficacy. In this study, we investigated the clinical relevance of CYP2D6 polymorphisms. METHODS We obtained tumor tissues and isolated DNA from 4861 of 8010 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who enrolled in the randomized, phase III double-blind Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial between March 1998 and May 2003 and received tamoxifen and/or letrozole treatment. Extracted DNA was used for genotyping nine CYP2D6 single-nucleotide polymorphisms using polymerase chain reaction-based methods. Genotype combinations were used to categorize CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes as poor, intermediate, and extensive metabolizers (PM, IM, and EM, respectively; n = 4393 patients). Associations of CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes with breast cancer-free interval (referred to as recurrence) and treatment-induced hot flushes according to randomized endocrine treatment and previous chemotherapy were assessed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS No association between CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes and breast cancer-free interval was observed among patients who received tamoxifen monotherapy without previous chemotherapy (P = .35). PM or IM phenotype had a non-statistically significantly reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence compared with EM phenotype (PM or IM vs EM, HR of recurrence = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.24). CYP2D6 metabolism phenotype was associated with tamoxifen-induced hot flushes (P = .020). Both PM and IM phenotypes had an increased risk of tamoxifen-induced hot flushes compared with EM phenotype (PM vs EM, HR of hot flushes = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.59; IM vs EM, HR of hot flushes = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.43). CONCLUSIONS CYP2D6 phenotypes of reduced enzyme activity were not associated with worse disease control but were associated with increased hot flushes, contrary to the hypothesis. The results of this study do not support using the presence or absence of hot flushes or the pharmacogenetic testing of CYP2D6 to determine whether to treat postmenopausal breast cancer patients with tamoxifen.


The Breast | 2012

1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1)

Fatima Cardoso; Alberto Costa; Larry Norton; D. Cameron; Tanja Cufer; Lesley Fallowfield; Prudence A. Francis; Joseph Gligorov; Stella Kyriakides; Nan Lin; Olivia Pagani; Elżbieta Senkus; Christoph Thomssen; M. Aapro; Jonas Bergh; A. Di Leo; N. El Saghir; Patricia Ganz; Karen A. Gelmon; A. Goldhirsch; Nadia Harbeck; Nehmat Houssami; Clifford A. Hudis; Bella Kaufman; M. Leadbeater; Musa Mayer; A. Rodger; Hope S. Rugo; Virgilio Sacchini; George W. Sledge

The 1st international Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 1) took place on November 2011, in Lisbon. Consensus guidelines for the management of this disease were developed. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus guidelines.


European Journal of Cancer | 1998

Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: results of the international Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial VI

Olivia Pagani; A. O’Neill; M. Castiglione; R. D. Gelber; A. Goldhirsch; C.M Rudenstam; Jurij Lindtner; J Collins; Diana Crivellari; Alan S. Coates; Franco Cavalli; Beat Thürlimann; Edda Simoncini; Martin F. Fey; Karen N. Price; Hans-Jörg Senn

Adjuvant chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea has been shown to be associated with reduced relapses and improved survival for premenopausal breast cancer patients. Amenorrhoea was, therefore, studied to define features of chemotherapy (i.e. duration and timing) and disease-related factors which are associated with its treatment effects. We reviewed data from IBCSG Trial VI, in which accrual was between July 1986 and April 1993. 1196 of the 1475 eligible patients (81%) were evaluable for this analysis. The median follow-up was 60 months. Women who experienced amenorrhoea had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) than those who did not (P = 0.0004), although the magnitude of the effect was reduced when adjusted for other prognostic factors (P = 0.09). The largest treatment effect associated with amenorrhoea was seen in patients assigned to receive only three initial CMF courses (5-yr DFS: 67% versus 49%, no amenorrhoea; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P = 0.002). DFS differences between amenorrhoea categories were larger for patients with ER/PR positive tumours (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, patients whose menses returned after brief amenorrhoea had a DFS similar to those whose menses ceased and did not recover (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.62; P = 0.63). The effects associated with a permanent or temporary chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea are especially significant for node-positive breast cancer patients who receive a suboptimal duration of CMF chemotherapy. Cessation of menses, even for a limited time period after diagnosis of breast cancer, might be beneficial and should be prospectively investigated, especially in patients with oestrogen receptor-positive primaries.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2010

International Guidelines for Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Can Metastatic Breast Cancer Be Cured?

Olivia Pagani; Elżbieta Senkus; William C. Wood; Marco Colleoni; Tanja Cufer; Stella Kyriakides; Alberto Costa; Fatima Cardoso

A distinctive subset of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is oligometastatic disease, which is characterized by single or few detectable metastatic lesions. The existing treatment guidelines for patients with localized MBC include surgery, radiotherapy, and regional chemotherapy. The European School of Oncology–Metastatic Breast Cancer Task Force addressed the management of these patients in its first consensus recommendations published in 2007. The Task Force endorsed the possibility of a more aggressive and multidisciplinary approach for patients with oligometastatic disease, stressing also the need for clinical trials in this patient population. At the sixth European Breast Cancer Conference, held in Berlin in March 2008, the second public session on MBC guidelines addressed the controversial issue of whether MBC can be cured. In this commentary, we summarize the discussion and related recommendations regarding the available therapeutic options that are possibly associated with cure in these patients. In particular, data on local (surgery and radiotherapy) and chemotherapy options are discussed. Large retrospective series show an association between surgical removal of the primary tumor or of lung metastases and improved long-term outcome in patients with oligometastatic disease. In the absence of data from prospective randomized studies, removal of the primary tumor or isolated metastatic lesions may be an attractive therapeutic strategy in this subset of patients, offering rapid disease control and potential for survival benefit. Some improvement in outcome may also be achieved with optimization of systemic therapies, possibly in combination with optimal local treatment.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010

Longer-Term Assessment of Trastuzumab-Related Cardiac Adverse Events in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) Trial

Marion Procter; Thomas M. Suter; Evandro de Azambuja; Urania Dafni; Veerle Van Dooren; Susanne Muehlbauer; Miguel Angel Climent; Ernst Rechberger; Walter Tsang Wu Liu; Mazakasu Toi; R. Charles Coombes; David Dodwell; Olivia Pagani; Jorge Madrid; Marcia Hall; Shin Cheh Chen; Christian Focan; Michael Muschol; Dirk J. van Veldhuisen; Martine Piccart-Gebhart

PURPOSE We investigated the incidence of cardiac adverse events in patients with early breast cancer in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial who were treated with 1 year of trastuzumab after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The HERA trial is a three-group, randomized trial that compared 1 year or 2 years of trastuzumab with observation in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) -positive early breast cancer. Eligible patients had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; >or= 55%) after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Cardiac function was monitored throughout the trial. This analysis considers patients randomly assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab treatment or observation. RESULTS There were 1,698 patients randomly assigned to observation and 1,703 randomly assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab treatment; 94.1% of patients had been treated with anthracyclines. The incidence of discontinuation of trastuzumab because of cardiac disorders was low (5.1%). At a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the incidence of cardiac end points remained low, though it was higher in the trastuzumab group than in the observation group (severe CHF, 0.8% v 0.0%; confirmed significant LVEF decreases, 3.6% v 0.6%) In the trastuzumab group, 59 of 73 patients with a cardiac end point reached acute recovery; of these 59 patients, 52 were considered by the cardiac advisory board (CAB) to have a favorable outcome from the cardiac end point. CONCLUSION The incidence of cardiac end points remains low even after longer-term follow-up. The cumulative incidence of any type of cardiac end point increases during the scheduled treatment period of 1 year, but it remains relatively constant thereafter.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2010

International Guidelines for Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Combination vs Sequential Single-Agent Chemotherapy

Fatima Cardoso; Philippe L. Bedard; Olivia Pagani; Elżbieta Senkus-Konefka; Lesley Fallowfield; Stella Kyriakides; Alberto Costa; Tanja Cufer; Kathy S. Albain

Compared with treatment options for early-stage breast cancer, few data exist regarding the optimal use of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The choice of using a combination of cytotoxic chemotherapies vs sequential single agents is controversial. At the 6th European Breast Cancer Conference, the European School of Oncology Metastatic Breast Cancer Task Force convened an open debate on the relative benefits of combination vs sequential therapy. Based on the available data, the Task Force recommends sequential monotherapy as the preferred choice in advanced disease, in the absence of rapid clinical progression, life-threatening visceral metastases, or the need for rapid symptom and/or disease control. Patient- and disease-related factors should be used to choose between combination and sequential single-agent chemotherapy for MBC. Additional research is needed to determine the impact of therapy on patient-rated quality of life and to identify predictive factors that can be used to guide therapy.


European Journal of Cancer | 2012

The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists recommendations for the management of young women with breast cancer.

Fatima Cardoso; Sibylle Loibl; Olivia Pagani; Alessandra Graziottin; Pietro Panizza; Laura Martincich; Oreste Gentilini; Fedro Peccatori; A. Fourquet; Suzette Delaloge; Lorenza Marotti; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Anna Maria Kotti-Kitromilidou; Alan Rodger; Nadia Harbeck

EUSOMA (The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists) is committed to writing recommendations on different topics of breast cancer care which can be easily adopted and used by health professionals dedicated to the care of patients with breast cancer in their daily practice. In 2011, EUSOMA identified the management of young women with breast cancer as one of the hot topics for which a consensus among European experts was needed. Therefore, the society recently organised a workshop to define such recommendations. Thirteen experts from the different disciplines met for two days to discuss the topic. This international and multidisciplinary panel thoroughly reviewed the literature in order to prepare evidence-based recommendations. During the meeting, two working groups were set up to discuss in detail diagnosis and loco-regional and systemic treatments, including both group aspects of psychology and sexuality. The conclusions reached by the working groups were then discussed in a plenary session to reach panel consensus. Whenever possible, a measure of the level of evidence (LoE) from 1 (the highest) to 4 (the lowest) degree, based on the methodology proposed by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), was assigned to each recommendation. The present manuscript presents the recommendations of this consensus group for the management of young women with breast cancer in daily clinical practice.


The Breast | 2014

Second international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY2)

Shani Paluch-Shimon; Olivia Pagani; Ann H. Partridge; Eran Bar-Meir; Lesley Fallowfield; Deborah Fenlon; Eitan Friedman; Karen A. Gelmon; Oreste Gentilini; James Geraghty; Nadia Harbeck; Stephen Higgins; Sibylle Loibl; Elizabeth Moser; Fedro Peccatori; Hila Raanani; Bella Kaufman; Fatima Cardoso

The 2nd International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY2) took place in November 2014, in Dublin, Ireland organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women (BCYW) were updated from BCY1 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines, and areas of research priorities were identified. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

Collaboration


Dive into the Olivia Pagani's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aron Goldhirsch

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Goldhirsch

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge