Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Olivier Lichtarge is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Olivier Lichtarge.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 1999

Similar Structures and Shared Switch Mechanisms of the β2-Adrenoceptor and the Parathyroid Hormone Receptor Zn(II) BRIDGES BETWEEN HELICES III AND VI BLOCK ACTIVATION

Søren P. Sheikh; Jean-Pierre Vilardarga; Thomas J. Baranski; Olivier Lichtarge; Taroh Iiri; Elaine C. Meng; Robert A. Nissenson; Henry R. Bourne

The seven transmembrane helices of serpentine receptors comprise a conserved switch that relays signals from extracellular stimuli to heterotrimeric G proteins on the cytoplasmic face of the membrane. By substituting histidines for residues at the cytoplasmic ends of helices III and VI in retinal rhodopsin, we engineered a metal-binding site whose occupancy by Zn(II) prevented the receptor from activating a retinal G protein, Gt (Sheikh, S. P., Zvyaga, T. A., Lichtarge, O., Sakmar, T. P., and Bourne, H. R. (1996)Nature 383, 347–350). Now we report engineering of metal-binding sites bridging the cytoplasmic ends of these two helices in two other serpentine receptors, the β2-adrenoreceptor and the parathyroid hormone receptor; occupancy of the metal-binding site by Zn(II) markedly impairs the ability of each receptor to mediate ligand-dependent activation of Gs, the stimulatory regulator of adenylyl cyclase. We infer that these two receptors share with rhodopsin a common three-dimensional architecture and an activation switch that requires movement, relative to one another, of helices III and VI; these inferences are surprising in the case of the parathyroid hormone receptor, a receptor that contains seven stretches of hydrophobic sequence but whose amino acid sequence otherwise shows no apparent similarity to those of receptors in the rhodopsin family. These findings highlight the evolutionary conservation of the switch mechanism of serpentine receptors and help to constrain models of how the switch works.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2004

Evolutionary Trace of G Protein-coupled Receptors Reveals Clusters of Residues That Determine Global and Class-specific Functions

Srinivasan Madabushi; Alecia K. Gross; Anne Philippi; Elaine C. Meng; Theodore G. Wensel; Olivier Lichtarge

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation mediated by ligand-induced structural reorganization of its helices is poorly understood. To determine the universal elements of this conformational switch, we used evolutionary tracing (ET) to identify residue positions commonly important in diverse GPCRs. When mapped onto the rhodopsin structure, these trace residues cluster into a network of contacts from the retinal binding site to the G protein-coupling loops. Their roles in a generic transduction mechanism were verified by 211 of 239 published mutations that caused functional defects. When grouped according to the nature of the defects, these residues sub-divided into three striking sub-clusters: a trigger region, where mutations mostly affect ligand binding, a coupling region near the cytoplasmic interface to the G protein, where mutations affect G protein activation, and a linking core in between where mutations cause constitutive activity and other defects. Differential ET analysis of the opsin family revealed an additional set of opsin-specific residues, several of which form part of the retinal binding pocket, and are known to cause functional defects upon mutation. To test the predictive power of ET, we introduced novel mutations in bovine rhodopsin at a globally important position, Leu-79, and at an opsin-specific position, Trp-175. Both were functionally critical, causing constitutive G protein activation of the mutants and rapid loss of regeneration after photobleaching. These results define in GPCRs a canonical signal transduction mechanism where ligand binding induces conformational changes propagated through adjacent trigger, linking core, and coupling regions.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 1999

C5a receptor activation. Genetic identification of critical residues in four transmembrane helices.

Thomas J. Baranski; Paul Herzmark; Olivier Lichtarge; Basil O. Gerber; Joshua Trueheart; Elaine C. Meng; Taroh Iiri; Søren P. Sheikh; Henry R. Bourne

Hormones and sensory stimuli activate serpentine receptors, transmembrane switches that relay signals to heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). To understand the switch mechanism, we subjected 93 amino acids in transmembrane helices III, V, VI, and VII of the human chemoattractant C5a receptor to random saturation mutagenesis. A yeast selection identified 121 functioning mutant receptors, containing a total of 523 amino acid substitutions. Conserved hydrophobic residues are located on helix surfaces that face other helices in a modeled seven-helix bundle (Baldwin, J. M., Schertler, G. F., and Unger, V. M. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 272, 144–164), whereas surfaces predicted to contact the surrounding lipid tolerate many substitutions. Our analysis identified 25 amino acid positions resistant to nonconservative substitutions. These appear to comprise two distinct components of the receptor switch, a surface at or near the extracellular membrane interface and a core cluster in the cytoplasmic half of the bundle. Twenty-one of the 121 mutant receptors exhibit constitutive activity. Amino acids substitutions in these activated receptors predominate in helices III and VI; other activating mutations truncate the receptor near the extracellular end of helix VI. These results identify key elements of a general mechanism for the serpentine receptor switch.


Folding and Design | 1997

Meeting review: the Second Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13–16, 1996

Roland L. Dunbrack; Dietlind L. Gerloff; Michael J. Bower; Xiaowu Chen; Olivier Lichtarge; Fred E. Cohen

In most fields of scientific endeavor, the outcomes of important experiments are not always known before the experiments are performed. But in protein structure prediction, algorithms are usually developed and tested in situations where the answers are known. In December 1996, the Second Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2) was held in Asilomar, California to rectify this situation: protein sequences were provided in advance for which the experimental structure had not yet been published. Over 70 research groups provided bona fide predictions on 42 targets in four categories: comparative or homology modeling, fold recognition or threading, ab initio structure predictions, and docking predictions. Since the previous CASP meeting in 1994, the role of fold recognition in structure prediction has increased enormously with the largest number of groups participating in this category. In this review, we highlight some of the important developments and give at least a qualitative sense of what kind of methods produced some of the better predictions.


Journal of Molecular Biology | 1996

An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families

Olivier Lichtarge; Henry R. Bourne; Fred E. Cohen


Science | 1997

Receptor and βγ Binding Sites in the α Subunit of the Retinal G Protein Transducin

René Onrust; Paul Herzmark; Patty P. Chi; Pablo D. Garcia; Olivier Lichtarge; Chris Kingsley; Henry R. Bourne


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 1996

Evolutionarily conserved Galphabetagamma binding surfaces support a model of the G protein-receptor complex.

Olivier Lichtarge; Henry R. Bourne; Fred E. Cohen


Journal of Molecular Biology | 1997

Identification of functional surfaces of the zinc binding domains of intracellular receptors

Olivier Lichtarge; Keith R. Yamamoto; Fred E. Cohen


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2000

A regulator of G protein signaling interaction surface linked to effector specificity

Mathew E. Sowa; Wei He; Theodore G. Wensel; Olivier Lichtarge


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2003

Conserved Motifs in Somatostatin, D2-dopamine, and α2B-Adrenergic Receptors for Inhibiting the Na-H Exchanger, NHE1

Chin-Yu Lin; Madhulika G. Varma; Anita Joubel; Srinivasan Madabushi; Olivier Lichtarge; Diane L. Barber

Collaboration


Dive into the Olivier Lichtarge's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fred E. Cohen

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elaine C. Meng

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Herzmark

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Taroh Iiri

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alecia K. Gross

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge