Olivier Saunier
Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Olivier Saunier.
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity | 2016
Paul W. Eslinger; Ted W. Bowyer; Pascal Achim; Tianfeng Chai; Benoit Deconninck; Katie Freeman; Sylvia Generoso; Philip Hayes; Verena Heidmann; Ian Hoffman; Yuichi Kijima; Monika Krysta; Alain Malo; Christian Maurer; Fantine Ngan; Peter Robins; J. Ole Ross; Olivier Saunier; Clemens Schlosser; Michael Schöppner; Brian T. Schrom; Petra Seibert; Ariel F. Stein; Kurt Ungar; Jing Yi
The International Monitoring System (IMS) is part of the verification regime for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty Organization (CTBTO). At entry-into-force, half of the 80 radionuclide stations will be able to measure concentrations of several radioactive xenon isotopes produced in nuclear explosions, and then the full network may be populated with xenon monitoring afterward. An understanding of natural and man-made radionuclide backgrounds can be used in accordance with the provisions of the treaty (such as event screening criteria in Annex 2 to the Protocol of the Treaty) for the effective implementation of the verification regime. Fission-based production of (99)Mo for medical purposes also generates nuisance radioxenon isotopes that are usually vented to the atmosphere. One of the ways to account for the effect emissions from medical isotope production has on radionuclide samples from the IMS is to use stack monitoring data, if they are available, and atmospheric transport modeling. Recently, individuals from seven nations participated in a challenge exercise that used atmospheric transport modeling to predict the time-history of (133)Xe concentration measurements at the IMS radionuclide station in Germany using stack monitoring data from a medical isotope production facility in Belgium. Participants received only stack monitoring data and used the atmospheric transport model and meteorological data of their choice. Some of the models predicted the highest measured concentrations quite well. A model comparison rank and ensemble analysis suggests that combining multiple models may provide more accurate predicted concentrations than any single model. None of the submissions based only on the stack monitoring data predicted the small measured concentrations very well. Modeling of sources by other nuclear facilities with smaller releases than medical isotope production facilities may be important in understanding how to discriminate those releases from releases from a nuclear explosion.
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity | 2018
Christian Maurer; Jonathan Baré; Jolanta Kusmierczyk-Michulec; Alice Crawford; Paul W. Eslinger; Petra Seibert; Blake Orr; Anne Philipp; Ole Ross; Sylvia Generoso; Pascal Achim; Michael Schoeppner; Alain Malo; Anders Ringbom; Olivier Saunier; Denis Quélo; Anne Mathieu; Yuichi Kijima; Ariel F. Stein; Tianfeng Chai; Fong Ngan; Susan Leadbetter; Pieter De Meutter; Andy Delcloo; Rich Britton; Ashley V. Davies; Lee Glascoe; Donald D. Lucas; Matthew Simpson; Phil Vogt
After performing a first multi-model exercise in 2015 a comprehensive and technically more demanding atmospheric transport modelling challenge was organized in 2016. Release data were provided by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization radiopharmaceutical facility in Sydney (Australia) for a one month period. Measured samples for the same time frame were gathered from six International Monitoring System stations in the Southern Hemisphere with distances to the source ranging between 680 (Melbourne) and about 17,000 km (Tristan da Cunha). Participants were prompted to work with unit emissions in pre-defined emission intervals (daily, half-daily, 3-hourly and hourly emission segment lengths) and in order to perform a blind test actual emission values were not provided to them. Despite the quite different settings of the two atmospheric transport modelling challenges there is common evidence that for long-range atmospheric transport using temporally highly resolved emissions and highly space-resolved meteorological input fields has no significant advantage compared to using lower resolved ones. As well an uncertainty of up to 20% in the daily stack emission data turns out to be acceptable for the purpose of a study like this. Model performance at individual stations is quite diverse depending largely on successfully capturing boundary layer processes. No single model-meteorology combination performs best for all stations. Moreover, the stations statistics do not depend on the distance between the source and the individual stations. Finally, it became more evident how future exercises need to be designed. Set-up parameters like the meteorological driver or the output grid resolution should be pre-scribed in order to enhance diversity as well as comparability among model runs.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012
Victor Winiarek; Marc Bocquet; Olivier Saunier; Anne Mathieu
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2013
Olivier Saunier; Anne Mathieu; Damien Didier; Marilyne Tombette; Denis Quélo; Victor Winiarek; Marc Bocquet
Elements | 2012
Anne Mathieu; Irène Korsakissok; Denis Quélo; Jérôme Groëll; Marilyne Tombette; Damien Didier; Emmanuel Quentric; Olivier Saunier; Jean-Pierre Benoit; Olivier Isnard
Atmospheric Environment | 2014
Victor Winiarek; Marc Bocquet; Nora Duhanyan; Yelva Roustan; Olivier Saunier; Anne Mathieu
Atmospheric Environment | 2011
Victor Winiarek; Julius Vira; Marc Bocquet; Mikhail Sofiev; Olivier Saunier
Atmospheric Environment | 2009
Olivier Saunier; Marc Bocquet; Anne Mathieu; Olivier Isnard
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society | 2017
Y. Liu; J.-M. Haussaire; Marc Bocquet; Yelva Roustan; Olivier Saunier; Anne Mathieu
Applied Geochemistry | 2018
Anne Mathieu; Mizuo Kajino; Irène Korsakissok; Raphaël Périllat; Denis Quélo; Arnaud Quérel; Olivier Saunier; Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama; Yasuhito Igarashi; Damien Didier