Olle Lagerquist
University of Alberta
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Olle Lagerquist.
European Journal of Applied Physiology | 2011
Austin J. Bergquist; J. M. Clair; Olle Lagerquist; C. S. Mang; Yoshino Okuma; David F. Collins
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) generates contractions by depolarising axons beneath the stimulating electrodes. The depolarisation of motor axons produces contractions by signals travelling from the stimulation location to the muscle (peripheral pathway), with no involvement of the central nervous system (CNS). The concomitant depolarisation of sensory axons sends a large volley into the CNS and this can contribute to contractions by signals travelling through the spinal cord (central pathway) which may have advantages when NMES is used to restore movement or reduce muscle atrophy. In addition, the electrically evoked sensory volley increases activity in CNS circuits that control movement and this can also enhance neuromuscular function after CNS damage. The first part of this review provides an overview of how peripheral and central pathways contribute to contractions evoked by NMES and describes how differences in NMES parameters affect the balance between transmission along these two pathways. The second part of this review describes how NMES location (i.e. over the nerve trunk or muscle belly) affects transmission along peripheral and central pathways and describes some implications for motor unit recruitment during NMES. The third part of this review summarises some of the effects that the electrically evoked sensory volley has on CNS circuits, and highlights the need to identify optimal stimulation parameters for eliciting plasticity in the CNS. A goal of this work is to identify the best way to utilize the electrically evoked sensory volley generated during NMES to exploit mechanisms inherent to the neuromuscular system and enhance neuromuscular function for rehabilitation.
Muscle & Nerve | 2010
Olle Lagerquist; David F. Collins
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown to generate contractions that include a central recruitment of motoneurons; however, the effect of pulse width on electromyographic (EMG) and torque responses during NMES are not well documented. Soleus EMG and isometric plantarflexion torque were recorded from 14 subjects with NMES delivered to the tibial nerve using 50, 200, 500, and 1000 μs pulse widths. M‐waves were significantly smaller during 20 HZ NMES compared with responses evoked by single pulses of 200, 500, and 1000 μs, but not 50 μs pulse widths. At all pulse widths, stimulation at 20 HZ depressed soleus H‐reflexes compared with single pulses. Two seconds of 100 HZ NMES significantly increased H‐reflexes and torque during the subsequent 20 HZ NMES with 200, 500, and 1000 μs, but not 50 μs, pulse widths. NMES delivered using wide pulses generated larger contractions with a relatively greater central contribution than narrow pulses. This may help reduce atrophy and produce fatigue‐resistant contractions for rehabilitation. Muscle Nerve, 2010
Journal of Biological Rhythms | 2009
Alexander Tamm; Olle Lagerquist; Alejandro L. Ley; David F. Collins
The ability to generate torque during a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) changes over the day. The present experiments were designed to determine the influence of an individuals chronotype on this diurnal rhythm and on cortical, spinal, and peripheral mechanisms that may be related to torque production. After completing a questionnaire to determine chronotype, 18 subjects (9 morning people, 9 evening people) participated in 4 data collection sessions (at 09:00, 13:00, 17:00, and 21:00) over 1 day. We used magnetic stimulation of the cortex, electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve, electromyographic (EMG) recordings of muscle activity, and isometric torque measurements to evaluate the excitability of the motor cortex, the spinal cord, and the torque-generating capacity of the triceps surae (TS) muscles. We found that for morning people, cortical excitability was highest at 09:00, spinal excitability was highest at 21:00, and there were no significant differences in TS EMG or torque produced during MVCs over the day. In contrast, evening people showed parallel increases in cortical and spinal excitability over the day, and these were associated with increased TS EMG and MVC torque. There were no differences at the level of the muscle over the day between morning and evening people. We propose that the simultaneous increases in cortical and spinal excitability increased central nervous system drive to the muscles of evening people, thus increasing torque production over the day. These differences in cortical excitability and performance of a motor task between morning and evening people have implications for maximizing human performance and highlight the influence of chronotype on an individuals diurnal rhythms.
Journal of Applied Physiology | 2009
Olle Lagerquist; Lee D. Walsh; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; David F. Collins; Simon C. Gandevia
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) generates contractions by activation of motor axons (peripheral mechanism), but the afferent volley also contributes by recruiting spinal motoneurons synaptically (central mechanism), which recruits motoneurons according to Hennemans size principle. Thus, we hypothesized that contractions that develop due to a combination of peripheral and central mechanisms will fatigue less rapidly than when electrically evoked contractions are generated by the activation of motor axons alone. Plantar-flexion torque evoked by NMES over the triceps surae was compared in five able-bodied subjects before (Intact) and during (Blocked) a complete anesthetic block of the tibial and common peroneal nerves. In the Blocked condition, plantar-flexion torque could only develop from the direct activation of motor axons beneath the stimulating electrodes. NMES was delivered using three protocols: protocol A, constant 100 Hz for 30 s; protocol B, four 2-s bursts of 100 Hz alternating with 20-Hz stimulation; and protocol C, alternating 100 Hz bursts (1 s on, 1 s off) for 30 s. The percent change in evoked plantar flexion torque from the beginning to the end of the stimulation differed (P < 0.05) between Intact and Blocked conditions for all protocols (Intact: protocol A = +125%, B = +230%, C = +78%; Blocked: protocol A = -79%, B = -15%, C = -35%). These results corroborate previous evidence that NMES can evoke contractions via the recruitment of spinal motoneurons in addition to the direct recruitment of motor axons. We now show that NMES delivered for periods of up to 30 s generates plantar-flexion torque which decreases when only motor axons are recruited and increases when the central nervous system can contribute.
Muscle & Nerve | 2008
Olle Lagerquist; David F. Collins
It has been proposed that pulse‐widths of 0.5–1.0 ms should be used to evoke H‐reflexes in humans; however, the influence of pulse‐width on H‐reflex recruitment over a range of stimulus intensities has not been well characterized. We constructed soleus H‐reflex vs. M‐wave recruitment curves using 50, 200, 500, and 1000 μs pulses in 12 subjects. In contrast to previous findings, changing the pulse‐width did not significantly alter maximal H‐reflex (Hmax) or M‐wave (Mmax) amplitudes or Hmax/Mmax ratios. In fact, the 1000 μs pulses resulted in larger H‐reflexes when the M‐wave was 5% Mmax; smaller M‐waves at Hmax; and lower H‐reflex thresholds compared with 50 μs pulses. These differences reflect a leftward shift in the H‐reflex vs. M‐wave recruitment curve when using wide vs. narrow pulses and, combined with no change in the Hmax/Mmax ratios, suggest that factors other than antidromic collision in motor axons limit Hmax. These results support the idea that 1000 μs pulses should be used to evoke H‐reflexes and suggest that wider pulses may be beneficial to generate contractions with a greater reflex contribution when using neuromuscular stimulation for rehabilitation. Muscle Nerve, 2007
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience | 2014
Jesse C. Dean; Joanna M. Clair-Auger; Olle Lagerquist; David F. Collins
Motoneurons receive a barrage of inputs from descending and reflex pathways. Much of our understanding about how these inputs are transformed into motor output in humans has come from recordings of single motor units during voluntary contractions. This approach, however, is limited because the input is ill-defined. Herein, we quantify the discharge of soleus motor units in response to well-defined trains of afferent input delivered at physiologically-relevant frequencies. Constant frequency stimulation of the tibial nerve (10–100 Hz for 30 s), below threshold for eliciting M-waves or H-reflexes with a single pulse, recruited motor units in 7/9 subjects. All 25 motor units recruited during stimulation were also recruited during weak (<10% MVC) voluntary contractions. Higher frequencies recruited more units (n = 3/25 at 10 Hz; n = 25/25 at 100 Hz) at shorter latencies (19.4 ± 9.4 s at 10 Hz; 4.1 ± 4.0 s at 100 Hz) than lower frequencies. When a second unit was recruited, the discharge of the already active unit did not change, suggesting that recruitment was not due to increased synaptic drive. After recruitment, mean discharge rate during stimulation at 20 Hz (7.8 Hz) was lower than during 30 Hz (8.6 Hz) and 40 Hz (8.4 Hz) stimulation. Discharge was largely asynchronous from the stimulus pulses with “time-locked” discharge occurring at an H-reflex latency with only a 24% probability. Motor units continued to discharge after cessation of the stimulation in 89% of trials, although at a lower rate (5.8 Hz) than during the stimulation (7.9 Hz). This work supports the idea that the afferent volley evoked by repetitive stimulation recruits motor units through the integration of synaptic drive and intrinsic properties of motoneurons, resulting in “physiological” recruitment which adheres to Henneman’s size principle and results in relatively low discharge rates and asynchronous firing.
Journal of Applied Physiology | 2006
Olle Lagerquist; E. Paul Zehr; David Docherty
Experimental Brain Research | 2010
C. S. Mang; Olle Lagerquist; David F. Collins
Experimental Brain Research | 2006
Olle Lagerquist; E. Paul Zehr; Evan R. L. Baldwin; Piotr M. Klakowicz; David F. Collins
Experimental Brain Research | 2012
Olle Lagerquist; Cameron S. Mang; David F. Collins