Olle Reichard

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon α-2b with and without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C

Summary Background Pilot studies suggested that more patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection had a sustained virological response when treated with the combination of interferon α-2b and ribavirin than with interferon α-2b alone. We investigated the biochemical and virological responses and safety of treatment with interferon α-2b and ribavirin compared with interferon α-2b alone. Methods In this double-blind trial 100 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with interferon α-2b (3 MU three times a week) in combination with ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg per day) or placebo for 24 weeks and then followed up for a further 24 weeks. A further follow-up was done 1 year after active treatment stopped. The primary endpoint was the sustained virological response, defined as no detectable HCV RNA by PCR at both week 24 and week 48. Retrospectively, the baseline HCV-RNA load was analysed as a predictor of a sustained virological response. Data were analysed by intention to treat. Findings 18 (36%) of the 50 patients in the interferon α-2b and ribavirin group had a sustained virological response compared with nine (18%) of the 50 patients in the interferon α-2b and placebo group (p=0·047). At the 1 year follow-up the proportion of patients with a virological response was greater in the interferon α-2b and ribavirin group than the interferon α-2b and placebo group (42 vs 20%, p=0·03), respectively. More patients with baseline HCV-RNA concentrations greater than 3×10 6 genome equivalents (Eq) per ml had a sustained response with interferon α-2b and ribavirin than with interferon α-2b and placebo (12/29 vs 1/26, p=0·009), whereas the sustained response did not differ between the two treatment groups for HCV-RNA amounts less than 3×10 6 Eq per ml (6/21 vs 8/24, p=0·67), respectively. Interpretation More patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virological response with interferon α-2b and ribavirin than with only interferon α-2b treatment. We suggest that patients with high HCV-RNA loads should be treated with interferon α-2b and ribavirin.

Ribavirin treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C: results of a placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND/AIMS Small, uncontrolled studies of ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C have reported efficacy in chronic hepatitis C. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 24-week course of oral ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C, compared to placebo. METHODS A total of 114 patients were randomised to ribavirin or placebo. Ribavirin was administered in doses of 1000 or 1200 mg/day for 24 weeks. Efficacy was determined in the intention-to-treat population: 76 received ribavirin and 38 placebo. RESULTS Ribavirin was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing and normalising serum ALT levels: 42/76 (55%) of ribavirin-treated patients vs 2/38 (5%) placebo recipients had either normalisation of the ALT levels or a reduction from baseline of at least 50% (p < 0.001). ALT levels were normal in 22/76 (29%) of ribavirin-treated patients vs 0/38 placebo recipients (p < 0.001). Twenty-four weeks after stopping ribavirin, the majority of patients had abnormal ALT levels. There was no difference between the treatment groups in reduction or disappearance of HCV-RNA levels. HCV RNA disappeared during treatment in 3% of ribavirin-treated patients and 3% of placebo recipients. More ribavirin than placebo patients showed improvement in total Knodell score (45% vs 31%), but these differences were not statistically significant. Analysis of each component of a histology activity index revealed no statistically significant differences between treatment groups. Ribavirin patients had fewer lymphoid aggregates than did placebo recipients at the post-treatment assessment (p = 0.05). Ribavirin was associated with reversible haemolytic anaemia: a fall in haemoglobin occurred in 3% of placebo- and 32% (25/78) of ribavirin-treated patients, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that ribavirin was no more effective than placebo in reducing or eliminating HCV-RNA levels, and was not significantly more effective than placebo in improving hepatic histology after 6 months of treatment. The role of a 6-month treatment of chronic hepatitis C with ribavirin alone, without a significant effect on HCV RNA, is therefore limited.

Ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C

We evaluated oral ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection in a pilot study including 10 patients. Patients (7 men, 3 women; mean age 40 years, range 23-54) all had biopsy-proven chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis and were repeatedly positive for antibodies to hepatitis C virus. Treatment was with oral ribavirin 1000-1200 mg per day in two divided doses for 12 weeks. The median serum alanine aminotransferase concentration for all patients at enrollment was 3.15 mu kat/l (range 1.22-7.79) and decreased significantly (p less than 0.005) to 1.25 mu kat/l (0.78-2.04) after 12 weeks of treatment. Within 6 weeks of the end of treatment the median serum alanine aminotransferase concentration was not significantly different from that before treatment. Side-effects were mild and fully reversible after cessation of therapy. We conclude that ribavirin is the first drug to offer a potentially effective oral treatment for chronic hepatitis C. It should be further evaluated in controlled trials, possibly in combination with interferon alpha.

Pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin for 14 versus 24 weeks in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3 and rapid virological response

A recent nonrandomized pilot trial showed that hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with genotype 2/3 and rapid virological response (RVR) had a 90% sustained virological response (SVR) rate after 14 weeks of treatment. We aimed to assess this concept in a randomized controlled trial. In the trial, 428 treatment‐naïve HCV RNA–positive patients with genotype 2 or 3 were enrolled. Patients with RVR were randomized to 14 (group A) or 24 (group B) weeks of treatment. Patients were treated with pegylated interferon α‐2b (1.5 μg/kg) subcutaneously weekly and ribavirin (800‐1400 mg) orally daily. The noninferiority margin was set to be 10% between the two groups with a one‐sided 2.5% significance level. RVR was obtained in 302 of 428 (71%), and 298 of these were randomized to group A (n = 148) or group B (n = 150). In the intention‐to‐treat analysis, SVR rates were 120 of 148 (81.1%) in group A and 136 of 150 (90.7%) in group B (difference, 9.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.7‐17.7). Among patients with an HCV RNA test 24 weeks after the end of treatment, 120 of 139 (86.3%) patients in group A achieved SVR compared with 136 of 146 (93.2%) in group B (difference, 6.9%; 95% confidence interval, −0.1 to +13.9). Conclusion: We cannot formally claim that 14 weeks of treatment is noninferior to 24 weeks of treatment. However, the SVR rate after 14 weeks of treatment is high, and although longer treatment may give slightly better SVR, we believe economical savings and fewer side effects make it rational to treat patients with genotype 2 or 3 and RVR for only 14 weeks. (HEPATOLOGY 2007.)

Long-term follow-up of chronic hepatitis C patients with sustained virological response to alpha-interferon

BACKGROUND/AIMS This study aimed to determine the long-term outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who respond to interferon treatment with clearance of serum HCV RNA. METHODS We performed a long-term biochemical, virological, and histological follow-up of all sustained virological responders, defined as those who became HCV RNA negative at follow-up 6 months after the end of treatment, from 3 controlled interferon trials performed in Sweden between 1988 and 1994. RESULTS At biochemical and virological long-term follow-up performed in 26 sustained virological responders 3.5-8.8 years (mean +/- SD, 5.4+/-1.6 years) after the end of IFN therapy, 22 patients (85%) had normal serum ALT levels, and 24 patients (92%) were HCV RNA negative in serum. Liver biopsies performed in 23 patients 2.1-8.7 years (mean +/- SD, 5.0+/-1.8 years) after end of treatment showed no or minimal inflammation, whereas mild and probably irreversible fibrosis was seen in a few patients. CONCLUSION In this well-defined material of sustained responders to IFN therapy, the long-term prognosis was excellent. Nearly all had a durable response, not only biochemically and virologically, but more importantly also histologically with normalisation or near normalisation of previous histological lesions.

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment for hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients.

Summary.  Standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C (HCV) is pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin. There is limited experience with either drug in dialysis [end stage renal disease (ESRD)]. Six haemodialysis patients, four with HCV genotype 1, one with genotype 4 and one genotype 2 were treated with pegylated interferon‐alfa‐2b (n = 4) and pegylated interferon‐alfa‐2a (n = 2) for 24–48 weeks according to genotype with a dose of 50 or 135 μg/week respectively. All patients were given reduced ribavirin doses, initially 200–400 mg/day. Ribavirin trough plasma concentrations were measured with a HPLC method previously developed for earlier treatment studies, aiming at a target concentration of 10–15 μmol/L. Interferon related side‐effects were common, in one patient peg‐alfa‐2b was permanently reduced to 50 μg every 9–10 days with improvement in tolerance. Average ribavirin dose was 170–300 mg/day. Ribavirin‐induced anaemia was treated with high doses of erythropoietin and low doses of iron. Blood‐transfusions were not needed. All patients became HCV‐RNA‐PCR negative during treatment which was completed or nearly completed in four patients. One patient terminated therapy prematurely due to pronounced interferon related side‐effects and another died of myocardial infarction probably not related to therapy. Three patients have remained HCV‐RNA negative with extended follow‐up, two of whom have had a successful kidney transplant. Pegylated interferons are likely to become a valuable addition for HCV therapy in ESRD and are possible to combine with ribavirin. However the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of both peg‐alfa‐2a and 2b need to be studied more closely in prospective studies before definite dosing recommendations can be made.

Non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma and other nonhepatic malignancies in Swedish patients with hepatitis C virus infection

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL), multiple myeloma (MM), thyroid cancer (TC), chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL), acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL), and Hodgkins lymphoma (HL). A Swedish cohort of 27,150 HCV‐infected persons notified during 1990‐2000 was included in the study. The database was linked to other national registers to calculate the observation time, expressed as person‐years, and to identify all incident malignancies in the cohort. The patients were stratified according to assumed time of previous HCV infection. The relative risk of malignancy was expressed as a standardized incidence ratio (SIR)—the observed number compared to the expected number. During 1990‐2000 there were 50 NHL, 15 MM, 14 ALL, 8 TC, 6 CLL, and 4 HL diagnoses in the cohort. Altogether, 20 NHL, 7 MM, 5 TC, 4 CLL, 1 ALL, and 1 HL patient fulfilled the criteria to be included in the statistical analysis. The observation time was 122,272 person‐years. The risk of NHL and MM was significantly increased in the stratum with more than 15 years of infection (SIR 1.89 [95% CI, 1.10‐3.03] and 2.54 [95% CI, 1.11‐5.69], respectively). The association was not significant in TC or CLL. In conclusion, we report the incidence of several malignancies in a nationwide cohort of HCV‐infected persons. Although the delayed diagnosis of HCV probably has resulted in an underestimation of the risk, this study showed a significantly increased risk of NHL and MM. (HEPATOLOGY 2005;41:652–659.)

High Levels of Chronic Immune Activation in the T-Cell Compartments of Patients Coinfected with Hepatitis C Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Are Reverted by Alpha Interferon and Ribavirin Treatment

ABSTRACT Chronic immune activation is a driver of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) disease progression. Here, we describe that subjects with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-1 coinfection display sharply elevated immune activation as determined by CD38 expression in T cells. This occurs, despite effective antiretroviral therapy, in both CD8 and CD4 T cells and is more pronounced than in the appropriate monoinfected control groups. Interestingly, the suppression of HCV by pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin treatment reduces activation. High HCV loads and elevated levels of chronic immune activation may contribute to the high rates of viral disease progression observed in HCV/HIV-1-coinfected patients.

Expansion of CD56− NK cells in chronic HCV/HIV-1 co-infection: Reversion by antiviral treatment with pegylated IFNα and ribavirin

Co-infection with HCV and HIV-1 is a problem of increasing importance and the role of innate cellular immunity in this co-infection is incompletely understood. Here, we have observed sharply elevated numbers of CD56(-)CD16(+) perforin(low) NK cells in HCV/HIV-1 co-infected subjects on antiretroviral therapy. Interestingly, this expansion of unconventional CD56(-) NK cells rapidly reverted when HCV was suppressed by IFNalpha and ribavirin treatment, and was not seen in mono-infected control groups. In vitro experiments suggested that this effect of treatment was due to suppression of HCV viremia rather than a direct effect of IFNalpha on these cells. In contrast, the conventional CD56(+) NK cells were largely unchanged in subjects with high HCV loads, although they exhibited slightly decreased perforin expression. With delayed kinetics, the CD56(bright) immuno-regulatory NK cell subset temporarily increased to supranormal levels in response to HCV treatment. In contrast to the NK compartment, the CD1d-restricted NKT cells were severely reduced by the co-infection and not restored by treatment. Together, our data suggest that the high HCV loads in HCV/HIV-1 co-infection alter the NK cell compartment in a way not observed in HCV mono-infection.

Comparison of 3 Quantitative HCV RNA Assays - Accuracy of Baseline Viral Load to Predict Treatment Outcome in Chronic Hepatitis C

The correlation between 3 assays for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification and their respective accuracy in predicting the response to interferon and interferon/ribavirin therapy was evaluated by analysing pre-treatment sera from 100 patients. A total of 97%, 100%, and 98% of the patients tested positive by the branched DNA 2.0 assay (Quantiplex), a multi-cycle reversed transcriptase polymerase chain reaction quantitative assay (Superquant) and the Roche Amplicor Monitor assay, respectively. The correlations between the assays, in all patients and in the major genotypes 1, 2, and 3, were significant, although the levels detected by the Amplicor Monitor assay were more than 1 log lower than by the other assays. Sustained virological responders to interferon therapy, but not to combination therapy, had lower baseline viral levels than long-term non-responders (p = 0.002 by Quantiplex 2.0; p = 0.008 by Superquant; p = 0.06 by Roche Amplicor Monitor). Pre-treatment viral load greater than 3 x 10(6) Eq or copies/ml by the Quantiplex 2.0 and Superquant assays and greater than 100,000 copies/ml by the Amplicor Monitor assay predicted long-term non-response in 94%, 93% and 91% of the interferon treated patients, respectively. In conclusion, acceptable correlations between available commercial quantitative assays were found. High baseline viral load predicted long-term non-response to interferon monotherapy, whereas it did not to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy.