Olli-P. Kallioniemi

Molecular cytogenetics of primary breast cancer by CGH

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) reveals DNA sequence copy number changes that are shared among the different cell subpopulations present in a tumor and may help to delineate the average progression pathways of breast cancer. Previous CGH studies of breast cancer have concentrated on selected subgroups of breast cancer. Here, 55 unselected primary breast carcinomas were analyzed using optimized quality‐controlled CGH procedures. Gains of 1q (67%) and 8q (49%) were the most frequent aberrations. Other recurrent gains were found at 33 chromosomal regions, with 16p, 5p12–14, 19q, 11q13–14, 17q12, 17q22–24, 19p, and 20q13 being most often (>18%) involved. Losses found in >18% of the tumors involved 8p, 16q, 13q, 17p, 9p, Xq, 6q, 11q, and 18q. The total number of aberrations per tumor was highest in poorly differentiated (P = 0.01) and in DNA aneuploid (P = 0.05) tumors. The high frequency of 1q gains and presence of +1q as the sole abnormality suggest that it is an early genetic event. In contrast, gains of 8q were most common in genetically and phenotypically advanced breast cancers. The vast majority of breast cancers (80%) have gains of 1q, 8q, or both, and 3 changes (+1q, +8q, or −13q) account for 91% of the tumors. In conclusion, CGH results indicate that certain chromosomal imbalances are very often selected for, sometimes in a preferential order, during the progression of breast cancer. Further studies of such common changes may form the basis for a molecular cytogenetic classification of breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 21:177–184, 1998.

Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) provides a molecular cytogenetic approach for genome-wide scanning of differences in DNA sequence copy number. The technique is now attracting wide-spread interest, especially among cancer researchers. The rapidly expanding database of CGH publications already covers about 1500 tumors and is beginning to reveal genetic abnormalities that are characteristic of certain tumor types or stages of tumor progression. Six novel gene amplifications, as well as a locus for a cancer-predisposition syndrome, have been discovered based on CGH data. CGH has now been established as a first-line screening technique for cancer researchers and will serve as a basis for ongoing efforts to develop high-resolution next-generation genome scanning, such as the microarray technology.

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) for high-throughput molecular pathology research.

A rapidly increasing number of genes are being suspected to play a role in cancer biology. To evaluate the clinical significance of newly detected potential cancer genes, it is usually required to examine a high number of well‐characterized primary tumors. Using traditional methods of molecular pathology, this is a time consuming endeavor rapidly exhausting precious tissue resources. To allow for a high throughput tissue analysis we have developed a “tissue chip” approach (Kononen et al., Nat. Med. 1998;4:844–7). Using this tissue microarray (TMA) technology, samples from up to 1,000 different tumors are arrayed in one recipient paraffin block, sections of which can be used for all kind of in situ analyses. Section from TMA blocks can then be utilized for the simultaneous analysis of up to 1,000 different tumors on the DNA, RNA or protein level. TMAs allow a high throughput molecular analysis of thousands of tumors within a few hours. All currently available data have suggested that minute arrayed tissue specimens are highly representative of their donor tissues. There are multiple different types of TMAs that can be utilized in cancer research including multi tumor arrays (containing different tumor types), tumor progression arrays (tumors of different stages) and prognostic arrays (tumors with clinical endpoints). The combination of multiple different TMAs allows a very quick but comprehensive characterization of biomarkers of interest. We anticipate that the use of TMAs will greatly accelerate the transition of basic research findings to clinical applications.

Comparative genomic hybridization reveals frequent gains of 20q, 8q, 11q, 12p, and 17q, and losses of 18q, 9p, and 15q in pancreatic cancer

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to screen for genomic imbalances in 24 exocrine pancreatic carcinomas, including 11 low‐passage cell lines (4–8 subcultures) and 13 uncultured samples. Aberrations were found in all cell lines and in seven of the 13 biopsies. The most frequent changes in the cell lines were gains of 20q (91%), 11q (64%), 17q (64%), 19q (64%), 8q, 12p, 14q, and 20p (55%), and losses of 18q (100%), 9p (91%), 15q (73%), 21q (64%), 3p (55%), and 13q (55%). High‐level gains (tumor to normal ratio over 1.5) were detected at 3q, 6p, 7q, 8q, 12p, 19q, and 20q. Among the tumor biopsies, overrepresentations of 7p and 8q were most common (31%), followed by 5p, 5q, 11p, 11q, 12p, and 18q (23%), whereas the most frequent losses involved 18p and 18q (31%) and 6q and 17p (23%). The genetic changes in nine samples obtained from metastatic lesions did not differ significantly from those in 15 primary carcinomas. Most of the gains and losses detected in this CGH study correspond well to those identified in previous cytogenetic and molecular genetic investigations of pancreatic carcinomas. However, frequent gain of 12p and loss of 15q have not been previously reported. Molecular genetic analyses of these chromosome arms are warranted, and may lead to the discovery of novel genes important in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20:383–391, 1997.

Cloning of BCAS3 (17q23) and BCAS4 (20q13) genes that undergo amplification, overexpression, and fusion in breast cancer†

In breast cancer, several chromosomal sites frequently undergo amplification, implicating the location of genes important for tumor development and progression. Here we cloned two novel genes, breast carcinoma amplified sequence 3 (BCAS3) and 4 (BCAS4), from the two most common amplification sites in breast cancer, 17q23 and 20q13. The BCAS3 gene at 17q23 spans more than 600 kb at the genomic level and was predicted to encode a 913 amino acid nuclear protein. The BCAS4 gene at 20q13.2 encodes a 211 amino acid cytoplasmic protein. Both BCAS3 and BCAS4 represent novel genes with no homologies to any other known gene or protein. In the MCF7 breast cancer cell line, the BCAS3 and BCAS4 genes were co‐amplified, and cloning of a highly overexpressed 1.3‐kb transcript revealed a rearrangement fusing the last two exons of BCAS3 with BCAS4. The fusion led to a novel message in which only the first exon of BCAS4 and part of exon 23 of BCAS3 were transcribed. The BCAS4–BCAS3 fusion transcript was detected only in MCF7 cells, but the BCAS4 gene was also overexpressed in nine of 13 breast cancer cell lines. In conclusion, our results indicate that these novel genes, BCAS3 at 17q23 and BCAS4 at 20q13.2, undergo amplification, overexpression, and fusion in breast cancer and therefore may have a role in the frequent chromosomal alterations affecting these two loci. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Biochip technologies in cancer research

Development of high-throughput ‘biochip’ technologies has dramatically enhanced our ability to study biology and explore the molecular basis of disease. Biochips enable massively parallel molecular analyses to be carried out in a miniaturized format with a very high throughput. This review will highlight applications of the various biochip technologies in cancer research, including analysis of 1) disease predisposition by using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays, 2) global gene expression patterns by cDNA microarrays, 3) concentrations, functional activities or interactions of proteins with proteomic biochips, and 4) cell types or tissues as well as clinical end-points associated with molecular targets by using tissue microarrays. One can predict that individual cancer risks can, in the future, be estimated accurately by a microarray profile of multiple SNPs in critical genes. Diagnostics of cancer will be facilitated by biochip readout of activity levels of thousands of genes and proteins. Biochip diagnostics coupled with informatics solutions will form the basis of individualized treatment decisions for cancer patients.

EphB2 expression across 138 human tumor types in a tissue microarray : High levels of expression in gastrointestinal cancers

Purpose: To comprehensively evaluate ephrin receptor B2 (EphB2) expression in normal and neoplastic tissues. EphB2 is a tyrosine kinase recently implicated in the deregulation of cell-to-cell communication in many tumors. Experimental Design: EphB2 protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays that included 76 different normal tissues, >4,000 samples from 138 different cancer types, and 1,476 samples of colon cancer with clinical follow-up data. Results: We found most prominent EphB2 expression in the intestinal epithelium (colonic crypts) with cancer of the colorectum displaying the highest EphB2 positivity of all tumors. Positivity was found in 100% of 118 colon adenomas but in 33.3% of 45 colon carcinomas. EphB2 expression was also observed in 75 tumor categories, including serous carcinoma of the endometrium (34.8%), adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (33.3%), intestinal adenocarcinoma of the stomach (30.2%), and adenocarcinoma of the small intestine (70%). The occasional finding of strong EphB2 positivity in tumors without EphB2 positivity in the corresponding normal cells [adenocarcinoma of the lung (4%) and pancreas (2.2%)] suggests that deregulation of EphB2 signaling may involve up-regulation of the protein expression. In colon carcinoma, loss of EphB2 expression was associated with advanced stage (P < 0.0001) and was an indicator of poor overall survival (P = 0.0098). Conclusions: Our results provide an overview on the EphB2 protein expression in normal and neoplastic tissues. Deregulated EphB2 expression may play a role in several cancer types with loss of EphB2 expression serving as an indicator of the possible pathogenetic role of EphB2 signaling in the maintenance of tissue architecture of colon epithelium.

Androgen receptor CAG polymorphism and prostate cancer risk

Abstract. Recent studies have suggested that polymorphisms of the androgen receptor gene (AR) may influence the risk of prostate cancer (PC) development and progression. Here, we analyzed the length of the CAG repeat of the AR gene in 1363 individuals, including patients with PC, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), and population controls. There was a tendency for short CAG repeats to be associated with PC. The Odds Ratio (OR) for PC was 1.47 (P=0.05) when individuals with short CAG repeats (≤18) were compared with those having long repeats (>18). CAG repeat length was not significantly associated with family history, disease stage, grade, age at diagnosis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at diagnosis, or prognosis of the patients. Unexpectedly, short CAG repeats were significantly less common in patients with BPH compared with controls (OR=0.47, P=0.03). Our results suggest that the CAG polymorphism of the AR gene is unlikely to have a major role in the development or progression of PC in the Finnish population. The association of CAG repeats with the risk of BPH warrants further study.

Genetic basis and clonal evolution of human prostate cancer.

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on the genetic basis and clonal evolution of human prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is now receiving attention among cancer researchers, urologists, as well as in the media because of a number of reasons. First and foremost, prostate cancer is now the most common cancer of men in many regions of the developed world. Despite this high incidence, etiology, and risk factors for prostate cancer have remained largely unknown. Studies suggest that although hereditary factors are involved in a fraction of the cases, currently unknown environmental and lifestyle factors are likely to be the most important causative factors. The diagnosis of prostate carcinoma at a very early stage is attractive as it enables curative treatment of the disease. An underlying problem in studies of the epidemiological and clinical aspects of prostate cancer is the fact that the biology and natural history of human prostate cancer are so poorly understood. Studies on the genetic basis of cancer progression should be based on the detailed understanding of the histological and clinical characteristics of tumor progression. Several genetic aberrations that are found in primary prostate carcinomas have been reported to predict the likelihood of metastasis. The failure of endocrine therapy is one of the most important problems in the management of prostate cancer patients. Studies on the genetic basis of prostate cancer have provided new information on the biological behavior and natural history of this increasingly common disease, whose molecular basis was previously very poorly understood. A genetic test to diagnose an inherited predisposition to prostate cancer may become available in the near future. The further understanding of genetic mechanisms is likely to be instrumental in developing targeted therapies for the advanced stages of prostate cancer.

Frequent loss of the 11q14-24 region in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A study by comparative genomic hybridization

The genetic basis and molecular pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and the molecular mechanisms responsible for its progression remain poorly understood. Here, karyotyping techniques specifically optimized for CLL, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to search for CLL‐specific genetic aberrations. CGH and karyotyping both revealed copy number changes in 12 of the 25 CLL cases (48%) analyzed. Loss at 11q emerged as the most common aberration (6 cases), followed by a gain of chromosome 12 (4) and loss at 13q (3). Concordance between CGH and G‐banding was found in 23 of the 25 cases (92%), which is more than reported in a recent similar CGH study of CLL. Owing to the basic differences in G‐banding and CGH, however, their simultaneous clinical application is recommended. The frequent loss of 11q14‐24 suggests that this chromosomal region deserves further attention as a candidate locus involved in the pathogenesis of CLL. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 19:286–290, 1997.