Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Olugbemiro Jegede is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Olugbemiro Jegede.


Research in Science & Technological Education | 1999

Transcending Cultural Borders: implications for science teaching

Olugbemiro Jegede; Glen S. Aikenhead

Abstract The current development towards ‘science for all’ in all parts of the globe necessitates that consideration be given to how pupils move between their everyday life‐world and the world of school science, how pupils deal with cognitive conflicts between those two worlds, and what this means for effective teaching of science. This paper reviews a new cognitive explanation‐‐collateral learning theory‐‐for how pupils cope with disparate worldviews mediated by transcending cultural borders between their everyday culture and the culture of science. The assistance that most pupils receive when they attempt to negotiate these cultural borders will influence their success at science. A new pedagogy is proposed in which teachers assume a role of culture broker in the classroom to achieve culturally sensitive curriculum and assessment.


Learning and Instruction | 2001

Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on- campus and distance learning practice: an exploratory investigation

Gershon Tenenbaum; Som Naidu; Olugbemiro Jegede; Jon Austin

Abstract This study attempts to identify characteristics of constructivism and their presence in face-to-face and open and distance learning (ODL) environments. In phase 1 of this study, a 6-week discussion through an electronic mailing list was carried out to explore the concept of constructivism, the process underlying constructivist learning and its facilitation. In the second phase, a questionnaire was developed and later analysed to ascertain the presence of constructivist principles in formal higher education instructional activities. The results of these studies were very similar and foregrounded the following seven components of constructivist teaching and learning: (1) arguments, discussions, debates, (2) conceptual conflicts and dilemmas, (3) sharing ideas with others, (4) materials and measures targeted toward solutions, (5) reflections and concept investigation, (6) meeting student needs, and (7) making meaning, real-life examples. Based on tutorials analysis (phase 1) and surveys (phase 2) in one university, the findings indicate that these components are not sufficiently present in any of the settings which were investigated, despite the positive intentions that instructional designers had in their planning phase.


Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning | 2001

Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Achievement of Distance Education Students

Margaret Taplin; Olugbemiro Jegede

The responses of 712 high achieving and low achieving students at the Open University of Hong Kong were analysed to investigate gender differences in factors that contribute to successful achievement in distance education. The analysis indicated a number of gender differences, including in the areas of organisation and use of study materials, confidence about studies, and independent versus collaborative study. Based on these, some questions have been raised about the need to develop some different treatment for male and female students in order to maximise the achievement of both groups.


Distance Education | 1999

Differences between low and high achieving distance learners in locus of control and metacognition

Olugbemiro Jegede; Margaret Taplin; Rocky Y. K. Fan; May S.C. Chan; Jessie Yum

A total of 712 students of the Open University of Hong Kong (OUHK) – sampled from high achievers and low achievers, as defined by their performances in their overall course scores in four consecutive semesters — participated in the study. An instrument, the Survey of Students’ Study Preferences and Habits, developed and validated for the study was also used to collect data from the students who participated. The data collected through this instrument were complemented with in‐depth telephone interviews using a sub‐set of 32 from the main study sample. The analysis of the data, using both qualitative and quantitative methods which included descriptive and inferential statistics, showed very interesting patterns of differences in locus of control and the use of mctacognitivc strategics by low achievers and high achievers. For instance, high achievers rated themselves significantly higher than low achievers (p <. 01) in a number of scales such as confidence with studies, ability to cope well with studying in...


Distance Education | 1995

On-line professional staff development: an evaluation study

Linda de Vries; Som Naidu; Olugbemiro Jegede; Betty Collis

This paper reports the design, implementation, and evaluation of a teleseminar on instructional design (ID) and computer-mediated communication (CMC) for the purposes of staff development at The University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia. Participation was open to any staff with an involvement or interest in distance education. This study was motivated by the following research questions: Is CMC a viable medium for the professional development of staff in distance education? Does the nature of moderation of CMC-based discussions influence the nature of contributions from subscribers? Do participants use different strategies (interactive, cognitive, and metacognitive) in CMC-based discussions? To address these questions a teleseminar was instituted with a focus on the issues of ID and CMC. CMC-based moderation techniques were used to manage the discussion. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluation tools were used to measure the outcomes of the teleseminar. Results of these evaluation data show that CMC proved to be a viable medium for the professional development of staff, that the moderation strategies influenced the nature of contributions from the subscribers, and that participants used a range of strategies to manage the discussion and their participation in it.


Distance Education | 1994

Distance Education Research Priorities for Australia: A Study of the Opinions of Distance Educators and Practitioners.

Olugbemiro Jegede

The advantages of undertaking research in distance education are numerous. They include those which impact on national development, educational practice, professional practice in distance education, policy and management, and the constant review of research needs and methodology. Research in distance education has suffered from a number of problems which include lack of co‐ordination and focus, and the involvement of comparatively few researchers. This is perhaps why there have been calls of late from some quarters such as the Australian Research Council to prioritise educational research agenda in Australia. Future development in distance education would require a coordinated effort in establishing research priorities in Australia to effectively drive distance education theory and practice. One of the criteria in setting research priorities should be that derived from distance educators and practitioners of distance education. This paper reports on the Australian data collated from an investigation carri...


Journal of Research in Science Teaching | 1999

CROSS-CULTURAL SCIENCE EDUCATION : A COGNITIVE EXPLANATION OF A CULTURAL PHENOMENON

Glen S. Aikenhead; Olugbemiro Jegede


Educational Research | 2000

Trainee teachers' perception of their knowledge about expert teaching

Olugbemiro Jegede; Margaret Taplin; Sing-Lai Chan


Journal of Research in Science Teaching | 1990

Eco-Cultural Influences upon Students' Concept Attainment in Science.

Peter Akinsola Okebukola; Olugbemiro Jegede


Distance Education | 1994

Students' anxiety in learning through distance education

Olugbemiro Jegede; Jannette Kirkwood

Collaboration


Dive into the Olugbemiro Jegede's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margaret Taplin

Open University of Hong Kong

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Som Naidu

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessie Yum

Open University of Hong Kong

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rocky Y. K. Fan

Open University of Hong Kong

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James C. Taylor

University of Southern Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Glen S. Aikenhead

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margaret Taplin

Open University of Hong Kong

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Som Naidu

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

May Sok-ching Chan

Open University of Hong Kong

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge