Omar J. BenMarzouk-Hidalgo

Therapeutic effect of the acquisition of cytomegalovirus-specific immune response during preemptive treatment.

Background. It has been suggested that preemptive therapy against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after transplantation promotes a CMV-specific immune response. Our objective was to determine whether solid-organ transplant patients at high risk for CMV infection treated preemptively acquire a CMV-specific immune response and whether the acquired immune response confers immunity by controlling subsequent CMV replication episodes and by protecting from late-onset CMV disease. Methods. Patients were followed up for 18 months after transplantation. CMV viral load was determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction assays, and the T-cell immune response was characterized by intracellular cytokine staining. Results. The 21 patients studied developed CMV replication episodes at a median of 4 weeks (range 2–8 weeks) after transplantation and a CMV-specific T-cell response within a median of 12 weeks (range 10–20 weeks). The decline in the incidence of CMV replication episodes is inversely correlated with the acquisition of the CMV-specific T-cell response (linear regression r2=0.781, Pearson correlation=−0.883; P=0.001). There were no CMV replication episodes after week 47 of transplantation. In addition, after acquisition of the immune response, 42 replication episodes were cleared without treatment. The time taken for immune clearance of replication correlated with the peak viral load (P=0.01). No incidence of CMV early or late-onset disease was detected. Conclusions. Our results demonstrate that preemptive therapy is a safe and an effective strategy for the control of CMV infection in solid-organ transplant recipients at high risk for CMV infection. This is the first study that reports a therapeutic effect of the acquisition of CMV-specific immune response during preemptive treatment.

Comparison of the new Abbott Real Time CMV assay and the Abbott CMV PCR Kit for the quantitation of plasma cytomegalovirus DNAemia

CMV DNA loads measured by the new Abbott RealTime CMV PCR were significantly higher than those quantitated by the Abbott CMV PCR kit (approximately 1 log(10)), and provided a better estimate of the actual CMV load present in plasma specimens as inferred by the use of the WHO standard.

First Face Composite-Tissue Transplant Recipient Successfully Treated for Cytomegalovirus Infection with Preemptive Valganciclovir Treatment

ABSTRACT Little is known about cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after face transplantation, since only two of the 11 cases of face transplantation reported worldwide have documented a CMV infection after transplantation. Herein, we present the first report of a composite-tissue face allotransplant recipient at high risk for CMV infection (D+/R− [CMV serpositive donor positive/CMV seronegative receptor]) undergoing preemptive treatment. Preemptive treatment was safe and effective for controlling CMV infection and thus promoting early acquisition of a CMV-specific immune response that protected the patient from late-onset CMV disease.

Viral load, CMV-specific T-cell immune response and cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients at higher risk for cytomegalovirus infection during preemptive therapy.

Despite advances in prevention, cytomegalovirus (CMV) recurrence is an important challenge in high‐risk organ recipients. The present study prospectively evaluates the impact of CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response and secondary prophylaxis on the risk of recurrence in a cohort of CMV high‐risk organ recipients and whether it is possible to determine a safe standardized viral load value below which CMV disease is unlikely. Thirty‐nine recipients were included. Thirty‐six had primary infections, and 88.9% recurred. Rate and duration of recurrent CMV infection was similar in patients with and without secondary prophylaxis: 57.9% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.770 and 16 vs. 15 days, P = 0.786, respectively. The only factor independently associated with no episodes of CMV recurrence was the acquisition of CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response (OR: 0.151, 95% CI: 0.028–0.815; P = 0.028). Cytomegalovirus diseases (N = 5) occurred in patients with CMV viral load above 1500 IU/ml who did not follow the planned monitorization schedule. Our observations suggest that episodes of recurrent CMV infection are common after preemptive therapy despite secondary prophylaxis and that CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response is associated with a decreased risk of recurrent infections. Preemptive therapy may be safe in patients at high risk for CMV infection with strict close monitoring of the CMV viral load.

Cellular HIV reservoir replenishment is not affected by blip or intermittent viremia episodes during darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy.

Objective:To assess the impact of blips and persistent viremia episodes on cell-associated HIV-DNA reservoir in extensively pretreated patients receiving ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy (MtDRV/rtv) for 24 months. Design and methods:Patients from the MonDAR prospective study (NCT01606722) who received at least 6 months of MtDRV/rtv and had at least two available peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) samples were selected and classified according to the viral outcome as continuous undetectable viremia (cUV; n = 40), blips (n = 31), intermittent viremia (IV; n = 23), and virological failure (VF, two consecutive viral loads >200 copies/ml; n = 20). Proviral HIV-DNA was quantified by real-time PCR in PBMCs samples at baseline, and months 6, 12, 18 and 24. Additionally, HIV-DNA levels were exhaustively analyzed at virological failure and blip episodes. Results:The HIV-DNA levels remained constant during the 24 months in every group. Neither blips nor intermittent viremia influenced the HIV-DNA levels at short-term or at middle term. By contrast, virological failure episodes gave rise to a significant increase in proviral DNA (2.15 vs. 2.32 log10 HIV-DNA copies/106 PBMCs; P = 0.042). Basal proviral DNA levels more than 2 log10 copies/106 PBMCs predicted the time to viral rebound at any given cut-off point (>20, >50, and >200 copies/ml. HR: 3.02, 2.61, and 3.02, respectively; P ⩽ 0.03. Besides, an adherence less than 95% was also strongly associated with virological failure (HR, 3.17; P = 0.021). Conclusion:Blip episodes and intermittent viremia did not affect the cellular HIV reservoir dynamic during MtDRV/rtv. Higher adherence and an HIV-DNA levels less than 2 log10 copies/106 PBMCs at baseline were associated with a lower risk of virological failure.

Differential Effects of Viremia and Microbial Translocation on Immune Activation in HIV-Infected Patients Throughout Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir Monotherapy

AbstractThe purpose of this article is to evaluate the evolution of microbial translocation (MT) and its role in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells immune activation (IA) in HIV-1-infected patients on ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy (mtDRV/rtv).Prospective study of consecutive HIV-1-infected patients switched to mtDRV/rtv as a simplification regimen. Subjects were classified according to the virological behavior during a 24-month follow-up as continuous undetectable viral load, blips, intermittent viremia, and virological failure (VF). MT was evaluated by plasma LPS and 16S genomic rDNA (16S rDNA) levels, whereas IA was assessed by the coexpression of HLA-DR and CD38 in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and plasma sCD14 levels.Seventy-one patients were included in this substudy of the MonDar cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01505722). At baseline, CD4+ (&rgr; = −0.352, P = 0.01) and CD8+ T-cell activation (&rgr; = −0.468, P < 0.001) were correlated with time with viral suppression, but not with MT markers. A significant decrease in plasma LPS levels was found only in patients without VF (baseline, 77.8 vs month 24, 60.4 pg/mL; P < 0.001]. Both plasma 16S rDNA and sCD14 levels were unchanged irrespective of the viral behavior. The only variable independently associated with a decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells activation was an undetectable HIV-1 viremia (&bgr; = 4.78, P < 0.001 and &bgr; = 2.93, P = 0.005, respectively).MT does not have a pivotal role in T-cell activation, at least in patients with long-term viral suppression. The viremic episodes and VF are the main factors related to CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells IA, even during mtDRV/rtv.

Darunavir minimum plasma concentration and ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy outcome in HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate whether low darunavir (DRV) minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) values contribute to virological outcomes during DRV/ritonavir monotherapy (mtDRV/rtv). METHODS This was a prospective observational single-arm 96-week efficacy study in virologically suppressed subjects on triple therapy switched to mtDRV/rtv (800/100 mg every 24 h). Previous virological failures (VF) on protease-inhibitor-based regimens were allowed if the historical resistance tests showed no major resistance mutation to DRV/rtv. VF was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA measurements of >200 copies/ml. Efficacy was analysed by per-protocol and by intention-to-treat analyses. Plasma DRV Cmin values were measured by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS A total of 150 subjects were included. At week 96, the efficacy rate on treatment was 83.6% (95% CI 77.2%, 90.0%) by per-protocol analysis and 67.6% (95% CI 60.0%, 75.2%) by intention-to-treat. In the whole cohort the median (IQR) DRV Cmin was significantly higher during the periods of undetectable than of detectable viraemia (1.82 µg/ml [1.47-2.46] versus 1.56 µg/ml [0.93-2.32]; P=0.006) as well as in the subjects with blips and VF. However, a cutoff point sufficiently sensitive and specific could not be found. CONCLUSIONS The DRV Cmin values are related to viral control during mtDRV/rtv, but therapeutic drug monitoring cannot be recommended routinely as a precise cutoff point is unknown. Adherence is a key success factor on this regimen.

Protease inhibitor monotherapy is effective in controlling human immunodeficiency virus 1 shedding in the male genital tract

Cross-sectional study comparing seminal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) shedding in patients receiving boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy (mtPI/rtv) (n = 66) versus triple therapy (TT) (n = 61). Seminal HIV-1 shedding rates in patients with undetectable plasma HIV-RNA were 16.0% on mtPI/rtv compared with 28.6% on TT (p 0.173). Aviraemic status and time on viral suppression were independently associated with lack of seminal HIV-1 shedding. During TT, non PI/rtv-based regimens were associated with a better control of HIV infection in semen despite similar time on viral suppression. The use of mtPI/rtv in well-controlled patients is not associated with increased seminal HIV excretion compared with TT.

No Differences of Immune Activation and Microbial Translocation Among HIV-infected Children Receiving Combined Antiretroviral Therapy or Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy

AbstractThis is a cross-sectional study of 15 aviremic chronic HIV-infected children revealing no differences in immune activation (IA; HLA-DR+CD38+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and sCD14) and microbial translocation (MT; lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and 16S rDNA) among HIV-infected patients under combined antiretroviral treatment (cART; n = 10) or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy (mtPI/rtv; n = 5). In both cases, IA and MT were lower in healthy control children (n = 32). This observational study suggests that ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy (mtPI/rtv) is not associated with an increased state of IA or MT as compared with children receiving cART.

Timing of CMV‐specific effector memory T cells predicts viral replication and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The aim of this study was to characterize timing, kinetic, and magnitude of CMV‐specific immune response after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and its ability to predict CMV replication and clinical outcomes. Using cell surface and intracellular cytokine staining by flow cytometry, CMV‐specific T‐cell response was measured in blood, while CMV viral load and chimerism were determined by real‐time PCR. Patients that reconstituted CMV‐specific T‐cell response within 6 weeks after Allo‐SCT showed a more robust immune response (CD8+: 0.7 cells/μl vs. 0.3/μl; P‐value = 0.01), less incidence of CMV replication (33% vs. 89.5%; P‐value = 0.007), reduced viral loads (1.81 log copies/ml vs. 0 copies/ml; P‐value = 0.04), and better overall survival (72%; CI: 0.53–0.96 vs. 42% CI: 0.24–0.71; P‐value = 0.07) than patients with a delayed immune reconstitution. Viremic patients had significantly higher transplant‐related mortality than nonviremic patients after 1 year (33% CI: 0.15–0.52 vs. 0% CI: 0.05–0.34; P‐value = 0.01). Risk factors independently associated with viral replication were receptor pretransplant CMV‐positive serostatus (P‐value = 0.02) and acquiring CMV‐specific T‐cell response after 6 weeks post‐transplantation (P‐value = 0.009). In conclusion, timing of acquiring a positive CMV‐specific T‐cell immune response after transplantation may identify patients with different risk for viral replication and different clinical outcomes, including survival.