Oreola Donini
Princeton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Oreola Donini.
Nature Biotechnology | 2007
Monisha G. Scott; Edie Dullaghan; Neeloffer Mookherjee; Natalie Glavas; Matthew Waldbrook; Annick Thompson; Aikun Wang; Ken Lee; Silvana Doria; Pam Hamill; Jie Jessie Yu; Yuexin Li; Oreola Donini; M. Marta Guarna; B. Brett Finlay; John R. North; Robert E. W. Hancock
We show that an innate defense–regulator peptide (IDR-1) was protective in mouse models of infection with important Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. When given from 48 h before to 6 h after infection, the peptide was effective by both local and systemic administration. Because protection by IDR-1 was prevented by in vivo depletion of monocytes and macrophages, but not neutrophils or B- and T-lymphocytes, we conclude that monocytes and macrophages are key effector cells. IDR-1 was not directly antimicrobial: gene and protein expression analysis in human and mouse monocytes and macrophages indicated that IDR-1, acting through mitogen-activated protein kinase and other signaling pathways, enhanced the levels of monocyte chemokines while reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine responses. To our knowledge, an innate defense regulator that counters infection by selective modulation of innate immunity without obvious toxicities has not been reported previously.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2009
Hong Bing Yu; Agnieszka Kielczewska; Annett Rozek; Shunsuke Takenaka; Yuling Li; Lisa Thorson; Robert E. W. Hancock; M. Marta Guarna; John R. North; Leonard J. Foster; Oreola Donini; B. Brett Finlay
Innate defense regulator-1 (IDR-1) is a synthetic peptide with no antimicrobial activity that enhances microbial infection control while suppressing inflammation. Previously, the effects of IDR-1 were postulated to impact several regulatory pathways including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38 and CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein, but how this was mediated was unknown. Using a combined stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture-proteomics methodology, we identified the cytoplasmic scaffold protein p62 as the molecular target of IDR-1. Direct IDR-1 binding to p62 was confirmed by several biochemical binding experiments, and the p62 ZZ-type zinc finger domain was identified as the IDR-1 binding site. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of p62 molecular complexes demonstrated that IDR-1 enhanced the tumor necrosis factor α-induced p62 receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1) complex formation but did not affect tumor necrosis factor α-induced p62-protein kinase ζ complex formation. In addition, IDR-1 induced p38 MAPK activity in a p62-dependent manner and increased CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein β activity, whereas NF-κB activity was unaffected. Collectively, these results demonstrate that IDR-1 binding to p62 specifically affects protein-protein interactions and subsequent downstream events. Our results implicate p62 in the molecular mechanisms governing innate immunity and identify p62 as a potential therapeutic target in both infectious and inflammatory diseases.
Journal of Biotechnology | 2016
Mahesh Kudrimoti; Amarintha Curtis; Samar Azawi; Francis P. Worden; Sanford Katz; Douglas Adkins; Marcelo Bonomi; Jenna Elder; Stephen T. Sonis; Richard Straube; Oreola Donini
Dusquetide, a novel Innate Defense Regulator, modulates the innate immune system at a key convergence point in intracellular signaling pathways and has demonstrated activity in both reducing inflammation and increasing clearance of bacterial infection. Innate immunity has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of oral mucositis (OM), a universal toxicity of chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Testing the hypothesis that dusquetide can mitigate the development and duration of OM, preclinical studies have been completed and correlated with interim results from a Phase 2 clinical study in patients undergoing CRT for head and neck cancer. Dusquetide reduced the duration of OM in mouse and hamster models by approximately 50%, which was recapitulated by the 50% reduction of severe OM (SOM) in the Phase 2 trial. A reduction in the clinical rate of infection was also observed, consistent with previously reported preclinical studies. In aggregate, these results not only demonstrate the safety and efficacy of dusquetide in addressing this unmet medical need, but also provide proof of concept for the translation of dusquetide action between animal models and the human clinical setting, and further support the contention that innate immunity is an important driver for the initiation and continued impact of OM.
Biotechnology Reports | 2017
Mahesh Kudrimoti; Amarinthia Curtis; Samar Azawi; Francis P. Worden; Sanford Katz; Douglas Adkins; Marcelo Bonomi; Zack Scott; Jenna Elder; Stephen T. Sonis; Richard Straube; Oreola Donini
Highlights • Dusquetide was well-tolerated during treatment and throughout the 12-month follow-up.• Dusquetide did not interfere with tumor treatment.• Dusquetide treated groups had less mortality that placebo treated groups through the 12-month follow-up.• Dusquetide treated groups had fewer “non-fungal” infections than placebo treated groups.
Vaccine | 2018
Jennifer Westfall; Jennifer L. Yates; Greta Van Slyke; Dylan J. Ehrbar; Thomas Measey; Richard Straube; Oreola Donini; Nicholas J. Mantis
Biodefense vaccine are destined to be stockpiled for periods of time and deployed in the event of a public health emergency. In this report, we compared the potency of liquid and lyophilized (thermostabilized) formulations of a candidate ricin toxin subunit vaccine, RiVax, adsorbed to aluminum salts adjuvant, over a 12-month period. The liquid and lyophilized formulations were stored at stressed (40 °C) and unstressed (4 °C) conditions and evaluated at 3, 6 and 12-month time points for potency in a mouse model of lethal dose ricin challenge. At the same time points, the vaccine formulations were interrogated in vitro by competition ELISA for conformational integrity using a panel of three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), PB10, WECB2, and SyH7, directed against known immunodominant toxin-neutralizing epitopes on RiVax. We found that the liquid vaccine under stress conditions declined precipitously within the first three months, as evidenced by a reduction in in vivo potency and concomitant loss of mAb recognition in vitro. In contrast, the lyophilized RiVax vaccine retained in vivo potency and conformational integrity for up to one year at 4 °C and 40 °C. We discuss the utility of monitoring the integrity of one or more toxin-neutralizing epitopes on RiVax as a possible supplement to animal studies to assess vaccine potency.
International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2018
Michael Accardi; Oreola Donini; Adam Rumage; Alexis Ascah; Julius Haruna; Mylene Pouliot; Kim Bujold; Hai Huang; Wieslaw Wierzbicki; John Stamatopoulos; Houman Naraghi; Thomas Measey; Simon Authier
Abstract Purpose: Characterization of a novel partial-body irradiation (PBI) shielding strategy in nonhuman primates (NHP; rhesus macaques), aimed at protecting the oral cavity, with respect to various gastrointestinal acute radiation syndrome (GI-ARS) syndrome parameters as well as buccal ulceration development. Materials and methods: NHPs were irradiated using a Cobalt-60 gamma source, in a single uniform dose, ranging from 9–13 Gy and delivered at 0.60–0.80 Gy min−1. Animals were either partially shielded via oral cavity shielding (PBIOS) or underwent total-body irradiation (TBI). Results: Clinical manifestations of GI-ARS, and also radiation-induced hematology and clinical chemistry changes, following PBIOS were comparable to the PBI NHP GI-ARS model utilizing shielding of the distal pelvic limbs and were significantly milder than TBI at similar radiation doses. Nadir citrulline levels were comparable between PBIOS and TBI but signs of recovery appeared earlier in PBIOS-treated animals. The PBIOS model prevented oral mucositis, whereas the TBI model presented buccal ulcerations at all tested radiation dose levels. Conclusions: Taken together, these results suggest that the PBIOS model is a suitable alternative to traditional PBI. For GI-ARS investigations requiring orally administered medical countermeasures, PBIOS confers added value due to the prevention of oral mucositis over traditional PBI.
Chemistry & Biology | 2006
Kai Hilpert; Melissa Elliott; Rudolf Volkmer-Engert; Peter Henklein; Oreola Donini; Qun Zhou; Dirk F.H. Winkler; Robert E. W. Hancock
Archive | 2014
Oreola Donini; Annett Rozek; Jackson Lee; John North; Michael J. Abrams
Archive | 2012
Oreola Donini; Annett Rozek; Shannon Wayne Lentz
Blood | 2010
Oreola Donini; Brynmor A. Watkins; John E. Palardy; Steven M. Opal; Stephen T. Sonis; Michael J. Abrams; John R. North