Oriol Bestard

Achieving Donor-Specific Hyporesponsiveness Is Associated with FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cell Recruitment in Human Renal Allograft Infiltrates

Exploring new immunosuppressive strategies inducing donor-specific hyporesponsiveness is an important challenge in transplantation. For this purpose, a careful immune monitoring and graft histology assessment is mandatory. Here, we report the results of a pilot study conducted in twenty renal transplant recipients, analyzing the immunomodulatory effects of a protocol based on induction therapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin low doses, sirolimus, and mofetil mycophenolate. Evolution of donor-specific cellular and humoral alloimmune response, peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and apoptosis was evaluated. Six-month protocol biopsies were performed to assess histological lesions and presence of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in interstitial infiltrates. After transplantation, there was an early and transient apoptotic effect, mainly within the CD8+HLADR+ T cells, combined with a sustained enhancement of CD4+CD25+high lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The incidence of acute rejection was 35%, all steroid sensitive. Importantly, only pretransplant donor-specific cellular alloreactivity could discriminate patients at risk to develop acute rejection. Two thirds of the patients became donor-specific hyporesponders at 6 and 24 mo, and the achievement of this immunologic state was not abrogated by prior acute rejection episodes. Remarkably, donor-specific hyporesponders had the better renal function and less chronic renal damage. Donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was inhibited by depleting CD4+CD25+high T cells, which showed donor-Ag specificity. FOXP3+CD4+CD25+high Tregs both in peripheral blood and in renal infiltrates were higher in donor-specific hyporesponders than in nonhyporesponders, suggesting that the recruitment of Tregs in the allograft plays an important role for renal acceptance. In conclusion, reaching donor-specific hyporesponsiveness is feasible after renal transplantation and associated with Treg recruitment in the graft.

Presence of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells Predicts Outcome of Subclinical Rejection of Renal Allografts

Subclinical rejection (SCR) of renal allografts refers to histologic patterns of acute rejection despite stable renal function. The clinical approach to SCR is controversial; it would be helpful to identify biomarkers that could determine whether the identified cellular infiltrates were detrimental. For investigation of whether the presence of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) could help determine the functional importance of tubulointerstitial infiltrates observed in 6-mo protocol biopsies, 37 cases of SCR were evaluated. The presence of FoxP3+ Treg discriminated harmless from injurious infiltrates, evidenced by independently predicting better graft function 2 and 3 yr after transplantation. Furthermore, the FoxP3+ Treg/CD3+ T cell ratio positively correlated with graft function at 2 yr after transplantation, suggesting that an increasing proportion of Treg within the global T cell infiltrate may facilitate renal engraftment; therefore, immunostaining for FoxP3+ Treg in patients with SCR on protocol biopsies may ultimately be useful to identify patients who may require alterations in their immunosuppressive regimens.

Circulating alloreactive T cells correlate with graft function in longstanding renal transplant recipients.

Monitoring for alloreactive memory T cells after organ transplantation may allow individualization of immunosuppression. Two pathways of T cell allorecognition have been implicated in chronic graft dysfunction: Direct (recipient T cells respond to donor peptides presented by donor antigen-presenting cells) and indirect (donor peptides are processed and presented by recipient antigen-presenting cells). Previous studies have assessed these alloresponses only during the first 2 yr after kidney transplantation,so this study correlated the presence of circulating donor-reactive memory/effector T cells, primed by both pathways, in 34 longstanding living-donor renal transplant recipients using the highly sensitive IFN-gamma Elispot assay. Remarkably, 59% of patients had directly primed donor-reactive T cells, and their presence correlated directly with serum creatinine (P = 0.001) and inversely with estimated GFR (P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis revealed that hyporesponsiveness of direct, donor-specific T cells was the only variable that significantly correlated with graft function and that antidonor indirect alloreactivity was the only variable that significantly correlated with proteinuria. Interestingly, when both allorecognition pathways were considered together, patients with undetectable direct alloreactivity had better longterm graft function, independent of allosensitization by the indirect pathway. In conclusion, circulating donor-specific alloreactive T cells primed by both pathways are detectable long after transplantation and are associated with graft injury. Assessment of alloreactive memory/effector T cells might be helpful to tailor individual immunosuppression regimens for transplant recipients in the future.

Immunomodulatory effect of mesenchymal stem cells on B cells.

The research on T cell immunosuppression therapies has attracted most of the attention in clinical transplantation. However, B cells and humoral immune responses are increasingly acknowledged as crucial mediators of chronic allograft rejection. Indeed, humoral immune responses can lead to renal allograft rejection even in patients whose cell-mediated immune responses are well controlled. On the other hand, newly studied B cell subsets with regulatory effects have been linked to tolerance achievement in transplantation. Better understanding of the regulatory and effector B cell responses may therefore lead to new therapeutic approaches. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are arising as a potent therapeutic tool in transplantation due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory properties. The research on MSCs has mainly focused on their effects on T cells and although data regarding the modulatory effects of MSCs on alloantigen-specific humoral response in humans is scarce, it has been demonstrated that MSCs significantly affect B cell functioning. In the present review we will analyze and discuss the results in this field.

Cross-validation of IFN-γ Elispot assay for measuring alloreactive memory/effector T cell responses in renal transplant recipients.

Assessment of donor‐specific alloreactive memory/effector T cell responses using an IFN‐γ Elispot assay has been suggested to be a novel immune‐monitoring tool for evaluating the cellular immune risk in renal transplantation. Here, we report the cross‐validation data of the IFN‐γ Elispot assay performed within different European laboratories taking part of the EU RISET consortium. For this purpose, development of a standard operating procedure (SOP), comparisons of lectures of IFN‐γ plates assessing intra‐ and interlaboratory assay variability of allogeneic or peptide stimuli in both healthy and kidney transplant individuals have been the main objectives. We show that the use of a same SOP and count‐settings of the Elispot bioreader allow low coefficient variation between laboratories. Frozen and shipped samples display slightly lower detectable IFN‐γ frequencies than fresh samples. Importantly, a close correlation between different laboratories is obtained when measuring high frequencies of antigen‐specific primed/memory T cell alloresponses. Interestingly, significant high donor‐specific alloreactive T cell responses can be similarly detected among different laboratories in kidney transplant patients displaying histological patterns of acute T cell mediated rejection. In conclusion, assessment of circulating alloreactive memory/effector T cells using an INF‐γ Elispot assay can be accurately achieved using the same SOP, Elispot bioreader and experienced technicians in kidney transplantation.

Pretransplant Immediately Early-1-Specific T Cell Responses Provide Protection for CMV Infection After Kidney Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is still a major complication after kidney transplantation. Although cytotoxic CMV‐specific T cells play a crucial role controlling CMV survival and replication, current pretransplant risk assessment for CMV infection is only based on donor/recipient (IgG)‐serostatus. Here, we evaluated the usefulness of monitoring pre‐ and 6‐month CMV‐specific T cell responses against two dominant CMV antigens (IE‐1 and pp65) and a CMV lysate, using an IFN‐γ Elispot, for predicting the advent of CMV infection in two cohorts of 137 kidney transplant recipients either receiving routine prophylaxis (n = 39) or preemptive treatment (n = 98). Incidence of CMV antigenemia/disease within the prophylaxis and preemptive group was 28%/20% and 22%/12%, respectively. Patients developing CMV infection showed significantly lower anti‐IE‐1‐specific T cell responses than those that did not in both groups (p < 0.05). In a ROC curve analysis, low pretransplant anti‐IE‐1‐specific T cell responses predicted the risk of both primary and late‐onset CMV infection with high sensitivity and specificity (AUC > 0.70). Furthermore, when using most sensitive and specific Elispot cut‐off values, a higher than 80% and 90% sensitivity and negative predictive value was obtained, respectively. Monitoring IE‐1‐specific T cell responses before transplantation may be useful for predicting posttransplant risk of CMV infection, thus potentially guiding decision‐making regarding CMV preventive treatment.

Intragraft regulatory T cells in protocol biopsies retain foxp3 demethylation and are protective biomarkers for kidney graft outcome.

Presence of subclinical rejection (SCR) with IF/TA in protocol biopsies of renal allografts has been shown to be an independent predictor factor of graft loss. Also, intragraft Foxp3+ Treg cells in patients with SCR has been suggested to differentiate harmful from potentially protective infiltrates. Nonetheless, whether presence of Foxp3 Treg cells in patients with SCR and IF/TA may potentially protect from a deleterious graft outcome has not yet been evaluated. This is a case‐control study in which 37 patients with the diagnosis of SCR and 68 control patients with no cellular infiltrates at 6‐month protocol biopsies matched for age and time of transplantation were evaluated. We first confirmed that numbers of intragraft Foxp3‐expressing T cells in patients with SCR positively correlates with Foxp3 demethylation at the Treg‐specific demethylation region. Patients with SCR without Foxp3+ Treg cells within graft infiltrates showed significantly worse 5‐year graft function evolution than patients with SCR and Foxp3+ Treg cells and those without SCR. When presence of SCR and IF/TA were assessed together, presence of Foxp3+ Treg could discriminate a subgroup of patients showing the same graft outcome as patients with a normal biopsy. Thus, presence of Foxp3+ Treg cells in patients with SCR even with IF/TA is associated with a favorable long‐term allograft outcome.

Prospective assessment of antidonor cellular alloreactivity is a tool for guidance of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Current characterization of the immune risk in renal transplant patients is only focused on the assessment of preformed circulating alloantibodies; however, alloreactive memory T cells are key players in mediating allograft rejection. Immune monitoring of antidonor alloreactive memory/effector T cells using an IFN-γ Elispot has been shown to distinguish patients at risk for immune-mediated graft dysfunction, suggesting a potential tool for immunosuppression individualization. In this nonrandomized study, we prospectively assessed donor and nondonor T-cell alloreactivity in 60 highly alloreactive patients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression and in non-T-cell alloreactive transplant recipients treated with a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen. The impact was evaluated using 1-year allograft outcome. We found a strong association between ongoing antidonor T-cell alloreactivity and histological lesions of acute T cell-mediated rejection in 6-month protocol biopsies, distinguishing those patients with better 1-year graft function, regardless of immunosuppression regimen. Interestingly, evidence for enhanced immune regulation, driven by circulating Foxp3-demethylated regulatory T cells, was only observed among patients achieving antidonor T-cell hyporesponsiveness. Thus, prospective evaluation of donor-specific T-cell sensitization may add crucial information on the alloimmune state of transplanted patients to be used in daily clinical practice.

Biomarkers in renal transplantation.

Purpose of reviewAn important effort is being made among the transplant community investigating novel biological markers at different biological levels that enable transplant clinicians to identify patients at risk for allograft rejection or, conversely, patients in whom immunosuppression could be safely minimized. Here, we review recent important biomarkers that have shown relevant impact on renal graft outcome. Recent findingsImportant collaborative studies have allowed the identification of biomarkers or biological signatures indicative of organ tolerance or rejection in different transplant settings (mainly kidney and liver transplantation). This has required novel and highly specific technological assays focused at different biological levels, employing peripheral blood, urine and grafts tissue. Noteworthy, standardization and methodical validation of reliable tests or biomarkers is being a crucial task since the start of this challenge. These endeavours include detailed characterizations of serum alloantibody levels, measurements of individual soluble or cell-surface markers in peripheral blood, urine or both; profiling gene expression, proteome expression patterns or both and evaluations of peripheral cellular alloimmunity, among others. SummaryDespite the important advances achieved so far in the identification of several potentially useful biomarkers of tolerance, rejection or both, validation and demonstration of their clinical utility still needs to be tested. Ultimately, in order to facilitate the achievement of such important goal, all efforts should probably be performed in the context of international cooperative networks.

Preformed Frequencies of Cytomegalovirus (CMV)–Specific Memory T and B Cells Identify Protected CMV-Sensitized Individuals Among Seronegative Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication after kidney transplantation. Baseline CMV risk is typically determined by the serological presence of preformed CMV-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies, even though T-cell responses to major viral antigens are crucial when controlling viral replication. Some IgG-seronegative patients who receive an IgG-seropositive allograft do not develop CMV infection despite not receiving prophylaxis. We hypothesized that a more precise evaluation of pretransplant CMV-specific immune-sensitization using the B and T-cell enzyme-linked immunospot assays may identify CMV-sensitized individuals more accurately, regardless of serological evidence of CMV-specific IgG titers. METHODS We compared the presence of preformed CMV-specific memory B and T cells in kidney transplant recipients between 43 CMV IgG-seronegative (sR(-)) and 86 CMV IgG-seropositive (sR(+)) patients. Clinical outcome was evaluated in both groups. RESULTS All sR(+) patients showed a wide range of CMV-specific memory T- and B-cell responses. High memory T- and B-cell frequencies were also clearly detected in 30% of sR(-) patients, and those with high CMV-specific T-cell frequencies had a significantly lower incidence of late CMV infection after prophylactic therapy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting CMV viremia and disease showed a high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (>0.8), which translated into a high sensitivity and negative predictive value of the test. CONCLUSIONS Assessment of CMV-specific memory T- and B-cell responses before kidney transplantation among sR(-) recipients may help identify immunized individuals more precisely, being ultimately at lower risk for CMV infection.