Orlando Soto
Science Applications International Corporation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Orlando Soto.
54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference | 2013
Orlando Soto; Joseph D. Baum; Rainald Lohner
In this work a stabilized large deformation element suitable for real coupled fluid/solid simulations is presented. The element uses a mixed interpolation (Q1/P0): Standard continuous tri-linear finite element (FE) functions for the kinematic variables (displacements, velocities and accelerations), and a constant pressure per element (piecewise discontinuous pressures). It is well known that this type of element may show spurious pressure modes (chessboard mode) when is used to approximate incompressible fields (i.e. plastic flow, incompressible fluids, etc,). The mathematical explanation for such a behavior is the element inability of fulfilling the BB condition (the element is not div-stable). However, in Codina et al., the P1/P0 element is stabilized by means of a variational multiscale method (VMS), and it is used to solve the Stokes problem (incompressible flow equations at very low Reynolds number). Following the ideas of the cited reference, the authors of this work added to the standard large-deformation Lagrangian FE (Galerkin) formulation, a stabilization contribution which is only evaluated over the inter-element boundaries. Such a term enforces in a weak manner the pressure continuity and, in that way, it adds control over the inter-element pressure jumps (in general this procedure may be used to stabilize elements with discontinuous pressures). The method is clearly consistent: At the continuous level the pressures are continuous and the new term enforces such continuity at the discrete level. The stabilized IEOSS-Q1/P0 solid element (Inter-Element Orthogonal Subgrid-Scale Stabilized Q1/P0 element) was embedded into an efficient FE scheme to deal with large deformation problems. Others main ingredients of the formulation are: Some phenomenological material models (concrete, steel, sand, rock, etc,) to deal with damage and fracture of structures, a general contact algorithm which uses bin technology to perform the nodeface searching operations in a very efficient manner, and a cracking procedure to deal with the topology changes due to crack propagation and fragment formation. All the schemes, contact included, have been fully parallelized and coupled using a loose-embedded procedure with the well-established CFD (computational fluid dynamics) code FEFLO. Several real 3D coupled CFD/CSD cases, two of them with experimental comparison, are presented to validate the scheme.
Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics 2005#R##N#Theory and Applications | 2006
Rainald Löhner; Chi Yang; Juan R. Cebral; Fernando F. Camelli; Fumiya Togashi; Joseph D. Baum; Hong Luo; Eric L. Mestreau; Orlando Soto
Publisher Summary The chapter describes the typical life cycle of scientific computing codes. Particular relevance is placed on the number of users, their concerns, the machines on which the codes operate as they mature, as well as the relative importance of parallel computing. It is seen that parallel computing achieves the highest importance in the early phases of code development, acting as an enabling technology without which new scientific codes could not develop. Given the typical times, new applications tend to run at their inception, Moores law itself is perhaps the biggest incentive for new scientific computing codes. Without it, computing time would not decrease in the future and the range of applications would soon be exhausted. One of the most remarkable constants in the rapidly changing world is the rate of growth for the number of transistors that are packaged onto a square inch. This rate, commonly known as Moores law, is approximately a factor of 2 every 18 months that translates into a factor of 10 every 5 years.
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering | 2008
Rainald Löhner; Juan R. Cebral; Fernando Camelli; Sunil Appanaboyina; Joseph D. Baum; Eric L. Mestreau; Orlando Soto
Archive | 2006
Rainald Löhner; Juan R. Cebral; Chi Yang; Joseph D. Baum; Eric L. Mestreau; Orlando Soto
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering | 2006
Rainald Löhner; Chi Yang; Juan R. Cebral; Fernando Camelli; Orlando Soto; Jacob Waltz
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering | 2007
Rainald Löhner; Juan R. Cebral; Fernando F. Camelli; Joseph D. Baum; Eric L. Mestreau; Orlando Soto
Engineering Fracture Mechanics | 2010
Orlando Soto; Joseph D. Baum; Rainald Löhner
42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit | 2004
Orlando Soto; Rainald Löhner
Computational particle mechanics | 2014
Rainald Löhner; Fernando Camelli; Joseph D. Baum; Fumiya Togashi; Orlando Soto
55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2017
Rainald Lohner; Fernando Mut; Fernando F. Camelli; Joseph D. Baum; Orlando Soto; Fumiya Togashi; Laura Carrington