Osamah Hussein

Reduced susceptibility of low density lipoprotein (LDL) to lipid peroxidation after fluvastatin therapy is associated with the hypocholesterolemic effect of the drug and its binding to the LDL

Increased plasma cholesterol concentration in hypercholesterolemic patients is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis. The impaired removal of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) in these patients results in the presence of their LDL in the plasma for a long period of time and thus can contribute to its enhanced oxidative modification. In the present study we analyzed the effect of the hypocholesterolemic drug, fluvastatin, on plasma and LDL susceptibilities to oxidation during 24 weeks of therapy. Fluvastatin therapy (40 mg/day for 24 weeks) in 10 hypercholesterolemic patients resulted in 30%, 34% and 22% decrements in plasma levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, respectively. This effect has been achieved after only 4 weeks of therapy. We next studied the effect of fluvastatin therapy on LDL susceptibility to oxidation in vivo and in vitro. 2.2-Azobis, 2-amidinopropane hydrochloride (AAPH, 100 mM)-induced plasma lipid peroxidation was decreased by 70% and 77% after 12 weeks and 24 weeks of fluvastatin therapy respectively. The lag time required for the initiation of CuSO4 (10 microM)-induced LDL oxidation was prolonged by 1.2- and 2.5-fold, after 12 and 24 weeks of fluvastatin therapy respectively. We next analyzed the in vitro effect of fluvastatin on plasma and LDL susceptibilities to oxidation. Preincubation of plasma or LDLs that were obtained from normal subjects with 0.1 microgram/ml of fluvastatin, caused 20% or 57% reduction in AAPH-induced lipid peroxidation, respectively. Similarly, a 1.6- and 2.7-fold prolongation of the lag time required for CuSO4-induced LDL oxidation was found following LDL incubation with 0.1 and 1.0 microgram/ml of fluvastatin, respectively. To find out possible mechanisms that contribute to this inhibitory effect of fluvastatin on LDL oxidizability, we analyzed the antioxidative properties of fluvastatin. Fluvastatin did not scavenge free radicals and did not inhibit linoleic acid peroxidation. Fluvastatin also did not act as a chelator of copper ions. However, fluvastatin was shown to specifically bind mainly to the LDL surface phospholipids and this interaction altered the lipoprotein charge as evident from the 38% decrement in the electrophoretic mobility of fluvastatin-treated LDL, in comparison to nontreated LDL. The inhibitory effect of fluvastatin therapy on LDL oxidation probably involves both its stimulatory effect on LDL removal from the circulation, as well as a direct binding effect of the drug to the lipoprotein. We thus conclude that the antiatherogenic properties of fluvastatin may not be limited to its hypocholesterolemic effect, but could also be related to its ability to reduce LDL oxidizability.

Interactions of platelets, macrophages, and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia: antiatherogenic effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy.

To assess the effect of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors on plasma cholesterol concentrations and on platelet aggregation, lovastatin or fluvastatin, 40 mg daily, was given to hypercholesterolemic patients. After 24 weeks, plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations were reduced by 37% after lovastatin therapy and 29% after fluvastatin therapy. The platelet cholesterol/phospholipid ratio was reduced by 33% and 26%, respectively. Platelet aggregation was significantly reduced by 12-15% (p < 0.01) after 4 weeks of therapy with either agent. Lovastatin or fluvastatin therapy reduced platelet aggregation through an in vivo hypocholesterolemic action on the platelet cholesterol content and also through a direct effect on platelet function, as a result of drug binding to the platelets. We also studied the effect of these HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on LDL susceptibility to oxidation. LDL oxidation (induced by copper ions) was reduced by 31% after lovastatin therapy and by 37% after fluvastatin therapy. The inhibitory effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on LDL oxidation involved their stimulatory effect on the removal of LDL from the circulation and a direct binding effect of the drugs to the lipoprotein. Because HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors can inhibit platelet aggregation, macrophage foam cell formation, and LDL oxidation, major contributors to atherogenesis, the use of these drugs can significantly attenuate the atherosclerotic process.

Ezetimibe's effect on platelet aggregation and LDL tendency to peroxidation in hypercholesterolaemia as monotherapy or in addition to simvastatin

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT Statins demonstrate a pleiotropic effect which contributes beyond the hypocholesterolaemic effect to prevent atherosclerosis. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Ezetimibe has an antioxidative effect when given as monotherapy or as an add-on to the statin, simvastatin. AIMS To investigate the effect of lowering low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) on platelet aggregation and LDL tendency to peroxidation by ezetimibe alone or with simvastatin in hypercholesterolaemia. METHODS Sixteen patients with LDL-C >3.4 mmol l(-1) received ezetimibe for 3 months (Part I). Twenty-two patients on fixed simvastatin dose with LDL-C >2.6 mmol l(-1) were enrolled (Part II). Part II patients continued simvastatin treatment 20 mg day(-1) for 6 weeks, then received 20 mg day(-1) simvastatin combined with ezetimibe 10 mg day(-1) for another 6 weeks. The tendency of LDL to peroxidation measured by lag time in minutes required for initiation of LDL oxidation and by LDL oxidation at maximal point (plateau) was measured before and after ezetimibe treatment. RESULTS Part I: Ezetimibe 10 mg daily for 3 months decreased plasma LDL-C level 16% (P = 0.002), prolonged lag time to LDL oxidation from 144 +/- 18 min to 195 +/- 16 min (P < 0.001), decreasing maximal aggregation from 83 +/- 15% to 60 +/- 36% (P = 0.04). Part II: Serum level LDL-C decreased 23% (P = 0.02) and lag time in minutes to LDL oxidation was prolonged from 55.9 +/- 16.5 to 82.7 +/- 11.6 (P < 0.0001) using combined simvastatin-ezetimibe therapy. There were no differences in platelet aggregation. CONCLUSIONS Ezetimibe was associated with decreased platelet aggregation and LDL tendency to peroxidation. Treatment with ezetimibe in addition to simvastatin has an additive antioxidative effect on LDL.

Valsartan therapy has additive anti-oxidative effect to that of fluvastatin therapy against low-density lipoprotein oxidation: studies in hypercholesterolemic and hypertensive patients.

In hypercholesterolemic and hypertensive patients, an increased propensity of their low-density lipoprotein (LDL) to oxidative modification has been observed. Because oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) plays a major role in atherosclerosis, the current study analyzed the anti-oxidative effect of valsartan (an angiotensin II receptor antagonist) therapy in combination with fluvastatin therapy in these patients. Administration of 40 mg/d of fluvastatin for 2 months to seven patients resulted in significant reduction in plasma total and LDL cholesterol (by 24–28%). Valsartan administration (80 mg/d for an additional 2-month period) in combination with fluvastatin did not further affect plasma cholesterol levels. Fluvastatin therapy inhibited the susceptibility of LDL to copper ion–induced oxidation, as shown by prolongation of the lag time by 22% and by a reduction of thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances (TBARS) levels by 14%, as compared with the patients LDL baseline oxidation. The addition of valsartan to fluvastatin resulted in a further 17% prolongation of the lag time and in an additional reduction of 21% in TBARS levels. In a parallel study, the LDL from eight patients who were first treated with 80 mg/d of valsartan for 2 months demonstrated reduced susceptibility to copper ion–induced oxidation, as observed by prolongation of lag time by 23% and reduction in TBARS levels by 19%, compared with the baseline values. The administration of 40 mg/d of fluvastatin for an additional 2 months in combination with valsartan, however, demonstrated no further inhibitory effect on LDL oxidation. The anti-oxidative properties of fluvastatin and valsartan against LDL oxidation were also demonstrated in vitro and the combination of both drugs was shown to have an additive effect. Valsartan therapy in hypercholesterolemic and hypertensive patients has an additive anti-oxidative effect to that of fluvastatin therapy. This may be related both to the anti-oxidative properties of valsartan and to the blocking of angiotensin II–induced oxidative stress.

Paraoxonase activity and expression is modulated by therapeutics in experimental rat nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease.

Objective. The objective of the present study is to investigate the effect of rosiglitazone, metformin, ezetimibe, and valsartan (alone or in combinations) on paraoxonase (PON) activity and PON-mRNA expression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods. 54 Male Sprague–Dawley rats were divided to 9 groups: chow diet group (15 weeks); methionine-choline-deficient diet (MCDD) group (15 weeks); MCDD-treated groups for the last 6 weeks with either metformin (M), rosiglitazone (R), metformin plus rosiglitazone (M+R), ezetimibe (E), valsartan (V), or a combination of R+M+V or of R+M+V+E for a total period of 15 weeks. Results. PON activities in serum and liver were decreased in MCDD rats. PON activity in serum increased significantly in all treatment groups. PON activity in liver was also increased significantly, except only in groups R, E, V, R+M+V, and R+M+V+E. Liver PON3 mRNA expression increased significantly in groups R+M, E, V, R+M+V, and R+M+V+E whereas liver PON2 mRNA expression increased significantly in MCDD, R+M, E, V, R+M+V, and R+M+V+E. Conclusions. PON activities in serum and liver were decreased in NAFLD. Treatment with insulin sensitizers, ezetimibe, and valsartan increased PON activity and reduced oxidative stress both in serum and liver.

Effect of Letrozole on Plasma Lipids, Triglycerides, and Estradiol in Postmenopausal Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE The aromatase inhibitor letrozole effectively treats breast cancer by decreasing estrogen levels in postmenopausal women. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of letrozole on plasma lipids, triglyceride lipase (TGL), and estradiol levels in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-two postmenopausal women with MBC received letrozole, 2.5 mg/day. Blood samples for assessment of plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, TGL, and estradiol were taken at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. RESULTS A nonsignificant increase was found in TC and HDL cholesterol levels after 3 months, which returned to baseline levels after 6 months (p = .794 and p = .444, respectively). LDL cholesterol increased nonsignificantly after 6 months and returned to baseline thereafter (p = .886). The mean estradiol level was suppressed from 44 pmol/l before treatment to <18 pmol/l after 6 months (p = .014). No difference was found in the estradiol suppression rate whether baseline levels were >40 or <40 pmol/l. CONCLUSION Letrozole has a safe effect on the lipid and TGL profiles of postmenopausal women with MBC. Estradiol levels were maximally suppressed within 6 months of treatment. The increased levels of TC during treatment were reversible and returned to normal levels after 3 months.

The Beneficial Effect of N-Acetylcysteine and Ciprofloxacin Therapy on the Outcome of Ischemic Fulminant Hepatic Failure

Fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is a multisystemic disorder associated with high mortality rates [1]. The causes can be categorized broadly as viral, toxin-mediated, metabolic, autoimmune, ischemic, neoplastic, and idiopathic [2]. Because many FHF deaths result from impaired hepatic regeneration [3] and increased hepatocyte apoptosis [4], an appropriate treatment strategy would consist of medical intervention that either directly promotes hepatic regeneration or negates the effects of circulating inhibitors and prevents apoptosis [3–5]. Ischemic hepatitis refers to the development of centrilobular hepatic necrosis after a reduction in hepatic blood flow and is associated with a poor prognosis [6]. The high mortality rate of this disorder (about 60%) is related mainly to the underlying disease rather than the hepatitis itself [7]. In the absence of hypoxemia and prolonged shock, congestive heart failure (CHF) alone as a cause of FHF has been reported only in a very few patients [8]. The precise pathogenesis is uncer-

The changes in renal function after a single dose of intravenous furosemide in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis

BackgroundPatients with compensated Child-A cirrhosis have sub clinical hypovolemia and diuretic treatment could result in renal impairment.AimTo evaluate the changes in renal functional mass as reflected by DMSA uptake after single injection of intravenous furosemide in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.MethodsEighteen cirrhotic patients were divided in two groups; eight patients (group 1, age 56 ± 9.6 yrs, Gender 5M/3F, 3 alcoholic and 5 non alcoholic) were given low intravenous 40 mg furosemide and ten other patients (group 2, age 54 ± 9.9, Gender 6M/4F, 4 alcoholic and 6 non alcoholic) were given high 120 mg furosemide respectively. Renoscintigraphy with 100MBq Of Tc 99 DMSA was given intravenously before and 90 minutes after furosemide administration and SPECT imaging was determined 3 hours later. All patients were kept under low sodium diet (80mEq/d) and all diuretics were withdrawn for 3 days. 8-hours UNa exertion, Calculated and measured Creatinine clearance (CCT) were performed for all patients.ResultsIntravenous furosemide increased the mean renal DMSA uptake in 55% of patients with compensated cirrhosis and these changes persist up to three hours after injection. This increase was at the same extent in either low or high doses of furosemide. (From 12.8% ± 3.8 to 15.2% ± 2.2, p < 0.001 in Gr I as compared to 10.6% ± 4.6 to 13.5% ± 3.6 in Gr 2, p < 0.001). In 8 patients (45%, 3 pts from Gr 1 and 5 pts from Gr 2) DMSA uptake remain unchanged. The mean 8 hrs UNa excretion after intravenous furosemide was above 80 meq/l and was higher in Gr 2 as compared to Gr 1 respectively (136 ± 37 meq/l) VS 100 ± 36.6 meq/l, P = 0.05). Finally, basal global renal DMSA uptake was decreased in 80% of patients; 22.5 ± 7.5% (NL > 40%), as compared to normal calculated creatinine clearance (CCT 101 ± 26), and measured CCT of 87 ± 30 cc/min (P < 0.001).ConclusionA single furosemide injection increases renal functional mass as reflected by DMSA in 55% of patients with compensated cirrhosis and identify 45% of patients with reduced uptake and who could develop renal impairment under diuretics. Whether or not albumin infusion exerts beneficial effect in those patients with reduced DMSA uptake remains to be determined.

CASE REPORT: Severe Cholestatic Jaundice in the Elderly Induced by Low-Dose Amiodarone

Amiodarone is a commonly used antiarrhytmic in elderly patients. it causes mild asymptomatic elevations in aminotransferase levels (15–55%). Overt hepatic injury is less common (1–3%) but may be fatal (1). Immunologic mechanisms are suspected in instances of acute hepatitis associated with a positive direct Combs’ test (2). Chronic injury resulting from the long half-life of amiodarone has led to many lesions, including an alcohol-like illness and phospholipidosis, (3). Because the drug is released slowly from deposits in lysosome, hepatic abnormalities may remain for 1 year after the drug is discontinued (3). In contrast to pulmonary toxicity, which may occur in susceptible patients at low doses (4), hepatic toxicity is related to high amiodarone dosages (usually >400 mg/daily (3). Recently a case of pseudo-alcoholic cirrhosis with low-dose amiodarone has been reported (5). Severe cholestatic jaundice in the elderly is frequently considered as a classic presentation of biliary or pancreatic malignancy and requires many invasive procedures to rule out the diagnosis (6). Amiodarone-induced cholestatic jaundice has been reported in only seven cases (7) and is considered an extremely rare complication. However, all these reported patients had a high cumulative dose of amiodarone. Low-dose amiodarone therapy is an unusual cause of cholestatic jaundice. Moreover, while the prognosis of increased aminotransferases is good and well documented (3) and may disappear even while continuing the drug, the prognosis in cholestatic jaundice in amiodarone hepatotoxicity is poorly documented. We report the case of an elderly patient who was admitted to the surgical department with painless cholestatic jaundice and whose