Osamu Asanuma

Measurement of the strength of iodine-125 seed moving at unknown speed during implantation in brachytherapy

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of estimating the strength of the moving radiation source during patient implantation. The requirement for the counting time was investigated by comparing the results of the measurements for the static source with those for the source moving at 2, 5, 10 and 20 cm s−1. The utilized source was 125I with an air-kerma strength of 0.432 U (μGym2h–1). The detector utilized was a plastic scintillation detector (8 cm × 5 cm × 2 cm in thickness) set at 8 cm away from the needle to guide the source. Experiments were conducted in order to determine the most desirable counting time. Analysis using the maximum of the measured values while the source passed through the needle indicated that the results for the moving source increased more than those for the static source as the counting time decreased. The combined standard uncertainty, with the coverage factor of 1, was within 4% at the counting time of 100 ms. This investigation supported the feasibility of the method proposed for estimating the source strength during the implantation procedure, regardless of the source speed. The method proposed is a potential option for reducing the risk of accidental replacements of sources with those of incorrect strengths.

A dosimetry method for low dose rate brachytherapy by EGS5 combined with regression to reflect source strength shortage

The post-implantation dosimetry for brachytherapy using Monte Carlo calculation by EGS5 code combined with the source strength regression was investigated with respect to its validity. In this method, the source strength for the EGS5 calculation was adjusted with the regression, so that the calculation would reproduce the dose monitored with the glass rod dosimeters (GRDs) on a water phantom. The experiments were performed, simulating the case where one of two 125I sources of Oncoseed 6711 was lacking strength by 4–48%. As a result, the calculation without regression was in agreement with the GRD measurement within 26–62%. In this case, the shortage in strength of a source was neglected. By the regression, in order to reflect the strength shortage, the agreement was improved up to 17–24%. This agreement was also comparable with accuracy of the dose calculation for single source geometry reported previously. These results suggest the validity of the dosimetry method proposed in this study.

A comparison of the dose distributions between the brachytherapy 125I source models, STM1251 and Oncoseed 6711, in a geometry lacking radiation equilibrium scatter conditions

Abstract The purpose of this study was to estimate the uncertainty in the dose distribution for the 125I source STM1251, as measured with a radiophotoluminescent glass rod dosimeter and calculated using the Monte Carlo code EGS5 in geometry that included the source structure reported by Kirov et al. This was performed at a range of positions in and on a water phantom 18 cm in diameter and 16 cm in length. Some dosimetry positions were so close to the surface that the backscatter margin was insufficient for photons. Consequently, the combined standard uncertainty (CSU) at the coverage factor k of 1 was 11.0–11.2% for the measurement and 1.8–3.6% for the calculation. The calculation successfully reproduced the measured dose distribution within 13%, with CSU at k ≤ 1.6 (P > 0.3). Dose distributions were then compared with those for the 125I source Oncoseed 6711. Our results supported the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 43 Updated Protocol (TG43U1) formalism, in which STM1251 dose distributions were more penetrating than those of Oncoseed 6711. This trend was also observed in the region near the phantom surface lacking the equilibrium radiation scatter conditions. In this region, the difference between the TG43U1 formalism and the measurement and calculation performed in the present study was not significant (P > 0.3) for either of the source models. Selection of the source model based on the treatment plans according to the TG43U1 formalism will be practical.

Strength estimation of a moving 125Iodine source during implantation in brachytherapy: application to linked sources

This study sought to demonstrate the feasibility of estimating the source strength during implantation in brachytherapy. The requirement for measuring the strengths of the linked sources was investigated. The utilized sources were 125I with air kerma strengths of 8.38–8.63 U (μGy m2 h–1). Measurements were performed with a plastic scintillator (80 mm × 50 mm × 20 mm in thickness). For a source-to-source distance of 10.5 mm and at source speeds of up to 200 mm s–1, a counting time of 10 ms and a detector-to-needle distance of 5 mm were found to be the appropriate measurement conditions. The combined standard uncertainty (CSU) with the coverage factor of 1 (k = 1) was ∼15% when using a grid to decrease the interference by the neighboring sources. Without the grid, the CSU (k = 1) was ∼5%, and an 8% overestimation due to the neighboring sources was found to potentially cause additional uncertainty. In order to improve the accuracy in estimating source strength, it is recommended that the measurment conditions should be optimized by considering the tradeoff between the overestimation due to the neighboring sources and the intensity of the measured value, which influences the random error.

An in vitro verification of strength estimation for moving an 125I source during implantation in brachytherapy

Abstract This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of a method for estimating the strength of a moving brachytherapy source during implantation in a patient. Experiments were performed under the same conditions as in the actual treatment, except for one point that the source was not implanted into a patient. The brachytherapy source selected for this study was 125I with an air kerma strength of 0.332 U (μGym2h−1), and the detector used was a plastic scintillator with dimensions of 10 cm × 5 cm × 5 cm. A calibration factor to convert the counting rate of the detector to the source strength was measured and then the accuracy of the proposed method was investigated for a manually driven source. The accuracy was found to be under 10% when the shielding effect of additional needles for implantation at other positions was corrected, and about 30% when the shielding was not corrected. Even without shielding correction, the proposed method can detect dead/dropped source, implantation of a source with the wrong strength, and a mistake in the number of the sources implanted. Furthermore, when the correction was applied, the achieved accuracy came close to within 7% required to find the Oncoseed 6711 (125I seed with unintended strength among the commercially supplied values of 0.392, 0.462 and 0.533 U).