Osamu Kinebuchi

A comparison between calcium channel blocking drugs with different potencies for T- and L-type channels in preventing atrial electrical remodeling

Calcium overload plays a key role in the development of atrial electrical remodeling. The effect of an L-type Ca channel blocker in preventing this remodeling has been reported to be short lasting, partly due to down-regulation of this channel and persisting Ca entry through the T-type Ca channel. To prove if efonidipine, a dual L- and T-type Ca channel blocker exerts a greater effect than an L-type Ca channel blocker verapamil, 21 dogs underwent rapid atrial pacing at 400 bpm for 14 days, pretreatment with efonidipine in 7 (E), verapamil in 7 (V), and none in 7 (C). We measured the atrial effective refractory period (ERP) serially during 14 days of rapid pacing. In response to rapid pacing, ERP decreased progressively in C. In contrast, in E and V, ERP remained greater than ERP in C (P < 0.01) on days 2 through 7. However, on the 14th day, ERP in V decreased to the level seen in C, whereas ERP in E remained significantly longer than ERPs in C or V (P < 0.01). The blockade L-type Ca channel alone is not sufficient, but the addition of a T-type Ca channel blockade shows a more sustained effect to prevent atrial electrical remodeling.

Daily oral verapamil before but not after rapid atrial excitation prevents electrical remodeling

BACKGROUND Intravenous verapamil has been reported to prevent electrical remodeling induced by rapid atrial excitation of several minutes to several hours. However, the clinical efficacy of verapamil when taken orally and daily remains controversial. PURPOSE We attempted to demonstrate our hypothesis that if verapamil prevents calcium (Ca) overload, its efficacy would be greater when taken before, rather than after, the onset of rapid atrial excitation. METHODS In 24 dogs, pacing and recording electrodes were sutured onto the right atrium. After a 5-day recovery period, rapid atrial pacing at 400 ppm was started, followed 2 days later by oral verapamil (8 mg/kg per day) in eight dogs (After group; A). In another eight dogs, oral verapamil administration was begun 1 week before the initiation of rapid pacing (Before group; B). In the remaining eight dogs, only rapid atrial pacing was started, without oral verapamil (Control group; C). We measured the effective refractory period (ERP) and conduction velocity (CV), and calculated wavelength (WL) at cycle lengths 200 and 300 ms on the day before (P0), and after 2 (P2), 7 (P7), 14(P14) days of rapid pacing. RESULTS In response to rapid atrial pacing, ERP, CV, WL decreased and progressively and comparably in A and C (P<0.05 vs. P0). In contrast, in B, these parameters did not change significantly and remained greater than those in A and C (P<0.05). Moreover, the adaptation of ERP to rate was preserved only in B. The duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) was shorter in B than in A and C (P<0.05). The inducibility of AF tended to be lower, and the fibrillation cycle length was longer in B than in A and C. CONCLUSIONS Oral verapamil started before but not after rapid atrial excitation prevents electrical remodeling. Verapamil may exert beneficial effects when it is taken during sinus rhythm, but not after more than 2 days of atrial tachyarrhythmia.