Oswaldo Lozoya

Human hepatic stem cell and maturational liver lineage biology.

Livers are comprised of maturational lineages of cells beginning extrahepatically in the hepato‐pancreatic common duct near the duodenum and intrahepatically in zone 1 by the portal triads. The extrahepatic stem cell niches are the peribiliary glands deep within the walls of the bile ducts; those intrahepatically are the canals of Hering in postnatal livers and that derive from ductal plates in fetal livers. Intrahepatically, there are at least eight maturational lineage stages from the stem cells in zone 1 (periportal), through the midacinar region (zone 2), to the most mature cells and apoptotic cells found pericentrally in zone 3. Those found in the biliary tree are still being defined. Parenchymal cells are closely associated with lineages of mesenchymal cells, and their maturation is coordinated. Each lineage stage consists of parenchymal and mesenchymal cell partners distinguishable by their morphology, ploidy, antigens, biochemical traits, gene expression, and ability to divide. They are governed by changes in chromatin (e.g., methylation), gradients of paracrine signals (soluble factors and insoluble extracellular matrix components), mechanical forces, and feedback loop signals derived from late lineage cells. Feedback loop signals, secreted by late lineage stage cells into bile, flow back to the periportal area and regulate the stem cells and other early lineage stage cells in mechanisms dictating the size of the liver mass. Recognition of maturational lineage biology and its regulation by these multiple mechanisms offers new understandings of liver biology, pathologies, and strategies for regenerative medicine and treatment of liver cancers. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;)

Hepatic Stem Cells and Hepatoblasts: Identification, Isolation, and Ex Vivo Maintenance

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses hepatic stem cells (HpSCs) and provides protocols on HpSCs, especially human hepatic stem cells (hHpSCs). It also includes development of a serum-free, hormonally defined medium (HDM), preparation of tissue extracts enriched in extracellular matrix, and methods to design biodegradable, polylactide scaffoldings or microcarriers in ways appropriate for progenitors and use of bioreactors. There has been recognition that the epithelial–mesenchymal relationship is lineage dependent. Epithelial stem cells are partnered with mesenchymal stem cells, and their differentiation is co-ordinate. In the liver, the lineages begin with the HpSCs paired with their mesenchymal partners and angioblasts that interact with multiple forms of paracrine signals. These two give rise to descendents in a stepwise, lineage-dependent fashion and their descendents remain in a partnership throughout differentiation. Tissue engineering involves the mimicking of the livers epithelial–mesenchymal relationship with recognition of the lineage-dependent phenomena. Serum-free, HDM have been found to select for parenchymal cells even when the cells are on tissue culture plastic. Tissue-specific gene expression is improved in cultures under serum-free conditions and especially with serum-free medium supplemented with only the specific hormones needed to drive expression of a given tissue-specific gene.

Successful transplantation of human hepatic stem cells with restricted localization to liver using hyaluronan grafts

Cell therapies are potential alternatives to organ transplantation for liver failure or dysfunction but are compromised by inefficient engraftment, cell dispersal to ectopic sites, and emboli formation. Grafting strategies have been devised for transplantation of human hepatic stem cells (hHpSCs) embedded into a mix of soluble signals and extracellular matrix biomaterials (hyaluronans, type III collagen, laminin) found in stem cell niches. The hHpSCs maintain a stable stem cell phenotype under the graft conditions. The grafts were transplanted into the livers of immunocompromised murine hosts with and without carbon tetrachloride treatment to assess the effects of quiescent versus injured liver conditions. Grafted cells remained localized to the livers, resulting in a larger bolus of engrafted cells in the host livers under quiescent conditions and with potential for more rapid expansion under injured liver conditions. By contrast, transplantation by direct injection or via a vascular route resulted in inefficient engraftment and cell dispersal to ectopic sites. Transplantation by grafting is proposed as a preferred strategy for cell therapies for solid organs such as the liver. (HEPATOLOGY 2013)

Universally Conserved Relationships between Nuclear Shape and Cytoplasmic Mechanical Properties in Human Stem Cells

The ability of cells to proliferate, differentiate, transduce extracellular signals and assemble tissues involves structural connections between nucleus and cytoskeleton. Yet, how the mechanics of these connections vary inside stem cells is not fully understood. To address those questions, we combined two-dimensional particle-tracking microrheology and morphological measures using variable reduction techniques to measure whether cytoplasmic mechanics allow for discrimination between different human adherent stem cell types and across different culture conditions. Here we show that nuclear shape is a quantifiable discriminant of mechanical properties in the perinuclear cytoskeleton (pnCSK) of various stem cell types. Also, we find the pnCSK is a region with different mechanical properties than elsewhere in the cytoskeleton, with heterogeneously distributed locations exhibiting subdiffusive features, and which obeys physical relations conserved among various stem cell types. Finally, we offer a prospective basis to discriminate between stem cell types by coupling perinuclear mechanical properties to nuclear shape.

Mechanical control of spheroid growth: Distinct morphogenetic regimes

We develop a model of transport and growth in epithelio-mesenchymal interactions. Analysis of the growth of an avascular solid spheroid inside a passive mesenchyme or gel shows that sustained volumetric growth requires four generic mechanisms: (1) growth factor, (2) protease, (3) control of cellularity, and (4) swelling. The model reveals a bifurcation delineating two distinct morphogenetic regimes: (A) steady growth, (B) growth arrested by capsule formation in the mesenchyme. In both morphogenetic regimes, growth velocity is constant unless and until a complete capsule forms. Comprehensive exploration of the large parameter space reveals that the bifurcation is determined by just two ratios representing the relative strengths of growth and proteolytic activity. Growth velocity is determined only by the ratio governing growth, independent of proteolytic activity. There is a continuum of interior versus surface growth, with fastest growth at the surface. The model provides a theoretical basis for explaining observations of growth arrest despite proteolysis of surrounding tissue, and gives a quantitative framework for the design and interpretation of experiments involving spheroids, and tissues which are locally equivalent to spheroids.

Mechanical Control of Epithelial Growth: Distinct Morphogenetic Regimes

We develop a model of transport and growth in epithelio-mesenchymal interactions. Analysis of the growth of an avascular epithelial spheroid inside a passive mesenchyme shows that sustained volumetric growth requires four generic mechanisms: (1) growth factor, (2) protease, (3) control of cellularity, and (4) swelling. The model reveals a bifurcation delineating two distinct morphogenetic regimes: (A) steady epithelial growth, (B) epithelial growth arrested by capsule formation in the mesenchyme. In both morphogenetic regimes, growth velocity is constant unless and until a complete capsule forms. Comprehensive exploration of the parameter space reveals that the bifurcation is determined by a ratio of the relative strengths of growth and proteolytic activity. Growth velocity is determined only by the strength of growth signaling, independent of proteolytic activity. There is a continuum of bulk versus surface growth, with fastest growth at the surface. The model provides a theoretical basis for explaining epithelial growth arrest despite proteolysis of surrounding tissue, and gives a quantitative framework for the design and interpretation of experiments.