Otmar D. Wiestler

The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system.

The fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumours of the central nervous system, published in 2007, lists several new entities, including angiocentric glioma, papillary glioneuronal tumour, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumour of the fourth ventricle, papillary tumour of the pineal region, pituicytoma and spindle cell oncocytoma of the adenohypophysis. Histological variants were added if there was evidence of a different age distribution, location, genetic profile or clinical behaviour; these included pilomyxoid astrocytoma, anaplastic medulloblastoma and medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity. The WHO grading scheme and the sections on genetic profiles were updated and the rhabdoid tumour predisposition syndrome was added to the list of familial tumour syndromes typically involving the nervous system. As in the previous, 2000 edition of the WHO ‘Blue Book’, the classification is accompanied by a concise commentary on clinico-pathological characteristics of each tumour type. The 2007 WHO classification is based on the consensus of an international Working Group of 25 pathologists and geneticists, as well as contributions from more than 70 international experts overall, and is presented as the standard for the definition of brain tumours to the clinical oncology and cancer research communities world-wide.

The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary

The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System is both a conceptual and practical advance over its 2007 predecessor. For the first time, the WHO classification of CNS tumors uses molecular parameters in addition to histology to define many tumor entities, thus formulating a concept for how CNS tumor diagnoses should be structured in the molecular era. As such, the 2016 CNS WHO presents major restructuring of the diffuse gliomas, medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors, and incorporates new entities that are defined by both histology and molecular features, including glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and glioblastoma, IDH-mutant; diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M–mutant; RELA fusion–positive ependymoma; medulloblastoma, WNT-activated and medulloblastoma, SHH-activated; and embryonal tumour with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered. The 2016 edition has added newly recognized neoplasms, and has deleted some entities, variants and patterns that no longer have diagnostic and/or biological relevance. Other notable changes include the addition of brain invasion as a criterion for atypical meningioma and the introduction of a soft tissue-type grading system for the now combined entity of solitary fibrous tumor / hemangiopericytoma—a departure from the manner by which other CNS tumors are graded. Overall, it is hoped that the 2016 CNS WHO will facilitate clinical, experimental and epidemiological studies that will lead to improvements in the lives of patients with brain tumors.

NOA-04 Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential Radiochemotherapy of Anaplastic Glioma With Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine or Temozolomide

PURPOSE The standard of care for anaplastic gliomas is surgery followed by radiotherapy. The NOA-04 phase III trial compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy at progression with the reverse sequence in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (N = 318) were randomly assigned 2:1:1 (A:B1:B2) to receive conventional radiotherapy (arm A); procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV; arm B1); or temozolomide (arm B2) at diagnosis. At occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression, patients in arm A were treated with PCV or temozolomide (1:1 random assignment), whereas patients in arms B1 or B2 received radiotherapy. The primary end point was time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as progression after radiotherapy and one chemotherapy in either sequence. RESULTS Patient characteristics in the intention-to-treat population (n = 274) were balanced between arms. All histologic diagnoses were centrally confirmed. Median TTF (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.8), progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.3, and overall survival (HR = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.9) were similar for arms A and B1/B2. Extent of resection was an important prognosticator. Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas share the same, better prognosis than anaplastic astrocytomas. Hypermethylation of the O(6)-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.0), mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1) gene (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.77), and oligodendroglial histology (HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.55) reduced the risk of progression. Hypermethylation of the MGMT promoter was associated with prolonged PFS in the chemotherapy and radiotherapy arm. CONCLUSION Initial radiotherapy or chemotherapy achieved comparable results in patients with anaplastic gliomas. IDH1 mutations are a novel positive prognostic factor in anaplastic gliomas, with a favorable impact stronger than that of 1p/19q codeletion or MGMT promoter methylation.

Molecular predictors of progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A prospective translational study of the German Glioma Network

PURPOSE The prognostic value of genetic alterations characteristic of glioblastoma in patients treated according to present standards of care is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred one patients with glioblastoma were prospectively recruited between October 2004 and December 2006 at the clinical centers of the German Glioma Network. Two hundred fifty-eight patients had radiotherapy, 199 patients had temozolomide, 189 had both, and seven had another chemotherapy as the initial treatment. The tumors were investigated for TP53 mutation, p53 immunoreactivity, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin-dependent kinase CDK 4 or murine double minute 2 amplification, CDKN2A homozygous deletion, allelic losses on chromosome arms 1p, 9p, 10q, and 19q, O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations. RESULTS Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.8 and 12.5 months. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, higher performance score, MGMT promoter methylation, and temozolomide radiochemotherapy as independent factors associated with longer OS. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer PFS (relative risk [RR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68; P < .001) and OS (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.54; P < .001) in patients receiving temozolomide. IDH1 mutations were associated with prolonged PFS (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.91; P = .028) and a trend for prolonged OS (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.19; P = .10). No other molecular factor was associated with outcome. CONCLUSION Molecular changes associated with gliomagenesis do not predict response to therapy in glioblastoma patients managed according to current standards of care. MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutational status allow for stratification into prognostically distinct subgroups.

NeuN: a useful neuronal marker for diagnostic histopathology.:

The monoclonal antibody A60 specifically recognizes the DNA-binding, neuron-specific protein NeuN, which is present in most neuronal cell types of vertebrates. In this study we demonstrate the potential use of NeuN as a diagnostic neuronal marker using a wide range of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human surgical and autopsy specimens from the central and peripheral nervous system. After microwave antigen retrieval, almost all neuronal populations revealed strong immunoreactivity for NeuN in nuclei, perikarya, and some proximal neuronal processes, whereas more distal axon cylinders and dendritic ramifications were not stained. The stain greatly enhanced the gray matter architecture. NeuN immunoreactivity was not detected in Purkinje cells, most neurons of the internal nuclear layer of the retina, and in sympathetic chain ganglia. We examined nine gangliogliomas and 14 dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors, one ganglioneuroma, and one dysplastic cerebellar gangliocytoma. The neuronal component of all of these lesions showed marked immunoreactivity for NeuN. In addition, NeuN immunoreactivity was focally seen in one of seven medulloblastomas with prominent neuronal differentiation. There was no staining of non-neuronal structures. The results indicate that NeuN immunoreactivity is a sensitive and specific neuronal marker in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, and may be useful in diagnostic histopathology.

PTEN mutations in gliomas and glioneuronal tumors

Cytogenetic and loss of heterozygosity studies have suggested the presence of at least one tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 10 involved in the formation of high grade gliomas. Recently, the PTEN gene, also termed MMAC1 or TEP1, on chromosomal band 10q23 has been identified. Initial studies revealed mutations of PTEN in limited series of glioma cell lines and glioblastomas. In order to systematically evaluate the involvement of PTEN in gliomas, we have analysed the entire PTEN coding sequence by SSCP and direct sequencing in a series of 331 gliomas and glioneuronal tumors. PTEN mutations were detected in 20/142 glioblastomas, 1/7 giant cell glioblastomas, 1/2 gliosarcomas, 1/30 pilocytic astrocytomas and 2/22 oligodendrogliomas. No PTEN mutations were detected in 52 astrocytomas, 37 oligoastrocytomas, three subependymal giant cell astrocytomas, four pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, 15 ependymomas, 16 gangliogliomas and one dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor. In addition, all tumors were examined for the presence of homozygous deletions of the PTEN gene; these were detected in 7 glioblastomas that did not have PTEN mutations. Therefore, PTEN mutations occur in approximately 20% of glioblastomas but are rare in lower grade gliomas. These findings confirm that PTEN is one of the chromosome 10 tumor suppressor genes involved in the development of glioblastomas.

SHARED ALLELIC LOSSES ON CHROMOSOMES 1P AND 19Q SUGGEST A COMMON ORIGIN OF OLIGODENDROGLIOMA AND OLIGOASTROCYTOMA

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in specific chromosomal regions, which are likely to harbor tumor suppressor genes, has been associated with human gliomas. In this study we have analyzed astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors for LOH on chromosomes 1 and 19. By microsatellite analysis LOH was found on chromosome arm 1p in 6/15 oligodendrogliomas WHO grade II and III, 12/25 oligoastrocytomas WHO grade II and III, 6/79 glioblastomas WHO grade IV, 5/44 astrocytomas WHO grade II and III and 0/23 pilocytic astrocytomas WHO grade I. The high incidence of LOH on chromosome arm 1p in oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas indicates that a putative tumor suppressor gene in this region is involved in the formation of gliomas with oligodendroglial features. Furthermore, the frequent involvement of chromosome arm lp in oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas, but not in astrocytomas, suggests that genetically oligoastrocytoma is more similar to oligodendroglioma than to astrocytoma. In order to support this hypothesis, oligodendroglial and astrocytic areas in three mixed oligoastrocytomas were examined differentially for LOH lp and for LOH 19q, the second genetic region believed to be affected in these tumors. All three tumors had LOH of lp and LOH of 19q in both areas of oligodendroglial and of astrocytic differentiation. These findings show that the astrocytic and oligodendroglial portions of oligoastrocytoma share molecular genetic features and probably are of monoclonal origin.

The Spectrum of Long-term Epilepsy–associated Tumors: Long-term Seizure and Tumor Outcome and Neurosurgical Aspects

Summary:  Purpose: To describe the histologic spectrum and clinical characteristics of patients with neuroepithelial tumors and drug‐resistant epilepsy and to analyze clinical data and treatment related to seizure outcome and survival.

Subsets of Glioblastoma Multiforme Defined by Molecular Genetic Analysis

Glioblastoma multiforme is a clinically and histologically heterogeneous lesion; however, to date, it has not been possible to subdivide glioblastomas on a clinical, histopathological or biological basis. Previous studies have demonstrated that loss of portions of chromosomes 10 and 17 and amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are the most frequent genetic alterations in glioblastoma. We therefore examined 74 glioblastomas from 67 patients for loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 10 and 17, and for amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene, to determine whether glioblastomas can be subtyped on a genetic basis. Using Southern blot analysis we were able to detect different patterns of genomic alterations. Eighteen of 67 informative patients were characterized by a loss of heterozygosity on the short arm of chromosome 17 in the tumor tissue. Forty‐five of 64 informative patients showed a loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 10. Amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene was noted in 25 of 67 patients and was restricted to those glioblastomas that had lost portions of chromosome 10. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification occurred significantly more often in patients without chromosome 17p loss than in patients with chromosome 17p loss (p = 0.01). In addition, those glioblastomas with a loss of chromosome 17p occurred in patients significantly younger than those with glioblastomas characterized by EGFR gene amplification (p = 0.001). These data emphasize the genetic heterogeneity of glioblastoma and suggest the division of glioblastoma into genetic subsets.

Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the german prospective randomized trial hit ’91

Purpose: The German Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (GPOH) conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter trial (HIT ’91) in order to improve the survival of children with medulloblastoma by using postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiation therapy as opposed to maintenance chemotherapy after immediate postoperative radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Between 1991 and 1997, 158 patients were enrolled and 137 patients randomized. Seventy-two patients were allocated to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy (arm I, investigational). Chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide, etoposide, intravenous high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin, and cytarabine given in two cycles. In arm II (standard arm), 65 patients were assigned to receive immediate postoperative radiotherapy, with concomitant vincristine followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, CCNU, and vincristine (“Philadelphia protocol”). All patients received radiotherapy to the craniospinal axis (35.2 Gy total dose, 1.6 Gy fractionated dose / 5 times per week followed by a boost to posterior fossa with 20 Gy, 2.0 Gy fractionated dose). Results: During chemotherapy Grade III/IV infections were predominant in arm I (40%). Peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity were prevailing in arm II (37% and 34%, respectively). Dose modification was necessary in particular in arm II (63%). During radiotherapy acute toxicity was mild in the majority of patients and equally distributed in both arms. Myelosuppression led to a mean prolongation of treatment time of 11.5 days in arm I and 7.5 days in arm II, and interruptions in 35% of patients in arm I. Quality control of radiotherapy revealed correct treatment in more than 88% for dose prescription, more than 88% for coverage of target volume, and 98% for field matching. At a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1.4–62 months), the Kaplan-Meier estimates for relapse-free survival at 3 years for all randomized patients were 0.70 ± 0.08; for patients with residual disease: 0.72 ±0.06; without residual disease: 0.68 ± 0.09; M0: 0.72 ± 0.04; M1: 0.65 ± 0.12; and M2/3: 0.30 ± 0.15. For all randomized patients without M2/3 disease: 0.65± 0.05 (arm I) and 0.78 ± 0.06 (arm II) (p < 0.03); patients between 3 and 5.9 years: 0.60 ± 0.13 and 0.64 ± 0.14, respectively, but patients between 6 and 18 years: 0.62 ± 0.09 and 0.84 ± 0.08, respectively (p < 0.03). In a univariate analysis the only negative prognostic factors were M2/3 disease (p < 0.002) and an age of less than 8 years (p < 0.03). Conclusions: Maintenance chemotherapy would seem to be more effective in low-risk medulloblastoma, especially in patients older than 6 years of age. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was accompanied by increased myelotoxicity of the subsequent radiotherapy, causing a higher rate of interruptions and an extended overall treatment time. Delayed and/or protracted radiotherapy may therefore have a negative impact on outcome. M2/3 disease was associated with a poor survival in both arms, suggesting the need for a more intensive treatment. Young age and M2/3 stage were negative prognostic factors in medulloblastoma, but residual or M1 disease was not, suggesting a new stratification system for risk subgroups. High quality of radiotherapy may be a major contributing factor for the overall outcome.