Ozgur Arikan
Istanbul Medeniyet University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ozgur Arikan.
Urology | 2013
Gokhan Atis; Cenk Gurbuz; Ozgur Arikan; Mert Kilic; Sabri Pelit; Cengiz Canakci; Samet Gungor; Turhan Caskurlu
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney. MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 2008 to March 2012, 24 patients with a solitary kidney who were treated with RIRS for renal stones were included in the study. All patients were preoperatively evaluated with urine culture, serum biochemistry, urinary ultrasonography, noncontrast computed tomography or intravenous urography, or both. The procedure was considered as successful in patients with complete stone disappearance or fragments <4 mm on computed tomography. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. The mean serum creatinine levels before and after the procedures were compared using a paired sample t-test. RESULTS The study included 24 patients with a mean age of 44.41 ± 12.15 years (range, 24-70). The mean stone size was 19.83 ± 5.90 mm (range, 10-35). The mean operative time was 55.83 ± 10.90 minutes (range, 40-75). The success rates were 83.3% and 95.8% after the first and second procedures, respectively. A pigtail stent was placed in all patients. The mean serum creatinine levels before the procedures and at 2 weeks after removal of the pigtail stents were 1.54 ± 0.55 mg/dL (range, 0.7-2.8) and 1.56 ± 0.50 mg/dL (range, 0.9-2.6), respectively (P = .92). Minor complications, classified as Clavien I or II, occurred in 4 patients (16.6%). No major complications (Clavien III-V) occurred in the study group. CONCLUSION RIRS is an effective and safe procedure that can be used to manage renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney.
Urological Research | 2014
Cenk Gurbuz; Gokhan Atis; Ozgur Arikan; Ozgur Efilioglu; Asif Yildirim; Onur Danacıoglu; Turhan Caskurlu
The objective of this study was to audit the cost of flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy. The data for 302 consecutive flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURSL) procedure undertaken in our department for renal stone treatment were collected retrospectively. The costs associated with performing FURSL, including the cost of ancillary equipment were analyzed. This includes the cost of the initial purchase of the ureterorenoscopes and the holmium laser equipment. The cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy for each lithotripsy procedure (for a total of 302 FURSL) was
Journal of Endourology | 2012
Gokhan Atis; Cenk Gurbuz; Ozgur Arikan; Lutfi Canat; Mert Kilic; Turhan Caskurlu
118. Additional cost of ancillary equipment including laser device, ureteral acces sheath and stone retrival catheter were
Urology | 2013
Gokhan Atis; Ozgur Arikan; Cenk Gurbuz; Asif Yildirim; Bulent Erol; Sabri Pelit; Ismail Ulus; Turhan Caskurlu
156,
Urology Journal | 2013
Bayram Guner; Ozgur Arikan; Gokhan Atis; Lutfi Canat; Turhan Caskurlu
231 and
International Braz J Urol | 2013
Gokhan Atis; Hakan Koyuncu; Cenk Gurbuz; Faruk Yencilek; Ozgur Arikan; Turhan Caskurlu
611, respectively. In this series, the costs of the ancillary equipment including laser exceeded the purchase and maintenance of the flexible ureteroscope. The cost of disposables rather than flexible ureteroscope itself should be considered in planning the budget.
The Scientific World Journal | 2010
Gokhan Atis; Omer Faruk Memis; Hasan Samet Güngör; Ozgur Arikan; Yesim Saglican; Turhan Caskurlu
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The development of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes has permitted easier access to calculi throughout the urinary tract. We compared the use of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of shockwave lithotripsy-refractory, isolated renal pelvic calculi by evaluating stone-free rates, operating room times, and associated complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ureteroscopic stone treatment was attempted in 47 patients with isolated renal pelvic stones between November 2008 and December 2010. The procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Semirigid ureteroscopy was routinely performed in all patients. If the stones were accessible in the renal pelvis with the semirigid ureteroscope (S-URS), they were then treated with the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser through S-URS under direct vision. If the stones were not accessible, flexible ureteroscopy was then performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS In 25 of 47 patients, renal pelvic stones were accessible with S-URS, and the stones were fragmented with the Ho:YAG laser using S-URS. In the remaining 22 patients, the stones were accessed with the flexible ureteroscope (F-URS), and the fragmentation of stones was performed with the Ho:YAG laser using the F-URS. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, grade of hydronephrosis, mean stone size, and stone laterality among the two groups. The mean operative times were 71.90 ± 17.90 minutes in the S-URS group and 93.41 ± 18.56 minutes in the F-URS group (P=0.001). The stone-free rates at postoperative day 1 and at the 1 month follow-up were 72% and 76% in the S-URS group and 81.8% and 86.4% in the F-URS group, respectively (P=0.861 and P=0.368). We found no significant differences among groups with regard to stone-free rates, complication rates, and hospital lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS Although it is well known that flexible ureteroscopy permits a detailed caliceal examination and therapeutic interventions, semirigid ureteroscopy is also often another sufficient means of reaching the renal pelvis in selected patients.
Urological Research | 2014
Bulent Erkurt; Turhan Caskurlu; Gokhan Atis; Cenk Gurbuz; Ozgur Arikan; Eyup Sabri Pelit; Bulent Altay; Firat Erdogan; Asif Yildirim
OBJECTIVE To compare the success and complication rates of a 4.5-6.5F semirigid ureteroscope (S-URS) with an 8.5-11.5F S-URS in treating ureteral stones in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-two patients with ureteral stones, who were treated with 4.5-6.5F S-URS (group 1) and 52 patients who were treated with 8.5-11.5F S-URS (group 2) were compared retrospectively using a matched-pair analysis. The size, lateralization, location, and impaction of the stones and also the patient age, gender, body mass index, and the presence of hydronephrosis were used as the matching parameters. The stones were fragmented with Holmium-YAG laser. RESULTS The matching parameters were comparable between the 2 groups. The stone-free rates were 88.5% in group 1 and 84.6% in group 2 (P = .566) after a single procedure. The mean operative times for groups 1 and 2 were 32.7 ± 5.8 and 30.2 ± 5.4 minutes, respectively (P = .06). Postoperative hematuria was detected in 1.9% and 13.5% of patients in groups 1 and 2 (P = .027). Ureteral balloon dilation was needed in 1.9% and 15.4% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .015). Mucosal injury was observed in 1.9% and 13.5% of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .027). No major complications were noted in either group. CONCLUSION Although the stone-free rates and operative times were similar between the 2 groups, a 4.5-6.5F ureteroscope can reduce the need for ureteral balloon dilation and some minor complications, such as mucosal injury and postoperative hematuria, in adult patients.
Urological Research | 2013
Gokhan Atis; Berkan Resorlu; Cenk Gurbuz; Ozgur Arikan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Ali Unsal; Turhan Caskurlu
Abstract The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is one of the most widely used reversible contraception methods throughout the world. With advancing technology, it has rapidly gained acceptance through its increased effectiveness and practicality compared with more invasive means such as laparoscopic tubal ligation. This pictorial essay will present the IUDs most commonly used today. It will illustrate both normal and abnormal positions of IUDs across all cross-sectional imaging modalities including 2-dimensional ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, with a focus on the emerging role of 3-dimensional ultrasound as the modality of choice.
The Journal of Urology | 2015
Turhan Caskurlu; Ozgur Arikan; Asif Yildirim; Berrin Tanidir; Cengiz Canakci; Yavuz Onur Danacioglu; Ramazan Gokhan Atis; Cenk Gurbuz; Bulent Erol; Haluk Vahaboglu
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bilateral single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of bilateral renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 2008 to February 2012, 42 patients who had undergone bilateral single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and laser lithotripsy were included in the study. The procedures were performed in the lithotomy position on an endoscopy table under general anesthesia, beginning on the side in which the stone size was smaller. Plain abdominal radiography, intravenous urograms (IVU), renal ultrasonography (USG) and / or non-contrast tomography (CT) scans were conducted for all patients. The success rate was defined as patients who were stone-free or only had residual fragment less than 4 mm. RESULTS A total of 42 patients (28 male, 14 female) with a mean age 39.2 ± 14.2 were included in the present study. The mean stone size was 24.09 ± 6.37 mm with a mean operative time of 51.08 ± 15.22 minutes. The stone-free rates (SFR) were 92.8% and 97.6% after the first and second procedures, respectively. The average hospital stay was 1.37 ± 0.72 days. In two patients (4.7%), minor complications (Clavien I or II) were observed, whereas no major complications (Clavien III-V) or blood transfusions were noted in the studied group. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral single-session RIRS and laser lithotripsy can be performed safely and effectively with a high success rate and low complication rate in patients with bilateral renal stones.