P. A. Cain

Application of tissue Doppler to interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography and comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.

The main limitation of dobutamine echocardiography (DE) is its subjective interpretation. We sought to reduce the need for expert interpretation by developing a quantitative approach to DE using myocardial Doppler velocity (MDV) in 242 patients undergoing DE. In 128 patients with a normal dobutamine echocardiogram, the normal range was designed to give a specificity of 80%. The accuracy of this range was investigated in 114 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography within 2 months of DE. A standard dobutamine echocardiographic protocol was used, with MDV gathered from color tissue Doppler at rest and peak stress. Wall motion at these stages was scored by experienced observers using a 16-segment model and MDV was measured off-line. Sensitivity and specificity of wall motion scoring and MDV were obtained by comparison with angiographic evidence of disease, defined as stenosis > 50% of the coronary artery diameter. The normal range in tethered segments (septum, anteroseptum, and inferior) was > or = 7 cm/s in the basal segments and > or = 5 cm/s in the midsegments. In the free wall (anterior, lateral, and posterior), the cutoff was > or = 6 cm/s in the base and > or = 4 cm/s in the midventricle. Of 114 patients undergoing angiography, 84 (75%) had significant stenoses, and the sensitivity of wall motion scoring and MDV were 88% and 83%, respectively, with specificities of 81% and 72% (p = NS). The accuracy was similar overall (86% vs 80%), as well as in each vascular territory. These data suggest that a fully quantitative interpretation of DE using site-specific normal ranges of tissue Doppler, which account for regional variations of base-apex function, is feasible and equivalent in accuracy to expert wall motion scoring.

Effect of tissue Doppler on the accuracy of novice and expert interpreters of dobutamine echocardiography

The subjective interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography (DBE) makes the accuracy of this technique dependent on the experience of the observer, and also poses problems of concordance between observers. Myocardial tissue Doppler velocity (MDV) may offer a quantitative technique for identification of coronary artery disease, but it is unclear whether this parameter could improve the results of less expert readers and in segments with low interobserver concordance. The aim of this study was to find whether MDV improved the accuracy of wall motion scoring in novice readers, experienced echocardiographers, and experts in stress echocardiography, and to identify the optimal means of integrating these tissue Doppler data in 77 patients who underwent DBE and angiography. New or worsening abnormalities were identified as ischemia and abnormalities seen at rest as scarring. Segmental MDV was measured independently and previously derived cutoffs were applied to categorize segments as normal or abnormal. Five strategies were used to combine MDV and wall motion score, and the results of each reader using each strategy were compared with quantitative coronary angiography. The accuracy of wall motion scoring by novice (68 +/- 3%) and experienced echocardiographers (71 +/- 3%) was less than experts in stress echocardiography (88 +/- 3%, p <0.001). Various strategies for integration with MDV significantly improved the accuracy of wall motion scoring by novices from 75 +/- 2% to 77 +/- 5% (p <0.01). Among the experienced group, accuracy improved from 74 +/- 2% to 77 +/- 5% (p <0.05), but in the experts, no improvement was seen from their baseline accuracy. Integration with MDV also improved discordance related to the basal segments. Thus, use of MDV in all segments or MDV in all segments with wall motion scoring in the apex offers an improvement in sensitivity and accuracy with minimal compromise in specificity.

Assessment of regional long-axis function during dobutamine echocardiography

Echocardiographic analysis of regional left ventricular function is based upon the assessment of radial motion. Long-axis motion is an important contributor to overall function, but has been difficult to evaluate clinically until the recent development of tissue Doppler techniques. We sought to compare the standard visual assessment of radial motion with quantitative tissue Doppler measurement of peak systolic velocity, timing and strain rate (SRI) in 104 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DbE). A standard DbE protocol was used with colour tissue Doppler images acquired in digital ciné-loop format. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), time to peak velocity (TPV) and SRI were assessed off-line by an independent operator. Wall motion was assessed by an experienced reader. Mean PSV, TPV and SRI values were compared with wall motion and the presence of coronary artery disease by angiography. A further analysis included assessing the extent of jeopardized myocardium by comparing average values of PSV, TPV and SRI against the previously validated angiographic score. Segments identified as having normal and abnormal radial wall motion showed significant differences in mean PSV (7.9 +/- 3.8 and 5.9 +/- 3.3 cm/s respectively; P < 0.001), TPV (84 +/- 40 and 95 +/- 48 ms respectively; P = 0.005) and SRI (-1.45 +/- 0.5 and -1.1 +/- 0.9 s(-1) respectively; P < 0.001). The presence of a stenosed subtending coronary artery was also associated with significant differences from normally perfused segments for mean PSV (8.1+/-3.4 compared with 5.7+/-3.7 cm/s; P < 0.001), TPV (78 +/- 50 compared with 92 +/- 45 ms; P < 0.001) and SRI (-1.35 +/- 0.5 compared with -1.20 +/- 0.4 s(-1); P = 0.05). PSV, TPV and SRI also varied significantly according to the extent of jeopardized myocardium within a vascular territory. These results suggest that peak systolic velocity, timing of contraction and SRI reflect the underlying physiological characteristics of the regional myocardium during DbE, and may potentially allow objective analysis of wall motion.

Usefulness of quantitative echocardiographic techniques to predict recovery of regional and global left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction

The left ventricular response to dobutamine may be quantified using tissue Doppler measurement of myocardial velocity or displacement or 3-dimensional echocardiography to measure ventricular volume and ejection fraction. This study sought to explore the accuracy of these methods for predicting segmental and global responses to therapy. Standard dobutamine and 3-dimensional echocardiography were performed in 92 consecutive patients with abnormal left ventricular function at rest. Recovery of function was defined by comparison with follow-up echocardiography at rest 5 months later. Segments that showed improved regional function at follow-up showed a higher increment in peak tissue Doppler velocity with dobutamine therapy than in nonviable segments (1.2 +/- 0.4 vs 0.3 +/- 0.2 cm/s, p = 0.001). Similarly, patients who showed a >5% improvement of ejection fraction at follow-up showed a greater displacement response to dobutamine (6.9 +/- 3.2 vs 2.1 +/- 2.3 mm, p = 0.001), as well as a higher rate of ejection fraction response to dobutamine (9 +/- 3% vs 2 +/- 2%, p = 0.001). The optimal cutoff values for predicting subsequent recovery of function at rest were an increment of peak velocity >1 cm/s, >5 mm of displacement, and a >5% improvement of ejection fraction with low-dose dobutamine.

Anatomical M-mode : A novel technique for the quantitative evaluation of regional wall motion analysis during dobutamine echocardiography

Recognition of abnormal wall motion during dobutamine echocardiography requires an expert observer. Anatomical M-mode echocardiography may offer a novel quantitative approach to interpretation, amenable to less expert readers. We studied the application of this new modality to 124 patients (80 with known coronary anatomy and 44 patients at low probability of coronary disease) who underwent dobutamine echocardiography, using a standard protocol. Wall motion was interpreted by an experienced reader, using digitally stored 2-dimensional echocardiographic images at rest and peak stress. Percentage of systolic thickening was measured offline using anatomical M-mode echocardiography in the basal and mid segments at rest and peak dose, and compared with wall motion scores and coronary angiography. Of 729 segments, wall motion was identified as normal in 449, ischemic or viable in 171 and showed resting WM abnormalities only in 109 segments. After exclusion of the apex, anatomical M-mode measurements were feasible in 729 of 960 possible basal- and mid-zone segments (76%). Measurement of systolic thickening at peak dose was reproducible within (r2 = 0.83) and between observers (r2 = 0.93). Systolic thickening was significantly greater in segments with normal wall motion (37 ± 2%) compared with ischemic or viable segments (30 ± 2%, p < 0.001), and scar segments (23 ± 3%, p < 0.001). There was an increment of thickening from rest to stress in normal and viable segments, no change in scar, and a decrement in ischemic segments. Significant coronary artery disease (defined by stenoses >70% diameter) was present in 59 patients. Systolic thickening showed significant variation between segments interpreted by wall motion scoring and angiography as true and false positive and true and false negative (p < 0.05). Measurement of systolic thickening using anatomical M-mode echocardiography offers an objective method to quantify systolic thickening at dobutamine echocardiography but has limited clinical feasibility.

Screening for coronary artery disease

Unidentified coronary artery disease remains a significant cause of premature death and morbidity during the prime of life. The availability of effective interventions for the management of ischemia has provoked new interest in screening for this condition in asymptomatic patients, in the hope of reducing the burden of this condition. Although widespread use of stress testing is ineffective, the use of imaging techniques may offer better accuracy for detection of ischemia. Other tests that identify evidence of atheroma in the peripheral or coronary circulation may be useful to identify patients at risk.

Use of myocardial backscatter as a quantitative tool for dobutamine echocardiography: feasibility, response to ischemia and accuracy compared with coronary angiography

Background: Integrated backscatter (IB) changes with ischemia, but most prior studies have involved parasternal imaging, which limited the number of evaluable segments. We sought to assess the efficacy and feasibility of IB from the apical views, and compare this to myocardial Doppler findings and wall motion analysis during dobutamine echocardiography. Methods and results: Forty-one patients undergoing dobutamine echocardiography had gray scale images and color myocardial Doppler acquired in three apical views. Cyclic variation IB (CVIB), time to peak IB (tIB, corrected for QT interval) and Doppler peak velocity (PV) in the same segment at rest and peak stress were assessed offline from digital cineloops at 80–120 frames/s. Significant coronary disease was defined by quantitative angiography as >50% stenosis. Analysis of the waveform in the apical views was feasible in 82% of segments. The backscatter curve was shown to be biphasic, with correlation of the first peak with peak tissue velocity, and significant regional variation. However, the response to normal segments was different with tissue Doppler (increased velocity) and backscatter (no change). Ischemia was associated with a lower peak tissue velocity and lower CVIB. Only resting tissue velocity and tIB (not CVIB) distinguished scar from ischemic segments. Using an optimal cutoff of <5.3 dB at rest achieved a sensitivity of 55%, a specificity of 76% and an accuracy of 75% when compared to angiography. The same cutoff at peak achieved a sensitivity of 58%, a specificity of 80% and an accuracy of 76%. Conclusions: CVIB and tissue velocity responses to stress are different, but both may be used to identify abnormal segments in patients with CAD. However, while measurement of CVIB is feasible in the apical views, the variability caused by anisotropy limits the accuracy of a single cutoff.