P. A. Rukoyatkin
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. A. Rukoyatkin.
Physics of Particles and Nuclei | 2014
V. P. Ladygin; T. Uesaka; V. Glagolev; Yu. V. Gurchin; A. Yu. Isupov; K. Itoh; M. Janek; J.-T. Karachuk; T. Kawabata; A. N. Khrenov; A. S. Kiselev; V. A. Krasnov; A. Kurepin; A. K. Kurilkin; P. K. Kurilkin; N. B. Ladygina; D. Lipchinski; Y. Maeda; A. I. Malakhov; G. Martinska; S. Nedev; S. M. Piyadin; J. Popovichi; S. Rangelov; S. G. Reznikov; P. A. Rukoyatkin; S. Sakaguchi; H. Sakai; K. Sekiguchi; M. A. Shikhalev
The review of the recent results on spin effects in few nucleon systems obtained at LHEP-JINR are presented. The data on the deuteron analyzing powers in different reactions in the wide energy range demonstrate the sensitivity to the spin structure of the light nuclei. The future plans on the studies with polarized deuterons from new polarized ion source at Nuclotron will be reported.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei | 2003
V. Bradnova; M. M. Chernyavsky; L. Just; S. P. Kharlamov; A. D. Kovalenko; M. Haiduc; K. A. Kotel’nikov; V. A. Krasnov; V. G. Larionova; F. G. Lepekhin; A. Malakhov; G. I. Orlova; N. G. Peresadko; N. G. Polukhina; P. A. Rukoyatkin; V. V. Rusakova; N. A. Salmanova; B. B. Simonov; S. Vokal; P. I. Zarubin
A physical program of irradiation of emulsions in beams of relativistic nuclei named the BECQUEREL Project is reviewed. It is destined to study in detail the processes of relativistic fragmentation of light radioactive and stable nuclei. The expected results would make it possible to answer some topical questions concerning the cluster structure of light nuclei. Owing to the best spatial resolution, the nuclear emulsions would enable one to obtain unique and evident results. The most important irradiations will be performed in the secondary beams of He, Be, B, C, and N radioactive nuclei formed on the basis of JINR Nuclotron beams of stable nuclei. We present results on the charged state topology of relativistic fragmentation of the 10B nucleus at low energy-momentum transfers as the first step of the research.
Physics of Atomic Nuclei | 2001
L. S. Azhgirey; V. V. Arkhipov; S. Afanasiev; V. K. Bondarev; V. N. Zhmyrov; L. S. Zolin; V. I. Ivanov; A. Yu. Isupov; A. A. Kartamyshev; V. A. Kashirin; V. Kolesnikov; V. A. Kuznetsov; V. P. Ladygin; N. B. Ladygina; A. Litvinenko; S. G. Reznikov; P. A. Rukoyatkin; A.Yu. Semenov; I. A. Semenova; G. D. Stoletov; G. Filipov; A. N. Khrenov
The tensor analyzing power Ayy and the vector analyzing power Ay for the inelastic scattering of 4.5-GeV/c deuterons on beryllium nuclei at angle of about 80 mrad are measured in the vicinity of baryon-resonance excitation. These new data, presented as a function of t, comply well with the results of previous 4.5-, 5.5-, and 9-GeV/c measurements at zero angle in overlapping regions of t; all available data are described by a unified dependence on |t| upto about 0.9 (GeV/c)2. The experimental results are compared with the results of calculations performed within the multiple-scattering model and the model involving omega-meson exchange in the t channel.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2016
S.N. Basilev; Yu P Bushuev; V. Glagolev; Di. Kirillov; N.V. Kostyaeva; A.D. Kovalenko; A.N. Livanov; D Marchand; G. Martinská; J. Mušinsky; C.F. Perdrisat; N.M. Piskunov; P. A. Rukoyatkin; V. Punjabi; R.A. Shindin; I.M. Sitnik; V.M. Slepnev; I.V. Slepnev; E. Tomasi-Gustafsson; J. Urbán; V Wang
The reaction p + CH2→ forward charge particle + X is used for this aim traditionally. Analyzing power of this reaction falls off as 1/p, where p is the laboratory momentum. At the proton momenta of order 8 GeV/c, which are expected at the JLab experiment, the low analyzing power creates problems for off-line analysis of data. On the other hand, it is well known that the reaction p+p → p+p has the much more analyzing power. So, the calorimeter is predestinated for suppression of inelastic events in this reaction. In the report it is shown that the problem is solved quite well.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2016
S.N. Basilev; Yu.P. Bushuev; V. Glagolev; S.A. Dolgiy; Di. Kirillov; N.V. Kostyaeva; A.D. Kovalenko; A.N. Livanov; P.K. Manyakov; G. Martinská; J. Mušinský; N.M. Piskunov; A.A. Povtoreiko; P. A. Rukoyatkin; R.A. Shindin; I.M. Sitnik; V.M. Slepnev; I.V. Slepnev; J. Urbán
The differential cross sections of the charge exchange reaction dp → (pp)n has been measured at 1.75 GeV/c momentum per nucleon for small transferred momenta using the one arm magnetic spectrometer STRELA at the Nuclotron accelerator. The ratio of the differential cross section of the charge exchange reaction dp → (pp)n to that of the np → pn elementary process is discussed in order to estimate the spin-dependent part of the np → pn charge exchange amplitude on the basis of dp → (pp)n data. The np → pn amplitude turned out to be predominantly spin-dependent.
Physics of Particles and Nuclei | 2014
V. P. Balandin; A. E. Baskakov; S.N. Basilev; E. Brash; Yu.P. Bushuev; O. Gavrishchuk; V. Glagolev; M. K. Jones; M. G. Kadykov; M. Khandaker; Di. Kirillov; Y. Kiryushin; E. V. Kostyukhov; N. A. Kuzmin; A.N. Livanov; P.K. Manyakov; G. Martinská; M. Meziane; S. A. Movchan; J. Mušinsky; L. Pentchev; C.F. Perdrisat; N.M. Piskunov; A.A. Povtoreiko; V. Punjabi; P. A. Rukoyatkin; R.A. Shindin; A. V. Shutov; N. A. Shutova; I.M. Sitnik
An accurate data base for the analyzing power of thick CH2 analyzers for high energy protons has been at the basis of several research efforts in a number of laboratories. Starting in the late eighties such data were collected at SATURNE in Saclay, and with the Synchrophasotron in Dubna, and led to an extensive program of study of polarization phenomena in pd interaction, either backward elastic scattering or breakup [1–6]. At about the same time it became evident that measuring polarization observables in elastic ep was going to be the best approach to determine the form factors of the proton, GEp and GMp, as had been predicted by Akhiezer and Rekalo [7].
Physics of Atomic Nuclei | 2003
L. S. Azhgirey; V. V. Arkhipov; S. Afanasiev; V. K. Bondarev; V. N. Zhmyro; L. S. Zolin; V. I. Ivanov; A. Yu. Isupov; A. A. Kartamyshev; V. A. Kashirin; V. Kolesnikov; V. A. Kuznetsov; V. P. Ladygin; N. B. Ladygina; A. Litvinenko; S. G. Reznikov; P. A. Rukoyatkin; A.Yu. Semenov; I. A. Semenova; G. D. Stoletov; G. Filipov; A. N. Khrenov; N. P. Yudin
The invariant differential cross section, the tensor analyzing power Ayy, and the vector analyzing power Ay for the reaction 9Be(d, p)X are measured at an initial deuteron momentum of 4.5 GeV/c and a proton detection angle of about 80 mrad. The data obtained for the differential cross section are consistent with the results of measurements at 3.5 and 5.78 GeV/c and a proton emission angle of 2.5°. The values found for the tensor analyzing power Ayy are compared with similar data obtained previously for the deuteron-fragmentation process occurring on a carbon target at various values of the initial deuteron momentum and leading to proton emission at zero angle. The data on the differential cross section for the reaction 9Be(d, p)X can be satisfactorily described within the relativistic impulse approximation by using standard deuteron wave functions; however, the approach based on this conceptual framework proves to be inadequate in dealing with data on the tensor analyzing power. These results indicate that it is necessary either to change the method for describing the relativistic deuteron or to take into account additional mechanisms.
European Physical Journal C | 2004
V. I. Sharov; N. G. Anischenko; V. Antonenko; S.A. Averichev; L. S. Azhgirey; N. A. Bazhanov; A.A. Belyaev; N.A. Blinov; N. S. Borisov; S. B. Borzakov; Yu.T. Borzunov; Yu.P. Bushuev; L.P. Chernenko; E. V. Chernykh; V.F. Chumakov; S.A. Dolgii; A. N. Fedorov; V. V. Fimushkin; Miroslav Finger; M. FingerJr.; L. B. Golovanov; G. M. Gurevich; A. Janata; A. D. Kirillov; E.V. Komogorov; A. D. Kovalenko; A.I. Kovalev; V.A. Krasnov; P. Krstonoshich; E.S. Kuzmin
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics | 2002
V.Yu. Alexakhin; V. P. Balandin; N. F. Furmanec; L. N. Glonti; I. G. Kosarev; A. Yu. Korzenev; G. I. Lanshikov; V. L. Murnov; V. D. Peshekhonov; Yu. K. Potrebennikov; Yu. N. Rogov; R. A. Salmin; M. G. Sapoznikov; E. A. Strokovsky; Yu. A. Tchentsev; N. V. Vlasov; S. Afanasiev; V. V. Arkhipov; C. A. Avramenko; A. I. Golokhvastov; A. B. Ivanov; V. I. Ivanov; A. Yu. Isupov; S. A. Khorozov; A. N. Khrenov; A. Litvinenko; J. Lukstins; A. Malakhov; L. V. Malinina; I. I. Migulina
Physics of Atomic Nuclei | 2003
L. S. Azhgirey; V. V. Arkhipov; Sergey V. Afanasiev; V. K. Bondarev; V. N. Zhmyro; L. S. Zolin; V. I. Ivanov; A. Yu. Isupov; A. A. Kartamyshev; V. A. Kashirin; V. Kolesnikov; V. A. Kuznetsov; V. P. Ladygin; N. B. Ladygina; A. Litvinenko; S. G. Reznikov; P. A. Rukoyatkin; Andrei Yu Semenov; I. A. Semenova; G. D. Stoletov; G. Filipov; A. N. Khrenov; N. P. Yudin