P. Adam

Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation

INTRODUCTION Displaced fractures of the femoral neck in the elderly are best treated with arthroplasty. The type of arthroplasty to be used, either hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, remains controversial as total hip replacements potentially have a higher rate of dislocation. HYPOTHESIS Dual mobility cups have a low dislocation rate when used to manage acute fractures of the femoral neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicenter prospective study conducted in France over an inclusion time of 3 months, all displaced fractures of the femoral neck treated with arthroplasty were operated on with insertion of a dual mobility cup. Patients had clinical and radiological assessment at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperative. RESULTS Two hundred and fourteen hips in 214 patients with a mean age of 83 years (range, 70-103 years) were included. None of the patients was lost to follow-up. The mortality rate after 9 months was 19%. Two patients (1%) had early postoperative infection successfully treated with lavage and antibiotics. Three patients (1.4%), operated through a posterior approach, presented one postoperative dislocation, all of which were posterior. Reduction was performed through closed external manipulation under general anesthesia. There was no recurrence of dislocation. DISCUSSION This low rate of dislocation after acute total hip replacement using dual mobility design cups favorably compares with hemiarthroplasties. Dual mobility cups might therefore be considered a valuable option to prevent postoperative dislocation when treating displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur in elderly patients if a total hip replacement is recommended. Further study is needed before extending the indications for total hip arthroplasty following a fracture of the femoral neck, to assess the potential cost and complications of a longer procedure with its potential acetabular complication, and weigh them against the potential benefits.

Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature.

Fractures of the distal femur are rare and severe. The estimated frequency is 0.4% with an epidemiology that varies: there is a classic bimodal distribution, with a frequency peak for men in their 30s and a peak for elderly women; however, at present it is found predominantly in women and in the elderly with more than 50% of patients who are over 65. The most common mechanism is an indirect trauma on a bent knee, and more rarely direct trauma by crushing. The anatomy of the distal femur explains the three major types of fracture. Because of the anatomy of the distal femur, only surgical treatment is indicated to stabilize the fracture. A non-surgical treatment is a rare option. The aim of this report was to provide an update on the existing surgical solutions for the management of these fractures and describe details of the surgical technique applicable to these injuries. Recent radiological, clinical and biomechanical data published in the literature are reported to compare different surgical options.

Trochanteric locking nail versus arthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged over 75 years.

INTRODUCTION In trochanteric fracture, whatever its anatomic type, internal fixation is currently the standard attitude, with arthroplasty as a relatively unusual option. HYPOTHESIS Hip implants are an excellent alternative to osteosynthesis in unstable trochanteric fracture in patients aged over 75 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS A non-randomised prospective multicenter study compared osteosynthesis by trochanteric nailing (n=113) to hip arthroplasty (n=134) in unstable trochanteric fracture (AO types 31 A2.2 and 3 and A3.3) in 247 patients over the age of 75 years. The series was recruited during 2007 in seven centres, four of which included only arthroplasties, two only osteosyntheses and one both. The two groups were comparable in age, sex, preoperative Parker score, pre-fracture place of residence, fracture type, time to surgery and preoperative comorbidity. The sole difference was in operators, with more senior surgeons in arthroplasty (62% versus 27%). RESULTS Three-month mortality was identical in the two groups (21.2% versus 21%). General complications did not differ, although mechanical complications were more frequent in the nailing group (12.5% versus 2.8%). Functional results (Parker and PMA scores) were better in the implant than in the nail group. DISCUSSION The present study validated hip arthroplasty in these indications. Cemented stems associated to a dual-mobility acetabular component gave the best results. TYPE OF STUDY Prospective, level of evidence III.

Early prediction of femoral head avascular necrosis following neck fracture.

Femoral neck fracture puts at risk functional prognosis in young patients and can be life-threatening in the elderly. The present study reviews methods of femoral head vascularity assessment following neck fracture, to address the following issues: what is the risk of osteonecrosis? And what, in the light of this risk, is the best-adapted treatment to avoid iterative surgery? Femoral head vascularity depends on retinacular vessels and especially the lateral epiphyseal artery, which contributes from 70 to 80% of the femoral head vascular supply. Fracture causes vascular lesions, which are in turn the prime cause of necrosis. Other factors combine with this: hematoma tamponade effect, reduced joint space and increased pressure due to lower extremity positioning in extension/internal rotation/abduction during surgery. Head deformity is not due to direct cell death but to the repair process originating from the surrounding living bone. In post-traumatic necrosis, proliferation rapidly invades the head, with significant osteogenesis. Pathologic fractures occur at the boundary between the new and dead bone. Many techniques have been reported to help assess residual hemodynamics and risk of necrosis. Some are invasive: superselective angiography, intra-osseous oxygen pressure measurement, or Doppler-laser hemodynamic measurement; others involve imaging: scintigraphy, conventionnal or dynamic MRI. The future seems to lie with dynamic MRI, which allows a new classification of femoral neck fractures, based on a non-invasive assessment of femoral head vascularity.

Minimally-invasive fixation of distal extra-articular femur fractures with locking plates: Limitations and failures

Minimally-invasive fixation using a locking plate and early motion is normal practice. However, technical errors and pitfalls are common. This surgery has a set of rules that encompass both the mechanics of the internal fixation system and the implantation itself. If these rules are not strictly followed, alignment defects and/or early failure of the fixation can occur. We analysed four cases of clinical failure that were encountered after minimally-invasive distal femoral extra-articular fixation with locking plates. The following rules must be followed with this technique: extra-articular fracture, minimally-invasive approach, long plate alternating between locking screw and empty hole (five holes on either side of fracture), bi-cortical screws, placement of locking screws near a complex fracture but away from a simple fracture. Osteoporotic bone, obesity that interferes with the instrumentation, articular fracture, horizontal fracture line and surgeon experience are all limitations of this minimally-invasive technique.

Minimally invasive locking screw plate fixation of non-articular proximal and distal tibia fractures.

Intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal quarter tibia fractures is known to be a challenging procedure due to the metaphyseal enlargement, the reduced contact between implant and cortex and fracture comminution. Therefore, some authors suggest preferring the use of plate internal fixation in the management of these challenging fractures. The purpose of this manuscript is to present and describe our technique of minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of extra-articular proximal and distal tibia fractures. Osteosynthesis was performed by means of a locking screw plate system which construct characteristics usually allow immediate weight-bearing and early functional mobilization. This minimally invasive surgical procedure advantageously combines the principles of closed fixation with construct stability.

Minimally-invasive internal fixation of extra-articular distal femur fractures using a locking plate: Tricks of the trade

Fractures of the distal femur are rare and occur in two distinct population categories: young patients after high energy traumas and elderly patients who fall from their full height, and often carry severe co-morbidities making especially difficult to manage theses complex injuries. In elderly patients the potential complications are numerous including infection, non-union and frequent function deterioration. We present a technique of minimally invasive internal fixation of the distal extra-articular femur using a locking plate and present the tricks of the trade to obtain successful reduction and achieve union. The hardware used includes plate fixation with a large fragment locking screw. This minimally invasive surgery combines stability of the internal fixation device with the principles of closed surgery, allowing early mobilization and immediate weight bearing to warrant good functional recovery.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated by locked plating: Feasibility assessment of the mini-invasive surgical option. A prospective series of 36 fractures

INTRODUCTION The treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by conventional plating is associated with problems related to fracture union and eventual refracture. Additionally, locking nailing cannot be used in all cases because of the risk of malunion. To resolve these issues, locking plates have been proposed to combine the advantages of closed reduction and internal fixation while achieving a higher quality reduction with plate fixation. HYPOTHESIS Locking plates put into place by a mini-invasive surgical approach result in fixation without substantial misalignment or non-union. PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 2002 to December 2007 we prospectively treated 35 patients (one bilateral), 28 women and seven men with a fracture around the hip implant (21), around the knee (8), between the hip implant and the knee (2), between a trochanteric internal fixation device and the knee implant (5). The mean age was 76, (39-93). Internal fixation was always attempted by mini-invasive surgery using locking plate system with locking screws (Synthès™). Rehabilitation included immediate weight bearing with as much weight as the patient would tolerate. The preoperative Parker score was 5.25 (0-9). RESULTS There was one patient lost to follow-up, one early failure, and seven deaths (four of whom were included in the study group since their follow-up was at least 24 months) for a total of 31 fractures (30 patients), the mean follow-up for the series was 26 months (6-67). Twenty-six fixations were performed by mini-invasive approach and 10 through a conventional open surgery. Patients applied full weight (n=20), partial weight (n=3) or no weight for 6 weeks (n=13). Infections developed in two patients and there were three cases of mechanical failure. Fracture union was achieved in 35 out of 36 cases. More than 5° of misalignment was observed in five patients. Loosening of the implant did not occur in any patients during follow-up. The Parker score in patients seen at follow up was 4.3 (0-9). DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION Locking compression plates associated with a mini-invasive surgical approach result in a high rate of union (35/36) with no significant misalignment (only 5/36 cases of misalignment of more than 5°), no refractures (n=0) and a low rate of mechanical failure (3/36) while allowing full weight bearing in most cases (20/36). Locking plates for periprosthetic femoral fractures allow patients to begin walking again, with stable intermediate term results.

Treatment of distal humerus fractures with LCP DHP™ locking plates in patients older than 65 years.

INTRODUCTION Fractures of the distal humerus are often complex and therefore challenging to treat. In elderly patients with decreased bone strength due to osteoporosis, strong fixation is crucial to allow resuming early motion that guarantees a good functional outcome as well as minimising mechanical complications. Locked implants meet these requirements. Here, we report outcomes in a uniform series of patients older than 65 years with distal humerus fractures managed with LCP DHP(®) (Synthès) fixation. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of this technique. HYPOTHESIS LCP DHP provides strong fixation of osteoporotic bone and leads to good clinical and radiological outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied 46 consecutive patients (2004-2010) with a mean age of 80 years including 15 with extra-articular and 31 with articular distal humerus fractures. At presentation, 11 complications were noted in nine patients (compound fractures and trauma-related nerve injuries). The transolecranon approach was used in 31 patients. Mean duration of immobilisation was 2.7 weeks in 33 patients. RESULTS Forty-three patients were re-evaluated after a mean follow-up of 25 months (range, 10-64 months); two patients died and one was lost to follow-up. Flexion was 127° and loss of extension was 23°, producing an average range of motion of 104°. Functional recovery was highly satisfactory with a Mayo Clinic Performance Score of 87 (70-100) and 95% of good and very good results. Postoperative complications consisted of infection (n=3), metaphyseal non-union (n=2), ulnar nerve injury (n=6), transient radial nerve palsy (n=1), and peri-articular ossification (n=4). Compound fracture and worse AO fracture type were associated with worse functional outcomes. DISCUSSION Despite the high complication rate, functional recovery was similar to that reported in previous case series, including after arthroplasty. Furthermore, the rate of mechanical complications was lower. Thus, our working hypothesis was confirmed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV retrospective non-comparative study.

Minimally invasive fixation of type B and C interprosthetic femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION Interprosthetic femoral fractures are rare and raise unresolved treatment issues such as the length of the fixation material that best prevents secondary fractures. Awareness of the advantages of locked-plate fixation via a minimally invasive approach remains limited, despite the potential of this method for improving success rates. HYPOTHESIS Femur-spanning (from the trochanters to the condyles) locked-plate fixation via a minimally invasive approach provides high healing rates with no secondary fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2004 to May 2011, all eight patients seen for interprosthetic fractures were treated with minimally invasive locked-plate fixation. Mean time since hip arthroplasty was 47.5 months and mean time since knee arthroplasty was 72.6 months. There were 12 standard primary prostheses and four revision prostheses; 11 prostheses were cemented and a single prosthesis showed femoral loosening. Classification about the hip prostheses was Vancouver B in one patient and Vancouver C in seven patients; about the knee prosthesis, the fracture was SoFCOT B in three patients and SOFCOT C in five patients, and a single fracture was SoFCOT D. Minimally invasive locking-plate fixation was performed in all eight patients, with installation on a traction table in seven patients. RESULTS Healing was obtained in all eight patients, after a mean of 14 weeks (range, 12-16 weeks). One patient had malalignment with more than 5° of varus. There were no general or infectious complications. One patient died, 32 months after surgery. The mean Parker-Palmer mobility score decreased from 6.2 pre-operatively to 2.5 at last follow-up. Early construct failure after 3 weeks in one patient required surgical revision. There was no change in implant fixation at last follow-up. No secondary fractures were recorded. DISCUSSION In patients with type B or C interprosthetic fractures, femur-spanning fixation not only avoids complications related to altered bone stock and presence of prosthetic material, but also decreases the risk of secondary fractures by eliminating stress riser zones. The minimally invasive option enhances healing by preserving the fracture haematoma. Thus, healing was obtained consistently in our patients, with no secondary fractures, although the construct failed in one patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.