Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where P. Andrew Futreal is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by P. Andrew Futreal.


Nature | 2002

Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer

Helen Davies; Graham R. Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; S. M. Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J. Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A. Gusterson; Colin S. Cooper; Janet Shipley

Cancers arise owing to the accumulation of mutations in critical genes that alter normal programmes of cell proliferation, differentiation and death. As the first stage of a systematic genome-wide screen for these genes, we have prioritized for analysis signalling pathways in which at least one gene is mutated in human cancer. The RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK–MAP kinase pathway mediates cellular responses to growth signals. RAS is mutated to an oncogenic form in about 15% of human cancer. The three RAF genes code for cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinases that are regulated by binding RAS. Here we report BRAF somatic missense mutations in 66% of malignant melanomas and at lower frequency in a wide range of human cancers. All mutations are within the kinase domain, with a single substitution (V599E) accounting for 80%. Mutated BRAF proteins have elevated kinase activity and are transforming in NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore, RAS function is not required for the growth of cancer cell lines with the V599E mutation. As BRAF is a serine/threonine kinase that is commonly activated by somatic point mutation in human cancer, it may provide new therapeutic opportunities in malignant melanoma.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

Marco Gerlinger; Andrew Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Grönroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q. McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R. Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron Charles Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P. Andrew Futreal; Charles Swanton

BACKGROUND Intratumor heterogeneity may foster tumor evolution and adaptation and hinder personalized-medicine strategies that depend on results from single tumor-biopsy samples. METHODS To examine intratumor heterogeneity, we performed exome sequencing, chromosome aberration analysis, and ploidy profiling on multiple spatially separated samples obtained from primary renal carcinomas and associated metastatic sites. We characterized the consequences of intratumor heterogeneity using immunohistochemical analysis, mutation functional analysis, and profiling of messenger RNA expression. RESULTS Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed branched evolutionary tumor growth, with 63 to 69% of all somatic mutations not detectable across every tumor region. Intratumor heterogeneity was observed for a mutation within an autoinhibitory domain of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase, correlating with S6 and 4EBP phosphorylation in vivo and constitutive activation of mTOR kinase activity in vitro. Mutational intratumor heterogeneity was seen for multiple tumor-suppressor genes converging on loss of function; SETD2, PTEN, and KDM5C underwent multiple distinct and spatially separated inactivating mutations within a single tumor, suggesting convergent phenotypic evolution. Gene-expression signatures of good and poor prognosis were detected in different regions of the same tumor. Allelic composition and ploidy profiling analysis revealed extensive intratumor heterogeneity, with 26 of 30 tumor samples from four tumors harboring divergent allelic-imbalance profiles and with ploidy heterogeneity in two of four tumors. CONCLUSIONS Intratumor heterogeneity can lead to underestimation of the tumor genomics landscape portrayed from single tumor-biopsy samples and may present major challenges to personalized-medicine and biomarker development. Intratumor heterogeneity, associated with heterogeneous protein function, may foster tumor adaptation and therapeutic failure through Darwinian selection. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others.).


Nature | 2013

Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer

Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Serena Nik-Zainal; David C. Wedge; Samuel Aparicio; Sam Behjati; Andrew V. Biankin; Graham R. Bignell; Niccolo Bolli; Åke Borg; Anne Lise Børresen-Dale; Sandrine Boyault; Birgit Burkhardt; Adam Butler; Carlos Caldas; Helen Davies; Christine Desmedt; Roland Eils; Jórunn Erla Eyfjörd; John A. Foekens; Mel Greaves; Fumie Hosoda; Barbara Hutter; Tomislav Ilicic; Sandrine Imbeaud; Marcin Imielinsk; Natalie Jäger; David T. W. Jones; David Jones; Stian Knappskog; Marcel Kool

All cancers are caused by somatic mutations; however, understanding of the biological processes generating these mutations is limited. The catalogue of somatic mutations from a cancer genome bears the signatures of the mutational processes that have been operative. Here we analysed 4,938,362 mutations from 7,042 cancers and extracted more than 20 distinct mutational signatures. Some are present in many cancer types, notably a signature attributed to the APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases, whereas others are confined to a single cancer class. Certain signatures are associated with age of the patient at cancer diagnosis, known mutagenic exposures or defects in DNA maintenance, but many are of cryptic origin. In addition to these genome-wide mutational signatures, hypermutation localized to small genomic regions, ‘kataegis’, is found in many cancer types. The results reveal the diversity of mutational processes underlying the development of cancer, with potential implications for understanding of cancer aetiology, prevention and therapy.


Nature | 2007

Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes

Christopher Greenman; Philip Stephens; Raffaella Smith; Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Chris Hunter; Graham R. Bignell; Helen Davies; Jon Teague; Adam Butler; Claire Stevens; Sarah Edkins; Sarah O’Meara; Imre Vastrik; Esther Schmidt; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Gurpreet Bhamra; Gemma Buck; Bhudipa Choudhury; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon A. Forbes; Kris Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jon Hinton; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones

Cancers arise owing to mutations in a subset of genes that confer growth advantage. The availability of the human genome sequence led us to propose that systematic resequencing of cancer genomes for mutations would lead to the discovery of many additional cancer genes. Here we report more than 1,000 somatic mutations found in 274 megabases (Mb) of DNA corresponding to the coding exons of 518 protein kinase genes in 210 diverse human cancers. There was substantial variation in the number and pattern of mutations in individual cancers reflecting different exposures, DNA repair defects and cellular origins. Most somatic mutations are likely to be ‘passengers’ that do not contribute to oncogenesis. However, there was evidence for ‘driver’ mutations contributing to the development of the cancers studied in approximately 120 genes. Systematic sequencing of cancer genomes therefore reveals the evolutionary diversity of cancers and implicates a larger repertoire of cancer genes than previously anticipated.


Nature | 2009

The cancer genome

Michael R. Stratton; Peter J. Campbell; P. Andrew Futreal

All cancers arise as a result of changes that have occurred in the DNA sequence of the genomes of cancer cells. Over the past quarter of a century much has been learnt about these mutations and the abnormal genes that operate in human cancers. We are now, however, moving into an era in which it will be possible to obtain the complete DNA sequence of large numbers of cancer genomes. These studies will provide us with a detailed and comprehensive perspective on how individual cancers have developed.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2011

COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer

Simon A. Forbes; Nidhi Bindal; Sally Bamford; Charlotte G. Cole; Chai Yin Kok; David Beare; Mingming Jia; Rebecca Shepherd; Kenric Leung; Andrew Menzies; Jon W. Teague; Peter J. Campbell; Michael R. Stratton; P. Andrew Futreal

COSMIC (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic) curates comprehensive information on somatic mutations in human cancer. Release v48 (July 2010) describes over 136 000 coding mutations in almost 542 000 tumour samples; of the 18 490 genes documented, 4803 (26%) have one or more mutations. Full scientific literature curations are available on 83 major cancer genes and 49 fusion gene pairs (19 new cancer genes and 30 new fusion pairs this year) and this number is continually increasing. Key amongst these is TP53, now available through a collaboration with the IARC p53 database. In addition to data from the Cancer Genome Project (CGP) at the Sanger Institute, UK, and The Cancer Genome Atlas project (TCGA), large systematic screens are also now curated. Major website upgrades now make these data much more mineable, with many new selection filters and graphics. A Biomart is now available allowing more automated data mining and integration with other biological databases. Annotation of genomic features has become a significant focus; COSMIC has begun curating full-genome resequencing experiments, developing new web pages, export formats and graphics styles. With all genomic information recently updated to GRCh37, COSMIC integrates many diverse types of mutation information and is making much closer links with Ensembl and other data resources.


Cell | 2011

Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development

Philip Stephens; Christopher Greenman; Beiyuan Fu; Fengtang Yang; Graham R. Bignell; Laura Mudie; Erin Pleasance; King Wai Lau; David Beare; Lucy Stebbings; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Michael A. Quail; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Nigel P. Carter; Laura A. Morsberger; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; George A. Follows; Anthony R. Green; Adrienne M. Flanagan; Michael R. Stratton

Summary Cancer is driven by somatically acquired point mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, conventionally thought to accumulate gradually over time. Using next-generation sequencing, we characterize a phenomenon, which we term chromothripsis, whereby tens to hundreds of genomic rearrangements occur in a one-off cellular crisis. Rearrangements involving one or a few chromosomes crisscross back and forth across involved regions, generating frequent oscillations between two copy number states. These genomic hallmarks are highly improbable if rearrangements accumulate over time and instead imply that nearly all occur during a single cellular catastrophe. The stamp of chromothripsis can be seen in at least 2%–3% of all cancers, across many subtypes, and is present in ∼25% of bone cancers. We find that one, or indeed more than one, cancer-causing lesion can emerge out of the genomic crisis. This phenomenon has important implications for the origins of genomic remodeling and temporal emergence of cancer. PaperClip


Nature | 2010

A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome

Erin Pleasance; R. Keira Cheetham; Philip Stephens; David J. McBride; Sean Humphray; Christopher Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Graham R. Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie A Alipaz; Markus J. Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J. Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J. Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula Kokko-Gonzales; Niall Anthony Gormley; Russell Grocock; Christian D. Haudenschild; Matthew M. Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies

All cancers carry somatic mutations. A subset of these somatic alterations, termed driver mutations, confer selective growth advantage and are implicated in cancer development, whereas the remainder are passengers. Here we have sequenced the genomes of a malignant melanoma and a lymphoblastoid cell line from the same person, providing the first comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from an individual cancer. The catalogue provides remarkable insights into the forces that have shaped this cancer genome. The dominant mutational signature reflects DNA damage due to ultraviolet light exposure, a known risk factor for malignant melanoma, whereas the uneven distribution of mutations across the genome, with a lower prevalence in gene footprints, indicates that DNA repair has been preferentially deployed towards transcribed regions. The results illustrate the power of a cancer genome sequence to reveal traces of the DNA damage, repair, mutation and selection processes that were operative years before the cancer became symptomatic.


Nature | 2012

Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells

Mathew J. Garnett; Elena J. Edelman; Sonja J. Heidorn; Christopher Greenman; Anahita Dastur; King Wai Lau; Patricia Greninger; I. Richard Thompson; Xi Luo; Jorge Soares; Qingsong Liu; Francesco Iorio; Didier Surdez; L Leon Chen; Randy J. Milano; Graham R. Bignell; Ah Ting Tam; Helen Davies; Jesse A. Stevenson; Syd Barthorpe; Stephen R. Lutz; Fiona Kogera; Karl Lawrence; Anne McLaren-Douglas; Xeni Mitropoulos; Tatiana Mironenko; Helen Thi; Laura Richardson; Wenjun Zhou; Frances Jewitt

Clinical responses to anticancer therapies are often restricted to a subset of patients. In some cases, mutated cancer genes are potent biomarkers for responses to targeted agents. Here, to uncover new biomarkers of sensitivity and resistance to cancer therapeutics, we screened a panel of several hundred cancer cell lines—which represent much of the tissue-type and genetic diversity of human cancers—with 130 drugs under clinical and preclinical investigation. In aggregate, we found that mutated cancer genes were associated with cellular response to most currently available cancer drugs. Classic oncogene addiction paradigms were modified by additional tissue-specific or expression biomarkers, and some frequently mutated genes were associated with sensitivity to a broad range of therapeutic agents. Unexpected relationships were revealed, including the marked sensitivity of Ewing’s sarcoma cells harbouring the EWS (also known as EWSR1)-FLI1 gene translocation to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. By linking drug activity to the functional complexity of cancer genomes, systematic pharmacogenomic profiling in cancer cell lines provides a powerful biomarker discovery platform to guide rational cancer therapeutic strategies.


Nature | 2011

Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Xose S. Puente; Magda Pinyol; Víctor Quesada; Laura Conde; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Neus Villamor; Geòrgia Escaramís; Pedro Jares; Sílvia Beà; Marcos González-Díaz; Laia Bassaganyas; Tycho Baumann; Manel Juan; Mónica López-Guerra; Dolors Colomer; Jose M. C. Tubio; Cristina López; Alba Navarro; Cristian Tornador; Marta Aymerich; María Rozman; Jesús Hernández; Diana A. Puente; José M. P. Freije; Gloria Velasco; Ana Gutiérrez-Fernández; Dolors Costa; Anna Carrió; Sara Guijarro; Anna Enjuanes

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), the most frequent leukaemia in adults in Western countries, is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical presentation and evolution. Two major molecular subtypes can be distinguished, characterized respectively by a high or low number of somatic hypermutations in the variable region of immunoglobulin genes. The molecular changes leading to the pathogenesis of the disease are still poorly understood. Here we performed whole-genome sequencing of four cases of CLL and identified 46 somatic mutations that potentially affect gene function. Further analysis of these mutations in 363 patients with CLL identified four genes that are recurrently mutated: notch 1 (NOTCH1), exportin 1 (XPO1), myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88) and kelch-like 6 (KLHL6). Mutations in MYD88 and KLHL6 are predominant in cases of CLL with mutated immunoglobulin genes, whereas NOTCH1 and XPO1 mutations are mainly detected in patients with unmutated immunoglobulins. The patterns of somatic mutation, supported by functional and clinical analyses, strongly indicate that the recurrent NOTCH1, MYD88 and XPO1 mutations are oncogenic changes that contribute to the clinical evolution of the disease. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive analysis of CLL combining whole-genome sequencing with clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes. It highlights the usefulness of this approach for the identification of clinically relevant mutations in cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the P. Andrew Futreal's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael R. Stratton

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam Butler

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graham R. Bignell

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon Teague

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick Tarpey

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen Davies

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Edkins

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Menzies

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Jones

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge