P. Bielewicz
International School for Advanced Studies
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. Bielewicz.
Archive | 2016
P. A. R. Ade; N. Aghanim; M. Arnaud; M. Ashdown; J. Aumont; C. Baccigalupi; A. J. Banday; R. B. Barreiro; Nicola Bartolo; S. Basak; E. Battaner; K. Benabed; A. Benoît; A. Benoit-Lévy; J.-P. Bernard; M. Bersanelli; P. Bielewicz; J. J. Bock; A. Bonaldi; L. Bonavera; J. Borrill; F. R. Bouchet; M. Bucher; C. Burigana; R. C. Butler; E. Calabrese; J.-F. Cardoso; B. Casaponsa; A. Catalano; A. Challinor
This paper presents a study of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect from the Planck 2015 temperature and polarization data release. This secondary cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy caused by the large-scale time-evolving gravitational potential is probed from different perspectives. The CMB is cross-correlated with different large-scale structure (LSS) tracers: radio sources from the NVSS catalogue; galaxies from the optical SDSS and the infrared WISE surveys; and the Planck 2015 convergence lensing map. The joint cross-correlation of the CMB with the tracers yields a detection at 4σ where most of the signal-to-noise is due to the Planck lensing and the NVSS radio catalogue. In fact, the ISW effect is detected from the Planck data only at ≈3σ (through the ISW-lensing bispectrum), which is similar to the detection level achieved by combining the cross-correlation signal coming from all the galaxy catalogues mentioned above. We study the ability of the ISW effect to place constraints on the dark-energy parameters; in particular, we show that ΩΛ is detected at more than 3σ. This cross-correlation analysis is performed only with the Planck temperature data, since the polarization scales available in the 2015 release do not permit significant improvement of the CMB-LSS cross-correlation detectability. Nevertheless, the Planck polarization data are used to study the anomalously large ISW signal previously reported through the aperture photometry on stacked CMB features at the locations of known superclusters and supervoids, which is in conflict with ΛCDM expectations. We find that the current Planck polarization data do not exclude that this signal could be caused by the ISW effect. In addition, the stacking of the Planck lensing map on the locations of superstructures exhibits a positive cross-correlation with these large-scale structures. Finally, we have improved our previous reconstruction of the ISW temperature fluctuations by combining the information encoded in all the previously mentioned LSS tracers. In particular, we construct a map of the ISW secondary anisotropies and the corresponding uncertainties map, obtained from simulations. We also explore the reconstruction of the ISW anisotropies caused by the large-scale structure traced by the 2MASS Photometric Redshift Survey (2MPZ) by directly inverting the density field into the gravitational potential field.
Archive | 2014
J.A. Tauber; P. A. R. Ade; N. Aghanim; C. Armitage-Caplan; M. Arnaud; M. Ashdown; F. Atrio-Barandela; J. Aumont; C. Baccigalupi; A. J. Banday; R. B. Barreiro; R. Barrena; J. G. Bartlett; E. Battaner; Richard A. Battye; K. Benabed; A. Benoît; A. Benoit-Lévy; J.-P. Bernard; M. Bersanelli; P. Bielewicz; I. Bikmaev; A Blanchard; J. Bobin; J. J. Bock; H. Böhringer; A. Bonaldi; J. Borrill; F. R. Bouchet; Herve Bourdin
We present constraints on cosmological parameters using number counts as a function of redshift for a sub-sample of 189 galaxy clusters from the Planck SZ (PSZ) catalogue. The PSZ is selected through the signature of the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect, and the sub-sample used here has a signal-to-noise threshold of seven, with each object confirmed as a cluster and all but one with a redshift estimate. We discuss the completeness of the sample and our construction of a likelihood analysis. Using a relation between mass M and SZ signal Y calibrated to X-ray measurements, we derive constraints on the power spectrum amplitude sigma(8) and matter density parameter Omega(m) in a flat Lambda CDM model. We test the robustness of our estimates and find that possible biases in the Y-M relation and the halo mass function are larger than the statistical uncertainties from the cluster sample. Assuming the X-ray determined mass to be biased low relative to the true mass by between zero and 30%, motivated by comparison of the observed mass scaling relations to those from a set of numerical simulations, we find that sigma(8) = 0.75 +/- 0.03, Omega(m) = 0.29 +/- 0.02, and sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.27)(0.3) = 0.764 +/- 0.025. The value of sigma(8) is degenerate with the mass bias; if the latter is fixed to a value of 20% (the central value from numerical simulations) we find sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.27)(0.3) = 0.78 +/- 0.01 and a tighter one-dimensional range sigma(8) = 0.77 +/- 0.02. We find that the larger values of sigma(8) and Omega(m) preferred by Plancks measurements of the primary CMB anisotropies can be accommodated by a mass bias of about 40%. Alternatively, consistency with the primary CMB constraints can be achieved by inclusion of processes that suppress power on small scales relative to the Lambda CDM model, such as a component of massive neutrinos. We place our results in the context of other determinations of cosmological parameters, and discuss issues that need to be resolved in order to make further progress in this field.
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2011
C. Armitage-Caplan; Miguel A. de Avillez; Domingos Barbosa; A. J. Banday; Nicola Bartolo; Richard A. Battye; J.-P. Bernard; P. de Bernardis; S. Basak; M. Bersanelli; P. Bielewicz; A. Bonaldi; M. Bucher; F. R. Bouchet; F. Boulanger; C. Burigana; P. Camus; A. Challinor; S Chongchitnan; D. L. Clements; S. Colafrancesco; J. Delabrouille; M. De Petris; G. De Zotti; C. Dickinson; J. Dunkley; Torsten A. Ensslin; J. Fergusson; Pedro G. Ferreira; K. Ferrière
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2018
N. Aghanim; Y. Akrami; M. Ashdown; J. Aumont; C. Baccigalupi; M. Ballardini; A. J. Banday; R. B. Barreiro; Nicola Bartolo; S. Basak; K. Benabed; J.-P. Bernard; M. Bersanelli; P. Bielewicz; J. J. Bock; J. Borrill; F. R. Bouchet; F. Boulanger; M. Bucher; C. Burigana; E. Calabrese; J-F Cardoso; J. Carron; A. Challinor; H. C. Chiang; L. P. L. Colombo; C. Combet; B. P. Crill; F. Cuttaia; Paolo de Bernardis
VizieR Online Data Catalog. 2015;358:10014. | 2015
Peter A. R. Ade; N. Aghanim; C. Armitage-Caplan; M. Arnaud; M. Ashdown; F. Atrio-Barandela; J. Aumont; H. Aussel; C. Baccigalupi; A. J. Banday; R. B. Barreiro; R. Barrena; Matthias Bartelmann; J. G. Bartlett; E. Battaner; K. Benabed; A. Benoît; A. Benoit-Lévy; J.-P. Bernard; M. Bersanelli; P. Bielewicz; I. Bikmaev; J. Bobin; J. J. Bock; H. Böhringer; A. Bonaldi; J. R. Bond; J. Borrill; F. R. Bouchet; M. Bridges