Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where P. C. Cramer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by P. C. Cramer.


NCHRP Report | 2008

Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of Wildlife Crossings

John A. Bissonette; P. C. Cramer

This report documents the development of an interactive, web-based decision guide protocol for the selection, configuration, and location of wildlife crossings. For the first time, transportation planners and designers and wildlife ecologists have access to clearly written, structured guidelines to help reduce loss of property and life due to wildlife–vehicle collisions, while protecting wildlife and their habitat. The guidelines were based on goals and needs identified and prioritized by transportation professionals from across North America, and developed using the results of five parallel scientific studies.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Monitoring wildlife-vehicle collisions in the information age: how smartphones can improve data collection.

Daniel D. Olson; John A. Bissonette; P. C. Cramer; Ashley D. Green; Scott T. Davis; Patrick J. Jackson; Daniel C. Coster

Background Currently there is a critical need for accurate and standardized wildlife-vehicle collision data, because it is the underpinning of mitigation projects that protect both drivers and wildlife. Gathering data can be challenging because wildlife-vehicle collisions occur over broad areas, during all seasons of the year, and in large numbers. Collecting data of this magnitude requires an efficient data collection system. Presently there is no widely adopted system that is both efficient and accurate. Methodology/Principal Findings Our objective was to develop and test an integrated smartphone-based system for reporting wildlife-vehicle collision data. The WVC Reporter system we developed consisted of a mobile web application for data collection, a database for centralized storage of data, and a desktop web application for viewing data. The smartphones that we tested for use with the application produced accurate locations (median error = 4.6–5.2 m), and reduced location error 99% versus reporting only the highway/marker. Additionally, mean times for data entry using the mobile web application (22.0–26.5 s) were substantially shorter than using the pen/paper method (52 s). We also found the pen/paper method had a data entry error rate of 10% and those errors were virtually eliminated using the mobile web application. During the first year of use, 6,822 animal carcasses were reported using WVC Reporter. The desktop web application improved access to WVC data and allowed users to easily visualize wildlife-vehicle collision patterns at multiple scales. Conclusions/Significance The WVC Reporter integrated several modern technologies into a seamless method for collecting, managing, and using WVC data. As a result, the system increased efficiency in reporting, improved accuracy, and enhanced visualization of data. The development costs for the system were minor relative to the potential benefits of having spatially accurate and temporally current wildlife-vehicle collision data.


Wildlife Biology | 2015

How does variation in winter weather affect deer—vehicle collision rates?

Daniel D. Olson; John A. Bissonette; P. C. Cramer; Kevin D. Bunnell; Daniel C. Coster; Patrick J. Jackson

Understanding how deer move in relationship to roads is critical, because deer are in vehicle collisions, and collisions cause vehicle damage, as well as human injuries and fatalities. In temperate climates, mule deer Odocoileus hemionus have distinct movement patterns that affect their spatial distribution in relationship to roads. In this paper, we analyzed deer movements during two consecutive winter seasons with vastly different conditions to determine how deer—vehicle collision rates responded. We predicted that deer—vehicle collision rates would be higher when precipitation and snow depth were higher. We used meteorological data from local weather stations to describe temperature, precipitation and snow depth. We monitored deer movements with global positioning system telemetry to document distance of deer to roads, elevation use and road crossing rates. We also documented changes in deer abundance and traffic volumes, which were potentially confounding variables. We found that precipitation decreased 50% and snow depth decreased 48% between winters. In response, deer used habitats that were 16% higher in elevation and that were 213% farther from roads with high traffic volumes. Consequently, crossing rates also decreased as much as 96% on roads with high traffic volumes. Reduced crossing rates were likely responsible for much of the 75% decrease in deer—vehicle collisions that occurred during the second winter. Abundance and traffic volume also can be important factors affecting deer—vehicle collisions rates. However, it is unlikely they were the major drivers of variation in deer—vehicle collisions during our study, because traffic volumes did not change between years and deer abundance only decreased 7%. Our data suggest a mechanism by which variation in winter conditions can contribute to differences in deer—vehicle collision rates between years. These findings have significant management implications for deer—vehicle collision mitigation.


Advances in Ecology | 2014

Vehicle Collisions Cause Differential Age and Sex-Specific Mortality in Mule Deer

Daniel D. Olson; John A. Bissonette; P. C. Cramer; Kevin D. Bunnell; Daniel C. Coster; Patrick J. Jackson

As roads continue to be built and expanded, it is important that managers understand the effects that vehicle-related mortality can have on the population dynamics of wildlife. Our objective was to examine the frequency of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) vehicle collisions to determine if different demographic groups showed differential susceptibility to mortality when compared with their proportion in the population. We also compared vehicle collision rates of mule deer, elk (Cervus canadensis), and moose (Alces alces) to determine their relative vulnerability to vehicle collisions. We found that 65% of mule deer involved in vehicle collisions were female; of those, 40% were adult does ≥2 yrs. When we compared the proportion of bucks, does, and fawns killed in vehicle collisions to surveys of live deer, we found that bucks were killed at rate of 2.1–3.0 times their proportion in the population. Additionally, when we compared vehicle collision rates for 2010 and 2011, we found that mule deer were 7.4–8.7 times more likely to be involved in collisions than elk and 1.2–2.0 times more likely than moose. However, we were unable to detect a negative correlation () between mule deer abundance and increasing traffic volume.


NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice | 2010

New Approaches to Ecological Surveys

P. C. Cramer

During all phases of the transportation planning, development, and operations process environmental data are needed to prepare environmental documents, obtain permits, design and construct road improvements, mitigate or avoid impacts, monitor mitigation, and conduct maintenance activities. The objectives of this synthesis were to survey transportation and natural resource professionals familiar with transportation systems to identify ecological survey needs related to transportation activities and to identify technologies, techniques, and innovative methods to fulfill those needs. These technologies, techniques, and methods, collectively called new approaches, include data collection, its analysis and delivery, how it can be used in planning and operations, and cooperative working relations. The audience for this synthesis includes transportation professionals responsible for planning, designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining transportation projects and the road corridor in an environmentally and fiscally responsible manner, as well as professionals in natural resource agencies and other organizations who work with departments of transportation (DOTs) on these issues. The synthesis is based on an electronic survey conducted in early 2008 that was sent to all state DOTs and state fish and wildlife agencies, and concurrent literature and new initiatives searches.


2005 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET 2005)Federal Highway AdministrationUSDA Forest ServiceU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashington State Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationThe Humane Society of the United StatesDefenders of WildlifeNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh | 2005

Wildlife Crossings in North America: The State of the Science and Practice

P. C. Cramer; John A. Bissonette


Highways: Construction, Management, and Maintenance | 2010

Mitigation Measures to Reduce Impacts on Biodiversity

Clara Grilo; John A. Bissonette; P. C. Cramer


2007 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET 2007)Federal Highway AdministrationUSDA Forest ServiceU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyThe Humane Society of the United StatesDefenders of WildlifeArkansas State Highway and Transportation DepartmentFlorida Department of TransportationWashington State Department of TransportationCalifornia Department of TransportationNew York State Department of TransportationColorado Department of TransportationUniversity of California, DavisWestern Transportation InstituteNorth Carolina State University, RaleighTransportation Research BoardInfra Eco Network of EuropeParks Canada | 2007

Integrating Wildlife Crossing into Transportation Plans and Projects in North America

P. C. Cramer; John A. Bissonette


2013 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET 2013)Federal Highway AdministrationArizona Department of TransportationArizona Game and Fish DepartmentUSDA Forest ServiceNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh | 2013

Design Recommendations from Five Years of Wildlife Crossing Research Across Utah

P. C. Cramer


2011 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET 2011)Federal Highway AdministrationWashington State Department of TransportationUSDA Forest ServiceEnvironmental Protection AgencyUniversity of California, DavisWestern Transportation InstituteDefenders of WildlifeNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh | 2012

Using Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Data to Plan and Implement Transportation Mitigation: Case Studies from Utah

Ashley D. Green; P. C. Cramer; Douglas K Sakaguchi; Nathan H Merrill

Collaboration


Dive into the P. C. Cramer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ashley D. Green

Utah Division of Wildlife Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michelle E. Gadd

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge