P. Carroll
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. Carroll.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Nithyanandan Thyagarajan; Daniel C. Jacobs; Judd D. Bowman; N. Barry; A. P. Beardsley; G. Bernardi; F. Briggs; R. J. Cappallo; P. Carroll; B. E. Corey; A. de Oliveira-Costa; Joshua S. Dillon; D. Emrich; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; R. Goeke; L. J. Greenhill; B. J. Hazelton; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; Natasha Hurley-Walker; M. Johnston-Hollitt; David L. Kaplan; J. Kasper; Han-Seek Kim; P. Kittiwisit; E. Kratzenberg; E. Lenc; J. Line; Abraham Loeb; Colin J. Lonsdale
Detection of 21 cm emission of H I from the epoch of reionization, at redshifts > z 6, is limited primarily by foreground emission. We investigate the signatures of wide-field measurements and an all-sky foreground model using the delay spectrum technique that maps the measurements to foreground object locations through signal delays between antenna pairs. We demonstrate interferometric measurements are inherently sensitive to all scales, including the largest angular scales, owing to the nature of wide-field measurements. These wide-field effects are generic to all observations but antenna shapes impact their amplitudes substantially. A dish-shaped antenna yields the most desirable features from a foreground contamination viewpoint, relative to a dipole or a phased array. Comparing data from recent Murchison Widefield Array observations, we demonstrate that the foreground signatures that have the largest impact on the H I signal arise from power received far away from the primary field of view. We identify diffuse emission near the horizon as a significant contributing factor, even on wide antenna spacings that usually represent structures on small scales. For signals entering through the primary field of view, compact emission dominates the foreground contamination. These two mechanisms imprint a characteristic pitchfork signature on the “foreground wedge” in Fourier delay space. Based on these results, we propose that selective down-weighting of data based on antenna spacing and time can mitigate foreground contamination substantially by a factor of ∼100 with negligible loss of sensitivity.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia | 2015
A. R. Offringa; R. B. Wayth; Natasha Hurley-Walker; David L. Kaplan; N. Barry; A. P. Beardsley; M. E. Bell; G. Bernardi; Judd D. Bowman; F. Briggs; J. R. Callingham; R. J. Cappallo; P. Carroll; A. A. Deshpande; Joshua S. Dillon; K. S. Dwarakanath; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; Bi-Qing For; B. M. Gaensler; L. J. Greenhill; Paul Hancock; B. J. Hazelton; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; L. Hindson; Daniel C. Jacobs; M. Johnston-Hollitt; A. D. Kapińska; Han-Seek Kim; P. Kittiwisit
This is the Accepted Manuscript version of the following article: A. R. Offringa, et al., “The low-frequency environment of the Murchison Widefield Array: radio-frequency interference analysis and mitigation”, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, Vol. 32, March 2015. The final published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2015.7
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
A. R. Offringa; Cathryn M. Trott; Natasha Hurley-Walker; M. Johnston-Hollitt; B. McKinley; N. Barry; Adam P. Beardsley; Judd D. Bowman; F. Briggs; P. Carroll; Joshua S. Dillon; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; B. M. Gaensler; L. J. Greenhill; B. J. Hazelton; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; Daniel C. Jacobs; Han-Seek Kim; P. Kittiwisit; E. Lenc; J. Line; Abraham Loeb; D. A. Mitchell; M. F. Morales; A. R. Neben; S. Paul; B. Pindor; Jonathan C. Pober; P. Procopio
Experiments that pursue detection of signals from the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) are relying on spectral smoothness of source spectra at low frequencies. This article empirically explores the effect of foreground spectra on EoR experiments by measuring high-resolution full-polarization spectra for the 586 brightest unresolved sources in one of the MWA EoR fields using 45 h of observation. A novel peeling scheme is used to subtract 2500 sources from the visibilities with ionospheric and beam corrections, resulting in the deepest, confusion-limited MWA image so far. The resulting spectra are found to be affected by instrumental effects, which limit the constraints that can be set on source-intrinsic spectral structure. The sensitivity and power-spectrum of the spectra are analysed, and it is found that the spectra of residuals are dominated by PSF sidelobes from nearby undeconvolved sources. We release a catalogue describing the spectral parameters for each measured source.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Jonathan C. Pober; B. J. Hazelton; A. P. Beardsley; N. Barry; Z. E. Martinot; I. S. Sullivan; M. F. Morales; M. E. Bell; G. Bernardi; N. D. R. Bhat; Judd D. Bowman; F. Briggs; R. J. Cappallo; P. Carroll; B. E. Corey; A. de Oliveira-Costa; A. A. Deshpande; Joshua S. Dillon; D. Emrich; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; R. Goeke; L. J. Greenhill; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; L. Hindson; Natasha Hurley-Walker; Daniel C. Jacobs; M. Johnston-Hollitt; David L. Kaplan; J. Kasper
In this paper we present observations, simulations, and analysis demonstrating the direct connection between the location of foreground emission on the sky and its location in cosmological power spectra from interferometric redshifted 21 cm experiments. We begin with a heuristic formalism for understanding the mapping of sky coordinates into the cylindrically averaged power spectra measurements used by 21 cm experiments, with a focus on the effects of the instrument beam response and the associated sidelobes. We then demonstrate this mapping by analyzing power spectra with both simulated and observed data from the Murchison Widefield Array. We find that removing a foreground model which includes sources in both the main field-of-view and the first sidelobes reduces the contamination in high k_parallel modes by several percent relative to a model which only includes sources in the main field-of-view, with the completeness of the foreground model setting the principal limitation on the amount of power removed. While small, a percent-level amount of foreground power is in itself more than enough to prevent recovery of any EoR signal from these modes. This result demonstrates that foreground subtraction for redshifted 21 cm experiments is truly a wide-field problem, and algorithms and simulations must extend beyond the main instrument field-of-view to potentially recover the full 21 cm power spectrum.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
A. P. Beardsley; B. J. J. Hazelton; I. S. Sullivan; P. Carroll; N. Barry; M. Rahimi; B. Pindor; Cathryn M. Trott; J. Line; Daniel C. Jacobs; M. F. Morales; Jonathan C. Pober; G. Bernardi; Judd D. Bowman; M. P. Busch; F. Briggs; R. J. Cappallo; B. E. Corey; A. de Oliveira-Costa; Joshua S. Dillon; D. Emrich; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; B. M. Gaensler; R. Goeke; L. J. Greenhill; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; Natasha Hurley-Walker; M. Johnston-Hollitt; David L. Kaplan
The Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) has collected hundreds of hours of Epoch of Reionization (EoR) data and now faces the challenge of overcoming foreground and systematic contamination to reduce the data to a cosmological measurement. We introduce several novel analysis techniques such as cable reflection calibration, hyper-resolution gridding kernels, diffuse foreground model subtraction, and quality control methods. Each change to the analysis pipeline is tested against a two dimensional power spectrum figure of merit to demonstrate improvement. We incorporate the new techniques into a deep integration of 32 hours of MWA data. This data set is used to place a systematic-limited upper limit on the cosmological power spectrum of
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
A. Ewall-Wice; Joshua S. Dillon; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; Abraham Loeb; Andrei Mesinger; A. R. Neben; A. R. Offringa; Max Tegmark; N. Barry; Adam P. Beardsley; G. Bernardi; Judd D. Bowman; F. Briggs; R. J. Cappallo; P. Carroll; B. E. Corey; A. de Oliveira-Costa; D. Emrich; L. Feng; B. M. Gaensler; R. Goeke; L. J. Greenhill; B. J. Hazelton; Natasha Hurley-Walker; M. Johnston-Hollitt; Daniel C. Jacobs; David L. Kaplan; J. Kasper; Han-Seek Kim; E. Kratzenberg
\Delta^2 \leq 2.7 \times 10^4
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Daniel C. Jacobs; B. J. Hazelton; Cathryn M. Trott; Joshua S. Dillon; B. Pindor; I. S. Sullivan; Jonathan C. Pober; N. Barry; A. P. Beardsley; G. Bernardi; Judd D. Bowman; F. Briggs; R. J. Cappallo; P. Carroll; B. E. Corey; A. de Oliveira-Costa; D. Emrich; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; B. M. Gaensler; R. Goeke; L. J. Greenhill; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; Natasha Hurley-Walker; M. Johnston-Hollitt; David L. Kaplan; J. Kasper; Han-Seek Kim; E. Kratzenberg; E. Lenc
mK
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
P. Carroll; J. Line; M. F. Morales; N. Barry; A. P. Beardsley; B. J. Hazelton; D. C. Jacobs; Jonathan C. Pober; I. S. Sullivan; R. L. Webster; G. Bernardi; Judd D. Bowman; F. Briggs; R. J. Cappallo; B. E. Corey; A. de Oliveira-Costa; Joshua S. Dillon; D. Emrich; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; B. M. Gaensler; R. Goeke; L. J. Greenhill; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; N. Hurley-Walker; M. Johnston-Hollitt; D. L. Kaplan; Justin Christophe Kasper; Hs. Kim; E. Kratzenberg
^2
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
S. Paul; Shiv K. Sethi; M. F. Morales; K. S. Dwarkanath; N. Udaya Shankar; Ravi Subrahmanyan; N. Barry; Adam P. Beardsley; Judd D. Bowman; F. Briggs; P. Carroll; A. de Oliveira-Costa; Joshua S. Dillon; A. Ewall-Wice; L. Feng; L. J. Greenhill; B. M. Gaensler; B. J. Hazelton; Jacqueline N. Hewitt; Natasha Hurley-Walker; D. J. Jacobs; Han-Seek Kim; P. Kittiwisit; E. Lenc; J. Line; Abraham Loeb; B. McKinley; D. A. Mitchell; A. R. Neben; A. R. Offringa
at
The Astrophysical Journal | 2012
M. J. Jee; Andisheh Mahdavi; Henk Hoekstra; Arif Babul; Julianne J. Dalcanton; P. Carroll; P. Capak
k=0.27