P Cazenave
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P Cazenave.
Journal of Applied Ecology | 2016
James J. Waggitt; P Cazenave; Ricardo Torres; Benjamin Williamson; Beth E. Scott
Acknowledgements: James J. Waggitt was funded by a NERC Case studentship supported by OpenHydro Ltd and Marine Scotland Science (NE/J500148/1). Vessel-based transects were funded by a NERC (NE/J004340/1) and a Scottish National Heritage (SNH) grant. FVCOM modelling was funded by a NERC grant (NE/J004316/1). Marine Scotland Science provided time on the FRV Alba-na-Mara as part as the Marine Collaboration Research Forum (MarCRF). The bathymetry data used in hydrodynamic models (HI 1122 Sanday Sound to Westray Firth) was collected by the Maritime & Coastguard Agency (MCA) as part of the UK Civil Hydrography Programme. We wish to thank Christina Bristow, Matthew Finn and Jennifer Norris at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC); Marianna Chimienti, Ciaran Cronin, Tim Sykes and Stuart Thomas for performing vessel-based transects; Marine Scotland Science staff Eric Armstrong, Ian Davies, Mike Robertson, Robert Watret and Michael Stewart for their assistance; Shaun Fraser, Pauline Goulet, Alex Robbins, Helen Wade and Jared Wilson for invaluable discussions; Thomas Cornulier, Alex Douglas, James Grecian and Samantha Patrick for their help with statistical analysis; and Gavin Siriwardena, Leigh Torres, Mark Whittingham and Russell Wynn for their constructive comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. APC paid through institutional prepayment scheme
Biology Letters | 2018
James J. Waggitt; P Cazenave; Leigh M. Howarth; Peter G.H. Evans; Jeroen van der Kooij; Jan Geert Hiddink
Understanding links between habitat characteristics and foraging efficiency helps predict how environmental changes influence populations of top predators. This study examines whether measurements of prey (clupeids) availability varied over stratification gradients, and determined if any of those measurements coincided with aggregations of foraging seabirds (common guillemot Uria aalge and Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus) in the Celtic Sea, UK. The probability of encountering foraging seabirds was highest around fronts between mixed and stratified water. Prey were denser and shallower in mixed water, whilst encounters with prey were most frequent in stratified water. Therefore, no single measurement of increased prey availability coincided with the location of fronts. However, when considered in combination, overall prey availability was highest in these areas. These results show that top predators may select foraging habitats by trading-off several measurements of prey availability. By showing that top predators select areas where prey switch between behaviours, these results also identify a mechanism that could explain the wider importance of edge habitats for these taxa. As offshore developments (e.g. marine renewable energy installations) change patterns of stratification, their construction may have consequences on the foraging efficiency of seabirds.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Jozef Skákala; P Cazenave; Timothy J. Smyth; Ricardo Torres
We are in an era of unprecedented data volumes generated from observations and model simulations. This is particularly true from satellite Earth Observations (EO) and global scale oceanographic models. This presents us with an opportunity to evaluate large scale oceanographic model outputs using EO data. Previous work on model skill evaluation has led to a plethora of metrics. The paper defines two new model skill evaluation metrics. The metrics are based on the theory of universal multifractals and their purpose is to measure the structural similarity between the model predictions and the EO data. The two metrics have the following advantages over the standard techniques: a) they are scale-free, b) they carry important part of information about how model represents different oceanographic drivers. Those two metrics are then used in the paper to evaluate the performance of the FVCOM model in the shelf seas around the south-west coast of the UK.
Geoscientific Model Development | 2016
Momme Butenschön; James R. Clark; John Aldridge; J.I. Allen; Yuri Artioli; J.C. Blackford; Jorn Bruggeman; P Cazenave; Stefano Ciavatta; Susan Kay; Gennadi Lessin; Sonja M. van Leeuwen; Johan van der Molen; Lee de Mora; Luca Polimene; Sevrine F. Sailley; Nicholas Stephens; Ricardo Torres
Marine Geology | 2013
Vicki Lynn Ferrini; Donna J. Shillington; Kathryn M. Gillis; Christopher J. MacLeod; Damon A. H. Teagle; Antony Morris; P Cazenave; Stephen D. Hurst; Masako Tominaga
Progress in Oceanography | 2016
P Cazenave; Ricardo Torres; J. Icarus Allen
Ices Journal of Marine Science | 2016
James J. Waggitt; P Cazenave; Ricardo Torres; Benjamin Williamson; Beth E. Scott
Energy Policy | 2016
Robert A. Holland; Kate Scott; Emma Hinton; Melanie C. Austen; John Barrett; Nicola Beaumont; Tina Blaber-Wegg; Gareth Brown; Eleanor Carter-Silk; P Cazenave; Felix Eigenbrod; Kevin M. Hiscock; Tara Hooper; Andrew Lovett; Eleni Papathanasopoulou; Pete Smith; Amy Thomas; Rob Tickner; Ricardo Torres; Gail Taylor
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Mingxi Yang; Thomas G. Bell; Frances E. Hopkins; Vassilis Kitidis; P Cazenave; Philip D. Nightingale; Margaret J. Yelland; Robin W. Pascal; John Prytherch; Ian M. Brooks; Timothy J. Smyth
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2013
P Cazenave; Justin K. Dix; David O. Lambkin; Lisa C. McNeill