Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where P.D. Siciliano is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by P.D. Siciliano.


Journal of Animal Science | 2013

The effect of different feed delivery methods on time to consume feed and the resulting changes in postprandial metabolite concentrations in horses1

J. Kutzner-Mulligan; Joan H. Eisemann; P.D. Siciliano; J. Smith; K. Hewitt; J. Sharlette; S.E. Pratt-Phillips

Management techniques that reduce the insulin response to feeding in horses have application in preventing insulin resistance (IR) and potential associations (e.g., laminitis). Eight mature idle horses of BCS between 5 and 6.5 and with no previous indication of IR were fed a meal of concentrate under 4 feed delivery treatments in a repeated Latin Square design. Treatments were all based on a bucket of equal dimensions. The treatments included a control (CON) and 3 treatments hypothesized to increase time to consume feed (TCF): mobile obstacles above the feed (BALL), stationary obstacles below the feed (WAFF), and feed with water added (WTR). Jugular venous blood samples were taken at feed delivery, every 10 min for the first hour, and then every 30 min until 300 min after feed delivery. The TCF was different across treatment and was greater (P < 0.05) for BALL and WAFF when compared with CON and WTR. Glucose and insulin concentrations increased after feeding (P < 0.05) and tended to differ among treatments (P < 0.10). Peak insulin and glucose concentrations were affected by treatment as were the time to peak insulin and the area under the curve of insulin (P < 0.05). Therefore, feed delivery methods that include obstacles effectively increase TCF and attenuate postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations. A second experiment was designed to determine if the TCF changes associated with BALL and WAFF in Exp. 1 remain effective over a 4-d period. Four horses with no recent or regular history of consuming concentrates were fed concentrate meals for 4 consecutive d using the same treatments described in Exp. 1 and a Latin square design. Horses were subject to a 4-d adaptation period and were randomly assigned to 4-d treatment periods using the 4 previously described treatments. During adaptation, TCF decreased over time (P = 0.02). After adaptation, WAFF had greater TCF when compared with CON and WTR (P < 0.05) whereas WTR had the lowest TCF overall. Using obstacles to increase TCF on a daily basis may be an effective method to reduce postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations, thereby decreasing the risk of IR development in horses.


Journal of Animal Science | 2014

Intake estimation of horses grazing tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) or fed tall fescue hay

S.J. Chavez; P.D. Siciliano; G. B. Huntington

Six mature geldings of light horse breeds (557 ± 37 kg) were randomly assigned to a nontoxic endophyte-infected tall fescue hay (n = 3) or pasture treatment (n = 3) in a crossover design with 14-d periods to estimate DMI with alkane markers and to compare DMI of hay and pasture. When fed pasture, horses were housed in stalls from 0700 to 1300 h daily with access to water and then grazed pasture as a group in a single 0.4 ha pasture from 1300 to 0700 h. When fed hay, horses were maintained individually in stalls and given access to hay ad libitum from 1300 to 0700 h. All horses were individually fed 225 g oats twice daily treated with hexatriacontane (C36; external marker) and fecal samples were collected at 0700 and 1900 h on d 10 to 14. Fecal samples were mixed, dried, subsampled, and analyzed for tritriacontane (C33) and hentriacontane (C31) as internal markers and C36 as the external marker using gas chromatography. Estimated hay DMI using either C33 (1.75 kg/100 kg BW) or C31 (1.74 kg/100 kg BW) as internal alkane marker did not differ (P = 0.55) from measured hay DMI (1.70 kg/100 kg BW). Pasture DMI and DM digestibility (DMD) estimated with C31 (2.24 kg/100 kg BW and 53.1 g/100 g DMI) or with C33 (2.34 kg/100 kg BW and 56.2 g/100 g DMI) was greater (P = 0.05) than hay DMI and DMD (1.74 kg/100 kg BW and 44.5 g/100 g DMI). Intake estimated with C33 or C31 did not differ (P = 0.35) during hay or pasture. In conclusion, alkanes can be used to estimate pasture or hay DMI and DMD, and pasture intake exceeded hay intake when offered ad libitum.


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2017

A Review of Equine Grazing Research Methodologies

K.L. Martinson; P.D. Siciliano; Craig C. Sheaffer; B.J. McIntosh; A.M. Swinker; Carey A. Williams

ABSTRACT Recently, there has been a renewed interest and an increase in published research on equine grazing and pasture management. The objectives of this paper are to review equine grazing research methodologies with an aim to encourage standardized research procedures. This review highlights standard methods used in equine pasture‐related research, including use of climate data and soil type; seed bed preparation and grazing management; determining forage nutritive value; defining forage maturity; tracking horse health parameters; evaluating different grazing systems; and future technologies. This review covers in‐depth discussions on determining forage biomass yield, forage populations, ground cover, persistence, forage intake, and grazing behavior. Specifically, mechanical harvesting, hand clipping, rising plate meter, and falling plate meter are all methods used to determine forage biomass yield. Frequency grid, point sampling, visual assessment, Natural Resources Conservation Service pasture condition score, and the double Dominant, Abundant, Frequent, Occasional, Rare (DAFOR) scale can be used to track forage populations, ground cover, and persistence of pasture species. Three primary methods have been used when estimating horse forage intake including the difference between pre‐ and postgrazing herbage mass, the difference in pre‐ and postgrazing bodyweight, and use of digestibility and fecal output markers. Equine grazing behavior has been described by investigating preference, pre‐ and post‐sward height, and bite and mastication rate. Awareness of key methodologies should encourage movement toward research protocol standardization that will allow for scientific comparisons and application of pasture‐related research results across the horse industry. HIGHLIGHTSThe objectives of this paper are to review equine grazing research methodologies.The goal is to encourage movement toward research protocol standardization.Forage yield, ground cover, persistence, intake, and behavior are discussed.Forage maturity, horse health, and different grazing systems are also discussed.


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2013

Production and environmental implications of equine grazing

R.C. Bott; E.A. Greene; Katherine M. Koch; K.L. Martinson; P.D. Siciliano; Carey A. Williams; N. L. Trottier; Amy O. Burk; A.M. Swinker


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2009

Variation of Insulin Sensitivity Estimates in Horses

S.E. Pratt; P.D. Siciliano; L. Walston


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2013

Effect of Restricted Pasture Access on Pasture Dry Matter Intake Rate, Dietary Energy Intake, and Fecal pH in Horses

Emily C. Glunk; S.E. Pratt-Phillips; P.D. Siciliano


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2012

Determination of Pasture Dry Matter Intake Rates in Different Seasons and Their Application in Grazing Management

Lauren E. Dowler; P.D. Siciliano; S.E. Pratt-Phillips; M. H. Poore


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2009

Prediction of Hourly Pasture Dry Matter Intake in Horses

Lauren E. Dowler; P.D. Siciliano


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2011

Effect of Restricted Grazing on Dry Matter Intake Rate

E.C. Glunk; P.D. Siciliano


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2012

Effect of Restricted Grazing on Hindgut pH and Fluid Balance

P.D. Siciliano; Sterling Schmitt

Collaboration


Dive into the P.D. Siciliano's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S.E. Pratt-Phillips

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.C. Gill

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lauren E. Dowler

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A.M. Swinker

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S.J. Chavez

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A.C. Pearson

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.C. Sykes

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.L. Wycoff

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge