P. Dubsky

Dendritic Cell-Based Vaccination in Solid Cancer

PURPOSEnDendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy is rapidly emerging as a viable tool in cancer treatment. This approach has been used mostly in patients in the presence of defined tumor antigens such as melanoma. In this study, cancer patients with advanced disease that lacks defined tumor antigens were vaccinated with tumor lysate-pulsed DCs.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnTwenty patients (pancreatic, hepatocellular, cholangiocellular, and medullary thyroid carcinoma) with stage IV disease were enrolled in the study. In 3-week intervals, freshly isolated autologous CD14 magnetic bead-selected monocytes were cultured in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-4 to obtain immature DCs. These cells were pulsed with autologous tumor lysate and matured with tumor necrosis factor alpha. Mature DCs were applied into a groin lymph node, under ultrasound guidance. Adjuvant interleukin-2 (20,000 U/kg) was given subcutaneously daily, for 12 days, after each vaccination. Toxicity, tumor marker profile, immune response, and clinical response were determined.nnnRESULTSnVaccination was well tolerated. No physical signs of autoimmunity were detected. DC vaccination induced delayed-type hypersensitivity reactivity in 18 patients. Tumor marker responses were observed in eight patients. In addition, in three patients the generation of interferon gamma-positive T cells was induced during the vaccination. Objective changes in measurable lesions or tumor markers were evident in seven of 20 assessed patients. None of the patients was found to meet the criteria for partial or complete responses.nnnCONCLUSIONnThese data indicate that vaccination with autologous tumor-pulsed DCs generated from peripheral blood is safe and can induce tumor-specific cellular cytotoxicity. Clinical responses are achievable, even in patients with advanced disease.

EndoPredict improves the prognostic classification derived from common clinical guidelines in ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer

Background In early estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, the decision to administer chemotherapy is largely based on prognostic criteria. The combined molecular/clinical EndoPredict test (EPclin) has been validated to accurately assess prognosis in this population. In this study, the clinical relevance of EPclin in relation to well-established clinical guidelines is assessed. Patients and methods We assigned risk groups to 1702 ER-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal women from two large phase III trials treated only with endocrine therapy. Prognosis was assigned according to National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network-, German S3-, St Gallen guidelines and the EPclin. Prognostic groups were compared using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results After 10 years, absolute risk reductions (ARR) between the high- and low-risk groups ranged from 6.9% to 11.2% if assigned according to guidelines. It was at 18.7% for EPclin. EPclin reassigned 58%–61% of women classified as high-/intermediate-risk (according to clinical guidelines) to low risk. Women reclassified to low risk showed a 5% rate of distant metastasis at 10 years. Conclusion The EPclin score is able to predict favorable prognosis in a majority of patients that clinical guidelines would assign to intermediate or high risk. EPclin may reduce the indications for chemotherapy in ER-positive postmenopausal women with a limited number of clinical risk factors.

Do we need HER-2/neu testing for all patients with primary breast carcinoma?

HER‐2/neu is a valuable prognostic marker in primary breast carcinoma. Controversy surrounds the correlation between HER‐2/neu expression and other prognostic markers, as has been discussed in preclinical and clinical studies. The objective of the current study was to investigate the probability, calculated using parameters that are assessed routinely in clinical practice, that patients with breast carcinoma had positive HER‐2/neu status.

Impact of anti-HER2 therapy on overall survival in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients with brain metastases

Background:Trastuzumab-based therapy after diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) may improve survival due to prolonged systemic disease control. We investigated whether lapatinib may yield additional survival benefit.Methods:Eighty patients with BM from HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of at least 70 was required. We included a control group of 37 patients treated before 2003, when continuation of trastuzumab after diagnosis of BM was not yet recommended. Remainders received either trastuzumab or lapatinib and trastuzumab (either concomitantly or sequentially) with or without chemotherapy.Results:Median overall survival (OS) in patients receiving trastuzumab after diagnosis of BM was 13 months; corresponding numbers were 9 months in patients treated with chemotherapy, and 3 months with radiotherapy alone. Median OS was not reached in the lapatinib group. Addition of lapatinib prolonged OS over trastuzumab alone (P=0.002). After correction for potential confounders, lapatinib therapy remained an independent positive predictor for survival (HR 0.279; P=0.012).Interpretation:This retrospective single-centre study suggests that the introduction of lapatinib improved survival in patients with BM from HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients with KPS ⩾70 may benefit when treated with lapatinib in addition to trastuzumab after completion of local therapy.

Prognostic markers in breast cancer: the reliability of HER2/neu status in core needle biopsy of 325 patients with primary breast cancer

ZusammenfassungHintergrundDie Bestimmung einer HER2/neu-Überexpression im Gewebe eines Mammakarzinoms gibt Aufschluss über einen wichtigen prognostischen und prädiktiven Marker. Eine Überexpression von HER2/neu ist beim Mammakarzinom mit einer schlechten Prognose assoziiert. Da die Nadelbiopsie zunehmend in der Diagnostik des Mammakarzinoms angewandt wird, war es unser Ziel die Zuverlässigkeit der HER2/neu-Bestimmung in der Nadelbiopsie bei Patientinnen mit primärem Mammakarzinom zu evaluieren.Patienten und MethodenWir untersuchten an 325 Patientinnen mit primärem Mammakarzinom die Genauigkeit der immunhistochemischen HER2/neu-Bestimmung in der Nadelbiopsie verglichen mit dem Operationspräparat. Bei Patientinnen mit stark positivem HER2/neu Status wurde zusätzlich eine Fluoreszenz in situ Hybridisierung (FISH) der Nadelbiopsie durchgeführt.ErgebnisseDie Genauigkeit der HER2/neu-Bestimmung in der Nadelbiopsie verglichen mit dem Operationspräparat durch Immunhistochemie alleine war 92% und konnte durch zusätzliche FISH Analyse auf 96% und werden (gewichteter Kappa Koeffizient: 0,86).DiskussionWir konnten an diesem großen Patientenkollektiv zeigen, dass die Bestimmung von HER2/neu in der Nadelbiopsie beim Mammakarzinom verlässlich ist. Bei immunhistochemisch stark positivem HER2/neu Status in der Nadelbiopsie sollte dies durch FISH überprüft werden, um die Zahl der falsch positiven Ergebnisse zu minimieren.SummaryIntroductionThe assessment of HER2/neu overexpression in tissue provides information about one of the most relevant prognostic and predictive markers in breast cancer: overexpression of HER2/neu is associated with worse prognosis in primary breast cancer. Since core needle biopsy is increasingly used for the diagnosis of breast cancer, the purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of HER2/neu evaluation using this technique in patients with primary breast cancer.Patients and methodsWe investigated the accuracy of immunohistochemical assessment of HER2/neu in core needle biopsies compared with surgically obtained specimens in 325 patients with primary breast cancer. In patients strongly positive for HER2/neu, additional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of needle biopsies was performed.ResultsUsing immunohistochemistry alone, accuracy of HER2/neu assessment in core biopsies in relation to surgically removed specimens was 92% and increased to 96% with additional FISH analysis (weighted Kappa coefficient: 0.86).DiscussionAs proven with this large series of patients, the assessment of HER2/neu status by core needle biopsy in breast cancer is accurate. Notwithstanding, in order to minimize the number of false-positive results, strongly positive core needle biopsies identified using immunohistochemistry should be confirmed by FISH analysis.

Brain metastases free survival differs between breast cancer subtypes

Background:Brain metastases (BM) are frequently diagnosed in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer; in addition, an increasing incidence was reported for triple-negative tumours. We aimed to compare brain metastases free survival (BMFS) of breast cancer subtypes in patients treated between 1996 until 2010.Methods:Brain metastases free survival was measured as the interval from diagnosis of extracranial breast cancer metastases until diagnosis of BM. HER-2 status was analysed by immunohistochemistry and reanalysed by fluorescent in situ hybridisation if a score of 2+ was gained. Oestrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PgR) status was analysed by immunohistochemistry. Brain metastases free survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.Results:Data of 213 patients (46 luminal/124 HER-2/43 triple-negative subtype) with BM from breast cancer were available for the analysis. Brain metastases free survival differed significantly between breast cancer subtypes. Median BMFS in triple-negative tumours was 14 months (95% CI: 11.34–16.66) compared with 18 months (95% CI: 14.46–21.54) in HER-2-positive tumours (P=0.001) and 34 months (95% CI: 23.71–44.29) in luminal tumours (P=0.001), respectively. In HER-2-positive patients, co-positivity for ER and HER-2 prolonged BMFS (26 vs 15u2009m; P=0.033); in luminal tumours, co-expression of ER and PgR was not significantly associated with BMFS. Brain metastases free survival in patients with lung metastases was significantly shorter (17 vs 21 months; P=0.014).Conclusion:Brain metastases free survival in triple-negative breast cancer, as well as in HER-2-positive/ER-negative, is significantly shorter compared with HER-2/ER co-positive or luminal tumours, mirroring the aggressiveness of these breast cancer subtypes.

Influence of neoadjuvant therapy with epirubicin and docetaxel on the expression of HER2/neu in patients with breast cancer.

AbstractBackground. In primary breast cancer, the expression levels of biological markers relevant to the progression of the disease may be altered by administration of anticancer drugs. Since neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and docetaxel is increasingly used in advanced breast cancer, our purpose was to assess the influence of this neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the expression of the growth factor receptor HER2/neu.nPatients and methods. We investigated changes of HER2/neu status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and applied additional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in patients with potential modulation of HER2/neu status after administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and epirubicin in 97 breast cancer patients. The influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on HER2/neu expression was calculated by correlation of HER2/neu status before and after chemotherapy.nResults. The accuracy of HER2/neu assessment before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy by IHC combined with FISH analysis in selected cases was 100%. The evaluation of HER2/neu status in these patients by IHC alone yielded accuracy of 93%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and docetaxel caused no significant modulation of HER2/neu status (p = 0.66).nDiscussion. The administration of epirubicin and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting is not associated with significant changes of HER2/neu status in primary breast cancer. As a consequence, drug resistance or sensitivity is not induced by modulation of HER2/neu expression. Moreover, the time of assessment of the HER2/neu status is not a critical factor under neoadjuvant therapy with epirubicin and docetaxel.

HER2/neu expression correlates with vascular endothelial growth factor-C and lymphangiogenesis in lymph node-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUNDnVascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) is the main inducer of lymphangiogenesis. VEGF-C overexpression is associated with lymphovascular tumor cell invasion, an increased rate of lymph node metastasis and adverse prognosis in various human cancers. However, little is known about the upstream inducers of VEGF-C expression. Recent studies have shown that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) overexpression is associated with high VEGF-C levels in human breast cancer cells. In addition to blocking of HER2/neu, tyrosine kinase significantly decreased VEGF-C expression in vitro.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnVEGF-C expression, lymphatic microvessel density (LMVD), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and HER2/neu expression were evaluated with immunohistochemical/FISH methods in a collective of 150 lymph node-positive human breast cancers with long-term follow-up.nnnRESULTSnCases with 3+ HER2/neu protein expression showed a significantly stronger VEGF-C expression than all others cases (P = 0.006). In addition, we found a significant correlation between VEGF-C expression and LMVD (P = 0.012) and a strong positive association between LMVD and LVI (P < 0.001).nnnCONCLUSIONnOur data provide evidence for a clinically relevant association between HER2/neu and VEGF-C expression in human breast cancer. Inhibiting HER2/neu may reduce tumor progression by blocking VEGF-C-mediated tumor cell proliferation and lymphogenic metastasis.

Prognostic Value of Number of Removed Lymph Nodes, Number of Involved Lymph Nodes, and Lymph Node Ratio in 7502 Breast Cancer Patients Enrolled onto Trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG)

PurposeThe number of removed axillary lymph nodes and the ratio of involved to removed lymph nodes are described as independent prognostic factors beside the absolute number of involved lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. The correlation between these factors and prognosis were investigated in trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG).MethodsThis retrospective analysis is based on the data of 7052 patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer who were randomized in four trials of the ABCSG in the years 1990–2006 and underwent axillary lymph node dissection. The prognostic value of number of removed nodes (NRN), number of involved nodes (NIN), and ratio of involved to removed nodes (lymph node ratio, LNR) concerning recurrence-free survival and overall survival was analyzed.ResultsA total of 2718 patients had node-positive disease. No correlation was found between NRN and prognosis. Increasing NIN and LNR were significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and overall survival in univariate and multivariate analyses (Pxa0<xa0.001). Only in the subgroup of patients with one to three positive lymph nodes and treated with mastectomy (nxa0=xa0728) was LNR an additional prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.ConclusionsFor breast cancer patients stringently medicated in the framework of prospective adjuvant clinical trials and requiring a mandatory minimum of removed nodes, NRN does not influence prognosis, and LNR is not superior to NIN as prognostic factor. In patients with one to three positive lymph nodes and mastectomy, LNR could play a role as an additional prognostic factor.

Five-Year Follow-up After Heart Valve Replacement With the CarboMedics Bileaflet Prosthesis

BACKGROUNDnThe CarboMedics valve is a relatively new, low-profile, bileaflet, mechanical prosthesis. The results of a prospective follow-up study after valve replacement with this prosthesis in a university hospital are presented.nnnMETHODSnWe implanted 640 CarboMedics prostheses in 583 patients in the aortic (n = 359), mitral (n = 167), or aortic and mitral positions (double valve replacement; n = 57). Patient ages ranged from 11 to 81 years (mean age, 58 +/- 12.3 years).nnnRESULTSnOverall hospital mortality was 9.0%; however, when high-risk urgent cases were removed from the calculation, the operative mortality fell to 4.5%. Follow-up was 98% complete, comprising 2,027 patient-years for a mean follow-up of 44 months (range, 6 to 72 months). Actuarial freedom from complications (linearized rates in parentheses) was as follows: late mortality, 85% +/- 2.0% (2.3%/patient-year); thromboembolism, 92% +/- 1.1% (1.6%/patient-year); anticoagulation-related hemorrhage, 87% +/- 1.2% (2.8%/patient-year); prosthetic valve endocarditis, 98% +/- 0.5% (0.1%/patient-year); and overall valve-related morbidity and mortality, 76% +/- 2.1% (4.3%/ patient-year).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe CarboMedics valve shows a low rate of valve-related complications comparable with other new mechanical heart valve prostheses.