P.-E. Tremblay
University of Warwick
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P.-E. Tremblay.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
P.-E. Tremblay; Jeffrey D. Cummings; Jason S. Kalirai; B. T. Gänsicke; N. Gentile-Fusillo; R. Raddi
We revisit the properties and astrophysical implications of the field white dwarf mass distribution in preparation of Gaia applications. Our study is based on the two samples with the best established completeness and most precise atmospheric parameters, the volume-complete survey within 20 pc and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) magnitude-limited sample. We explore the modelling of the observed mass distributions with Monte Carlo simulations, but find that it is difficult to constrain independently the initial mass function (IMF), the initial-to-final-mass relation (IFMR), the stellar formation history (SFH), the variation of the Galactic disc vertical scale height as a function of stellar age, and binary evolution. Each of these input ingredients has a moderate effect on the predicted mass distributions, and we must also take into account biases owing to unidentified faint objects (20 pc sample), as well as unknown masses for magnetic white dwarfs and spectroscopic calibration issues (SDSS sample). Nevertheless, we find that fixed standard assumptions for the above parameters result in predicted mean masses that are in good qualitative agreement with the observed values. It suggests that derived masses for both studied samples are consistent with our current knowledge of stellar and Galactic evolution. Our simulations overpredict by 40–50 per cent the number of massive white dwarfs (M > 0.75 M⊙) for both surveys, although we can not exclude a Salpeter IMF when we account for all biases. Furthermore, we find no evidence of a population of double white dwarf mergers in the observed mass distributions.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
P.-E. Tremblay; N. Gentile-Fusillo; R. Raddi; Stefan Jordan; C. Besson; B. T. Gänsicke; S. G. Parsons; D. Koester; T. R. Marsh; Ralph C. Bohlin; Jason S. Kalirai; Susana Elizabeth Deustua
The Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) sample of white dwarf parallaxes is presented, including six directly observed degenerates and 46 white dwarfs in wide binaries. This data set is combined with spectroscopic atmospheric parameters to study the white dwarf mass–radius relationship (MRR). Gaia parallaxes and G magnitudes are used to derive model atmosphere-dependent white dwarf radii, which can then be compared to the predictions of a theoretical MRR. We find a good agreement between Gaia DR1 parallaxes, published effective temperatures (Teff) and surface gravities (log g), and theoretical MRRs. As it was the case for Hipparcos, the precision of the data does not allow for the characterization of hydrogen envelope masses. The uncertainties on the spectroscopic atmospheric parameters are found to dominate the error budget and current error estimates for well-known and bright white dwarfs may be slightly optimistic. With the much larger Gaia DR2 white dwarf sample, it will be possible to explore the MRR over a much wider range of mass, Teff, and spectral types.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Jeffrey D. Cummings; Jason S. Kalirai; P.-E. Tremblay; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz
We observed a sample of 10 white dwarf candidates in the rich open cluster NGC 2323 (M50) with the Keck Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer. The spectroscopy shows eight to be DA white dwarfs, with six of these having high signal-to-noise ratio appropriate for our analysis. Two of these white dwarfs are consistent with singly evolved cluster membership, and both are high mass ~1.07 M⊙, and give equivalent progenitor masses of 4.69 M⊙. To supplement these new high-mass white dwarfs and analyze the initial–final mass relation (IFMR), we also looked at 30 white dwarfs from publicly available data that are mostly all high-mass (
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
R. Raddi; S. Catalán; B. T. Gänsicke; J. J. Hermes; Ralf Napiwotzki; D. Koester; P.-E. Tremblay; G. Barentsen; H. J. Farnhill; M. Mohr-Smith; Janet E. Drew; P. Groot; L. Guzman-Ramirez; Quentin A. Parker; D. Steeghs; Albert A. Zijlstra
\gtrsim 0.9
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Jeffrey D. Cummings; Jason S. Kalirai; P.-E. Tremblay; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; P. Bergeron
M⊙). These original published data exhibited significant scatter, and to test if this scatter is true or simply the result of systematics, we have uniformly analyzed the white dwarf spectra and have adopted thorough photometric techniques to derive uniform cluster parameters for their parent clusters. The resulting IFMR scatter is significantly reduced, arguing that mass-loss rates are not stochastic in nature and that within the ranges of metallicity and mass analyzed in this work mass loss is not highly sensitive to variations in metallicity. Lastly, when adopting cluster ages based on Y2 isochrones, the slope of the high-mass IFMR remains steep and consistent with that found from intermediate-mass white dwarfs, giving a linear IFMR from progenitor masses between 3 and 6.5 M⊙. In contrast, when adopting the slightly younger cluster ages based on PARSEC isochrones, the high-mass IFMR has a moderate turnover near an initial mass of 4 M⊙.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Keaton J. Bell; J. J. Hermes; M. H. Montgomery; N. P. Gentile Fusillo; R. Raddi; B. T. Gänsicke; D. E. Winget; E. Dennihy; A. Gianninas; P.-E. Tremblay; P. Chote; K. I. Winget
We investigated the prospects for systematic searches of white dwarfs at low Galactic latitudes, using the VLT Survey Telescope (VST) H
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
J. J. Hermes; B. T. Gänsicke; D. Steeghs; Keaton J. Bell; R. Raddi; P.-E. Tremblay; E. Breedt; Gavin Ramsay; D. Koester; Philip J. Carter; Z. Vanderbosch; D. E. Winget; K. I. Winget
\alpha
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
S. G. Parsons; J. J. Hermes; T. R. Marsh; B. T. Gänsicke; P.-E. Tremblay; S. P. Littlefair; D. I. Sahman; R. P. Ashley; M. J. Green; S. Rattanasoon; V. S. Dhillon; M. R. Burleigh; S. L. Casewell; D. Buckley; I. P. Braker; P. Irawati; E. Dennihy; P. Rodríguez-Gil; D. E. Winget; K. I. Winget; Keaton J. Bell; Mukremin Kilic
Photometric Survey of the Galactic plane and Bulge (VPHAS+). We targeted 17 white dwarf candidates along sightlines of known open clusters, aiming to identify potential cluster members. We confirmed all the 17 white dwarf candidates from blue/optical spectroscopy, and we suggest five of them to be likely cluster members. We estimated progenitor ages and masses for the candidate cluster members, and compared our findings to those for other cluster white dwarfs. A white dwarf in NGC 3532 is the most massive known cluster member (1.13 M
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
R. Raddi; N. P. Gentile Fusillo; Anna F. Pala; J. J. Hermes; Boris T. Gaensicke; P. Chote; M. A. Hollands; Arne A. Henden; S. Catalán; S. Geier; D. Koester; Ulisse Munari; R. Napiwotzki; P.-E. Tremblay
_{\odot}
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2017
J. J. Hermes; B. T. Gänsicke; Steven D. Kawaler; P.-E. Tremblay; N. P. Gentile Fusillo; R. Raddi; S. M. Fanale; Keaton J. Bell; E. Dennihy; J. T. Fuchs; B. H. Dunlap; J. C. Clemens; M. H. Montgomery; D. E. Winget; P. Chote; T. R. Marsh; Seth Redfield
), likely with an oxygen-neon core, for which we estimate an