P. H. N. Pinto
Federal Fluminense University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. H. N. Pinto.
Reproduction, Fertility and Development | 2018
G. M. Bragança; R. I. T. P. Batista; J. M. G. Souza-Fabjan; V. A. P. Alfradique; Eduardo Kenji Nunes Arashiro; Isabel Oliveira Cosentino; P. H. N. Pinto; Luiz Sérgio de Almeida Camargo; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
The present study evaluated the effect of four ovarian stimulation protocols on the follicular population and molecular status of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs). Twelve Santa Inês ewes (in a cross-over design) received 80 or 120mg FSH alone in a multiple-dose (MD80 and MD120) regimen or in combination with 300IU equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) in a one-shot (OS80 and OS120) protocol. The follicular population, COC recovery rate, mean COCs per ewe and the rate of brilliant Cresyl blue-positive (BCB+) COCs were similar among treatments (P>0.05). The expression of markers of oocyte competence (ZAR1, zygote arrest 1; MATER, maternal antigen that embryo requires; GDF9, growth differentiation factor 9; BMP15, bone morphogenetic protein 15; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; BAX, Bcl-2 associated X protein) and the steroidogenic pathway (ERα, oestrogen receptor α; LHr, LH receptor; FSHr, FSH receptor; STAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein) was affected by stimulation. Specifically, the expression of markers of the steroidogenic pathway was reduced with increasing FSH dose in the OS protocol. FSH at a dose of 80mg reduced the expression of FSHr and ERα in the OS versus MD protocol. Conversely, in MD protocol, only LHr was affected by increasing FSH dose. In conclusion, 80mg FSH in the MD or OS protocol was sufficient to promote the development of multiple follicles and obtain fully grown (BCB+) oocytes. The MD protocol may be more appropriate for the production of better-quality oocytes.
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2018
Sheylla Foligno de Carvalho Menezes de Almeida; J. M. G. Souza-Fabjan; M. F. A. Balaro; G. M. Bragança; P. H. N. Pinto; José Gabriel de Almeida; Ana Beatriz Bossois Moura; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
Theriogenology | 2018
Eduardo Kenji Nunes Arashiro; Rodolfo Ungerfeld; Raquel Perez Clariget; P. H. N. Pinto; M. F. A. Balaro; G. M. Bragança; Lilian dos Santos Ribeiro; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
Theriogenology | 2018
P. H. N. Pinto; M. F. A. Balaro; J. M. G. Souza-Fabjan; Lilian dos Santos Ribeiro; G. M. Bragança; C. R. Leite; Eduardo Kenji Nunes Arashiro; Kleibe de Moraes Silva; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
Theriogenology | 2018
H. F. R. A. Saraiva; R. I. T. P. Batista; V. A. P. Alfradique; P. H. N. Pinto; Lilian dos Santos Ribeiro; C. S. Oliveira; J. M. G. Souza-Fabjan; Luiz Sérgio de Almeida Camargo; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
Archive | 2012
J. F. da Fonseca; R. do C. Cruz; P. H. N. Pinto; Olivardo Facó
Reproduction in Domestic Animals | 2018
Juliana Dantas Rodrigues Santos; Eduardo Kenji Nunes Arashiro; M. F. A. Balaro; J. M. G. Souza-Fabjan; P. H. N. Pinto; Clara Vieira de Souza; C. R. Leite; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
Theriogenology | 2017
J. M. G. Souza-Fabjan; Rômulo Mendonça da Rosa; M. F. A. Balaro; P. H. N. Pinto; G. B. Santos; Eduardo Kenji Nunes Arashiro; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Rodolfo Ungerfeld; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal | 2017
P. H. N. Pinto; M. F. A. Balaro; Eduardo Kenji Nunes Arashiro; R. I. T. P. Batista; M. E. F. Oliveira; G. M. Bragança; Jeferson Ferreira da Fonseca; Felipe Zandonadi Brandão
Archive | 2017
P. H. N. Pinto; José Antônio de Freitas; F. Z. Brandão; E. A. M. Pile; J. F. da Fonseca