P. H. Sprunger
Oregon State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. H. Sprunger.
Physical Review C | 2009
A. M. Vinodkumar; W. Loveland; P. H. Sprunger; Landon Prisbrey; M. Trinczek; M. Dombsky; P. Machule; J. J. Kolata; A. Roberts
We have measured the fusion excitation function for the {sup 9}Li+{sup 208}Pb reaction for near-barrier projectile center-of-mass energies of 23.9 to 43.0 MeV using the ISAC2 facility at TRIUMF. The {alpha}-emitting evaporation residues ({sup 211-214}At) were stopped in the {sup 208}Pb target, and their decay was measured. The isotopic yields at each energy were in good agreement with the predictions of a statistical model code (HIVAP). The measured fusion excitation function shows evidence for substantial sub-barrier fusion enhancement not predicted by current theoretical models. There is a suppression of the above barrier cross sections relative to these model predictions. The implications of this measurement for studying the fusion of {sup 11}Li with {sup 208}Pb are discussed.
FUSION08: New Aspects of Heavy Ion Collisions Near the Coulomb#N#Barrier | 2009
D. Shapira; J. F. Liang; C. J. Gross; R. L. Varner; J.R. Beene; D. W. Stracener; P. E. Mueller; J. J. Kolata; A. Roberts; W. Loveland; A. M. Vinodkumar; Landon Prisbrey; P. H. Sprunger; K. L. Jones; A. L. Caraley
As hindrance sets in for the fusion of heavier systems, the effect of large neutron excess in the colliding nuclei on their probability to fuse is still an open question. The detection of evaporation residues (ERs), however, provides indisputable evidence for the fusion (complete and incomplete) in the reaction. We therefore devised a system with which we could measure ERs using low intensity neutron‐rich radioactive ion beams with an efficiency close to 100%. We report on measurements of the production of ERs in collisions of 132,134Sn, 134Te and 134Sb ion beams with medium mass, neutron‐rich targets. The data taken with 132,134Sn bombarding a 64Ni target are compared to available data (ERs and fusion) taken with stable Sn isotopes. Preliminary data on the fusion of 132Sn with 96Zr target are also presented.
Physical Review C | 2008
A. M. Vinodkumar; W. Loveland; J. J. Neeway; Landon Prisbrey; P. H. Sprunger; D. Peterson; J. F. Liang; D. Shapira; C. J. Gross; R. L. Varner; J. J. Kolata; A. Roberts
Capture-fission cross sections were measured for the collision of the massive nucleus {sup 132}Sn with {sup 96}Zr at center-of-mass energies ranging from 192.8 to 249.6 MeV in an attempt to study fusion enhancement and hindrance in this reaction involving very neutron-rich nuclei. Coincident fission fragments were detected using silicon detectors. Using angle and energy conditions, deep inelastic scattering events were separated from fission events. Coupled-channels calculations can describe the data if the surface diffuseness parameter, a, is allowed to be 1.10 fm instead of the customary 0.6 fm. The measured capture-fission cross sections agree moderately well with model calculations using the dinuclear system model. If we use this model to predict fusion barrier heights for these reactions, we find the predicted fusion hindrance, as represented by the extra push energy, is greater for the more neutron-rich system, lessening the advantage of the lower interaction barriers with neutron-rich projectiles.
Physical Review C | 2007
R. S. Naik; W. Loveland; P. H. Sprunger; A. M. Vinodkumar; D. Peterson; C. L. Jiang; S. Zhu; X. D. Tang; E. F. Moore
The capture cross sections and fission fragment angular distributions were measured for the reaction of
Physical Review C | 2006
W. Loveland; A. M. Vinodkumar; P. H. Sprunger; G. A. Souliotis; D. Peterson; D. Shapira; J. F. Liang; D. J. Morrissey; Patrick A. Lofy
^{50}\mathrm{Ti}
Physical Review C | 2006
A. M. Vinodkumar; W. Loveland; P. H. Sprunger; D. Peterson; J. F. Liang; D. Shapira; R. L. Varner; C. J. Gross
with
Physical Review C | 2005
Kenneth E. Gregorich; W. Loveland; D. Peterson; P.M. Zielinski; S.L. Nelson; Y.H. Chung; Ch. E. Düllmann; C. M. Folden; Kjell Aleklett; R. Eichler; Darleane C. Hoffman; J. P. Omtvedt; G.K. Pang; J.M. Schwantes; S. Soverna; P. H. Sprunger; R. Sudowe; R.E. Wilson; Heino Nitsche
^{208}\mathrm{Pb}
Physical Review C | 2007
R. S. Naik; W. Loveland; P. H. Sprunger; A. M. Vinodkumar; D. Peterson; C. L. Jiang; S. Zhu; X. Tang; E. F. Moore; P. Chowdhury
at center of mass projectile energies (
Physical Review C | 2006
W. Loveland; A. M. Vinodkumar; R. S. Naik; P. H. Sprunger; B. Matteson; J. Neeway; M. Trinczek; M. Dombsky; P. Machule; D. Ottewell; D. S. Cross; K. Gagnon; W. Mills
{E}_{\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{m}.}
Physical Review C | 2008
A. M. Vinodkumar; W. Loveland; J. J. Neeway; Landon Prisbrey; P. H. Sprunger; D. Peterson; J. F. Liang; D. Shapira; C. J. Gross; R. L. Varner; J. J. Kolata; A. Roberts; A. L. Caraley
) of 183.7, 186.2, 190.2, 194.2, and 202.3 MeV (