Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where P. Heitzenroeder is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by P. Heitzenroeder.


ieee/npss symposium on fusion engineering | 2011

Iter In-Vessel Coil design and R&D

M. Kalish; P. Heitzenroeder; A.W. Brooks; L. Bryant; J. Chrzanowski; E. Daly; R. Feder; J. Feng; M. Messineo; M. Gomez; C. Hause; Tim D. Bohm; Ian Griffiths; A. Lipski; M. Mardenfeld; M. Nakahira; C. Neumeyer; R. Pillsbury; M.E. Sawan; M. Schaffer; R. T. Simmons; P. Titus; I. Zatz; T. Meighan

ITER will incorporate In Vessel Coils (IVCs) as a method of stabilizing “Edge Localized Modes” (ELM) and providing “Vertical Stabilization” (VS). To meet the ELM and VS Coil requirements strong coupling with the plasma is required so that it is necessary for the coils to be installed in the vessel just behind the blanket shield modules. Due to this close proximity to the plasma the radiation and temperature environment is severe and conventional electrical insulation materials and processes cannot be used. The development of mineral insulated conductor technology has been required in the IVC design to deal with this high radiation and high temperature environment. While mineral insulated conductor technology is not new, building a large magnet with high current carrying capability and a conductor diameter larger than the mineral insulated conductor currently manufactured requires R&D and the extension of existing technologies. A 59mm Stainless Steel Jacketed Mineral Insulated Conductor (SSMIC) using MgO is being developed for this application. The IVC ELM and VS coils design includes both the development of the fabrication techniques for the SSMIC and the design and analysis of the ELM and VS Coil assemblies.


ieee/npss symposium on fusion engineering | 2009

An overview of the iter in-vessel coil systems

P. Heitzenroeder; A.W. Brooks; J. Chrzanowski; F. Dahlgren; R. J. Hawryluk; G.D. Loesser; C. Neumeyer; C. Mansfield; J.J. Cordier; D. J. Campbell; G.A. Johnson; A. Martin; P.H. Rebut; J.O. Tao; J.P. Smith; M.J. Schaffer; D.A. Humphreys; P.J. Fogarty; B. Nelson; R.P. Reed

ELM mitigation is of particular importance in ITER in order to prevent rapid erosion or melting of the divertor surface, with the consequent risk of water leaks, increased plasma impurity content and disruptivity. Exploitable “natural” small or no ELM regimes might yet be found which extrapolate to ITER but this cannot be depended upon. Resonant Magnetic Perturbation has been added to pellet pacing as a tool for ITER to mitigate ELMs. Both are required, since neither method is fully developed and much work remains to be done. In addition, in-vessel coils enable vertical stabilization and RWM control. For these reasons, in-vessel coils (IVCs) are being designed for ITER to provide control of Edge Localized Modes (ELMs) in addition to providing control of moderately unstable resistive wall modes (RWMs) and the vertical stability (VS) of the plasma.


symposium on fusion technology | 2003

Design of the national compact stellarator experiment (NCSX)

B. Nelson; Lee A. Berry; A. Brooks; M. Cole; J.C. Chrzanowski; H.-M. Fan; P.J. Fogarty; P. Goranson; P. Heitzenroeder; S.P. Hirshman; G.H. Jones; James F. Lyon; G.H. Neilson; W. Reiersen; Dennis J Strickler; D. Williamson

Abstract The National Compact Stellarator Experiment (NCSX) [ http://www.pppl.gov/ncsx/Meetings/CDR/CDRFinal/EngineeringOverview_R2.pdf ] is being designed as a proof of principal test of a quasi-axisymmetric compact stellarator. This concept combines the high beta and good confinement features of an advanced tokamak with the low current, disruption-free characteristics of a stellarator. NCSX has a three-field-period plasma configuration with an average major radius of 1.4 m, an average minor radius of 0.33 m and a toroidal magnetic field on axis of up to 2 T. The stellarator core is a complex assembly of four coil systems that surround the highly shaped plasma and vacuum vessel. Heating is provided by up to four, 1.5 MW neutral beam injectors and provision is made to add 6 MW of ICRH. The experiment will be built at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, with first plasma expected in 2007.


symposium on fusion technology | 2001

Engineering features of the fusion ignition research experiment (FIRE)

R.J Thome; P. Heitzenroeder

Abstract The fusion ignition research experiment (FIRE) tokamak is an option for the next step in the US magnetic fusion energy program. It has a major radius of 2 m, and a minor radius of 0.525 m. The general requirements for FIRE are BT=10 T; IP=6.5 MA; minimum flat top time=10 s, and maximum number of full-power, full-field pulses=3000 with 30 000 pulses at 2/3 full field. The baseline design is able to meet or exceed these objectives. All magnets are inertially cooled with liquid nitrogen and have the capability for an 18 s flat top at 10 T. The use of BeCu in the inner legs of the toroidal field (TF) coil also allows for a field of 12 T with a pulse length of 12 s. Extended pulse lengths at lower fields (e.g. 214 s at 4 T and 2 MA) will allow FIRE to explore advanced tokamak modes (Physics basis for the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment (FIRE) Plasma Facing Components, in: Twenty-first Symposium on Fusion Technology, Madrid, September, 2000).


ieee npss symposium on fusion engineering | 1997

Engineering overview of the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX)

C. Neumeyer; P. Heitzenroeder; J. Chrzanowski; B. Nelson; J. Spitzer; R. Wilson; L. Dudek; R. Kaita; S. Ramakrishnan; D. Bashore; E. Perry

The NSTX project will provide a national facility for the study of plasma confinement, heating, and current drive in a low aspect ratio, spherical torus (ST) configuration, the ST configuration is an alternate confinement concept which is characterized by high /spl beta/, high elongation, high bootstrap fraction, and low B/sub T/ compared to conventional tokamaks, NSTX is the next step ST experiment following smaller experiments such as the PPPL CDX-U (Current Drive Experiment, Upgrade), the START (Small Tight Aspect Ratio Tokamak) at Culham, and the HIT (Helicity Injected Tokamak) at University of Washington, and is similar in scale to the MAST (Meg-Amp Spherical Tokamak) machine now under construction at Culham. This paper provides a description of the mission and gives an overview of the engineering features of the design of the machine and facility and discusses some of the key design solutions.


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2001

Engineering design of the National Spherical Torus Experiment

C. Neumeyer; P. Heitzenroeder; J Spitzer; J. Chrzanowski; A. Brooks; J. Bialek; H.-M. Fan; G. Barnes; M. Viola; B. Nelson; P. Goranson; R Wilson; E. Fredd; L. Dudek; R. Parsells; M. Kalish; W. Blanchard; R. Kaita; H.W. Kugel; B. McCormack; S. Ramakrishnan; R.E. Hatcher; G. Oliaro; E. Perry; T Egebo; A. von Halle; M. D. Williams; M. Ono

NSTX is a proof-of-principle experiment aimed at exploring the physics of the ‘spherical torus’ (ST) configuration, which is predicted to exhibit more efficient magnetic confinement than conventional large aspect ratio tokamaks, among other advantages. The low aspect ratio (R:a, typically 1.2‐2 in ST designs compared to 4‐5 in conventional tokamaks) decreases the available cross sectional area through the center of the torus for toroidal and poloidal field coil conductors, vacuum vessel wall, plasma facing components, etc., thus increasing the need to deploy all components within the so-called ‘center stack’ in the most efficient manner possible. Several unique design features have been developed for the NSTX center stack, and careful engineering of this region of the machine, utilizing materials up to their engineering allowables, has been key to meeting the desired objectives. The design and construction of the machine has been accomplished in a rapid and cost effective manner thanks to the availability of extensive facilities, a strong experience base from the TFTR era, and good cooperation between institutions.


Fusion Engineering and Design | 1989

The TFTR maintenance manipulator

D. Kungl; D. Loesser; P. Heitzenroeder; M. Selig; G. Boehme; G. Cerdan

Abstract TFTR plans to begin D—T experiments in mid 1990. The D—T experimental program will produce approximately one hundred shots, with a neutron generation rate of 10 19 neutrons per shot. This will result in high levels of activation in TFTR, especially in the vacuum vessel. The primary purpose of the Maintenance Manipulator is to provide a means of remotely performing certain defined maintenance and inspection tasks inside the vacuum torus so as to minimize personnel exposure to radiation. The manipulator consists of a six-link folding boom connected to a fixed boom on a movable carriage. The entire manipulator is housed in a vacuum antechamber connected to the vacuum torus, through a port formerly used for a vacuum pumping duct. The configuration extends 180° in either direction to provide complete coverage of the torus. The four 3500 1/s turbopumps which were formerly used in the pumping duct will be mounted on the antechamber. The manipulator will utilize two end effectors. The first, called a General Inspection Arm (GIA) provides a moveable platform to an inspection camera and an in-vacuum leak detector. The second is a bilateral, force-reflecting pair of slave arms which utilize specially developed tools to perform several maintenance functions. All components except the slave arms are capable of operating in TFTRs vacuum environment and during 150°C bakeout of the torus.


Nuclear Fusion | 2015

Progress toward commissioning and plasma operation in NSTX-U

M. Ono; J. Chrzanowski; L. Dudek; S.P. Gerhardt; P. Heitzenroeder; R. Kaita; J. Menard; E. Perry; T. Stevenson; R. Strykowsky; P. Titus; A. von Halle; M. Williams; N.D. Atnafu; W. Blanchard; M. Cropper; A. Diallo; D.A. Gates; R.A. Ellis; K. Erickson; J. C. Hosea; Ron Hatcher; S.Z. Jurczynski; S.M. Kaye; G. Labik; J. Lawson; Benoit P. Leblanc; R. Maingi; C. Neumeyer; R. Raman

The National Spherical Torus Experiment-Upgrade (NSTX-U) is the most powerful spherical torus facility at PPPL, Princeton USA. The major mission of NSTX-U is to develop the physics basis for an ST-based Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF). The ST-based FNSF has the promise of achieving the high neutron fluence needed for reactor component testing with relatively modest tritium consumption. At the same time, the unique operating regimes of NSTX-U can contribute to several important issues in the physics of burning plasmas to optimize the performance of ITER. NSTX-U further aims to determine the attractiveness of the compact ST for addressing key research needs on the path toward a fusion demonstration power plant (DEMO). The upgrade will nearly double the toroidal magnetic field BT to 1 T at a major radius of R0 = 0.93 m, plasma current Ip to 2 MA and neutral beam injection (NBI) heating power to 14 MW. The anticipated plasma performance enhancement is a quadrupling of the plasma stored energy and near doubling of the plasma confinement time, which would result in a 5–10 fold increase in the fusion performance parameter nτ T. A much more tangential 2nd NBI system, with 2–3 times higher current drive efficiency compared to the 1st NBI system, is installed to attain the 100% non-inductive operation needed for a compact FNSF design. With higher fields and heating powers, the NSTX-U plasma collisionality will be reduced by a factor of 3–6 to help explore the favourable trend in transport towards the low collisionality FNSF regime. The NSTX-U first plasma is planned for the Summer of 2015, at which time the transition to plasma operations will occur.


ieee/npss symposium on fusion engineering | 2009

Engineering cost & schedule lessons learned on NCSX

R. Strykowsky; T. Brown; J. Chrzanowski; M. Cole; P. Heitzenroeder; G.H. Neilson; Donald J. Rej; M. Viol

The National Compact Stellarator Experiment (NCSX) is designed to test physics principles of an innovative stellarator design developed by the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The project was technically very challenging, primarily due to the complex component geometries and tight tolerances that were required. As the project matured these challenges manifested themselves through all phases of the project (i.e. design, R&D, fabrication and assembly). Although the project was not completed, several major work packages, comprising about 65% of the total estimated cost (excluding management and contingency), were completed, providing a data base of actual costs that can be analyzed to understand cost drivers. Technical factors that drove costs included the complex geometry, tight tolerances, material requirements, and performance requirements. Management factors included imposed annual funding constraints that throttled project cash flow, staff availability, and inadequate R&D. Understanding how requirements and design decisions drove cost through this top-down forensic cost analysis could provide valuable insight into the configuration and design of future Stellarators and other devices.


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2002

Engineering overview of the fusion ignition research experiment (FIRE)

R.J Thome; P. Heitzenroeder

Abstract The FIRE tokamak is an option for the next step in the U.S. magnetic fusion energy program. The design goals have evolved to a major radius of 2.14 m, minor radius of 0.525 m, toroidal field (TF) of 10 T and plasma current of 7.7 mA for a flat-top time of ∼20 s. The requirement for 3000 full-power, full-field pulses and 30,000 pulses at 2/3 of full field has been retained since 1999. All magnets are inertially cooled with liquid nitrogen. Design options have been considered over a range of parameter space for either a wedged TF coil structure or a bucked and wedged TF/Central Solenoid structure. The wedged configuration has been selected as the baseline.

Collaboration


Dive into the P. Heitzenroeder's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Nelson

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Chrzanowski

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Cole

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Williamson

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Goranson

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P.J. Fogarty

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. Brown

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Neumeyer

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G.H. Neilson

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Viola

Princeton University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge