P.K. Galik

Replication and persistence of different strains of bovine viral diarrhea virus in an in vitro embryo production system.

Recent studies have shown that exposed, in vitro-derived embryos remain contaminated with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) after washing. However, introduction of a Genotype II versus Genotype I strain of BVDV into an IVF system was reported to provide greater potential for transmission of disease. The primary objective of this study was to compare the potentials for different strains of noncytopathic BVDV to replicate in an IVF system, associate with IVF embryos and infect co-cultured cells via association with washed embryos. The secondary objective was to compare the effect of different strains of BVDV on embryonic development. Two Genotype I (SD-1 and NY-1) and 2 Genotype II (CD-87 and PA-131) strains of BVDV were evaluated. After IVM and IVF of oocytes, presumptive zygotes were washed and transferred into in vitro cultures containing uterine tubal cells (UTC) and medium that was free of BVDV-neutralizing activity. Immediately before addition of zygotes, the cultures were inoculated with 10(5) cell culture infective doses (50%, CCID50) of a strain of BVDV or maintained as a negative control. Cultures of zygotes were then incubated for 7 d. Embryonic development was observed on Days 3 and 7, and attempts were made to isolate BVDV from UTC and medium on Day 7. Also on Day 7, groups of intact, washed blastocysts were either transferred into virus-free secondary cultures containing UTC or sonicated with sonicate fluid assayed by both virus isolation and single-closed-tube reverse transcription nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-nPCR). After 3 d in secondary culture, hatched embryos were enumerated, and medium from the cultures, washed UTC and embryos were tested for BVDV by virus isolation. In addition, washed UTC and embryos were tested for BVDV using RT-nPCR. All strains of BVDV persisted and replicated in the embryo culture environment, but cleavage beyond the 4-cell stage, blastocyst development and hatching varied among cultures contaminated with different strains of virus. Further, the quantity of BVDV associated with washed embryos from both initial and secondary cultures varied among strains, but the variation was unrelated to difference in genotype (SD-1 and PA-131 greater than NY-1 and CD-87). Although all strains of BVDV replicated in UTC in the initial in vitro cultures and remained associated with washed blastocysts, susceptible UTC in the secondary in vitro cultures were seldom infected by any strain of virus.

Washing and trypsin treatment of in vitro derived bovine embryos exposed to bovine viral diarrhea virus

Gametes, somatic cells and materials of animal origin in media are potential sources for introducing bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) into systems for production of IVF bovine embryos. Further, the efficacy of washing and trypsin treatment for removal of BVDV from IVF embryos is questionable. Washing and trypsin treatments recommended by the International Embryo Transfer Society for in vivo-derived embryos were applied to in vitro-derived, virus-exposed, bovine embryos in this side-by-side comparison of treatments. Embryos for the study were produced in a virus-free system in which follicular oocytes were matured and fertilized in vitro and presumptive zygotes were co-cultured with bovine uterine tubal cells for 7 d. A total of 18 trials was performed, 9 using a noncytopathic BVDV and 9 using a cytopathic BVDV. In each trial, 4 equal groups of 10 or less, zona pellucida-intact embryos/ova were assembled, including 2 groups of morulae and blastocysts (M/B) and 2 groups of nonfertile or degenerated ova (NFD). Each group was prewashed and exposed to 10(4) to 10(6) TCID50/mL of either noncytopathic (SD-1) or cytopathic (NADL) BVDV for 2 h. Following in vitro viral exposure, one group of M/B and one group of NFD were washed. The other groups of M/B and NFD were trypsin-treated. Both treatments were consistent with IETS guidelines. After in vitro exposure to noncytopathic BVDV and washing, viral assays of 100% (9/9) and 78% (7/9) of the groups of M/B and NFD ova, respectively, were positive. After in vitro exposure to cytopathic BVDV and washing, viral assay of 33% (3/9) of the groups of both M/B and NFD ova were positive. After in vitro exposure to noncytopathic BVDV and trypsin treatment, viral assay of 44% (4/9) of groups of M/B and 67% (6/9) of groups of NFD ova were positive. Finally, after in vitro exposure to cytopathic BVDV and trypsin treatment, viral assay of 22% (2/9) of the groups of M/B and 44% (4/9) of the groups of NFD ova were positive. Contingency table analysis, in which data was stratified by embryo type and virus biotype, was used to compare results. While a difference existed between results of the 2 treatments of groups of M/B within the noncytopathic biotype (P = 0.01, Mantel Haenszel Chi-square), no difference was observed between comparison of treatment between all groups in both biotypes (P > 0.05).

Quality controls for bovine viral diarrhea virus-free IVF embryos

Introduction of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) with cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) from the abattoir is a concern in the production of bovine embryos in vitro. Further, International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) guidelines for washing and trypsin treatment of in-vivo-derived bovine embryos ensure freedom from a variety of pathogens, but these procedures appear to be less effective when applied to IVF embryos. In this study, COCs were exposed to virus prior to IVM, IVF and IVC. Then, virus isolations from cumulus cells and washed or trypsin-treated nonfertile and degenerated ova were evaluated as quality controls for IVF embryo production. The effect of BVDV on rates of cleavage and development was also examined. All media were analyzed prior to the study for anti-BVDV antibody. Two approximately equal groups of COCs from abattoir-origin ovaries were washed and incubated for 1 h in minimum essential medium (MEM) with 10% equine serum. One group was incubated in 10(7) cell culture infective doses (50% endpoint) of BVDV for 1 h, while the other was incubated without virus. Subsequently, the groups were processed separately with cumulus cells, which were present throughout IVM, IVF and IVC. Cleavage was evaluated at 4 d and development to morulae and blastocysts at 7 d of IVC. After IVC, groups of nonfertile and degenerated ova or morulae and blastocysts were washed or trypsin-treated, sonicated and assayed for virus. Cumulus cells collected at 4 and 7 d were also assayed for virus. Anti-BVDV antibody was found in serum used in IVM and IVC but not in other media. A total of 1,656 unexposed COCs was used to produce 1,284 cleaved embryos (78%), 960 embryos > or = 5 cells (58%), and 194 morulae and blastocysts (12%). A total of 1,820 virus-exposed COCs was used to produce 1,350 cleaved embryos (74%), 987 embryos > or = 5 cells (54%), and 161 morulae and blastocysts (9%). Rates of cleavage (P = 0.021), cleavage to > or = 5 cells (P = 0.026) and development to morula and blastocyst (P = 0.005) were lower in the virus-exposed group (Chi-square test for heterogeneity). No virus was isolated from any samples from the unexposed group. For the exposed group, virus was always isolated from 4- and 7-d cumulus cells, from all washed nonfertile and degenerated ova (n = 40) and morulae and blastocysts (n = 57) and from all trypsin-treated nonfertile and degenerated ova (n = 80) and morulae and blastocysts (n = 91). Thus, virus persisted in the system despite the presence of neutralizing antibody in IVM and IVC media, and both washing and trypsin treatment were ineffective for removal of the virus. Presence of virus in 4- and 7-d cumulus cells as well as in nonfertile and degenerated ova were good indicators of virus being associated with morulae and blastocysts.

Trypsin treatment of bovine embryos after in vitro exposure to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus or bovine herpesvirus-4☆

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of trypsin treatment for the removal/inactivation of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (IBRV) adhering to zona pellucida-intact (ZP-I) bovine embryos and to determine if bovine herpesvirus-4 (BHV-4) adheres to ZP-I bovine embryos. When adherence of BHV-4 was demonstrated, an additional objective was to determine whether trypsin treatment removes or inactivates this virus. A total of 139 ZP-I embryos was collected from superovulated donor cows at 7 d after estrus. Embryos were exposed to 10(6) to 10(7) plaque-forming units (pfu) of either IBRV or BHV-4 for 1 to 2 h. Subsequently, approximately equal numbers of embryos exposed to each virus were either washed 12 times and the washes and embryos examined for the presence of infectious virus, or they were treated with trypsin and the embryos examined for the presence of infectious virus. Although the fourth wash was the last positive wash, an average of 18 pfu of virus was detected from each of six groups (a total of 24 embryos) after exposure to IBRV and washing. Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus was not isolated from any of nine trypsin-treated groups (a total of 43 embryos). The seventh wash was the last positive wash for any group after exposure to BHV-4, yet an average of 2 pfu of virus was detected from each of six groups (a total of 29 embryos) after washing. No BHV-4 was isolated from any of eight trypsin-treated groups (a total of 43 embryos). The study confirmed previous reports that IBRV adheres to the bovine ZP after in vitro exposure and that trypsin treatment is effective in keeping ZP-I embryos free of this virus. Adherence of BHV-4 to ZP-I bovine embryos was demonstrated for the first time. Trypsin treatment was also effective in removing this herpesvirus.

Comparison of three commercial vaccines for preventing persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus.

Eighty crossbred beef heifers were randomly allocated to four groups to evaluate the efficacy of vaccination in preventing development of calves persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV). Group 1 (n=11) was non-vaccinated controls, whereas three groups were vaccinated with commercially available multivalent BVDV vaccines at weaning (approximately 7 mo of age), 28 d post-weaning, approximately 1 y of age, and 28 d later. Groups 2 (n=23) and 3 (n=23) were given a modified-live BVDV vaccine, whereas Group 4 was given an inactivated BVDV vaccine. Heifers were bred by AI and subsequently exposed to two bulls. At 61 d after AI, 70 heifers were pregnant (n=10 for Group 1 and n=20/group for Groups 2, 3, and 4). Three cattle persistently infected with BVDV were commingled with the pregnant heifers (in an isolated pasture) from 68 to 126 d after AI. Thereafter, viremias were detected in pregnant heifers from Groups 1, 3, and 4 (10/10, 1/20, and 10/20, respectively), but not in pregnant heifers from Group 2 (0/20). Resulting calves were assessed for persistent infection using serum PCR, ear notch antigen capture-ELISA, and immunohistochemistry. Persistently infected calves were only produced in Group 1 (10/10) and Group 4 (2/18). In conclusion, commercial vaccines provided effective fetal protection despite prolonged natural exposure to BVDV. Given that viremias were detected in 11 vaccinated heifers after BVDV exposure, and two vaccinated heifers gave birth to persistently infected calves, there is continued need for biosecurity and diagnostic surveillance, in addition to vaccination, to ensure effective BVDV control.

Validation of a reverse transcription nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-nPCR) to detect bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) associated with in vitro-derived bovine embryos and co-cultured cells

Sensitive RT-nPCR assays can be used for the rapid detection of viruses. The objective of this research was to validate an RT-nPCR assay for detection of BVDV associated with various samples collected from an IVF system. In 12 research replicates, we maintained matured COCs as negative controls or exposed them to 1 of 4 noncytopathic strains (SD-1, NY-1, CD-87, or PA-131) of BVDV for 1 h immediately before IVF. After 4 d of IVC, we harvested groups of 5 nonfertile ova or degenerated embryos (NFD) and some associated cumulus cells and transferred developing embryos and the remaining cumulus cells into secondary IVC drops. On the seventh d of IVC, cumulus cells, groups of 5 washed NFD and groups of 5 developed, washed embryos were harvested. We also collected single developed embryos after washing, washing with trypsin, washing and cryopreservation in ethylene glycol, or washing with trypsin and cryopreservation in ethylene glycol. All washes were performed according to International Embryo Transfer Society standards. Developed embryos and NFD were sonicated prior to assay. All samples were assayed for BVDV using virus isolation and RT-nPCR. The virus isolation and RT-nPCR assays determined that all negative control samples were BVDV-free. Virus was detected in association with all exposed cumulus cells and groups of developed embryos using both virus isolation and RT-nPCR. Results from viral assays of other exposed samples indicate enhanced sensitivity of the RT-nPCR assay. The RT-nPCR assay used in this research exhibited acceptable sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and repeatability for rapid detection of BVDV associated with the various samples obtained from an IVF system.

IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND IN VITRO CULTURE OF BOVINE EMBRYOS IN THE PRESENCE OF NONCYTOPATHIC BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS

In vitro embryo production has been used extensively in research and is now offered as a commercial service, yet the hazards of introducing specific infectious agents into in vitro embryo production systems have not been completely defined. The introduction of noncytopathic bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is a special concern. One objective of this study was to determine if noncytopathic BVDV-infected uterine tubal cells in IVF and IVC systems affected the rate of cleavage and development. An additional objective was to determine if either degenerated ova or embryos produced in the presence of the infected cells had virus associated with them after washing. Follicular oocytes (n = 645) collected from slaughterhouse ovaries were matured and fertilized in vitro, and presumptive zygotes were cultured for 7 d. Primary cultures of uterine tubal cells for use during IVF and IVC were divided into 2 groups. One-half of the cultures was infected with noncytopathic BVDV while the other half was not exposed to the virus. Approximately equal groups of mature oocytes were inseminated, and the presumptive zygotes were cultured with infected or noninfected uterine tubal cells. After 7 d in IVC, zona pellucida-intact (ZP-I) morulae and blastocysts and degenerated ova were washed and assayed for the presence of infectious virus. Infections of uterine tubal cells were not apparent and did not reduce rates of cleavage and development (P > 0.05; Chi-square test for heterogeneity). After washing, BVDV was isolated at a significantly higher rate from groups of virus-exposed degenerated ova (79%) than from individual virus-exposed morulae and blastocysts (37%; P = 0.0002; Mantel-Haenszel summary, Chi-square).

Bovine herpesvirus-1 associated with single, trypsin-treated embryos was not infective for uterine tubal cells

It has been reported that bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) remains associated with in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine embryos after exposure to the virus and either washing or trypsin treatment. However, it is not known if the quantity of virus associated with an exposed IVP embryo is likely to infect a recipient cow after transfer. The specific objective of this study was to determine if IVP embryos that were exposed to BHV-1 would infect uterine tubal cells (UTC) in a co-culture system. In vitro-produced Day 7 embryos were exposed to BHV-1 and then washed or trypsin treated according to the IETS guidelines. These embryos were then co-cultured individually or in groups with UTC in microdrops of tissue culture medium 199 (TCM 199) supplemented with 10% equine serum. Following co-culture for 48 h, virus isolation was attempted on the embryos and the UTC from each drop. Virus was detected in washed individual embryos, groups of washed embryos, groups of trypsin-treated embryos and the UTC co-cultured with each of these treatments. However, BHV-1 was not detected in the individual, trypsin-treated embryos or the UTC co-cultured with them. It is concluded that trypsin treatment might effectively prevent infection of recipients if individual, Day 7, exposed embryos were transferred into the uterus.

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) and anti-BVDV antibodies in pooled samples of follicular fluid

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) can be found in cells and fluids from ovaries collected at the abattoir. On the other hand, immunoglobulins are also found in the fluid of ovarian follicles. Anti-BVDV antibodies in follicular fluid might reduce cross-contamination of COCs at the time of collection or hinder the use of virus isolation to test for the presence of virus. One objective of this study was to determine the frequency with which BVDV could be found in pooled follicular fluid collected during the periodic aspiration of COCs from abattoir-origin ovaries. A second objective was to determine the prevalence and neutralizing activity of anti-BVDV antibodies in these blended samples. We collected samples of pooled follicular fluid (n = 55) over a 20-month period as part of our routine oocyte collection activities. We assayed each sample for BVDV using virus isolation as well as reverse transcription nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-nPCR) procedures. We also tested follicular fluid for antibody that would neutralize four representative strains of BVDV (SD-1, a genotype 1a strain; NY-1, a genotype lb strain; CD-87, a genotype 2 strain, and PA-131, a divergent genotype 2 strain). We detected no BVDV by virus isolation, but we did identify the virus by RT-nPCR in one of the 55 samples of follicular fluid. Automated dye terminator nucleotide sequencing of the amplified portion of the viral genome indicated a genotype 1 strain that was distinct from any of our laboratory strains. In addition, each of the samples of follicular fluid contained sufficient antibody to neutralize large quantities of each of the four laboratory strains that were used. Finding BVDV in just 1 of 55 samples was consistent with reports of similar studies in which the occurrence of BVDV in abattoir-origin materials ranged from 0.9 to 12%. We presumed that failure to isolate the virus was due to neutralizing antibody in the sample. Thus, the incidence of BVDV contamination of our IVF system at the level of pooling of follicular fluid was low for the 20-month period. The presence of anti-BVDV antibody in pooled follicular fluid provided a coincidental means of neutralizing BVDV when it was introduced in fluid aspirated from infected ovaries.

Uterine tubal cells remain uninfected after culture with in vitro-produced embryos exposed to bovine viral diarrhea virus

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) has been isolated from washed and sonicated, in vitro-produced embryos, but the infectivity of BVDV associated with intact, developing, embryos has not been demonstrated. The objective of this study was to determine if a dose of BVDV infective for co-culture cells was associated with individual, developing embryos, following artificial exposure to the virus and washing. In 5 replicates, zona pellucida-intact, in vitro-produced embryos were assigned to a negative control embryo group, or were incubated in 10(5)-10(6) cell culture infective doses (50%, CCID50) per milliliter of a type I, noncytopathic (strain SD-1) BVDV for 2 h. Unexposed negative control embryos and exposed positive control embryos were washed, sonicated and assayed for BVDV using virus isolation with immunoperoxidase monolayer assay. Immediately or following cryopreservation, remaining virally-exposed, washed embryos were co-cultured individually with BVDV-negative cultures of bovine uterine tubal cells in a medium free of BVDV-neutralizing activity. After two days in culture, uterine tubal cells and embryos (including the zona pellucida) were separated and washed. The culture medium, uterine tubal cells and embryos were then assayed for BVDV. Bovine viral diarrhea virus was not isolated from any negative control embryo group, but was isolated from all positive control embryo groups. Although all uterine tubal cell populations were confirmed to be susceptible to BVDV, virus was never isolated from uterine tubal cells or embryos from post-exposure culture. In conclusion, although BVDV remains associated with washed in vitro-produced embryos, the virus associated with unsonicated embryos was not infective for uterine tubal cells in vitro.