P.M. Petersen

SEMEN QUALITY AND REPRODUCTIVE HORMONES BEFORE AND AFTER ORCHIECTOMY IN MEN WITH TESTICULAR CANCER

PURPOSEnWe clarify the impact of removal of the tumor bearing testis on semen quality and reproductive hormones in men with testicular cancer.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnSemen quality and levels of reproductive hormones were investigated in 48 men before and after orchiectomy for testicular cancer. Semen analysis was done in 35 of these men and hormone analyses were done in 47. The hormone data of patients with (14) or without (33) elevated values of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) were analyzed separately.nnnRESULTSnMedian sperm concentration and total sperm count decreased from 17 x 10(6)/ml. (range 0 to 117) and 39 x 10(6) (0 to 433), respectively, before to 7 x 10(6)/ml. (0 to 69) and 30 x 10(6) (0 to 200), respectively, after orchiectomy. After orchiectomy sperm concentration was decreased in 30 of 35 men (p = 0.001) and azoospermia developed in 3 (9%). In men without detectable HCG median follicle-stimulating hormone levels increased (p <0.001) from 5.7 IU/l. (range 0.01 to 30) before to 10.0 IU/l. (4.6 to 48) after orchiectomy in 33 of 33 patients. Median inhibin B significantly decreased (p = 0.003) from 108 pg./l. (range 60 to 193) before to 95 pg./l. (less than 20 to 141) after orchiectomy. Median luteinizing hormone increased significantly from 3.1 IU/l. (range 1.1 to 9.9) before to 5.2 IU/l. (2.1 to 27) after treatment (p <0.001). Testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin did not change significantly after orchiectomy. Patients with detectable serum HCG before orchiectomy had a considerable increase in follicle-stimulating hormone after orchiectomy, and a concomitant decrease in testosterone and estradiol.nnnCONCLUSIONSnSemen quality was poor at diagnosis and deteriorated further after orchiectomy compared with pretreatment values. Our findings indicate that in some patients the most appropriate time for cryopreservation of semen is before orchiectomy. Androgen production was maintained by increased luteinizing hormone stimulation after orchiectomy.

Gonadal function in men with testicular cancer: Biological and clinical aspects

This paper reviews current knowledge about the effect of testicular germ cell cancer (TGCC) on gonadal function and of cancer treatment on spermatogenesis and Leydig cell function. It is well documented that testicular cancer is associated with impaired spermatogenic function and some patients already have impairment of Leydig cell function before orchidectomy. The degree of spermatogenic dysfunction is higher than what can be explained by local tumour effect and by a general cancer effect, since patients with other malignant diseases have normal, or only slightly decreased, semen quality. Furthermore, sperm counts after orchidectomy are further reduced to less than half of the values in healthy men, even in patients cured from the cancer disease after orchidectomy alone. These observations are supported by histological investigations which have shown a high prevalence of abnormalities of spermatogenesis in the contralateral testis in patients with unilateral TGCC. The association between testicular cancer and poor gonadal function is very interesting both from a biological and from a therapeutic point of view. Firstly, the increase in incidence of testicular cancer has been suggested to be associated with a general decline in male reproductive health and it seems likely that the development of TGCC shares common aetiologic factors with development of other types of testicular dysfunction. This suggestion is supported by the observation that men with various types of gonadal dysfunction such as testicular dysgenesis, androgen insensitivity syndrome, and cryptorchidism have increased risk of testicular cancer. Secondly, the general cure rate in patients with testicular cancer exceeds 90% and the quality of life, including fertility aspects, is therefore important in the management of these patients. Spermatogenesis is already so severely impaired before treatment that fertility is lower than in healthy men. Moreover, radiotherapy and chemotherapy both induce dose‐dependent impairment of spermatogenesis and recovery of spermatogenesis after treatment may be long lasting even more than five years in some patients. Sufficient androgen production is seen in the majority of the patients, but some patients suffer from testosterone deficiency. The effect of chemotherapy on Leydig cell function also seems to be dose‐dependent. In conclusion there is no doubt that testicular cancer is associated with poor gonadal function even before treatment. Furthermore, the treatment of testicular cancer may have a serious impact on the gonadal function in these patients, most of whom are in the reproductive age. Moreover, the epidemiological and clinical data indicate a common aetiology between testicular germ cell cancer and other abnormalities in male reproductive health (such as infertility and cryptorchidism). These observations are in agreement with the suggestions of hormonal involvement in the aetiology of testicular cancer. Generally, men with TGCC need counselling about their reproductive function with respect to semen cryopreservation, chance of recovery of spermatogenesis, fertility, and the possible need for androgen replacement.

Endocrine function in patients treated for carcinoma in situ in the testis with irradiation

CIS is found in the contralateral testis in 5% of the patients with testicular germ cell cancer. The management of CIS in the contralateral testis is important because the majority – if not all – cases of CIS will progress to invasive disease without treatment. It is well documented that testicular irradiation with a total dose of 14–20 Gy (2 Gy×7–10) is an effective and safe treatment for CIS in the contralateral testis in patients with unilateral testicular germ cell cancer. However few relapses of testicular cancer have been observed in testis treated with these regimens and the data on 14 Gy are sparse. One study has indicated that more radiotherapy with lower doses per fraction could be useful, but more data are needed to confirm this. Endocrine testicular function has been shown to be impaired already before treatment in patients with CIS and is further impaired after testicular irradiation with 14–20 Gy (2 Gy×7–10) and only minor dose dependency is seen in the impairment of Leydig cell function. The optimal treatment of CIS in the contralateral testicle in patients orchidectomised for testicular cancer seems to be local radiotherapy of the testis with CIS in order to preserve at least a part of the Leydig cell function. However, the optimal dose level has to be defined.

Analysis of the polymorphic CAG repeat length in the androgen receptor gene in patients with testicular germ cell cancer

Changes in the length of a polymorphic trinucleotide (CAG) repeat in the androgen receptor (AR) gene, which may lead to altered transactivation of the AR gene, have been implicated to play a role in the pathogenesis of several forms of endocrine cancer and certain reproductive disorders. Subjects with reproductive disorders that are associated with a relative deficiency of androgen function carry an increased risk for testicular cancer, therefore we have examined the (CAG)n in the AR gene in DNA isolated from peripheral blood cells of 102 patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell neoplasia and compared them with a control group of 110 healthy men with proven fertility. All patients and control subjects underwent comprehensive andrological examination that included reproductive hormone profiles and the analysis of the (CAG)n in the AR gene that was done by means of PCR and DNA sequencing. There was no difference in the distribution of (CAG)n between the subjects and controls, no association of (CAG)n and the tumor type and no association with severity of the disease. We conclude that the high risk of testicular germ cell cancer in the Danish population is not associated with the (CAG)n polymorphism in the AR gene.

Comparison of the accuracy and precision of prostate localization with 2D–2D and 3D images

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEnPositional uncertainties related to the set-up of the prostate, using internal markers and either 2D-2D or 3D images, were studied. Set-up using direct prostate localization on CBCT scans is compared to set-up using internal markers.nnnMATERIAL AND METHODSn20 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. After each daily session, a set of 2D-2D and 3D images were acquired. The images isocenter was compared to reference images isocenter. For the set-up error analysis the systematic error, μ, and the set-up uncertainties, Σ and σ, were determined for the translational shift in the three directions, lat, lng and vrt. The set-up errors and uncertainties were calculated in the same way for rotations around the three axes, lat, lng and vrt.nnnRESULTSnSet-up uncertainties were evaluated for four different set-up methods. The systematic error uncertainties were found to be in the range 0.38-1.14 mm and for the random error 0.79-1.48 mm. For rotations the uncertainties ranges were 0.38-1.59° and 0.91-2.18° for systematic and random uncertainties, respectively. Set-up uncertainties, using internal markers or prostate itself to position the target in the isocenter, were comparable. The correlation between the two methods was better for translational shifts of the isocenter than for rotational shifts.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe study shows that the precision of the 2D-2D set-up is equivalent to the precision of the 3D images. It also shows that the soft-tissue based set-up needs 1 mm larger set-up margins than the marker based set-up for the prostate patients, when CBCT is used for daily verification of the location of the prostate.

Dosimetric benefit of DMLC tracking for conventional and sub-volume boosted prostate intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy

This study investigated the dosimetric impact of uncompensated motion and motion compensation with dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC) tracking for prostate intensity modulated arc therapy. Two treatment approaches were investigated; a conventional approach with a uniform radiation dose to the target volume and an intraprostatic lesion (IPL) boosted approach with an increased dose to a subvolume of the prostate. The impact on plan quality of optimizations with a leaf position constraint, which limited the distance between neighbouring adjacent MLC leaves, was also investigated. Deliveries were done with and without DMLC tracking on a linear acceleration with a high-resolution MLC. A cylindrical phantom containing two orthogonal diode arrays was used for dosimetry. A motion platform reproduced six patient-derived prostate motion traces, with the average displacement ranging from 1.0 to 8.9xa0mm during the first 75xa0s. A research DMLC tracking system was used for real-time motion compensation with optical monitoring for position input. The gamma index was used for evaluation, with measurements with a static phantom or the planned dose as reference, using 2% and 2xa0mm gamma criteria. The average pass rate with DMLC tracking was 99.9% (range 98.7-100%, measurement as reference), whereas the pass rate for untracked deliveries decreased distinctly as the average displacement increased, with an average pass rate of 61.3% (range 32.7-99.3%). Dose-volume histograms showed that DMLC tracking maintained the planned dose distributions in the presence of motion whereas traces with >3xa0mm average displacement caused clear plan degradation for untracked deliveries. The dose to the rectum and bladder had an evident dependence on the motion direction and amplitude for untracked deliveries, and the dose to the rectum was slightly increased for IPL boosted plans compared to conventional plans for anterior motion with large amplitude. In conclusion, optimization using a leaf position constraint had minimal dosimetric effect, DMLC tracking improved the target and normal tissue dose distributions compared to no tracking for target motion >3xa0mm, with the DMLC tracking distributions showing generally good agreement between the planned and delivered doses.

Gonadal Function in Men With Testicular Cancer

This article reviews current knowledge on the effect of testicular germ cell cancer (TGCC) on gonadal function and of the cancer treatment on spermatogenesis and Leydig cell function. It seems likely that development of TGCC shares common etiological factors with development other types of testicular dysfunction. This suggestion is supported by the observation that men with various types of gonadal dysfunction such as testicular dysgenesis, androgen insensitivity syndrome, and cryptorchidism have increased risk of testicular cancer. Epidemiological and clinical data indicate common etiology between testicular germ cell cancer and other abnormalities in male reproductive health such as infertility and cryptorchidism. These observations are in agreement with the suggestions of hormonal involvement in the etiology of testicular cancer. It is well documented that testicular cancer is associated with impaired spermatogenic function and some patients have impairment of Leydigs cell function already before orchidectomy. The degree of spermatogenic dysfunction is higher than what can be explained by local tumor effect and by a general cancer effect. These observations are supported by histological investigations, which have shown a high prevalence of abnormalities of spermatogenesis in the contralateral testis in patients with unilateral TGCC. The spermatogenetic function is still severely impaired after orchidectomy and radiotherapy as well as chemotherapy induce further dose-dependent impairment of spermatogenesis. Recovery of spermatogenesis after treatment may be long, in some patients lasting more than 5 years. Sufficient androgen production is seen in the majority of the patients but some patients do suffer from testosterone deficiency. The effect of chemotherapy on Leydigs cell function seems to be dose dependent. Trials on protection of spermatogenetic function against the harmful effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy by suppression of spermatogenesis has not been successful. The only way to maintain fertility is to limit gonadal exposure to harmful agents. Moreover cryopreservation of semen should be done before treatment. The optimal time for cryopreservation is before orchiectomy at least in some patients. Generally men with TGCC need counselling about their reproductive function, with respect to semen cryopreservation, chance for recovery of spermatogenesis, fertility, and the possibility of need for androgen replacement.