P. M. Sutter
Ohio State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. M. Sutter.
Scopus | 2011
Alexander Knebe; Steffen R. Knollmann; Y. Ascasibar; Gustavo Yepes; Stuart I. Muldrew; Frazer R. Pearce; M. A. Aragon-Calvo; Bridget Falck; Peter Behroozi; Daniel Ceverino; S. Colombi; Jürg Diemand; Doug Potter; Joachim Stadel; K. Dolag; Francesca Iannuzzi; Michal Maciejewski; Patricia K. Fasel; Jeffrey P. Gardner; S. Gottlöber; C-H. Hsu; Anatoly Klypin; Zarija Lukić; Cameron K. McBride; Susana Planelles; Vicent Quilis; Yann Rasera; Fabrice Roy; Justin I. Read; Paul M. Ricker
We present a detailed comparison of fundamental dark matter halo properties retrieved by a substantial number of different halo finders. These codes span a wide range of techniques including friends-of-friends, spherical-overdensity and phase-space-based algorithms. We
Physical Review Letters | 2014
Nico Hamaus; P. M. Sutter; Benjamin D. Wandelt
We present a simple empirical function for the average density profile of cosmic voids, identified via the watershed technique in ΛCDM N-body simulations. This function is universal across void size and redshift, accurately describing a large radial range of scales around void centers with only two free parameters. In analogy to halo density profiles, these parameters describe the scale radius and the central density of voids. While we initially start with a more general four-parameter model, we find two of its parameters to be redundant, as they follow linear trends with the scale radius in two distinct regimes of the void sample, separated by its compensation scale. Assuming linear theory, we derive an analytic formula for the velocity profile of voids and find an excellent agreement with the numerical data as well. In our companion paper [Sutter et al., arXiv:1309.5087 [Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (to be published)]], the presented density profile is shown to be universal even across tracer type, properly describing voids defined in halo and galaxy distributions of varying sparsity, allowing us to relate various void populations by simple rescalings. This provides a powerful framework to match theory and simulations with observational data, opening up promising perspectives to constrain competing models of cosmology and gravity.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
P. Melchior; P. M. Sutter; E. Sheldon; Elisabeth Krause; Benjamin D. Wandelt
We report the first measurement of the diminutive lensing signal arising from matter underdensities associated with cosmic voids. While undetectable individually, by stacking the weak gravitational shear estimates around 901 voids detected in SDSS DR7 by Sutter et al. (2012a), we find substantial evidence for a depression of the lensing signal compared to the cosmic mean. This depression is most pronounced at the void radius, in agreement with analytical models of void matter profiles. Even with the largest void sample and imaging survey available today, we cannot put useful constraints on the radial dark-matter void profile. We invite independent investigations of our findings by releasing data and analysis code to the public at https://github.com/pmelchior/void-lensing.
Physical Review Letters | 2014
Nico Hamaus; Benjamin D. Wandelt; P. M. Sutter; Guilhem Lavaux; Michael S. Warren
Galaxy bias, the unknown relationship between the clustering of galaxies and the underlying dark matter density field is a major hurdle for cosmological inference from large-scale structure. While traditional analyses focus on the absolute clustering amplitude of high-density regions mapped out by galaxy surveys, we propose a relative measurement that compares those to the underdense regions, cosmic voids. On the basis of realistic mock catalogs we demonstrate that cross correlating galaxies and voids opens up the possibility to calibrate galaxy bias and to define a static ruler thanks to the observable geometric nature of voids. We illustrate how the clustering of voids is related to mass compensation and show that volume-exclusion significantly reduces the degree of stochasticity in their spatial distribution. Extracting the spherically averaged distribution of galaxies inside voids from their cross correlations reveals a remarkable concordance with the mass-density profile of voids.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
P. M. Sutter; Guilhem Lavaux; Nico Hamaus; Benjamin D. Wandelt; David H. Weinberg; Michael S. Warren
To study the impact of sparsity and galaxy bias on void statistics, we use a single large-volume, high-resolution N-body simulation to compare voids in multiple levels of subsampled dark matter, halo populations, and mock galaxies from a Halo Occupation Distribution model tuned to dierent galaxy survey densities. We focus our comparison on three key observational statistics: number functions, ellipticity distributions, and radial density proles. We use the hierarchical tree structure of voids to
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
P. M. Sutter; Alice Pisani; Benjamin D. Wandelt; David H. Weinberg
We perform an Alcock-Paczynski test using stacked cosmic voids identified in the SDSS Data Release 7 main sample and Data Release 10 LOWZ and CMASS samples. We find ~1,500 voids out to redshift
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
P. M. Sutter; Guilhem Lavaux; Benjamin D. Wandelt; David H. Weinberg; Michael S. Warren; Alice Pisani
0.6
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014
P. M. Sutter; Guilhem Lavaux; Benjamin D. Wandelt; David H. Weinberg; Michael S. Warren
using a heavily modified and extended version of the watershed algorithm ZOBOV, which we call VIDE (Void IDentification and Examination). To assess the impact of peculiar velocities we use the mock void catalogs presented in Sutter et al. (2013). We find a constant uniform flattening of 14% along the line of sight when peculiar velocities are included. This flattening appears universal for all void sizes at all redshifts and for all tracer densities. We also use these mocks to identify an optimal stacking strategy. After correcting for systematic effects we find that our Alcock-Paczynski measurement leads to a preference of our best-fit value of
Physical Review D | 2015
Alice Pisani; P. M. Sutter; Nico Hamaus; Esfandiar Alizadeh; R. Biswas; Benjamin D. Wandelt; Christopher M. Hirata
\Omega_{\rm M}\sim 0.15
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2015
Florent Leclercq; Jens Jasche; P. M. Sutter; Nico Hamaus; Benjamin D. Wandelt
over