P. N. Shebalin
Russian Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. N. Shebalin.
Tectonophysics | 2001
Vladimir I. Keilis-borok; Alik Ismail-Zadeh; Vladimir Kossobokov; P. N. Shebalin
Abstract The lithosphere of the Earth is structured as a hierarchical system of volumes of different sizes, from about 10 tectonic plates to about 10 25 grains of rock. Their relative movement against the forces of friction and cohesion is realized to a large extent through earthquakes. The movement is controlled by a wide variety of independent processes, concentrated in the thin boundary zones between the volumes. The boundary zone has a similar hierarchical structure, consisting of volumes, separated by boundary zones, etc. Altogether, this hierarchy of volumes and multitude of processes compose the lithosphere into a large non-linear complex system. Upon coarse graining the integral mesoscale empirical regularities emerge, indicating a wide range of similarity, collective behavior, and the possibility of earthquake prediction. This approach led to new paradigms in the dynamics of the lithosphere and, on the practical side, created a capacity to predict from 70 to 90% of large earthquakes, with alarms occupying 10–20% of the time–space considered. Such predictions may be used to undertake earthquake preparedness measures, which would prevent a considerable part of the damage (although far from the total damage). The methodology linking prediction with preparedness was developed; it may help a disaster management authority to choose the preparedness measures, allowing for the currently realistic accuracy of predictions. A large-scale experiment in advance prediction of large earthquakes worldwide has been launched to test the prediction algorithms. The test is unprecedented in rigor and coverage. The forecasts are communicated, with due discretion, to several dozen leading scientists and administrators in many countries. Among already predicted earthquakes are all the last eight great ones with magnitude 8 and more. The major drawback is the rate of false alarms. The possibility is outlined to develop a new generation of prediction methods, with fivefold increase in accuracy and the transition to short-term prediction. The links with prediction of geotechnical and engineering disasters are established: scenarios of transitions to a large earthquake happen to share some features with a broader class of catastrophes. This experience now opens as yet untapped possibilities for reduction of technological disasters.
Archive | 2004
P. N. Shebalin; Vladimir I. Keilis-borok; Ilya Zaliapin; Seiya Uyeda; Toshiyasu Nagao; N. Tsybin
Archive | 2004
Vladimir I. Keilis-borok; Curt H. Davis; G. M. Molchan; P. N. Shebalin; P. Lahr; Carolyn Plumb
Archive | 2003
Vladimir I. Keilis-borok; P. N. Shebalin; Andrei Gabrielov; I. Zaliapin; Seiya Uyeda; Tomoharu Nagao
Archive | 2018
P. N. Shebalin
Archive | 2005
Vladimir I. Keilis-borok; P. N. Shebalin; Andrei Gabrielov; I. Zaliapin
Archive | 2004
P. N. Shebalin; Vladimir I. Keilis-borok; Seiya Uyeda
Archive | 2004
P. N. Shebalin; Elizabeth S. Cochran; John E. Vidale; Vladimir I. Keilis-borok
Archive | 2004
Vladimir I. Keilis-borok; P. N. Shebalin; Andrei Gabrielov; Donald L. Turcotte; I. Zaliapin; Michael Ghil
Archive | 2002
Vladimir Kossobokov; Keilis-Borok; P. N. Shebalin; N. N. Tsybin