P. Rougier

Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUNDnVEGFR-2 has a role in gastric cancer pathogenesis and progression. We assessed whether ramucirumab, a monoclonal antibody VEGFR-2 antagonist, in combination with paclitaxel would increase overall survival in patients previously treated for advanced gastric cancer compared with placebo plus paclitaxel.nnnMETHODSnThis randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial was done at 170 centres in 27 countries in North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Patients aged 18 years or older with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and disease progression on or within 4 months after first-line chemotherapy (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine with or without an anthracycline) were randomly assigned with a centralised interactive voice or web-response system in a 1:1 ratio to receive ramucirumab 8 mg/kg or placebo intravenously on days 1 and 15, plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A permuted block randomisation, stratified by geographic region, time to progression on first-line therapy, and disease measurability, was used. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat, and safety analysis included all patients who received at least one treatment with study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01170663, and has been completed; patients who are still receiving treatment are in the extension phase.nnnFINDINGSnBetween Dec 23, 2010, and Sept 23, 2012, 665 patients were randomly assigned to treatment-330 to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel and 335 to placebo plus paclitaxel. Overall survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel group than in the placebo plus paclitaxel group (median 9·6 months [95% CI 8·5-10·8] vs 7·4 months [95% CI 6·3-8·4], hazard ratio 0·807 [95% CI 0·678-0·962]; p=0·017). Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred in more than 5% of patients in the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel group versus placebo plus paclitaxel included neutropenia (133 [41%] of 327 vs 62 [19%] of 329), leucopenia (57 [17%] vs 22 [7%]), hypertension (46 [14%] vs eight [2%]), fatigue (39 [12%] vs 18 [5%]), anaemia (30 [9%] vs 34 [10%]), and abdominal pain (20 [6%] vs 11 [3%]). The incidence of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia was low in both groups (ten [3%] vs eight [2%]).nnnINTERPRETATIONnThe combination of ramucirumab with paclitaxel significantly increases overall survival compared with placebo plus paclitaxel, and could be regarded as a new standard second-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer.nnnFUNDINGnEli Lilly and Company.

Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUNDnPrevious results of the EORTC intergroup trial 40983 showed that perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) increases progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery alone for patients with initially resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Here we present overall survival data after long-term follow-up.nnnMETHODSnThis randomised, controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study recruited patients from 78 hospitals across Europe, Australia, and Hong Kong. Eligible patients aged 18-80 years who had histologically proven colorectal cancer and up to four liver metastases were randomly assigned (1:1) to either perioperative FOLFOX4 or surgery alone. Perioperative FOLFOX4 consisted of six 14-day cycles of oxaliplatin 85mg/m(2), folinic acid 200 mg/m(2) (DL form) or 100 mg/m(2) (L form) on days 1-2 plus bolus, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and 600 mg/m(2) (continuous 22 h infusion), before and after surgery. Patients were centrally randomised by minimisation, adjusting for centre and risk score and previous adjuvant chemotherapy to primary surgery for colorectal cancer, and the trial was open label. Analysis of overall survival was by intention to treat in all randomly assigned patients.nnnFINDINGSnBetween Oct 10, 2000, and July 5, 2004, 364 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group (182 patients in each group, of which 171 per group were eligible and 152 per group underwent resection). At a median follow-up of 8·5 years (IQR 7·6-9·5), 107 (59%) patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group had died versus 114 (63%) in the surgery-only group (HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·68-1·14; p=0·34). In all randomly assigned patients, median overall survival was 61·3 months (95% CI 51·0-83·4) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 54·3 months (41·9-79·4) in the surgery alone group. 5-year overall survival was 51·2% (95% CI 43·6-58·3) in the perioperative chemotherapy group versus 47·8% (40·3-55·0) in the surgery-only group. Two patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group and three in the surgery-only group died from complications of protocol surgery, and one patient in the perioperative chemotherapy group died possibly as a result of toxicity of protocol treatment.nnnINTERPRETATIONnWe found no difference in overall survival with the addition of perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 compared with surgery alone for patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. However, the previously observed benefit in PFS means that perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 should remain the reference treatment for this population of patients.nnnFUNDINGnNorwegian and Swedish Cancer Societies, Cancer Research UK, Ligue Nationale Contre Cancer, US National Cancer Institute, Sanofi-Aventis.

Docetaxel plus oxaliplatin with or without fluorouracil or capecitabine in metastatic or locally recurrent gastric cancer: a randomized phase II study

BACKGROUNDnDocetaxel/cisplatin/infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; DCF) is a standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). This phase II study evaluated docetaxel/oxaliplatin (TE), docetaxel/oxaliplatin/5-FU (TEF), and docetaxel/oxaliplatin/capecitabine (TEX) in patients with advanced GC.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients with metastatic or locally recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma (including carcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction) were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1) to TE, TEF, or TEX. Each regimen was tested at two doses before full evaluation at optimized dose levels. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), tumour response, and safety were also assessed. A therapeutic index (median PFS relative to the incidence of febrile neutropenia) was calculated for each regimen and compared with DCF (historical data).nnnRESULTSnOverall, 248 patients were randomly assigned to receive optimized dose treatment. Median PFS was longer with TEF (7.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.97-9.40] months) versus TE (4.50 [3.68-5.32] months) and TEX (5.55 [4.30-6.37] months). Median OS was 14.59 (95% CI: 11.70-21.78) months for TEF versus 8.97 (7.79-10.87) months for TE and 11.30 (8.08-14.03) months for TEX. The rate of tumour response (complete or partial) was 46.6% (95% CI 35.9-57.5) for TEF versus 23.1% (14.3-34.0) for TE and 25.6% (16.6-36.4) for TEX. The frequency and type of adverse events (AEs) were similar across the three arms. Common grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (21%), sensory neuropathy (14%), and diarrhoea (13%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 2% (TEF), 14% (TE), and 9% (TEX) of patients. The therapeutic index was improved with TEF versus TEX, TE, or DCF.nnnCONCLUSIONnThese results suggest that TEF is worthy of evaluation as an arm in a phase III trial or as a backbone regimen for new targeted agents in advanced GC. CLINICALTRIALS.nnnGOV IDENTIFIERnTrial registration number: NCT00382720.

Bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with progressive advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-intestinal (GI-NETs) tract (BETTER trial) – A phase II non-randomised trial

AIM OF THE STUDYnGastro-intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (GI-NETs) are chemotherapy-resistant tumours. Bevacizumab, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has shown promising results in several phase II trials of gastro-entero-pancreatic-NETs. We assessed bevacizumab combined with capecitabine, specifically in GI-NET patients.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnBEvacizumab in The Treament of neuroEndocrine tumoRs (BETTER) was a multicentre, open-label, non-randomised, two-group phase II trial. Here we present the group of patients with progressive, metastatic, well-differentiated GI-NETs. Patients Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (ECOG-PS)⩽2, Ki-67 proliferation rate <15% and no prior systemic chemotherapy were treated with bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg/q3w) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily, orally d1-14, resumed on d22) for 6-24 months. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), response rate, safety and quality of life.nnnRESULTSnOf the 49 patients included, 53% were men, median age was 60 years (41-82), primary tumour site was ileal in 82% patients and Ki-67 was <15% in 48 patients and not available for one patient. After a maximum of 24 month follow-up per patient, the median PFS by investigator assessment was 23.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2; not reached] and the overall disease control rate was 88% (18% partial response, 70% stable disease). The 2-year survival rate was 85%. Median OS was not reached. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (31%), diarrhoea (14%) and hand-foot syndrome (10%).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe combination of bevacizumab and capecitabine showed clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in the treatment of GI-NETs that warrant confirmation in a randomised phase III trial.

Quality-of-life and performance status results from the phase III RAINBOW study of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

The phase III RAINBOW trial showed the addition of ramucirumab to paclitaxel yielded survival benefits for previously treated patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Now analyses reveal that ramucirumab also maintains patient-reported quality of life, lengthening the time to deterioration of patient symptoms and functions, and slowing performance status decline.

Comparison of prognostic value of tissue Doppler imaging in carcinoid heart disease versus the value in patients with the carcinoid syndrome but without carcinoid heart disease.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in carcinoid heart disease (CHD). We prospectively enrolled 56 consecutive patients with proved digestive endocrine tumor and carcinoid syndrome. All patients underwent serial conventional, contrast, and TDI echocardiographic studies. The end point was all-cause mortality. Mean follow-up was 34 +/- 21 months. At the end of follow-up, 30 patients (54%) presented right CHD and 13 patients (23%) left CHD. A progression of CHD was documented in 23 patients (41%). Twenty-two patients (39%) died during follow-up. According to mortality receiver operating characteristic curves, ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e ratio) associated with an optimal sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 90% was 8. Mortality rate was significantly higher when the E/e ratio was >or=8 (94% vs 10% when E/e ratio was <8, p <0.0001). Using univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with death: left-sided CHD (p = 0.07) and E/e ratio >or=8 (p <0.0001). The only independent marker of death detected by multivariate analysis was an E/e ratio >or=8 (odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence interval 1.95 to 19.7, p = 0.002). In conclusion, TDI used during routine transthoracic echocardiography can be helpful to identify high-risk patients with CHD.

Poorly differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: Are they really heterogeneous? Insights from the FFCD-GTE national cohort

BACKGROUNDnDiagnosis and management of poorly differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) remain challenging. Recent studies suggest prognostic heterogeneity. We designed within the French Group of Endocrine Tumours a prospective cohort to gain insight in the prognostic stratification and treatment of GEP-NEC.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnAll patients with a diagnosis of GEP-NEC between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2013 could be included in this national cohort. Adenoneuroendocrine tumours were excluded.nnnRESULTSn253 patients from 49 centres were included. Median age was 66 years. Main primary locations were pancreas (21%), colorectal (27%), oesophagus-stomach (18%); primary location was unknown in 20%. Tumours were metastatic at diagnosis in 78% of cases. Performance status (PS) at diagnosis was 0-1 in 79% of patients. Among the 147 (58%) cases reviewed by an expert pathological network, 39% were classified as small cell NEC and 61% as large cell NEC. Median Ki67 index was 75% (range, 20-100). Median overall survivalxa0was 15.6 (13.6-17.0) months. Significant adverse prognostic factors in univariate analysis were PSxa0>xa01 (hazard ratio [HR]xa0=xa02.5), metastatic disease (HRxa0=xa01.6), NSE>2 upper limit of normal [ULN]; HRxa0=xa03.2), CgA>2 ULN (HRxa0=xa01.7) and lactate dehydrogenase >2 ULN (HRxa0=xa02.1). After first-line palliative chemotherapy (CT1) with platinum-etoposide (nxa0=xa0152), objective response, progression-free survivalxa0and overall survival were 50%, 6.2 and 11.6 months; they were 24%, 2.9 and 5.9, respectively, after post-CT1 FOLFIRI regimen (nxa0=xa072).nnnCONCLUSIONSnWe report a large prospective series of GEP-NEC which show the predominance of large cell type and advanced stage at diagnosis. Prognosis was found more homogeneous than previously reported, mainly impacted by PS and tumour burden.

Postoperative irinotecan in resected stage II–III rectal cancer: final analysis of the French R98 Intergroup trial

BACKGROUDnThe R98 trial explores the addition of irinotecan to a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) adjuvant regimen in optimally resected stages II-III rectal cancers. We report the updated long-term results. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end point.nnnPATIENST AND METHODSnBetween March 1999 and December 2005, 357 patients were randomized: 178 in 5-FU/LV and 179 in LV5-FU2 + irinotecan arm. The trial was stratified by control arm: Mayo Clinic regimen or LV5-FU2 regimen.nnnRESULTSnThree hundred and fifty-seven randomized patients were evaluable for efficacy. With a follow-up of 156 months, the DFS was in favour of experimental arm but did not reach statistical significance [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80, P = 0.154]. The same was observed for overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.87, P = 0.433). The 5-year DFS was 58% in the control arm and 63% in the experimental arm. The 5-year OS was 74% in the control arm and 75% in the experimental arm. Patients allocated to the experimental arm had more grade 3-4 neutropenia when compared with the LV5-FU2 arm (33% versus 6%, P = 0.03), but not when compared with the Mayo Clinic arm (33% versus 36%, P = 0.84). Grade 3-4 diarrhoea tended to be higher in the experimental arm, but analyses stratified by control arm or by radiotherapy failed to show significant differences across strata (test for interaction P = 0.44).nnnCONCLUSIONnEven though a benefit of irinotecan in subgroups of patients cannot be excluded, due to early termination and lack of power, the study does not support the addition of irinotecan to 5-FU/LV in routine in patients with resected stage II-III rectal cancer.BACKGROUDnThe R98 trial explores the addition of irinotecan to a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) adjuvant regimen in optimally resected stages II-III rectal cancers. We report the updated long-term results. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end point.nnnPATIENST AND METHODSnBetween March 1999 and December 2005, 357 patients were randomized: 178 in 5-FU/LV and 179 in LV5-FU2 + irinotecan arm. The trial was stratified by control arm: Mayo Clinic regimen or LV5-FU2 regimen.nnnRESULTSnThree hundred and fifty-seven randomized patients were evaluable for efficacy. With a follow-up of 156 months, the DFS was in favour of experimental arm but did not reach statistical significance [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80, P = 0.154]. The same was observed for overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.87, P = 0.433). The 5-year DFS was 58% in the control arm and 63% in the experimental arm. The 5-year OS was 74% in the control arm and 75% in the experimental arm. Patients allocated to the experimental arm had more grade 3-4 neutropenia when compared with the LV5-FU2 arm (33% versus 6%, P = 0.03), but not when compared with the Mayo Clinic arm (33% versus 36%, P = 0.84). Grade 3-4 diarrhoea tended to be higher in the experimental arm, but analyses stratified by control arm or by radiotherapy failed to show significant differences across strata (test for interaction P = 0.44).nnnCONCLUSIONnEven though a benefit of irinotecan in subgroups of patients cannot be excluded, due to early termination and lack of power, the study does not support the addition of irinotecan to 5-FU/LV in routine in patients with resected stage II-III rectal cancer.

Chimiothérapie intra-artérielle hépatique, chimioembolisation et radioembolisation : un apport important pour le traitement des métastases hépatiques des cancers colorectaux

RésuméLes traitements locaux des métastases hépatiques (MH) des adénocarcinomes colorectaux (CCR) prennent une place de plus en plus importante dans les stratégies thérapeutiques des patients ayant des MH non résécables limitées ou prédominantes au foie. La chimiothérapie intraartérielle hépatique (CIAH) a démontré très tôt son efficacité. Sa combinaison avec des polychimiothérapies systémiques a permis de doubler les taux de réponse et d’augmenter les taux de résection secondaires et la survie des patients. L’efficacité des chimioembolisations (CE) et des radioembolisations (RE) a surtout été établie à partir d’études de phase II ou de phase III les ayant évaluées à des stades très avancés, où la survie sans progression et la survie globale étaient augmentées. La place de ces traitements à des stades plus précoces est en cours d’évaluation, et devrait permettre d’optimiser la prise en charge des patients avec MH. Ces traitements locaux doivent être aujourd’hui utilisés en combinaison avec des traitements systémiques efficaces et/ou des résections, et le choix des meilleures stratégies et protocoles doit être fait en RCP spécialisées.AbstractLocal treatment of liver metastases (LM) of colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRC) has an emerging role in strategies of treatment for patients with limited or predominant unresectable LM. Hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy (HIAC) demonstrated efficacy. Its combination with systemic chemotherapy allowed to double the response rate, and increased the rate of secondary resection and survival of patients. The effectiveness of chemoembolization (CE) and radio-embolization (RE) was primarily established from Phase II or Phase III evaluation of patients in very advanced stages, and progression-free survival and overall survival were increased. The role of these treatments at earlier stages is being evaluated and is expected to optimize the care of patients with LM. These local treatments must now be used in combination with effective systemic therapies, and/or resection, and the choice of the best strategies and protocols must be done in specialized team with collaboration of expert radiologist, nuclear medicine and oncologist.

Chemosensitivity in ovarian metastases from gastric cancer: A case series

The development of ovarian metastases from gastric cancer indicates a turning point of the disease progression and is usually associated with poor prognosis. Efficacy of modern chemotherapy protocols in ovarian metastases from gastric cancer is unknown. In this case series, we have evaluated the chemosensitivity of ovarian metastases from gastric cancer in eight consecutive patients treated in our institution between January 2000 and April 2012. Median age at gastric cancer diagnosis was 48.3 years and ovarian metastases were mainly metachronous (88%). Patients were treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI protocols in first-line and with EOX protocol in second-line chemotherapy. These protocols of chemotherapy used in first- and second-line treatment were able to control the disease in 33.3% for ovarian metastases compared to 66.7% for extraovarian metastases. Mean overall survival (OS) from ovarian metastases diagnosis was 14.2 months. The four patients treated by bilateral oophorectomy had a longer mean OS (16 months) than the four patients who did not experienced surgery (12.3 months). In conclusion, this case series suggests that ovarian metastases from gastric cancer are less sensitive than extraovarian metastases to modern protocol of chemotherapy. To confirm these observations, a large retrospective study is ongoing.