P Seu

In situ splitting of the cadaveric liver for transplantation

BACKGROUND The shortage of cadaveric donor livers is the rate-limiting step in clinical liver transplantation. Split liver transplantation provides a means to expand the cadaveric donor pool. However, this concept has not reached its full potential because of inferior patient and graft survival and high complication rates when traditional ex vivo split techniques are used. Therefore we sought to evaluate the safety, applicability, and effectiveness of a new technique for split liver transplantation. METHODS This study consists of 15 in situ split liver procurements, which resulted in 28 liver transplants. In situ splitting of selected livers from hemodynamically stable cadaveric donors was performed at the donor hospital without any additional work-up or equipment being needed. In situ liver splitting is accomplished in a manner identical to the living-donor procurement. This technique for liver splitting results in a left lateral segment graft (segments 2 and 3) and a right trisegmental graft (segments 1 and 4-8). This procedure required the use of the donor hospital operating room for an additional 1.5-2.5 hr and did not interfere with the procurement of 30 kidneys, 12 hearts, 7 lungs, and 9 pancreata from these same donors. RESULTS The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rates were 92% and 92%, respectively, while the 6-month and 1-year actuarial graft survival rates were 86% and 86%, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rate of patients who received a left lateral segment graft was 100% and 100%, respectively, while those who received a right trisegmental graft had 6-month and 1-year rates of 86% and 86%, respectively. The actuarial death-censored graft survival rates at 6 months and 1 year were 80% and 80%, respectively, for the left lateral segment grafts, and 93% and 93%, respectively, for the right trisegmental grafts. Alograft and patient survival was independent of United Network for Organ Sharing status at the time of liver transplantation. No patient developed a biliary stricture, required re-exploration for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, or suffered from portal vein, hepatic vein, or hepatic artery thrombosis CONCLUSIONS In situ split liver transplantation can be accomplished without complications and provides results that are superior to those obtained previously with ex vivo methods. It abolishes ex vivo benching and prolonged ischemia times and provides two optimal grafts with hemostasis accomplished. This technique decreases pediatric waiting time and allows adult recipients to receive right-sided grafts safely. In situ splitting is the method of choice for expanding the cadaveric liver donor pool.

A simple model to estimate survival after retransplantation of the liver

To formulate a model predicting survival after liver retransplantation, we analyzed in detail the last 150 cases of hepatic retransplantation at UCLA. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified five variables that demonstrated independent simultaneous prognostic value in estimating patient survival after retransplantation: (1) age group (pediatric or adult), (2) recipient requiring preoperative mechanical ventilation, (3) donor organ cold ischemia > or =12 hr, (4) preoperative serum creatinine, and (5) preoperative serum total bilirubin. The Cox regression equation that predicts survival based on these covariates was simplified by assigning individual patients a risk classification based on a 5-point scoring system. We demonstrate that this system can be employed to identify a subgroup of patients in which the expected outcome is too poor to justify retransplantation. These findings may assist in the rational selection of patients suitable for retransplantation.

The role of tumor necrosis factor in allograft rejection. III, Evidence that anti-TNF antibody therapy prolongs allograft survival in rats with acute rejection

We have previously demonstrated that TNF-alpha levels are elevated in liver transplant patients experiencing acute rejection. In addition, prophylactic administration of anti-TNF-alpha or anti-TNF-beta antibodies prolonged graft survival in a rat heterotopic cardiac transplant model. This experiment was designed to evaluate anti-TNF therapy in the treatment of acute allograft rejection. Heterotopic cardiac transplants were performed using Buffalo donors and Lewis recipients. Histologic sections of transplanted grafts from untreated animals revealed significant rejection at day 4 with terminal rejection occurring on day 10.8 +/- 0.4. Animals in the experimental groups received antirejection therapy from postoperative days 4-13. Treatment with cyclosporine at 2 mg/kg/day prolonged graft survival to 16.5 +/- 2.0 days (P = 0.01 versus controls). Administration of polyclonal anti-TNF-alpha in combination with polyclonal anti-TNF-beta increased graft survival to 14.6 +/- 0.4 days (P less than 0.001 versus controls). Use of a monoclonal anti-TNF-alpha antibody was even more effective, with graft survival of 17.4 +/- 0.7 days (P less than 0.001 versus controls). Combination immunotherapy with monoclonal anti-TNF-alpha in conjunction with CsA extended survival to greater than 30 days. In contrast, recombinant TNF-alpha (5 micrograms/day, i.p.) markedly accelerated the time to graft failure (7.4 +/- 0.2 days, P less than 0.001 versus controls). Examination of explanted graft tissue on postoperative day 9 from animals treated with anti-TNF showed decreased mononuclear cell infiltrate when compared to untreated animals. Treatment with TNF-alpha markedly increased the inflammatory process. These results suggest that TNF may play a role in the pathogenesis of acute rejection.

The role of tumor necrosis factor in allograft rejection. II. Evidence that antibody therapy against tumor necrosis factor-alpha and lymphotoxin enhances cardiac allograft survival in rats.

In the previous study we demonstrated that circulating levels of TNF-alpha are elevated during liver allograft rejection and may precede clinical manifestations. The current study was designed to investigate the efficacy of antibody therapy against tumor necrosis factor-alpha and lymphotoxin (LT) in a rat heterotropic cardiac transplant model utilizing Buffalo donors and Lewis recipients. Control animals received no immunotherapy and experienced rejection on postoperative day 11 +/- 0.4 (mean +/- SEM). Experimental animals received immunotherapy either intraperitoneal or intravenous from days 1 to 10. The i.p. administered anti-TNF-alpha prolonged graft survival to 16 +/- 2.7 days (P less than 0.05 vs. controls); the i.v. administration prolonged survival to 15 +/- 1.4 days (P less than 0.004). Animals treated with i.p. anti-LT survived 17 +/- 1.7 days (P less than 0.002 vs. controls). Combination immunotherapy of anti-TNF-alpha and anti-LT increased function to 21 +/- 2.2 days (P less than 0.001 vs controls). Conversely, administration of purified TNF-alpha or LT to graft recipients accelerated the time to rejection. Mean survival for both treatments was 7 days (P less than 0.001 vs. controls). Histologic examination of the transplanted cardiac tissue showed a typical pattern for acute rejection; there was no evidence of hemorrhagic or coagulative necrosis. In contrast, administration of purified TNF-alpha or LT to recipients of a syngeneic heart did not stimulate rejection. These data suggest that TNF-alpha and LT may play a role in the pathogenesis of acute allograft rejection. In addition, the mechanism appears to be distinct from that seen in TNF-alpha or LT-mediated cytotoxicity of tumor cells.