Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where P. Shetty is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by P. Shetty.


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2017

Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

G. Femia; Taufik Fetahovic; P. Shetty; A. Lee

BACKGROUND For some patients with atrial fibrillation, direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is one strategy that can be used to establish sinus rhythm but appropriate anticoagulation is mandatory to prevent thromboembolic events. Historically, patients were anticoagulated with warfarin with bridging with unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin, however, recently novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban have become more popular. Despite the increase in use, real world data on safety and efficacy is limited. METHODS We retrospectively analysed patients that underwent DCCV at Wollongong Hospital from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2016 and compared peri-procedural anticoagulation with warfarin and the three NOACs. Patients were treated with at least 24hours of anticoagulation before and at least four weeks after the procedure unless contraindication developed. All patients underwent transoesophageal echocardiography prior to cardioversion regardless of anticoagulation type or duration. Patients with left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus did not undergo cardioversion. We analysed the utilisation rates of NOACs and compared the incidence of post procedural ischaemic strokes and major bleeding events at eight weeks follow-up. RESULTS Over the study period, 284 patients underwent DCCV; 109 (38.4%) patients were anticoagulated with warfarin and 175 (61.6%) with one of the three NOACs; 77 (27.1%) with apixaban, 60 (21.1%) with rivaroxaban and 38 (13.4%) with dabigatran. Patients treated with warfarin were on average older (71.3±9.7 vs. 65.2±12.9; p value, 0.0005) with more cardiac risk factors including documented heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (39.4% vs. 22.9%; p value, 0.0032), medically treated hypertension (76.1% vs. 48.6%; p value, 0.0001) and peripheral vascular disease (31.2% vs. 12.1%; p value, 0.0004). The NOACs were more frequently used in patients with lower CHA2DS2-VASc scores; 179 patients had a score≤3 with 52 (29.1%) patients treated with warfarin and 127 (70.9%) treated with a NOAC (p value, 0.0001). In our cohort, the use of NOACs increased over the study period from 45.6% in 2014 to 82.8% in 2016. There was a low incidence of ischaemic stroke and bleeding events in both groups, 1.8% versus 0.6% (p value, 0.5607) and 3.6% versus 1.7% (p value, 0.4343) respectively. In the NOAC group, 95 of the 174 patients were anticoagulation-naïve and anticoagulated for less than five days; in comparison to longer duration therapy there was no difference in ischaemic stroke and bleeding events. CONCLUSION In our institution, the use of NOACs in electrical cardioversion increased significantly over the study period and in our experience, they appear to be as safe as warfarin with low rates of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding. In addition, a short duration NOAC strategy was comparable to longer duration therapy.


European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes | 2018

Use of clinical risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the CONCORDANCE registry

Rong Bing; Shaun G. Goodman; Andrew T. Yan; Keith A.A. Fox; Chris P Gale; Karice Hyun; Mario D’Souza; P. Shetty; John Atherton; C. Hammett; Derek P. Chew; David Brieger

Aims There is little information on clinical risk stratification (CRS) compared to objective risk tools in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). We quantified CRS use, its agreement with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores (GRS), and association with outcomes. Methods and results Data were extracted from the Australian Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events (CONCORDANCE), a multi-centre NSTEACS registry. From February 2009 to December 2015, 4512 patients from 41 sites were included. Predictors of CRS use and association with treatment were identified, CRS-GRS agreement determined and prediction of in-hospital and 6-month mortality compared. Clinical risk stratification was documented in 21% of patients. Family history of coronary disease was the only independent predictor of CRS use [odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.04-1.45]; electrocardiogram changes (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.68-0.96), elevated biomarkers (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48-0.73), dementia (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.84), and an urban hospital setting (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.89) were independent negative predictors. A treatment-risk paradox was observed: high CRS risk patients received less anticoagulation (79% vs. 88%, P = 0.001) and angiography (83% vs. 71%, P < 0.001). CRS-GRS agreement was poor (kappa coefficient = 0.034) and CRS less predictive for in-hospital (c-statistic 0.54 vs. 0.87, P < 0.001) and 6-month (c-statistic 0.55 vs. 0.74, P < 0.01) mortality. Conclusion In Australia, CRS does not guide treatment, correlate with GRS or predict outcomes. This study suggests the need for greater awareness and integration of validated tools such as the GRACE score to optimally direct treatment and potentially improve outcomes.


BMJ Open | 2018

TEXT messages to improve MEDication adherence and Secondary prevention (TEXTMEDS) after acute coronary syndrome: a randomised clinical trial protocol

Clara K. Chow; Aravinda Thiagalingam; Karla Santo; Cindy Kok; Jay Thakkar; Sandrine Stepien; Laurent Billot; Stephen Jan; Rohina Joshi; Graham S. Hillis; David Brieger; Derek P. Chew; Karin Rådholm; John Atherton; Ravinay Bhindi; N. Collins; S. Coverdale; C. Hamilton-Craig; Nadarajah Kangaharan; Andrew Maiorana; Michelle McGrady; P. Shetty; Peter L. Thompson; Anthony Rogers; Julie Redfern

Background Identifying simple, low-cost and scalable means of supporting lifestyle change and medication adherence for patients following a cardiovascular (CV) event is important. Objective The TEXTMEDS (TEXT messages to improve MEDication adherence and Secondary prevention) study aims to investigate whether a cardiac education and support programme sent via mobile phone text message improves medication adherence and risk factor levels in patients following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Study design A single-blind, multicentre, randomised clinical trial of 1400 patients after an ACS with 12 months follow-up. The intervention group will receive multiple weekly text messages that provide information, motivation, support to adhere to medications, quit smoking (if relevant) and recommendations for healthy diet and exercise. The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients who are adherent to cardioprotective medications and the key secondary outcomes are mean systolic blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Secondary outcomes will also include total cholesterol, mean diastolic BP, the percentage of participants who are adherent to each cardioprotective medication class, the percentage of participants who achieve target levels of CV risk factors, major vascular events, hospital readmissions and all-cause mortality. The study will be augmented by formal economic and process evaluations to assess acceptability, utility and cost-effectiveness. Summary The study will provide multicentre randomised trial evidence of the effects of a text message-based programme on cardioprotective medication adherence and levels of CV risk factors. Ethics and dissemination Primary ethics approval was received from Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC2012/12/4.1 (3648) AU RED HREC/13/WMEAD/15). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international conferences. Trial registration number ACTRN12613000793718; Pre-results.


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2017

Socioeconomic Equity in the Receipt of In-Hospital Care and Outcomes in Australian Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: The CONCORDANCE Registry

Karice Hyun; Julie Redfern; Mark Woodward; Mario D’Souza; P. Shetty; Derek P. Chew; Nadarajah Kangaharan; A. Farshid; Kevin Alford; Tom Briffa; David Brieger

BACKGROUND Socioeconomic status (SES) is a social determinant of both health and receipt of health care services, but its impact is under-studied in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to examine the influence of SES on in-hospital care, and clinical events for patients presenting with an ACS to public hospitals in Australia. METHODS Data from 9064 ACS patient records were collected from 41 public hospitals nationwide from 2009 as part of the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome Care (CONCORDANCE) registry. For this analysis, we divided the cohort into four socioeconomic groups (based on postcode of usual residence) and compared the in-hospital care provided and clinical outcomes before and after adjustment for both patient clinical characteristics and hospital clustering. RESULTS Patients were divided into four SES groups (from the most to the least disadvantaged: 2042 (23%) vs. 2104 (23%) vs. 1994 (22%) vs. 2968 (32%)). Following adjustments for patient characteristics, there were no differences in the odds of receiving coronary angiogram, revascularisation, prescription of recommended medication, or referral to cardiac rehabilitation across the SES groups (p=0.06, 0.69, 0.89 and 0.79, respectively). After adjustment for clinical characteristics, no associations were observed for in-hospital and cumulative death (p=0.62 and p=0.71, respectively). However, the most disadvantaged group were 37% more likely to have a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) than the least disadvantaged group (OR (95% CI): 1.37 (1.1, 1.71), p=0.02) driven by incidence of in-hospital heart failure. CONCLUSIONS Although there may be gaps in the delivery of care, this delivery of care does not differ by patients SES. It is an encouraging affirmation that all patients in Australian public hospitals receive equal in-hospital care, and the likelihood of death is comparable between the SES groups.


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2008

Long-term Outcomes of Percutaneous Therapy for True Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Drug-eluting Stents Using the “Shunt” Technique

P. Shetty; Nigel Jepson; Robert Giles; Daniel Friedman; Warren Walsh; Roger Allan; Mark Pitney

405 Long-term Outcomes of Percutaneous Therapy for True Bifurcation Lesions Treated with Drug-eluting Stents Using the “Shunt” Technique Pratap Shetty ∗, Nigel Jepson, Robert Giles, Daniel Friedman, Warren Walsh, Roger Allan, Mark Pitney Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia Background: A standardised two stent technique, (“shunt stenting”) has been usual practice for treating true bifurcation lesions involvingmajor side branches (>2.25mm) at our institution. We report procedural and follow up data on the first 254 patients. Methods: Database data collection on all PCI lesions and procedures is collectedprospectively at our institution.We reviewed procedural details between November 2002 and January 2008. Follow-up was obtained through telephone interview and clinical review. Results:Out of 442 bifurcations treated, 254 were “shunt” stented. 75.6% were males with a mean age of 62.1 years. Acute coronary syndrome (53.2%) was the most common indication for angioplasty. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was used in 44.9%. The commonest lesion was LAD/Diagonal (66.1%). Cypher stents were used in 80%, Taxus in 10%. The average stent diameter used was 2.84mm (main branch) and 2.53mm (side branch). Procedural success with no MACE was obtained in 99.6% o t a


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2016

Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Direct Current Cardioversion Procedures

G. Femia; T. Fetahovic; T. Nguyendang; A. Yeung; P. Shetty; A. Lee


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2018

TCT-238 Comparing 3 year outcomes between medical therapy and percutaneous revascularisation for the surgically ineligible cohort.

Avedis Ekmejian; A. Lee; P. Shetty; Tuan Nguyen-Dang; A. Yeung; James Sapontis; Sami Firoozi; Ravinay Bhindi; P. Hansen; Jonathan Hill; Rafal Dworakowski; Philip MacCarthy; Ajay M. Shah; Jonathan Byrne


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2018

Comparison of 3-Year Outcomes Between Medical Therapy and Percutaneous Revascularisation for Surgically Ineligible Patients

A. Ekmejian; A. Lee; P. Shetty; J. Sapontis; S. Firoozi; Ravinay Bhindi; P. Hansen; M. Ward; A. Kaura; Jonathan Hill; Rafal Dworakowski; Philip MacCarthy; N Melikian; Ian Webb; Ajay M. Shah; Jonathan Byrne; E. Danson


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2018

Atrial Fibrillation: A Descriptive Study of Management in a Large Cardiology Practice

S. Eather; A. Ekmejian; R. Lim; F. Zaky; D. Owensby; A. Yeung; P. Shetty; A. Sepahpour; C. Hsieh; A. Lee


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2018

The Use of CHA2DS2VASc Score in Predicting the Outcome of Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Persistent atrial Fibrillation Immediately Post–Cardioversion and at 4 Weeks

V. Vijayarajan; A. Ekmejian; F. Zaky; P. Shetty

Collaboration


Dive into the P. Shetty's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Lee

Wollongong Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge