Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where P. Van Houtte is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by P. Van Houtte.


Annals of Oncology | 2012

Short course chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized multicentric phase II study

Raphaël Maréchal; Bertrand Vos; Marc Polus; Thierry Delaunoit; M. Peeters; P. Demetter; Alain Hendlisz; Anne Demols; Denis Franchimont; Gontran Verset; P. Van Houtte; J. Van De Stadt; J. L. Van Laethem

BACKGROUND Induction chemotherapy has been suggested to impact on preoperative chemoradiation efficacy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). To evaluate in LARC patients, the feasibility and efficacy of a short intense course of induction oxaliplatin before preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with T2-T4/N+ rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to arm A-preoperative CRT with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion followed by surgery-or arm B-induction oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-FU followed by CRT and surgery. The primary end point was the rate of ypT0-1N0 stage achievement. RESULTS Fifty seven patients were randomly assigned (arm A/B: 29/28) and evaluated for planned interim analysis. On an intention-to-treat basis, the ypT0-1N0 rate for arms A and B were 34.5% (95% CI: 17.2% to 51.8%) and 32.1% (95% CI: 14.8% to 49.4%), respectively, and the study therefore was closed prematurely for futility. There were no statistically significant differences in other end points including pathological complete response, tumor regression and sphincter preservation. Completion of the preoperative CRT sequence was similar in both groups. Grade 3/4 toxicity was significantly higher in arm B. CONCLUSIONS Short intense induction oxaliplatin is feasible in LARC patients without compromising the preoperative CRT completion, although the current analysis does not indicate increased locoregional impact on standard therapy.


Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery | 1988

The management of spinal epidural metastases

J. Brihaye; P. Ectors; M Lemort; P. Van Houtte

In 1959, in our first study on 24 cases of epidural metastases19, we noted that a feeling of deep pessimism was apparent in all previous publications with regard to the outcome of these patients. The same feeling is still perceptible in most recent studies. Since 1959, several papers from our departments21, 22, 57, 60, 76, 79, 85, 98, 104, 114, 128, 179 were dedicated to the problem of cancerous paraplegia, expressing in short our determination to find out the best management for these patients. We cannot adopt a defeatist attitude even if the final results still remain quite disappointing in many cases. In fact the main action for improving the results has always been and still is the promptness in making the diagnosis followed by the right therapeutic measure.


European Journal of Cancer | 2009

Mitomycin C with continuous fluorouracil or with cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced anal cancer (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II study 22011-40014)

Oscar Matzinger; F. Roelofsen; L. Mineur; S. Koswig; E.M. van der Steen-Banasik; P. Van Houtte; Karin Haustermans; L. Radosevic-Jelic; R.P. Mueller; Philippe Maingon; Laurence Collette; J.F. Bosset

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility and activity of radio-chemotherapy with mitomycin C (MMC) and cisplatin (CDDP) in locally advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma with reference to radiotherapy (RT) combined with MMC and fluorouracil (5-FU). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable disease >4 cmN0 or N+ received RT (36Gy+2 week gap+23.4Gy) with either MMC/CDDP or MMC/5-FU (MMC 10mg/m(2) d1 of each sequence; 5-FU 200mg/m(2)/day c.i.v. daily; CDDP 25mg/m(2) weekly). Forty patients/arm were needed to exclude a RECIST objective response rate (ORR), 8 weeks after treatment, of <75% (Fleming 1, alpha=10%, beta=10%). RESULTS The ORR was 79.5% (31/39) (lower bound confidence interval [CI]: 68.8%) with MMC/5-FU versus 91.9% (34/ 37) (lower bound CI: 82.8%) with MMC/CDDP. In the MMC/5-FU group, two patients (5.1%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity versus 11 (29.7%) in the MMC/CDDP group. Nine grade 3 haematological events occurred with MMC/CDDP versus none with 5-FU/MMC. The rate of other toxicities did not differ. There was no toxic death. Thirty-one patients in the MMC/5-FU arm (79.5%) and 18 in the MMC/CDDP arm (48.6%) were fully compliant with the protocol treatment (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Radio-chemotherapy with MMC/CDDP seems promising as only MMC/CDDP demonstrated enough activity (RECIST ORR >75%) to be tested further in phase III trials; MMC/5-FU did not. MMC/CDDP also had an overall acceptable toxicity profile.


Annals of Oncology | 1999

A randomised phase III trial comparing consolidation treatment with further chemotherapy to chest irradiation in patients with initially unresectable locoregional non-small-cell lung cancer responding to induction chemotherapy

Jean-Paul Sculier; Marianne Paesmans; Jean-Jacques Lafitte; J. Baumöhl; Jacques Thiriaux; O Van Cutsem; P Recloux; G. Bureau; M.C. Berchier; C. Zacharias; Paul Mommen; T. Bosschaerts; Thierry Berghmans; P. Van Houtte; Vincent Ninane

PURPOSE A phase III randomised trial was conducted in patients with non-metastatic unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer in order to compare, in responders to induction chemotherapy, consolidation treatment by further chemotherapy to chest irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 462 untreated NSCLC patients were eligible for three courses of induction chemotherapy (MIP) consisting of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), ifosfamide (3 g/m2) and mitomycin C (6 mg/m2). It was proposed that objective responders be randomised to either three further courses of MIP or to chest irradiation (60 Gy; 2 Gy per fraction given over six weeks). RESULTS An objective response rate of 35% was achieved; 115 patients (including 52% with initial stage IIIA and 44% with initial stage IIIB) were randomised to consolidation treatment, 60 of them to further chemotherapy and 55 to chest radiotherapy. There was no significant difference in survival between the two arms, with a respective median and two-year survival of 42 weeks (95% confidence intervals (95% CI: 35-51) and 18% (95% CI: 8-28) for chemotherapy and 54 weeks (95% CI: 43-73) and 22% (95% CI: 11-33) for irradiation. There was also no statistical difference for response duration between the two arms but chest irradiation was associated with a significantly greater duration of local control than chemotherapy (median duration times: 158 vs. 31 weeks, P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS For non-metastatic unresectable NSCLC treated by an induction chemotherapy regimen containing cisplatin and ifosfamide, if an objective response is obtained, consolidation treatments by further chemotherapy or by chest irradiation result in non-statistically different survival distributions, although a better local control duration is observed with radiotherapy.


European Respiratory Journal | 1998

Bronchial stenosis and sclerosing mediastinitis: an uncommon complication of external thoracic radiotherapy

St. Dechambre; J. Dorzee; J. Fastrez; C. Hanzen; P. Van Houtte; J.P. d'Odémont

The side-effects of radiation therapy on the bronchial tree or on the mediastinum are seldom reported. In this setting, we report a case of sclerosing mediastinitis with bronchial stenosis discovered 1 yr after external radiotherapy for lung cancer. The patient was treated with a Dumont stent and has so far had an uneventful further course for up to 42 months. Bronchial stenosis related to mediastinal fibrosis after radiotherapy has not been reported previously.


Diseases of The Esophagus | 2011

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a multicentre Rare Cancer Network study.

Bertrand Vos; T. Rozema; Richard Miller; Alain Hendlisz; J. L. Van Laethem; K. Khanfir; D. C. Weber; I. El Nakadi; P. Van Houtte

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. The aims of this retrospective study were to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of these patients. Between 1994 and 2004, 24 patients with SCCE from several centers were reviewed for data on demographics, presenting symptoms, diagnosis, disease stage, type of treatment, and outcome. SCCE occurs in the sixth decade: median age (interquartile range [IQR]): 65 (59-69) years with a male predominance (63%). The most common complaining symptoms were rapidly progressive dysphagia (79%), weight loss (54%), and retrosternal/epigastric pain (46%). The tumor arises primarily in the middle (52%) or in the lower (35%) third of the esophagus. History of tobacco and alcohol exposure was present in 90% and 70% of case, respectively. Extensive disease was present in 13 cases (54%) at initial diagnosis. The overall median survival (IQR) was 11 (8-20) months for all 24 patients, and the 2-year overall survival was 25.1%. Four patients were alive more than 2 years after treatment. Chemotherapy increased the survival compared with symptomatic management in extensive disease (median survival [IQR]: 9.5 [6-14] vs. 6 [4-7] months, P= 0.05). In limited disease, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy was more effective than non-concurrent treatment (median survival [IQR]: 36 [14-93] vs. 11 [9-15] months, P= 0.04). Two patients were treated by surgery and chemoradiation therapy with a survival of 35 and 66 months. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment of SCCE in all stage. For limited disease SCCE, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the primary choice compared with sequential approach. The role of surgery was not assessable in our study.


European Respiratory Journal | 2012

Surrogate markers predicting overall survival for lung cancer: ELCWP recommendations

Thierry Berghmans; Françoise Pasleau; Marianne Paesmans; Yves Bonduelle; J. Cadranel; I. Cs Toth; Camilo Garcia; Vicente Giner; Stéphane Holbrechts; Jean-Jacques Lafitte; J. Lecomte; Ingrid Louviaux; Eveline Markiewicz; A.P. Meert; Michel Richez; Martine Roelandts; A. Scherpereel; Ch. Tulippe; P. Van Houtte; P. Van Schil; C. Wachters; Virginie Westeel; Jean-Paul Sculier

The present systematic review was performed under the auspices of the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) in order to determine the role of early intermediate criteria (surrogate markers), instead of survival, in determining treatment efficacy in patients with lung cancer. Initially, the level of evidence for the use of overall survival to evaluate treatment efficacy was reviewed. Nine questions were then formulated by the ELCWP. After reviewing the literature with experts on these questions, it can be concluded that overall survival is still the best criterion for predicting treatment efficacy in lung cancer. Some intermediate criteria can be early predictors, if not surrogates, for survival, despite limitations in their potential application: these include time to progression, progression-free survival, objective response, local control after radiotherapy, downstaging in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), complete resection and pathological TNM in resected NSCLC, and a few circulating markers. Other criteria assessed in these recommendations are not currently adequate surrogates of survival in lung cancer.


Lung Cancer | 1994

Radiosensitization by cytotoxic drugs. The EORTC experience by the Radiotherapy and Lung Cancer Cooperative Groups

C. Schaake-Koning; W. van den Bogaert; O. Dalesio; J. Festen; J. Hoogenhout; P. Van Houtte; A. Kirkpatrick; M.G.J. Koolen; B. Maat; A. Nijs; A. Renaud; Patrick Rodrigus; Lon Schuster-Uitterhoeve; Jean-Paul Sculier; N. van Zandwijk; Harry Bartelink

UNLABELLED A three-arm randomized trial was performed to assess the acute and late toxicity and the impact on survival of the combination high-dose, split-course radiotherapy with 30 mg/m2 cisplatin (cDDP) weekly, with 6 mg/m2 cisplatin daily compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study started in May 1984 and was closed in May 1989 after 331 patients were randomised. The analysis was performed after a minimum follow-up period of 22 months. Radiotherapy (RT) consisted of 30 Gy, 10 fractions, five fractions a week; then a 3-week split followed by 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Nausea and vomiting were increased for a majority of the patients in the combined treatment arms during treatment. There was no addition of bone marrow suppression, renal dysfunction or esophagitis. Increase of late radiation damage was not observed. Local control (= absence of local progression) was improved for patients treated according to the daily cisplatin arm. This has lead to an improvement in overall survival. There was no effect in time to distant metastasis due to the combined modality. The treatment influence was confirmed in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION local control and survival can be improved by combining radiotherapy with daily low-dose cisplatin in patients with inoperable NSCLC.


Lung Cancer | 2009

A phase III randomised study comparing concomitant radiochemotherapy as induction versus consolidation treatment in patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer

Thierry Berghmans; P. Van Houtte; Marianne Paesmans; Vicente Giner; J. Lecomte; George Koumakis; Michel Richez; Stéphane Holbrechts; Martine Roelandts; Anne-Pascale Meert; Serge Alard; Nathalie Leclercq; Jean-Paul Sculier

As concomitant chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC is associated with survival advantage in comparison to a sequential approach, we conducted a phase III randomised study aiming to determine the best sequence and safety of chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT), using a regimen with cisplatin (CDDP), gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR). Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients received CDDP (60 mg/m(2)), GEM (1g/m(2), days 1 and 8) and VNR (25mg/m(2), days 1 and 8) with reduced dosage of GEM and VNR during radiotherapy (66Gy). Two cycles of CT with radiotherapy followed by two further cycles of CT alone were administered in arm A or the reverse sequence in arm B. The study was prematurely closed for poor accrual due to administrative problems. Forty-nine eligible patients were randomised. Response rates and median survival times were, respectively 57% (95% CI: 36-78%) and 17 months (95% CI: 9.3-24.6 months) in arm A and 79% (95% CI: 64-94%) and 23.9 months (95% CI: 13.3-34.5 months) in arm B (p>0.05). Chemotherapy dose-intensity was significantly reduced in arm A. Grade 3-4 oesophagitis occurred in 5 patients. One case of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis was observed. In conclusion, chemoradiotherapy with CDDP, GEM and VNR appears feasible as initial treatment or after induction chemotherapy. Consolidation chemoradiotherapy seems less toxic with a better observed response rates and survival although no valid conclusion can be drawn from the comparison of both arms.


European Journal of Cancer | 1980

Prognostic value of the superior vena cava syndrome as the presenting sign of small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung

P. Van Houtte; R. De Jager; J. Lustman-Maréchal; Yvon Kenis

Abstract In a series of 45 patients with small cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung with disease limited to one hemithorax, 15 of them presented at the time of diagnosis a superior vena cava syndrome. Both groups were similar in terms of response rate and survival. Superior vena cava syndrome is not an independent prognostic factor in small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Collaboration


Dive into the P. Van Houtte's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean-Paul Sculier

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marianne Paesmans

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stéphane Simon

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thierry Berghmans

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vincent Ninane

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Devriendt

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean Klastersky

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierre Scalliet

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge