P. van Velde
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by P. van Velde.
Precision Crop Protection - the Challenge and Use of Heterogeneity, Part 5 | 2010
J. van de Zande; V.T.J.M. Achten; H.T.A.M. Schepers; A.M. van der Lans; C. Kempenaar; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; H. Stallinga; P. van Velde
Matching spray volume to crop canopy sizes and shapes can reduce the use of plant protection products , thus reducing operational costs and environmental pollution. Developments on crop adapted spraying for fungal control are highlighted in arable crop spraying. A plant-specific variable volume precision sprayer, guided by foliage shape and volume (canopy density sprayer ; CDS ) was developed for bed-grown crops to apply fungicides . Sensor selection to quantify crop canopy and spray techniques to apply variable dose rates are evaluated based on laboratory measurements. Based on the laboratory experience a prototype CDS sprayer was built using either a Weed-IT ® or a GreenSeeker ® sensor to detect plant place (fluorescence) or size (reflectance). Variable rate application was either done with a pulse width modulation nozzle or a switchable four-nozzle body. Spray volume could be changed from 50 to 550 l ha−1 in 16 steps. Spray deposition , biological efficacy and agrochemical use reduction were evaluated in a flower bulb and a potato crop during field measurements using a prototype CDS sprayer. Spray volume savings of a prototype plant-specific sprayer are shown to be more than 75% in early late blight ( Phytophthora infestans ) control spraying in potatoes . In flower bulbs (lily ) it was shown that in Botrytis blight control on average spray volume could be reduced by 45%. In a potato crop biological efficacy was maintained at the same good level as of a conventional spraying. In a flower bulb crop biological efficacy of the CDS was lower than of conventional spraying, which means that spray strategy and dose algorithms need further research.
Archive | 2018
H. Stallinga; Ppo; P. van Velde; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; M. Wenneker; J.C. van de Zande; Wpr Agv Team Fruit-Bomen
Results of spray drift experiments are presented of the Munckhof MAS 3-row orchard sprayer in comparison with a reference spray technique for fruit crop spraying in The Netherlands. The Munckhof MAS 3-row orchard sprayer was equipped with a 90% drift reducing nozzle (Albuz TVI8001; 7 bar spray pressure), low level of air assistance (400 rpm PTO) and the VARIMAS variable air system and an Edge-Row setting. During the spray drift experiments the downwind outside 24 m of an apple orchard was sprayed at the full leaf stage (BBCH 91/92) using the fluorescent tracer Acid Yellow 250. Spray drift deposition was collected downwind of the sprayed orchard on a mowed grass area up to 25 m distance from the last tree row. Airborne spray drift was measured at 7.5 m distance from the last tree row on a pole at which two lines with collectors were attached at 1 m spacing up to 10 m height. The spray drift experiments showed that spraying an apple orchard at the full leaf stage (BBCH 91/92) with a Munckhof MAS 3-row orchard sprayer equipped with 90% drift reducing Albuz TVI8001 nozzles (7 bar), low level of air assistance (400 rpm PTO) and VARIMAS-system (last tree row sprayed from both sides) spray drift reduction at 4.5-5.5 m distance from the last tree row was 98.9% in comparison with the reference spray application. Using the VARIMAS-system with EdgeRow-setting the spray drift reduction was 99.5%. Airborne spray drift reduction at 7.5 m distance from the last tree row averaged over 10 m height was for the Munckhof MAS 3-row orchard sprayer equipped with 90% drift reducing Albuz TVI8001 nozzles (7 bar), low level of air assistance (400 rpm PTO) and VARIMAS-system 98.8% and for the VARIMAS-system with EdgeRow -setting 98.6%.
Aspects of applied biology | 2011
J. van de Zande; M. Wenneker; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; H. Stallinga; P. van Velde; N. Joosten
Aspects of applied biology | 2010
J.M.G.P. Michielsen; J. van de Zande; V.T.J.M. Achten; H. Stallinga; P. van Velde; B.R. Verwijs; C. Kempenaar; D.A. van der Schans; J. de Boer
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology | 2004
H. Stallinga; J. van de Zande; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; P. van Velde
Aspects of applied biology | 2014
J. van de Zande; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; H. Stallinga; P. van Velde
Proceedings of abstracts 12th Workshop Spray Application Techniques in Fruit Growing, 26-28 June 2013, Valencia, Spain | 2013
J.C. van de Zande; M. Wenneker; H. Stallinga; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; P. van Velde; A.T. Nieuwenhuizen
Aspects of applied biology | 2010
H. Stallinga; J. C. van de Zande; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; R. Meier; H.T.A.M. Schepers; P. van Velde; B.R. Verwijs; P. Balsari; P. I. Carpenter; S. E. Cooper; C. R. Glass; B. Magri; C. Mountford-Smith; T. H. Robinson; D. Stock; W. A. Taylor; E. W. Thornhill; J. van de Zande
Aspects of applied biology | 2010
J. C. van de Zande; H. Stallinga; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; P. van Velde; P. Balsari; P. I. Carpenter; S. E. Cooper; C. R. Glass; B. Magri; C. Mountford-Smith; T. H. Robinson; D. Stock; W. A. Taylor; E. W. Thornhill; J. van de Zande
International Advances in Pesticide Application, Robinson College, Cambridge, UK, 9-11 January 2008. | 2008
H. Stallinga; H.J. Holterman; J.M.G.P. Michielsen; P. van Velde; L. S. Alexander; P. I. Carpenter; S. E. Cooper; C. R. Glass; P. Gummer Andersen; B. Magri; T. H. Robinson; D. Stock; W. A. Taylor; E. W. Thornhill; J.C. van de Zande