Padmini S. Kedar
National Institutes of Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Padmini S. Kedar.
PLOS ONE | 2010
Elena K. Braithwaite; Padmini S. Kedar; Deborah J. Stumpo; Jonathan H. Freedman; Leona D. Samson; Samuel H. Wilson
Base excision repair (BER) is a DNA repair pathway designed to correct small base lesions in genomic DNA. While DNA polymerase beta (pol β) is known to be the main polymerase in the BER pathway, various studies have implicated other DNA polymerases in back-up roles. One such polymerase, DNA polymerase lambda (pol λ), was shown to be important in BER of oxidative DNA damage. To further explore roles of the X-family DNA polymerases λ and β in BER, we prepared a mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line with deletions in the genes for both pol β and pol λ. Neutral red viability assays demonstrated that pol λ and pol β double null cells were hypersensitive to alkylating and oxidizing DNA damaging agents. In vitro BER assays revealed a modest contribution of pol λ to single-nucleotide BER of base lesions. Additionally, using co-immunoprecipitation experiments with purified enzymes and whole cell extracts, we found that both pol λ and pol β interact with the upstream DNA glycosylases for repair of alkylated and oxidized DNA bases. Such interactions could be important in coordinating roles of these polymerases during BER.
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences | 2010
Samuel H. Wilson; William A. Beard; David D. Shock; Vinod K. Batra; Nisha A. Cavanaugh; Rajendra Prasad; Esther W. Hou; Yuan Liu; Kenjiro Asagoshi; Julie K. Horton; Padmini S. Kedar; Michael J. Carrozza; Aya Masaoka; Michelle Heacock
Base excision repair (BER) can protect a cell after endogenous or exogenous genotoxic stress, and a deficiency in BER can render a cell hypersensitive to stress-induced apoptotic and necrotic cell death, mutagenesis, and chromosomal rearrangements. However, understanding of the mammalian BER system is not yet complete as it is extraordinarily complex and has many back-up processes that complement a deficiency in any one step. Due of this lack of information, we are unable to make accurate predictions on therapeutic approaches targeting BER. A deeper understanding of BER will eventually allow us to conduct more meaningful clinical interventions. In this review, we will cover historical and recent information on mammalian BER and DNA polymerase β and discuss approaches toward development and use of small molecule inhibitors to manipulate BER. With apologies to others, we will emphasize results obtained in our laboratory and those of our collaborators.
DNA Repair | 2008
Padmini S. Kedar; Julie K. Horton; Samuel H. Wilson
Inhibition of PARP activity results in extreme sensitization to MMS-induced cell killing in cultured mouse fibroblasts. In these MMS-treated cells, PARP inhibition is accompanied by an accumulation of S-phase cells that requires signaling by the checkpoint kinase ATR [J.K. Horton, D.F. Stefanick, J.M. Naron, P.S. Kedar, S.H. Wilson, Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity prevents signaling pathways for cell cycle arrest following DNA methylating agent exposure, J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 15773-15785]. Here, we examined mouse fibroblast extracts for formation of a complex that may reflect association between the damage responsive proteins PARP-1 and ATR. Co-immunoprecipitation of PARP-1 and ATR was observed in extracts prepared from MMS-treated cells, but not under conditions of PARP inhibition. Further, our experiments demonstrated PAR-adduction of ATR in extracts from control and MMS-treated cells. An interaction between purified ATR and PARP-1 was similarly demonstrated, suggesting that the observed co-immunoprecipitation of ATR and PARP-1 from cell extracts may be due to a direct interaction between the two enzymes. In addition, purified recombinant ATR is a substrate for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by PARP-1, and poly(ADP-ribose) adduction of PARP-1 and ATR resulted in an increase in PARP-1 and ATR co-immunoprecipitation.
DNA Repair | 2013
Julie K. Horton; Natalie R. Gassman; Jason G. Williams; Scott A. Gabel; Matthew J. Cuneo; Rajendra Prasad; Padmini S. Kedar; Eugene F. DeRose; Esther W. Hou; Robert E. London; Samuel H. Wilson
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) binds intermediates of base excision repair (BER) and becomes activated for poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) synthesis. PAR mediates recruitment and functions of the key BER factors XRCC1 and DNA polymerase β (pol β) that in turn regulate PAR. Yet, the molecular mechanism and implications of coordination between XRCC1 and pol β in regulating the level of PAR are poorly understood. A complex of PARP-1, XRCC1 and pol β is found in vivo, and it is known that pol β and XRCC1 interact through a redox-sensitive binding interface in the N-terminal domain of XRCC1. We confirmed here that both oxidized and reduced forms of XRCC1 are present in mouse fibroblasts. To further understand the importance of the C12-C20 oxidized form of XRCC1 and the interaction with pol β, we characterized cell lines representing stable transfectants in Xrcc1(-/-) mouse fibroblasts of wild-type XRCC1 and two mutants of XRCC1, a novel reduced form with the C12-C20 disulfide bond blocked (C12A) and a reference mutant that is unable to bind pol β (V88R). XRCC1-deficient mouse fibroblasts are extremely hypersensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), and transfected wild-type and C12A mutant XRCC1 proteins similarly reversed MMS hypersensitivity. However, after MMS exposure the cellular PAR level was found to increase to a much greater extent in cells expressing the C12A mutant than in cells expressing wild-type XRCC1. PARP inhibition resulted in very strong MMS sensitization in cells expressing wild-type XRCC1, but this sensitization was much less in cells expressing the C12A mutant. The results suggest a role for the oxidized form of XRCC1 in the interaction with pol β in (1) controlling the PAR level after MMS exposure and (2) enabling the extreme cytotoxicity of PARP inhibition during the MMS DNA damage response.
DNA Repair | 2009
Michael J. Carrozza; Julie K. Horton; Padmini S. Kedar; Samuel H. Wilson
By limiting cell cycle progression following detection of DNA damage, checkpoints are critical for cell survival and genome stability. Methylated DNA damage, when combined with inhibition of PARP activity, results in an ATR-dependent S phase delay of the cell cycle. Here, we demonstrate that another checkpoint kinase, ATM, also is involved in the DNA damage response following treatment with a sub-lethal concentration of MMS combined with the PARP inhibitor 4-AN. Both ATM and PARP activities are important for moderating cellular sensitivity to MMS. Loss of ATM activity, or that of its downstream effector Chk2, limited the duration of the S phase delay. The combination of MMS and 4-AN resulted in ATM and Chk2 phosphorylation and the time course of phosphorylation for both kinases correlated with the S phase delay. Chk2 phosphorylation was reduced in the absence of ATM activity. The Chk2 phosphorylation that remained in the absence of ATM appeared to be dependent on ATR and DNA-PK. The results demonstrate that, following initiation of base excision repair and inhibition of PARP activity, ATM activation is critical for preventing the cell from progressing through S phase, and for protection against MMS-induced cytotoxicity.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Natalie R. Gassman; Padmini S. Kedar; Julie K. Horton; Samuel H. Wilson
Regulation of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) synthesis and turnover is critical to determining cell fate after genotoxic stress. Hyperactivation of PAR synthesis by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) occurs when cells deficient in DNA repair are exposed to genotoxic agents; however, the function of this hyperactivation has not been adequately explained. Here, we examine PAR synthesis in mouse fibroblasts deficient in the base excision repair enzyme DNA polymerase β (pol β). The extent and duration of PARP-1 activation was measured after exposure to either the DNA alkylating agent, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), or to low energy laser-induced DNA damage. There was strong DNA damage-induced hyperactivation of PARP-1 in pol β nullcells, but not in wild-type cells. In the case of MMS treatment, PAR synthesis did not lead to cell death in the pol β null cells, but instead resulted in increased PARylation of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) protein Ku70 and increased association of Ku70 with PARP-1. Inhibition of the NHEJ factor DNA-PK, under conditions of MMS-induced PARP-1 hyperactivation, enhanced necrotic cell death. These data suggest that PARP-1 hyperactivation is a protective mechanism triggering the classical-NHEJ DNA repair pathway when the primary alkylated base damage repair pathway is compromised.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Aya Masaoka; Natalie R. Gassman; Julie K. Horton; Padmini S. Kedar; Kristine L. Witt; Cheryl A. Hobbs; Grace E. Kissling; Keizo Tano; Kenjiro Asagoshi; Samuel H. Wilson
The breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein is a tumor suppressor playing roles in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation. Studies of DNA repair functions of BRCA1 have focused on double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways and have recently included base excision repair (BER). However, the function of BRCA1 in BER is not well defined. Here, we examined a BRCA1 role in BER, first in relation to alkylating agent (MMS) treatment of cells and the BER enzyme DNA polymerase β (pol β). MMS treatment of BRCA1 negative human ovarian and chicken DT40 cells revealed hypersensitivity, and the combined gene deletion of BRCA1 and pol β in DT40 cells was consistent with these factors acting in the same repair pathway, possibly BER. Using cell extracts and purified proteins, BRCA1 and pol β were found to interact in immunoprecipitation assays, yet in vivo and in vitro assays for a BER role of BRCA1 were negative. An alternate approach with the human cells of immunofluorescence imaging and laser-induced DNA damage revealed negligible BRCA1 recruitment during the first 60 s after irradiation, the period typical of recruitment of pol β and other BER factors. Instead, 15 min after irradiation, BRCA1 recruitment was strong and there was γ-H2AX co-localization, consistent with DSBs and repair. The rapid recruitment of pol β was similar in BRCA1 positive and negative cells. However, a fraction of pol β initially recruited remained associated with damage sites much longer in BRCA1 positive than negative cells. Interestingly, pol β expression was required for BRCA1 recruitment, suggesting a partnership between these repair factors in DSB repair.
Molecular Cell | 2004
Lee Wiederhold; John B. Leppard; Padmini S. Kedar; Feridoun Karimi-Busheri; Aghdass Rasouli-Nia; Michael Weinfeld; Alan E. Tomkinson; Tadahide Izumi; Rajendra Prasad; Samuel H. Wilson; Sankar Mitra; Tapas K. Hazra
Molecular Cell | 2007
Rajendra Prasad; Yuan Liu; Leesa J. Deterding; Vladimir Poltoratsky; Padmini S. Kedar; Julie K. Horton; Shin-ichiro Kanno; Kenjiro Asagoshi; Esther W. Hou; S. N. Khodyreva; O. I. Lavrik; Kenneth B. Tomer; Akira Yasui; Samuel H. Wilson
DNA Repair | 2006
Aditi Das; Lee Wiederhold; John B. Leppard; Padmini S. Kedar; Rajendra Prasad; Huxian Wang; Istvan Boldogh; Feridoun Karimi-Busheri; Michael Weinfeld; Alan E. Tomkinson; Samuel H. Wilson; Sankar Mitra; Tapas K. Hazra