Pål Viggo Hemmingsen
Statoil
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pål Viggo Hemmingsen.
Archive | 2008
Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Xiaoyun Li; Keijo J. Kinnari
An underinhibited system is defined as a system where an insufficient amount of thermodynamic inhibitor is present to prevent hydrate formation. Underinhibition might occur due to malfunctioning of equipment, temporary limitations in the inhibitor supplies or operational limitations or errors. Understanding the plugging risk of such systems is important in order to take the correct precautions to avoid blocked flowlines. In this paper we summarize the experimental efforts for the last decade within StatoilHydro on the hydrate plugging risk in underinhibited systems. The flow simulator has been used as the main experimental equipment. The overall results for systems underinhibited with ethylene glycol or methanol show that the plugging potential increases up to a maximum at concentrations around 10-15 wt%. At higher concentrations the plugging potential reduces compared to the uninhibited system. The results can be explained as follows: As water is converted to hydrates in a system containing a thermodynamic inhibitor, the inhibitor concentration will increase until the remaining aqueous phase is inhibited. This self-inhibited aqueous phase will wet the hydrate particles, giving raise to the characteristic term of “sticky” hydrate particles. The aqueous layer surrounding the hydrate particles will form liquid bridges, by capillary attractive forces, upon contact with other hydrate particles or the pipe wall. During the hydrate formation period, there is also a possibility that some of the liquid bridges are converted to solid ones, strengthening the agglomerates. Depending on the oil-water interfacial tension, the phase ratio between the aqueous phase and the solid hydrates and the conversion of liquid bridges to solid ones, this leads to increased plugging risk at lower concentrations of inhibitor (< 20 wt%) and reduced risk at higher concentrations as compared to the uninhibited system.
Archive | 2008
Keijo J. Kinnari; Catherine Labes-Carrier; Knud Lunde; Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Simon R. Davies; John A. Boxall; Carolyn A. Koh; E. Dendy Sloan
Hydrate plugging of hydrocarbon production conduits can cause large operational problems resulting in considerable economical losses. Modeling capabilities to predict hydrate plugging occurrences would help to improve facility design and operation in order to reduce the extent of such events. It would also contribute to a more effective and safer remediation process. This paper systematically describes different operational scenarios where hydrate plugging might occur and how a hydrate plug formation prediction tool would be beneficial. The current understanding of the mechanisms for hydrate formation, agglomeration and plugging of a pipeline are also presented. The results from this survey combined with the identified industrial needs are then used as a basis for the assessment of the capabilities of an existing hydrate plug formation model, called CSMHyK (The Colorado School of Mines Hydrate Kinetic Model). This has recently been implemented in the transient multiphase flow simulator OLGA as a separate module. Finally, examples using the current model in several operational scenarios are shown to illustrate some of its important capabilities. The results from these examples and the operational scenarios analysis are then used to discuss the future development needs of the CSMHyK model.
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition | 2008
Simon R. Davies; John A. Boxall; Carolyn A. Koh; E. Dendy Sloan; Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Keijo J. Kinnari; Zheng-Gang Xu
Fluid Phase Equilibria | 2011
Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Roderick Burgass; Karen Schou Pedersen; Keijo J. Kinnari; Henrik Sørensen
Spe Production & Operations | 2009
Simon R. Davies; John A. Boxall; Carolyn A. Koh; E. Dendy Sloan; Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Keijo J. Kinnari; Zheng-Gang Xu
Archive | 2011
Reidar Barfod Schüller; Lene Amundsen; Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Rainer Hoffmann
Archive | 2011
Baard Kaasa; Pål Viggo Hemmingsen
Archive | 2015
Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Gjermund Grimsbo; Marcus Fathi
Archive | 2014
Halvor Kjørholt; Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Gjermund Grimsbo; Gisle Stjern
Archive | 2018
Gjermund Grimsbo; Pål Viggo Hemmingsen; Halvor Kjørholt; Gisle Stjern