Pamela B. Morris
Medical University of South Carolina
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pamela B. Morris.
Journal of Clinical Lipidology | 2015
Terry A. Jacobson; Kevin C. Maki; Carl E. Orringer; Peter H. Jones; Penny M. Kris-Etherton; Geeta Sikand; Ralph La Forge; Stephen R. Daniels; Don P. Wilson; Pamela B. Morris; Robert A. Wild; Scott M. Grundy; Martha L. Daviglus; Keith C. Ferdinand; Krishnaswami Vijayaraghavan; Prakash Deedwania; Judith A. Aberg; Katherine P. Liao; James M. McKenney; Joyce L. Ross; Lynne T. Braun; Matthew K. Ito; Harold E. Bays; W. Virgil Brown
An Expert Panel convened by the National Lipid Association previously developed a consensus set of recommendations for the patient-centered management of dyslipidemia in clinical medicine (part 1). These were guided by the principle that reducing elevated levels of atherogenic cholesterol (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) reduces the risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This document represents a continuation of the National Lipid Association recommendations developed by a diverse panel of experts who examined the evidence base and provided recommendations regarding the following topics: (1) lifestyle therapies; (2) groups with special considerations, including children and adolescents, women, older patients, certain ethnic and racial groups, patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus, patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and patients with residual risk despite statin and lifestyle therapies; and (3) strategies to improve patient outcomes by increasing adherence and using team-based collaborative care.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2016
Donald M. Lloyd-Jones; Pamela B. Morris; Christie M. Ballantyne; Kim K. Birtcher; David D. Daly; Sondra M. DePalma; Margo Minissian; Carl E. Orringer; Sidney C. Smith
James L. Januzzi, Jr, MD, FACC, Chair Luis C. Afonso, MBBS, FACC Anthony Bavry, MD, FACC Brendan M. Everett, MD, FACC Jonathan Halperin, MD, FACC Adrian Hernandez, MD, FACC Hani Jneid, MD, FACC Dharam J. Kumbhani, MD, SM, FACC Eva M. Lonn, MD, FACC James K. Min, MD, FACC Pamela B. Morris
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2015
Pamela B. Morris; Brian A. Ference; Eiman Jahangir; Dmitriy N. Feldman; John J. Ryan; Hossein Bahrami; Mikhael F. El-Chami; Shyam Bhakta; David E. Winchester; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Monica Sanchez Shields; Prakash Deedwania; Laxmi S. Mehta; Binh An P. Phan; Neal L. Benowitz
Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as a result of inhaled tobacco products continues to be a global healthcare crisis, particularly in low- and middle-income nations lacking the infrastructure to develop and implement effective public health policies limiting tobacco use. Following initiation of public awareness campaigns 50 years ago in the United States, considerable success has been achieved in reducing the prevalence of cigarette smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke. However, there has been a slowing of cessation rates in the United States during recent years, possibly caused by high residual addiction or fatigue from cessation messaging. Furthermore, tobacco products have continued to evolve faster than the scientific understanding of their biological effects. This review considers selected updates on the genetics and epigenetics of smoking behavior and associated cardiovascular risk, mechanisms of atherogenesis and thrombosis, clinical effects of smoking and benefits of cessation, and potential impact of electronic cigarettes on cardiovascular health.
Circulation | 2016
Barbara S. Wiggins; Joseph J. Saseen; Robert L. Page; Brent N. Reed; Kevin Sneed; John B. Kostis; David E. Lanfear; Salim S. Virani; Pamela B. Morris
A drug-drug interaction (DDI) is a pharmacokinetic or pharmacological influence of 1 medication on another that differs from the known or anticipated effects of each agent alone.1 A DDI may result in a change in either drug efficacy or drug toxicity for 1 or both of the interacting medications.2 Pharmacokinetic DDIs result in altered absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of a medication. A pharmacodynamic DDI occurs when 1 medication modifies the pharmacological effect of another in an additive, a synergistic, or an antagonistic fashion. It is estimated that ≈2.8% of hospital admissions occur as a direct result of DDIs.3 However, the actual incidence of hospitalization secondary to clinically significant DDIs is likely to be highly underestimated because medication-related issues are more commonly reported as adverse drug reactions. Complex underlying disease states also may make recognizing a DDI more challenging, further contributing to a lower reported incidence. The overall clinical impact of a DDI can range from mild to life-threatening. Therefore, not all DDIs require a modification in therapy. The variability in the clinical significance of a DDI depends on both medication-specific and patient-specific factors. Medication-specific factors include the individual pharmacokinetic characteristics of each medication implicated in the DDI (eg, binding affinity, half-life [t1/2]), dose of the medications, serum concentrations, timing and sequence of administration, and duration of therapy. Patient-specific factors include age, sex, lifestyle, genetic polymorphisms causing differences in enzyme expression or activity, and disease impairment affecting drug metabolism (eg, hepatic or renal impairment, cardiac failure) or predisposition to differences in efficacy or safety (eg, statin intolerance in patients with a history of myopathy). Clinically significant DDIs are usually preventable. To optimize patient safety, healthcare providers must have an understanding of the mechanisms, magnitude, and potential consequences of any given DDI. Interpreting this information …
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2014
Pamela B. Morris; Christie M. Ballantyne; Kim K. Birtcher; Steven P. Dunn; Elaine M. Urbina
Managing risk related to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is vital in therapy for patients at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events given its important etiologic role in atherogenesis. Despite decades of research showing reduction of ASCVD risk with multiple approaches to lowering of LDL cholesterol, there continue to be significant gaps in care with inadequate numbers of patients receiving standard of care lipid-lowering therapy. Confusion regarding implementation of the multiple published clinical practice guidelines has been identified as one contributor to suboptimal management of LDL-related risk. This review summarizes the current guidelines for reduction of LDL-related cardiovascular risk provided by a number of major professional societies, which have broad applicability to diverse populations worldwide. Statements have varied in the process and methodology of development of recommendations, the grading system for level and strength of evidence, the inclusion or exclusion of expert opinion, the suggested ASCVD risk assessment tool, the lipoproteins recommended for risk assessment, and the lipoprotein targets of therapy. The similarities and differences among important guidelines in the United States and internationally are discussed, with recommendations for future strategies to improve consistency in approaches to LDL-related ASCVD risk and to reduce gaps in implementation of evidence-based therapies.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2017
Andrew M. Freeman; Pamela B. Morris; Neal D. Barnard; Caldwell B. Esselstyn; Emilio Ros; Arthur Agatston; Stephen Devries; James H. O’Keefe; Michael I. Miller; Dean Ornish; Kim A. Williams; Penny M. Kris-Etherton
The potential cardiovascular benefits of several trending foods and dietary patterns are still incompletely understood, and nutritional science continues to evolve. However, in the meantime, a number of controversial dietary patterns, foods, and nutrients have received significant media exposure and are mired by hype. This review addresses some of the more popular foods and dietary patterns that are promoted for cardiovascular health to provide clinicians with accurate information for patient discussions in the clinical setting.
Atherosclerosis | 2015
Domnique Newallo; Felix G. Meinel; U. Joseph Schoepf; Stefan Baumann; Carlo N. De Cecco; Rebecca Leddy; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Helge Möllmann; Christian W. Hamm; Pamela B. Morris; Matthias Renker
OBJECTIVE Accumulating data on predominantly Caucasian women suggests an association between breast arterial calcification (BAC) and coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to comprehensively examine the correlation between mammographic BAC and CAD endpoints detected by cardiac computed tomography (CCT) in African American (AA) women. METHODS Consecutive AA women who underwent digital screening mammography and CCT were identified. In blinded fashion, mammographic and CCT studies were reviewed. Patient-related pertinent covariates were assessed. RESULTS Two-hundred-four AA women (median age, 52.5 years) were included. BAC was present in 42 women (20.6%). BAC was significantly associated with coronary artery calcium score >100 (odds ratio [OR], 7.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.75-21.29; P < 0.001), atherosclerotic luminal narrowing (OR, 9.99; CI, 3.65-27.32; P < 0.001), and stenosis ≥50% (OR, 5.48; CI, 1.97-15.23; P = 0.001) by CCT. CONCLUSION In AA women, BAC is associated with increased probability of coronary calcification, atherosclerosis, and CAD on CCT.
Current Atherosclerosis Reports | 2017
Hasan Rehman; Ayeesha Kamran Kamal; Pamela B. Morris; Saleem Sayani; Anwar T. Merchant; Salim S. Virani
Purpose of ReviewHypertension and hyperlipidemia represent two major risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Mobile health or mHealth is defined as the use of mobile phone and wireless technologies to support the achievement of health objectives. Management of hypertension, and to some extent hyperlipidemia, has often employed mHealth interventions given lower cost and greater patient engagement compared to traditional methods. These interventions include the use of text messaging, wireless devices, and mobile phone applications. This review considers recent studies evaluating the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in the management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia.Recent FindingsNumerous studies have evaluated the role of mHealth interventions in the management of hypertension, while very few have evaluated their role in hyperlipidemia. Text messaging has been used most frequently. However, the trend is shifting towards the use of mobile phone applications and wireless devices. Interventions in developing countries have been modified for greater applicability to local settings. mHealth interventions were found to be frequently effective. However, studies comparing the relative efficacy of various mHealth strategies are scarce. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes data and analyses relating to cost effectiveness are also lacking.SummarymHealth interventions may be effective in improving hypertension management. More studies are needed to evaluate the role of mHealth strategies in hyperlipidemia management, particularly in identifying high-risk individuals and improving medication adherence. Studies assessing the long-term impact of these interventions, comparing different interventions and analyzing their relative cost effectiveness, are also needed. Following recently published guidelines on reporting results of mHealth interventions will provide a more meaningful context for interpreting these promising early studies.
Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2012
Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Pamela B. Morris
Cardiovascular risk factor-scoring algorithms may fall short in identifying asymptomatic individuals who will subsequently suffer a coronary event. It is generally thought that evaluation of the extent of the atherosclerotic plaque and total plaque burden can improve cardiovascular risk stratification. In the last decade, there has been an increasing interest in coronary calcium scoring by computed tomography. By determining the calcium score, an estimate of the total amount of coronary plaque is obtained. Numerous studies have shown that the calcium score predicts coronary heart disease. Recently, the calcium score was shown to improve risk stratification beyond cardiovascular risk factors, especially in those individuals deemed to be at intermediate risk. So far, only limited data exist on the cost-effectiveness of coronary calcium scoring in asymptomatic populations.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 2014
William T. Halligan; Pamela B. Morris; U. Joseph Schoepf; Blaine T. Mischen; James V. Spearman; J. Reid Spears; Philipp Blanke; Young Jun Cho; Justin R. Silverman; Salvatore A. Chiaramida; Ullrich Ebersberger
Transient ischemic dilation (TID) in the setting of abnormal stress–rest cardiac SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been linked with increased cardiovascular risk. However, the significance of TID in the setting of an otherwise normal SPECT MPI study has not been clearly established. In this study, cardiac CT was used to evaluate the prevalence of atherosclerotic lesions and the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with TID of the left ventricle with or without associated myocardial perfusion defects on SPECT MPI. Methods: The study population consisted of 1,553 consecutive patients who had undergone both cardiac CT and SPECT MPI within 1 mo between January 1, 2006, and September 1, 2011. Patients included in the study group had a pathologic TID value defined as ≥1.18 for men and ≥1.22 for women. Coronary CT angiography was used to evaluate each coronary segment for the presence and composition of atherosclerotic plaque and the degree of coronary stenosis. TID-positive patients were compared with a 2:1 risk-factor-matched-pair control cohort without TID. Results: TID was identified in 30 patients who were compared with TID-negative risk-factor-matched controls (n = 60). When compared with the TID-negative control cohort, TID-positive patients had no significant differences in the presence and extent of atherosclerosis, the degree of coronary artery stenosis, or the calcium score at cardiac CT. Similarly, there were no significant differences in these CT measures in TID-positive patients with a normal perfusion study (n = 20) when compared with TID-negative patients with a normal perfusion study (n = 48). In addition, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events when comparing both the TID-positive patients and the TID-negative control cohort and when comparing patients who were TID-positive with normal perfusion with patients who were TID-negative with normal perfusion. Conclusion: The presence of TID with an otherwise normal SPECT MPI study does not translate into a greater extent of coronary artery disease as assessed by cardiac CT or increased risk for future major adverse cardiac events.