Pamela Doty

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults with Partial‐Onset Seizures

Summary:  Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide when added to 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures, and assess plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs to determine any potential for drug interactions.

Adjunctive lacosamide for partial-onset seizures : Efficacy and safety results from a randomized controlled trial

Purpose:  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (200 and 400 mg/day) when added to one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures.

Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for partial‐onset seizures: A randomized controlled trial

Purpose:  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (400 and 600 mg/day) as adjunctive treatment in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

A Pooled Analysis of Lacosamide Clinical Trial Data Grouped by Mechanism of Action of Concomitant Antiepileptic Drugs

AbstractBackground: Lacosamide, a new antiepileptic drug (AED) with a different pharmacological action that enhances sodium channel slow inactivation, is approved for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. Previous analyses of pooled phase II/III trials have demonstrated that lacosamide provides additional efficacy when added to a broad range of AEDs. Objective: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide by grouping patients based upon the sodium channel-blocking properties of their concomitant AEDs. Study Design:Post hoc exploratory analyses were performed on pooled data in which patients were grouped based upon inclusion or non-inclusion of at least one ‘traditional’ sodium channel-blocking AED (defined as carbamazepine, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin derivatives) as part of their concomitant AED regimen. Setting: Data pooled from previously conducted phase II/III clinical trials of lacosamide. Patients: Adult patients with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization (N = 1308). Intervention: Four- to six-week Titration Phase followed by 12-week maintenance treatment with adjunctive lacosamide (Vimpat®) [200, 400 or 600 mg/day] or placebo. Main Outcome Measure: Efficacy variables included change in seizure frequency per 28 days and the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responder rate) from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase. The proportion of patients experiencing a ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase (75% responder rate) was also assessed. Safety parameters assessed were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuation due to TEAEs. Additional safety assessments were changes in ECG and laboratory parameters as well as vital signs (including bodyweight). Results: Of 1308 patients in the pooled phase II/III population, the majority (82%) were using at least one ‘traditional’ sodium channel-blocking concomitant AED. In this subgroup of patients, adjunctive lacosamide showed significant reductions in seizure frequency (p<0.01, all dosages) and significantly greater 50% and 75% responder rates (p < 0.01 for 400 mg/day; p < 0.01 [50% responder rate] and p<0.05 [75% responder rate] for 600 mg/day) compared with placebo; these effects were similar to the results seen in the pooled phase II/III population. TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs in this subgroup were dose related and similar to the pooled phase II/III population. In the remaining subgroup of patients, i.e. those not taking ‘traditional’ sodium channel-blocking AEDs as part of their concomitant AED regimen (n = 231; 18%), a pronounced, dose-related seizure reduction was observed with lacosamide (p<0.01, 400 and 600mg/day for median percent seizure reduction and 50% or 75% responder rates). Also in this group, incidences of TEAEs were low, and discontinuations due to TEAEs did not appear to increase with dose. Analyses of ECG, laboratory and vital signs (including bodyweight) assessments did not identify abnormalities in either subgroup that were outside of the known safety profile of lacosamide observed in the pooled phase II/III population. Conclusion: In this post hoc exploratory analysis, adjunctive lacosamide demonstrated significant seizure reduction over placebo regardless of the inclusion of ‘traditional’ sodium channel blockers in the concomitant AED regimen. Future prospective studies evaluating single AED combinations (e.g. lacosamide plus one other drug) are needed to better evaluate the potential for additive or synergistic effects of lacosamide in combination with AEDs not considered ‘traditional’ sodium channel blockers.

Lacosamide: pharmacology, mechanisms of action and pooled efficacy and safety data in partial-onset seizures

Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug approved in the USA and Europe as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures. Studies suggest that lacosamide selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels and possibly interacts with collapsin response mediator protein-2. The efficacy of lacosamide has been shown in animal models of epilepsy and Phase II/III clinical trials. Pharmacokinetic studies show that it is renally excreted, minimally bound to plasma proteins and has no known clinically relevant drug–drug interactions. Clinical trials show that lacosamide is well tolerated; the most common adverse events were dizziness, nausea and vomiting. In a Phase II/III pooled analysis, lacosamide 200 and 400 mg/day significantly reduced partial-onset seizure frequency and improved the 50% responder rate compared with placebo.

Examining the Clinical Utility of Lacosamide Pooled Analyses of Three Phase II/III Clinical Trials

AbstractBackground: Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. Completed phase II/III clinical trials of lacosamide provide a valuable opportunity to evaluate clinically relevant aspects of the resulting large patient pool. Objective: To provide insight into the clinical utility of lacosamide by performing a priori-defined and post hoc analyses on a large, pooled patient population. Study Design: Pooled data from three randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II/III trials. Patients: Adult patients with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization (N = 1294). Intervention: Four- to six-week titration followed by 12-week maintenance treatment with lacosamide (Vimpat®) 200, 400 or 600mg/day or placebo. Main Outcome Measure:A priori- defined primary efficacy variables for the pooled analysis were change in seizure frequency per 28 days and the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responder rate) from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase; a priori-defined secondary efficacy variables were the proportion of patients achieving a ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase (75% responder rate), the proportion of Maintenance Phase completers remaining seizure free throughout the entire Maintenance Phase and the percentage of seizure-free days during the Maintenance Phase for patients entering the Maintenance Phase. The pooled analyses of the change in seizure frequency, and 50% and 75% responder rates were performed with an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach, including all patients receiving at least one dose of trial medication and having at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. Similar analyses of the two primary efficacy variables and 75% responder rates were also performed using a modified ITT population (ITTm) that included ITT patients who entered the Maintenance Phase. Additional post hoc efficacy analyses were an evaluation of onset of efficacy and assessment of efficacy in patients grouped by prior surgical history and individual concomitant AED use. In addition, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling was performed, and safety data were assessed. Results: In this pooled analysis of 1294 difficult-to-treat patients, all three dosages of lacosamide (200, 400 and 600 mg/day) showed a significant improvement compared with placebo for median percent seizure reduction (ITT and ITTm; p < 0.05 for 200 mg/day, p < 0.001 for 400 and 600 mg/day), as well as for 50% responder rate (ITT and ITTm; p <0.05 for 200 mg/day, p<0.001 for 400 and 600 mg/day). Evaluation of 75% responder rate in the phase II/III pooled population showed that a significantly higher proportion of patients randomized to lacosamide 400 or 600 mg/day achieved a ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency compared with placebo (ITT and ITTm; p < 0.001); statistical significance was not observed for lacosamide 200 mg/day (ITT and ITTm). A total of 2.7%, 3.3% and 4.8% of patients completing the Maintenance Phase in the lacosamide 200, 400 and 600 mg/day groups, respectively, experienced no seizures throughout the entire Maintenance Phase (placebo group = 0.9%). The mean change from baseline in the percentage of seizure-free days in patients entering the Maintenance Phase for the phase II/III pool was 8.0%, 11.6% and 14.7% with lacosamide 200 (p =0.077), 400 (p<0.001) and 600 (p<0.001) mg/day groups, respectively, compared with 6.1% in the placebo group.The onset of efficacy relative to placebo was evident by the first week of treatment with lacosamide. Efficacy was similar in lacosamide-treated patients reporting prior surgical intervention for epilepsy compared to lacosamidetreated patients with no prior surgical intervention. Lacosamide showed a reduction in seizures, regardless of the concomitant AEDs used. The preferred pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model (Emax) supported the therapeutic dose range of lacosamide, and no additional safety concerns were identified in the phase II/III pooled analysis. Conclusions: Results of these a priori-defined and post hoc pooled data analyses from phase II/III trials demonstrate that lacosamide effectively reduces seizures in patients at all three dosages evaluated with an early onset of efficacy, regardless of patient surgical history and concomitant AED regimen.

Long‐term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: Results from a phase III open‐label extension trial

Purpose:  To evaluate the long‐term (up to 5 years exposure) safety and efficacy of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in open‐label extension trial SP756 (NCT00522275).

Safety and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide intravenous loading dose in lacosamide-naive patients with partial-onset seizures

Purpose:  To examine the safety and tolerability of rapidly initiating adjunctive lacosamide via a single intravenous loading dose followed by twice‐daily oral lacosamide in lacosamide‐naive adults with partial‐onset seizures.

Development of lacosamide for the treatment of partial-onset seizures

Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug (AED) available in multiple formulations that was first approved in 2008 as adjunctive therapy for partial‐onset seizures (POS) in adults. Unlike traditional sodium channel blockers affecting fast inactivation, lacosamide selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation. This mechanism of action results in stabilization of hyperexcitable neuronal membranes, inhibition of neuronal firing, and reduction in long‐term channel availability without affecting physiological function. Lacosamide has a well‐characterized and favorable pharmacokinetic profile, including a fast absorption rate, minimal or no interaction with cytochrome P‐450 izoenzymes, and a low potential for drug–drug interactions. Lacosamide clinical development included three placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, randomized trials conducted in more than 1300 patients, each demonstrating safety and efficacy of lacosamide compared to placebo as adjunctive therapy for adults with POS. The clinical use of lacosamide may broaden, pending results of trials evaluating its use as monotherapy for POS in adults, as treatment for epilepsy in pediatric subjects, and as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures in those with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Safety and efficacy of adjunctive lacosamide among patients with partial-onset seizures in a long-term open-label extension trial of up to 8 years

Long-term (up to 8 years of exposure) safety and efficacy of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide was evaluated in this open-label extension trial (SP615 [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00552305]). Patients were enrolled following participation in a double-blind trial or one of two open-label trials of adjunctive lacosamide for partial-onset seizures. Dosage adjustments of lacosamide (100-800 mg/day) and/or concomitant antiepileptic drugs were allowed to optimize tolerability and seizure reduction. Of the 370 enrolled patients, 77%, 51%, and 39% had >1, >3, or >5 years of lacosamide exposure, respectively. Median lacosamide modal dose was 400mg/day. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dizziness (39.7%), headache (20.8%), nausea (17.3%), diplopia (17.0%), fatigue (16.5%), upper respiratory tract infection (16.5%), nasopharyngitis (16.2%), and contusion (15.4%). Dizziness (2.2%) was the only TEAE that led to discontinuation in >2% of patients. Ranges for median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 47-65%, and those for ≥ 50% responder rates were 49-63% for 1-, 3-, and 5-year completer cohorts. Exposure to lacosamide for up to 8 years was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to previous double-blind trials, and efficacy was maintained.