Pamela J. Cheshire

Efficacy of topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan, administered at low dose levels in protracted schedules to mice bearing xenografts of human tumors

The efficacy of protracted schedules of therapy of the topoisomerase I inhibitors 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) and 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (irinotecan; CPT-11) were evaluated against a panel of 21 human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric malignancies. Tumors included eight colon adenocarcinomas, representing an intrinsically chemorefractory malignancy, six lines derived from childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (three embryonal, three alveolar) representing a chemoresponsive histiotype, sublines of rhabdomyosarcomas selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three pediatric brain tmors. All tumors were grown at the subcutaneous site. Topotecan was administered by oral gavage 5 days per week for 12 consecutive weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 1.5 mg/kg per dose. Irinotecan was given by i.v. administration daily for 5 days each week for 2 weeks [(d×5)2] (one cycle of therapy), repeated every 21 days. The MTD for three cycles was 10 mg/kg per dose. Treatment was started against advanced tumors. Topotecan caused a high frequency of objective regressions in one of eight colon tumor lines, whereas irinotecan caused complete regressions (CR) of all tumors in three colon lines and a high frequency of CRs in three additional lines. Both drugs demonstrated similar activity against rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. Topotecan caused CR of all tumors in four of six lines, and irinotecan in five of six lines evaluated. Both agents retained full activity against tumors selected for primary resistance to vincristine, but only irinotecan retained activity against a tumor selected for primary resistance to melphalan. Both agents demonstrated good activity against brain tumor xenografts with irinotecan causing CR in two of three lines and topotecan inducing CR in one of three lines. Results indicate that low-dose protracted schedules of daily administration of these topoisomerase I inhibitors is either equi-effective or more efficacious than more intense shorter schedules of administration reported previously.

Evaluation of 9-dimethylaminomethyl- 10-hydroxycamptothecin against xenografts derived from adult and childhood solid tumors

The topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) was evaluated against a panel of xenografts comprising four lines of adult colon adenocarcinoma, three colon tumors derived from adolescents, six childhood rhabdomyosarcomas from previously untreated patients as well as sublines selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three lines of childhood osteogenic sarcoma. Efficacy was determined at maximal tolerated dose levels using intermittent i.p. administration [every 4 days for 4 doses (q4d×4)] or daily p.o. or i. p. administration 5 days per week for up to 20 courses. On a q4d×4 schedule, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 12.5 mg/kg per administration, which caused marked weight loss and lethality in ≈5% of the tumor-bearing mice. This schedule caused significant growth inhibition (but no tumor regression) in advanced adult colon adenocarcinomas. The minimal treated/control (T/C) ratios were 0.49, 0.54, and 0.3 for three of the tumor lines and were achieved at 18–21 days after the initiation of treatment. In contrast, rhabdomyosarcomas were considerably more sensitive, with T/C ratios being <0.1 for three lines, whereas topotecan was less active against two other rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts (minimal T/C ratios, 0.17 and 0.14). As inhibitors of topoisomerase I have been demonstrated to have activity in the replication phase of the cell cycle (S-phase-specific), prolonged administration schedules were examined. Mice received topotecan 5 days per week for 3 weeks either by i.p. injection or by oral gavage (p.o.). In selected experiments, p.o. administration was continued for up to 20 weeks. Oral administration for 3 weeks (2 mg/kg per dose) resulted in complete regression of all six lines of rhabdomyosarcoma, with two lines demonstrating no regrowth during the period of observation (≥84 days). Similar results were obtained after i.p. administration, suggesting significant schedule dependency for these tumors. For colon tumors, the daily administration schedule (i.p. or p.o.) demonstrated some advantage over the intermittent schedule, resulting in partial regressions and significant inhibition of the growth of several colon adenocarcinoma lines. In rhabdomyosarcoma Rh 12 and VRC5 colon adenocarcinoma, both of which demonstrated intermediate sensitivity to topotecan, and in osteosarcoma OS33, protracted p.o. administration for 13–20 weeks (1.0–1.5 mg/kg per dose given daily x 5 days) caused complete regression without regrowth in Rh12 and OS33 tumors and partial regression of all VRC5 tumors. No toxicity was observed using this schedule of administration. Topotecan demonstrated significant activity against all three osteosarcoma xenografts examined, with optimal schedules causing complete regression in two lines. Topotecan demonstrated similar activity against KB 3-1 and KB 8-5 multidrug-resistant cells in culture, and the Rh 12/VCR an Rh 18/VCR xenografts selected for vincristine (VCR) resistance in vivo were as sensitive as their parental lines. However, Rh 28/L-PAM, selected for resistance to melphalan, was cross-resistant to topotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics studies were carried out at the respective MTD for oral (2 mg/kg) or i.p. (1.75 mg/kg) administration. During oral administration the maximal plasma concentration (of the active lactone) was achieved at 0.25 h (Cmax 41.7 ng/ml) and thet1/2α andt1/2β values were 0.55 and 2.8 h, respectively. Administration i.p. resulted in peak plasma levels of 523 ng/ml, witht1/2α andt1/2β elimination rates being 0.29 and 2.5 h, respectively. Although i.p. administration resulted in a 3-fold increase in AUC as compared with oral dosing, similar antitumor activity was observed against most xenograft lines. These results suggest that topotecan may have significant activity against several human cancers and that its efficacy may be schedule-dependent. Topotecan may have a particular role to play in the treatment of childhood solid tumors such as rhabdomyosarcoma and osteosarcoma.

Gefitinib enhances the antitumor activity and oral bioavailability of irinotecan in mice.

As a single agent the ERBB1 inhibitor, gefitinib (Iressa; ZD1839) showed minimal activity against a panel of 10 pediatric tumor xenografts that do not express the ERBB1 receptor. However, combined with irinotecan (CPT-11), significantly greater than additive activity was observed in four of eight models (P < 0.05), and the combination showed enhanced activity against three additional tumor lines. Breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2), a transporter that confers resistance to SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), was readily detected in six of nine xenograft models examined by immunohistochemistry. In vitro gefitinib potently reversed resistance to SN-38 only in a cell line that overexpressed functional ABCG2. However, overexpression of ABCG2 did not decrease accumulation nor increase the rate of efflux of [14C]gefitinib. On the basis of these results and the distribution of Abcg2 in mouse tissues, we assessed the ability of gefitinib to modulate irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Oral gefitinib coadministration resulted in no change in clearance of intravenously administered irinotecan. However, gefitinib treatment dramatically increased the oral bioavailability of irinotecan after simultaneous oral administration. It is concluded that gefitinib may modulate SN-38 activity at the cellular level to reverse tumor resistance mediated by ABCG2 through inhibiting drug efflux and may be used potentially in humans to modulate the oral bioavailability of a poorly absorbed camptothecin such as irinotecan.

Activation and antitumor activity of CPT-11 in plasma esterase-deficient mice

Purpose: To examine the antitumor activity and the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 (irinotecan, 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxycamptothecin) in a plasma esterase-deficient scid mouse model, bearing human tumor xenografts. Experimental design: Plasma carboxylesterase (CE)-deficient mice were bred with scid animals to develop a strain that would allow growth of human tumor xenografts. Following xenotransplantation, the effect of the plasma esterase on antitumor activity following CPT-11 administration was assessed. In addition, detailed pharmacokinetic studies examining plasma and biliary disposition of CPT-11 and its metabolites were performed. Results: In mice lacking plasma carboxylesterase, the mean SN-38 systemic exposures were approximately fourfold less than that observed in control animals. Consistent with the pharmacokinetic data, four to fivefold more CPT-11 was required to induce regressions in human Rh30 xenografts grown in esterase-deficient scid mice, as opposed to those grown in scid animals. Additionally, the route of elimination of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) was principally in the bile. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic profile for CPT-11 and its metabolites in the esterase-deficient mice more closely reflects that seen in humans. Hence, these mice may represent a more accurate model for antitumor studies with this drug and other agents metabolized by CEs.

Efficacy of oral irinotecan against neuroblastoma xenografts

The efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, 7-ethyl-10-(4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino)-carbonyloxy-camptotheci n (irinotecan, CPT-11), administered by oral gavage has been examined against a panel of six independently derived neuroblastoma xenografts. Irinotecan was administered either daily for 5 days on 12 consecutive weeks ¿(d x 5)12¿ or for 5 days on two consecutive weeks repeated every 21 days for 4 cycles ¿[(d x 5)2]4¿. Given on the (d x 5)12 schedule the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 50 mg/kg. For intermittent scheduling ¿[(d x 5)2]4¿, the MTD was 75 mg/kg, resulting in the same total dose being administered (3 g/kg) over the period of treatment. At the MTD for the 12 consecutive week schedule there were two of 42 toxicity related deaths, whereas intermittent scheduling at the MTD resulted in none of 42 deaths. The intermittent schedule ¿[(d x 5)2]4¿ was less toxic than therapy given (d x 5)12, as at the end of treatment mice weighed 92 +/- 4% (SD; n = 6 experiments) and 81 +/- 4% (SD; n = 6 experiments) of their body weight at the start of therapy, respectively. The latter schedule was associated with loose feces starting around week 8 of therapy, broken teeth and a high incidence of swelling of the orbital conjunctiva that developed late in the course of therapy. Given (d x 5)12, irinotecan caused complete regressions of all six neuroblastoma xenograft lines. Because mice tolerate significantly greater systemic exposure to SN-38 lactone than do patients (as determined by plasma AUC at the respective MTD), we evaluated the intermittent schedule of administration, reducing the dose/administration to determine the lowest dose levels that produced objective regressions of these neuroblastoma xenografts and determined the daily systemic exposure associated with these dose levels. In four lines examined objective responses were obtained at dose levels of 12.5 or 6.25 mg/kg. The daily plasma AUC exposures associated with minimum dose achieving response in NB1691 (12.5 mg/kg), NB1643 (6.25 mg/kg) and NBEB (12.5 mg/kg) for irinotecan lactone were 219, 152 and 653 ng-h/ml, respectively; and for SN-38 lactone were 704, 418 and 987 ng-h/ml, respectively. These results indicate that childhood neuroblastoma xenografts are highly sensitive to irinotecan given by oral administration and therapeutic activity is similar to i.v. irinotecan administered on similar schedules.

Evaluation of N-(5-indanylsulfonyl)-N′-(4-chlorophenyl)-urea against xenografts of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma

SummaryN-(5-indanylsulfonyl)-N′-(4-chlorophenyl)-urea (LY186641), a novel anticancer compound, was evaluated against six lines of rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts, each of which was established from tissue biopsies from untreated patients, and additional sublines selected as xenografts for primary resistance to vincristine, melphalan, and ifosfamide. LY186641 was given by oral gavage twice daily for 10 consecutive days or as 5-day courses repeated at 7-day intervals. At the optimal schedule, complete regressions of advanced tumors were obtained in each of the six rhabdomyosarcoma lines. There was no apparent cross-resistance in RMS lines selected for vincristine resistance or against multiple-drug-resistance KB cells in vitro. There was slight cross-resistance in xenografts selected for melphalan resistance, but not in an ifosfamide-resistant line. These results indicate that LY186641 may have significant clinical activity in the treatment of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma.

Factors that influence the therapeutic activity of 5-fluorouracil (6RS)leucovorin combinations in colon adenocarcinoma xenografts*

SummaryThe therapeutic activity of FUra alone or combined with [6RS]LV doses ranging from 50 to 1,000 mg/m2 was examined in eight colon adenocarcinoma xenografts, of which five were established from adult neoplasms (HxELC2, HxGC3, HxVRC5, HxHC1, and HxGC3/c1TK-c3 selected for TK deficiency) and three were derived from adolescent tumors (HxSJC3A, HxSJC3B, and HxSJC2). The growth-inhibitory effects of FUra were potentiated by higher doses of [6RS]LV (500–1,000 mg/m2) in three lines (HxGC3/c1TK-c3, HxSJC3A, and HxSJC3B) and by a low dose of [6RS]LV in only one tumor (HxVRC5). Expansion of pools of CH2−H4PteGlun+H4PteGlun (≥2.4-fold) in response to higher doses of [6RS]LV was obtained in all lines except HxHC1. Metabolism of [6RS]LV was high in HxVRC5, with high levels of 5-CH3−H4PteGlu being detected, but not in HxHC1, in which levels of 5-CH3−H4PteGlu and CH=H4PteGlu+10-CHO−H4PteGlu remained relatively low. In the adolescent tumors, levels of CH=H4PteGlu+10-CHO−H4PteGlu those of 5-CH3−H4PteGlu following [6RS]LV administration. and in HxSJC3A, in which pools of CH2−H4Pte-Glun+H4PteGlun were significantly expanded, 5-CH3−H4PteGlu concentrations were lower than those observed in the other two lines. The sensitivity of tumors to FUra±[6RS]LV and the characteristics of [6S]LV metabolism did not correlate with the activity of CH=H4PteGlu synthetase, the enzyme responsible for the initial cellular metabolism of [6S]LV to CH=H4PteGlu. Thus, no single metabolic phenotype correlated with the [6RS]LV-induced expansion of CH2−H4PteGlun+H4PteGlun pools. Potentiation of the therapeutic efficacy of FUra by [6RS]LV was observed in HxGC3c1TK-c3 xenografts but not in parent HxGC3 tumors, demonstrating the influence of dThd salvage capability in the response to FUra-[6RS]LV combinations. Plasma dThd concentrations in CBA/CaJ mice were high (1.1 μm). The present data therefore demonstrate the importance of (1) higher doses of [6RS]LV, (2) expansion of pools of CH2−H4PteGlun+H4PteGlun, and (3) dThd salvage capability in potentiation of the therapeutic efficacy of FUra in colon adenocarcinoma xenogafts. The plasma levels of FUra achieved in mice are presented.

Evaluation of a novel bis-naphthalimide anticancer agent, DMP 840, against human xenografts derived from adult, juvenile, and pediatric cancers

The new bis-naphthalimide antitumor agent (R,R)2,2′-[1,2-ethanediylbis[imino(1-methyl-2.1-ethanediyl)]-bis {5-nitro-1H-benz[de]-isoquinoline-1,3-2H) dione} dimethanesulfonate (DMP 840) was evaluated against parental and multidrug-resistant human KB cell lines in vitro and against these lines growing as xenografts in immunedeprived mice. In vitro, KB8-5 cells were 50-fold resistant to vincristine but only 16-fold resistant to DMP 840 as measured by clonogenic survival. For in vivo evaluation, DMP 840 was given by i. v. injection daily for 9 days or for 5 days/week for 2 consecutive weeks [(dx5)2]. In contrast to the cross-resistance of KB cell lines in vitro, both KB3-1 and KB8-5 tumors were highly and equally sensitive to DMP 840; only KB3-1 xenografts demonstrated sensitivity to vincristine, which was consistent with the in vitro results. DMP 840 was also evaluated against a panel of human tumors comprising colon adenocarcinoma and rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. Against eight lines of colon adenocarcinoma, DMP 840 caused a high frequency of partial and complete regressions in two lines and significant inhibition of growth in two lines. DMP 840 caused complete regressions in five of six lines of advanced rhabomyosarcomas, demonstrating a broad range of effective dose levels. The pattern of activity against this tumor panel was similar but not identical to that of two inhibitors of topoisomerase I. There was no cross-resistance to DMP 840 in xenografts selected for resistance to vincristine or in a rhabdomyosarcoma selected for resistance to the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan. In contrast, a colon tumor selected for topotecan resistance was completely resistant to DMP 840. Slight cross-resistance to DMP 840 was demonstrated in a rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft that was selected for primary resistance to melphalan and was cross-resistant to topoisomerase I inhibitors. The pattern of activity and cross-resistance in these tumors was compared with that shown by two agents that inhibit topoisomerase I: topotecan and CPT-11.

Therapeutic efficacy of the cyclopropylpyrroloindole, carzelesin, against xenografts derived from adult and childhood solid tumors.

The therapeutic efficacy of the sequence-selective, DNA minor-groove-binding alkylating agent carzelesin was evaluated against a series of human tumor xenografts growing at the s.c. site. The model consisted of seven colon adenocarcinomas, and six pediatric rhabdomyosarcomas. In addition, carzelesin was evaluated against xenografts selected in situ for resistance to vincristine, melphalan, and topotecan. Carzelesin was given as a single i.v. injection, and tumor volumes were determined at 7-day intervals. At the highest dose [0.5 mg/kg, the dose producing 10% lethality (LD10)]), carzelesin significantly inhibited growth in four of six colon tumor lines, causing a high proportion of partial regressions in one of seven lines and complete regressions of VRC5 colon tumors. At 0.25 mg/kg, significant growth inhibition was determined in only two of seven colon tumor lines with infrequent volume regressions. Carzelesin given at the highest nonlethal dose level significantly inhibited the growth of each of six rhabdomyosarcomas, causing a high frequency of partial or complete regressions in four of six tumor lines. There was no apparent cross-resistance to carzelesin in two rhabdomyosarcomas selected for vincristine resistance (Rh12/VCR, Rh18/VCR) or in Rh28/LPAM xenografts selected for primary resistance to the bifunctional alkylating agent melphalan. Interestingly, carzelesin maintained full activity against Rh18/TOPO tumors selected in situ for resistance to topotecan, whereas the colon tumorVRC5/TOPO, selected in a similar manner, was completely resistant to this agent.