Pamela R. Patton

Combination of voriconazole and caspofungin as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Background. The efficacy of the combination of voriconazole and caspofungin when used as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in organ transplant recipients has not been defined. Methods. Transplant recipients who received voriconazole and caspofungin (n=40) as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis (proven or probable) in a prospective multicenter study between 2003 and 2005 were compared to a control group comprising a cohort of consecutive transplant recipients between 1999 and 2002 who had received a lipid formulation of AmB as primary therapy (n=47). In vitro antifungal testing of Aspergillus isolates to combination therapy was correlated with clinical outcome. Results. Survival at 90 days was 67.5% (27/40) in the cases, and 51% (24/47) in the control group (HR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.30–1.14, P=0.117). However, in transplant recipients with renal failure (adjusted HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.12–0.85, P=0.022), and in those with A. fumigatus infection (adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16–0.84, P=0.019), combination therapy was independently associated with an improved 90-day survival in multivariate analysis. No correlation was found between in vitro antifungal interactions of the Aspergillus isolates to the combination of voriconazole and caspofungin and clinical outcome. Conclusions. Combination of voriconazole and caspofungin might be considered preferable therapy for subsets of organ transplant recipients with invasive aspergillosis, such as those with renal failure or A. fumigatus infection.

The changing causes of graft loss and death after kidney transplantation.

Background. The results of kidney transplantation have improved markedly over the last three decades. Despite this, patients still lose grafts and die. We sought to determine whether the causes of graft loss and death have changed over the last 30 years. Methods. We reviewed patients who underwent transplantation or who died between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 1999. We compared the causes of graft loss or death for three decades: 1970 to 1979, 1980 to 1989, and 1990 to 1999. Results. From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1999, we performed 2501 kidney transplantations in 2225 patients. For the three periods, 210, 588, and 383 patients lost their grafts, respectively. Graft survival increased substantially. Graft loss occurred later after transplantation, with 36.0% losing grafts in the first year during 1970 to 1970, 22.8% during 1980 to 1989, and 11.4% during 1990 to 1999. Death with a functioning graft increased from 23.8% for 1970 to 1979 to 37.5% for 1990 to 1999. Concomitantly, rejection as a cause of graft loss fell from 65.7% for 1970 to 1979 to 44.6% for 1990 to 1999. Approximately two thirds of the patients who died after transplantation died with a functioning graft and one third died after returning to dialysis. Cardiac disease as a cause of death increased from 9.6% for 1970 to 1979 to 30.3% for 1990 to 1999. Deaths from cancer and stroke also increased significantly over the three decades from 1.2% and 2.4%, respectively, for 1970 to 1979, to 13.2% and 8.0%, respectively, for 1990 to 1999. Conclusions. The causes of graft loss and death have changed over the last three decades. By better addressing the main causes of death, cardiac disease, and stroke with better prevention, graft loss due to death with a functioning graft will be reduced.

Delayed graft function after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND There is a strong association between delayed graft function (DGF) and reduced graft survival (GS) of cadaveric renal transplants. This study was performed to identify donor characteristics that might predict adverse outcomes. METHODS We reviewed the folders of 509 consecutive organ donors for 586 renal transplant recipients receiving grafts between 1990 and 1995. A uniform immunosuppression protocol was employed. RESULTS The factors that did not alter the rate of DGF were procurement year, local versus shared organs, donor gender, race, hypotension, serum creatinine level and trend, blood transfusions, and vasopressor use and dose. The factors that did alter the frequency of DGF were cause of death (P=0.0053), donor age (P=0.0017), cold ischemic time (P=0.0009), anastomotic time (P=0.0012), combined cold ischemic time and anastomotic time (P=0.00018), and body mass index (P=0.009). All of the factors with the exception of body mass index were of comparable import when analyzed by multiple logistic regression. One-year GS of patients without DGF was 93.2%, and the GS of those with DGF was 76.6% (P < 0.0001). However, none of the donor factors correlated with 1-year GS. Seventy-seven donors were the source of paired transplants performed by our program. Sixty percent were concordant for immediate function, 32% were discordant for DGF with equal numbers affecting the first or second graft, and in only 8% did DGF affect both grafts. CONCLUSIONS Donor factors associated with DGF were increased ischemia, donor age, and cause of death. Although there is a close association between DGF and reduced GS, there is no association between these donor factors and GS. This seeming paradox suggests that unknown variables contribute heavily to early graft outcome.

Obesity does not portend a bad outcome for kidney transplant recipients.

Background. Kidney transplant programs may avoid transplantation in obese patients because of reports indicating that obese patients have poorer outcomes than do nonobese patients. We recently reviewed our experience. Methods. Patients receiving a kidney transplant between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1999 were divided according to body mass index (BMI): group 1, BMI<25 (n=457); group 2, BMI≥25 and <30 (n=278); and group 3, BMI≥35 (n=98). Results. Cadaveric graft survival rates at 2 years were 85% for group 1, 88% for group 2, and 85% for group 3 (P>0.10). Cadaveric patient survival rates at 2 years were 92% for group 1, 91% for group 2, and 94% for group 3 (P>0.10). There were no differences in technical losses or in posttransplantation wound complications. Group 3 patients, however, did have a higher incidence of steroid‐induced posttransplantation diabetes mellitus than the other two groups (P<0.01). Conclusion. Obese transplant recipients have similar outcomes to nonobese patients.

Barriers to Evaluation and Wait Listing for Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Many factors have been shown to be associated with ESRD patient placement on the waiting list and receipt of kidney transplantation. Our study aim was to evaluate factors and assess the interplay of patient characteristics associated with progression to transplantation in a large cohort of referred patients from a single institution. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We examined 3029 consecutive adult patients referred for transplantation from 2003 to 2008. Uni- and multivariable logistic models were used to assess factors associated with progress to transplantation including receipt of evaluations, waiting list placement, and receipt of a transplant. RESULTS A total of 56%, 27%, and 17% of referred patients were evaluated, were placed on the waiting list, and received a transplant over the study period, respectively. Older age, lower median income, and noncommercial insurance were associated with decreased likelihood to ascend steps to receive a transplant. There was no difference in the proportion of evaluations between African Americans (57%) and Caucasians (56%). Age-adjusted differences in waiting list placement by race were attenuated with further adjustment for income and insurance. There was no difference in the likelihood of waiting list placement between African Americans and Caucasians with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS Race/ethnicity, age, insurance status, and income are predominant factors associated with patient progress to transplantation. Disparities by race/ethnicity may be largely explained by insurance status and income, potentially suggesting that variable insurance coverage exacerbates disparities in access to transplantation in the ESRD population, despite Medicare entitlement.

Malignant Melanoma in Solid Transplant Recipients Collection of Database Cases and Comparison With Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data for Outcome Analysis

OBJECTIVE To determine malignant melanoma cause-specific and overall survival among patients with melanoma diagnosed after organ transplantation compared with a national sample with malignant melanoma. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Mayo Clinic sites. PATIENTS Immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients with malignant melanoma identified from surgical and medical databases at Mayo Clinic (1978-2007), the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database (1999-2006), and the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry (1967-2007). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prognostic analyses by Breslow thickness and Clark level of overall and melanoma cause-specific survival. Expected survival rates were estimated by applying the age-, sex-, and calendar year-specific survival rates of patients with malignant melanoma cases reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to the study cohort. RESULTS Malignant melanoma was diagnosed in 638 patients (724 cases) after transplantation. Breslow thickness was available for 123 patients; Clark level, for 175. Three-year overall survival rates for patients stratified by Breslow thickness (≤ 0.75, 0.76-1.50, 1.51-3.00, and >3.00 mm) were 88.2%, 80.8%, 51.2%, and 55.3%, respectively, and 3-year cause-specific survival rates (95% confidence intervals) were 97.8% (93.7%-100%), 89.4% (76.5%-100%), 73.2% (53.2%-100%), and 73.9% (56.4%-96.6%), respectively. Three-year cause-specific survival rates (95% confidence intervals) for patients stratified by Clark level (I-IV) were 100%, 97.4% (92.4%-100%), 82.8% (65.3%-100%), and 65.8% (51.8%-83.7%), respectively. For patients with Breslow thickness of 1.51 to 3.00 mm and Clark level III or IV, the cause-specific survival rate in the study sample was significantly different from the expected estimates for patients with the same Breslow thickness or Clark level. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the expected survival rates derived from malignant melanoma cases reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients with thicker melanomas (ie, with a Clark level of III or IV or a Breslow thickness of 1.51 to 3.00 mm) had a significantly poorer malignant melanoma cause-specific survival rate. The overall survival rate was worse among patients with a prior history of transplantation, regardless of Breslow thickness or Clark level.

Outcome of kidney transplants in patients known to be flow cytometry crossmatch positive

Background. The clinical significance of the flow cytometry crossmatch has been addressed in several retrospective studies, but the results have been controversial. There are no prospective studies in which patients known to be antibody positive underwent transplantation. Methods. The flow cytometry crossmatch was performed prospectively in 1130 renal transplant recipients. A decision to perform transplantation was based on whether the positive results were on T or B cells, in the current or peak specimen, and taking into account the presence or absence of other immunological risk factors. One hundred antibody-positive patients received a transplant. Graft survival and rejection episodes were analyzed in this group and compared with 100 crossmatch-negative patients matched for age, sex, race, and time of transplantation. Results. The incidence of rejection at 1 month was higher in antibody-positive patients (26%) than in antibody-negative patients (12%, P <0.01). Early rejection seemed to be more frequent in antibody-positive patients regardless of whether the antibodies were current or historic, or against T or B cells. There were more steroid-resistant rejections in antibody-positive than in antibody-negative patients. However, biopsy specimens showed that vascular lesions that can be associated with humoral rejection were not more frequent in the antibody-positive patients than in the controls. There were no differences in graft survival between the two groups. Conclusions. Low-level preformed alloantibodies detected by flow cytometry represent a risk of rejection even for patients purposely selected for having no additional immunological risk factors. The risk seems to be due to donor-specific memory rather than to a direct effect of the antibodies. The results indicate that flow cytometry provides useful information to assess donor-recipient compatibility.

Late-onset invasive aspergillosis in organ transplant recipients in the current era

We assessed predictive factors and characteristics of patients with late-onset invasive aspergillosis in the current era of novel immunosuppressive agents. Forty transplant recipients with invasive aspergillosis were included in this prospective, observational study initiated in 2003 at our institutions. In 50% (20/40) of these patients, the infections were late-occurring. Receipt of sirolimus in conjunction with tacrolimus for refractory rejection or cardiac allograft vasculopathy (P=0.047) was significantly associated with late-onset infection. The use of depleting or non-depleting T or B-cell antibodies, either as induction or as antirejection therapy did not correlate with time to onset of invasive aspergillosis. Mortality at 90 days was 20% (4/20) for the patients with early-onset infection and 45% (9/20) for those with late-onset infection (P=0.17). Thus, nearly one-half of the Aspergillus infections in transplant recipients in the current era are late-occurring. These data have implications relevant for prophylactic strategies and guiding clinical management of transplant recipients presenting with pulmonary infiltrates.

Preemptive retransplantation for BK virus nephropathy: successful outcome despite active viremia.

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is now recognized as a major cause of renal allograft loss. Recent reports suggest that retransplantation in patients with graft loss due to BKVN is safe after return to dialysis. Since early transplantation is associated with improved outcomes, it would be advantageous if this procedure could be performed prior to ultimate graft loss. However, little data are available regarding the safety of this approach during active viremia. In this report, we describe successful preemptive retransplantation with simultaneous allograft nephrectomy in two patients with active BKVN and viremia at the time of surgery. With 21‐ and 12‐month follow‐up, respectively, both patients have stable allograft function and no evidence for active viral replication. We conclude that preemptive retransplantation can be considered in patients with failing allografts due to BKVN.

YSPSL (rPSGL-Ig) for improvement of early renal allograft function: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center Phase IIa study.

Gaber AO, Mulgaonkar S, Kahan BD, Woodle ES, Alloway R, Bajjoka I, Jensik S, Klintmalm GB, Patton PR, Wiseman A, Lipshutz G, Kupiec‐Weglinski J, Gaber LW, Katz E, Irish W, Squiers EC, Hemmerich S. YSPSL (rPSGL‐Ig) for improvement of early renal allograft function: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multi‐center Phase IIa study. 
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 523–533.