Pantelis Lioumis

A novel approach for documenting naming errors induced by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used both in basic research and in clinical practice. TMS has been utilized in studies of functional organization of speech in healthy volunteers. Navigated TMS (nTMS) allows preoperative mapping of the motor cortex for surgical planning. Recording behavioral responses to nTMS in the speech-related cortical network in a manner that allows off-line review of performance might increase utility of nTMS both for scientific and clinical purposes, e.g., for a careful preoperative planning. Four subjects participated in the study. The subjects named pictures of objects presented every 2-3s on a computer screen. One-second trains of 5 pulses were applied by nTMS 300ms after the presentation of pictures. The nTMS and stimulus presentation screens were cloned. A commercial digital camera was utilized to record the subjects performance and the screen clones. Delays between presentation, audio and video signals were eliminated by carefully tested combination of displays and camera. An experienced neuropsychologist studied the videos and classified the errors evoked by nTMS during the object naming. Complete anomias, semantic, phonological and performance errors were observed during nTMS of left fronto-parieto-temporal cortical regions. Several errors were detected only in the video classification. nTMS combined with synchronized video recording provides an accurate monitoring tool of behavioral TMS experiments. This experimental setup can be particularly useful for high-quality cognitive paradigms and for clinical purposes.

Language mapping in healthy volunteers and brain tumor patients with a novel navigated TMS system: Evidence of tumor-induced plasticity

OBJECTIVE This article explores the feasibility of a novel repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rnTMS) system and compares language mapping results obtained by rnTMS in healthy volunteers and brain tumor patients. METHODS Fifteen right-handed healthy volunteers and 50 right-handed consecutive patients with left-sided gliomas were examined with a picture-naming task combined with time-locked rnTMS (5-10 Hz and 80-120% resting motor threshold) applied over both hemispheres. Induced errors were classified into four psycholinguistic types and assigned to their respective cortical areas according to the coil position during stimulation. RESULTS In healthy volunteers, language disturbances were almost exclusively induced in the left hemisphere. In patients errors were more frequent and induced at a comparative rate over both hemispheres. Predominantly dysarthric errors were induced in volunteers, whereas semantic errors were most frequent in the patient group. CONCLUSION The right hemispheres increased sensitivity to rnTMS suggests reorganization in language representation in brain tumor patients. SIGNIFICANCE rnTMS is a novel technology for exploring cortical language representation. This study proves the feasibility and safety of rnTMS in patients with brain tumor.

Bilateral changes in excitability of sensorimotor cortices during unilateral movement: combined electroencephalographic and transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

It remains unclear what neuronal mechanisms in humans are reflected in the activation of the ipsilateral hemisphere during the performance of unilateral movements. To address this question we combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroencephalography (EEG), and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Compared with previous TMS studies, where changes in excitability might be related to both cortical and spinal mechanisms, our setup allowed a more direct evaluation of the cortical processes related to the performance of unilateral movements. EEG responses showed that the unilateral motor reactions were associated with the bilateral increase in the excitability of sensorimotor cortices. However, this increase was smaller in the ipsilateral hemisphere most likely due to the fact that the excitation in ipsilateral hemisphere coincided with additional inhibitory processes related to the suppression of mirror movements. This explanation was further corroborated by showing that only contralateral changes in cortical excitability led to the increase in the amplitude of peripheral MEPs, while neuronal activation in the ipsilateral hemisphere was not associated with the changes in the muscle responses. These results suggest that the increased excitability in the ipsilateral hemisphere was uncoupled from the modulation of the cortico-spinal output. Moreover, we show that the background neuronal activity during unilateral movements was different in the ipsi- and contralateral hemisphere. This difference most likely reflects inter-hemispheric balance between the excitation and inhibition which is required for the optimal performance of the unilateral movement.

Combined use of non-invasive techniques for improved functional localization for a selected group of epilepsy surgery candidates.

Invasive cortical mapping is conventionally required for preoperative identification of epileptogenic and eloquent cortical regions before epilepsy surgery. The decision on the extent and exact location of the resection is always demanding and multimodal approach is desired for added certainty. The present study describes two non-invasive preoperative protocols, used in addition to the normal preoperative work-up for localization of the epileptogenic and sensorimotor cortical regions, in two young patients with epilepsy. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to determine the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and the ictal onset zones. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) was used to determine the location and the extent of the primary motor representation areas. The localization results from these non-invasive methods were used for guiding the subdural grid deployment and later compared with the results from electrical cortical stimulation (ECS) via subdural grids, and validated by surgery outcome. The results from MEG and nTMS localizations were consistent with the ECS results and provided improved spatial precision. Consistent results of our study suggest that these non-invasive methods can be added to the standard preoperative work-up and may even hold a potential to replace the ECS in a subgroup of patients with epilepsy who have the suspected epileptogenic zone near the sensorimotor cortex and seizures frequent enough for ictal MEG.

Parallel input makes the brain run faster

In serial sensory processing, information flows from the thalamus via primary sensory cortices to higher-order association areas. However, association cortices also receive, albeit weak, direct thalamocortical sensory inputs of unknown function. For example, while information proceeds from primary (SI) to secondary (SII) somatosensory cortex in a serial fashion, both areas are known to receive direct thalamocortical sensory input. The present study examines the potential roles of such parallel input arrangements. The subjects were presented with median nerve somatosensory stimuli with the instruction to respond with the contralateral hand. The locations and time courses of the activated brain areas were first identified with magnetoencephalography (MEG). In a subsequent session, these brain areas were modulated with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at 15-210 ms after the somatosensory stimulus while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. TMS pulses at 15-40 ms post-stimulus significantly speeded up reaction times and somatosensory-evoked responses, with largest facilitatory effects when the TMS pulse was given to contralateral SII at about 20 ms. To explain the results, we propose that the early somatosensory-evoked physiological SII activation exerts an SII-->SI influence that facilitates the reciprocal SI-->SII pathway - with TMS to SII we apparently amplified this mechanism. The results suggest that the human brain may utilize parallel inputs to facilitate long-distance cortico-cortical connections, resulting in accelerated processing and speeded reaction times. This arrangement could also allow very early top-down modulation of the bottom-up stream of sensory information.

Functional Plasticity of the Motor Cortical Structures Demonstrated by Navigated TMS in Two Patients with Epilepsy

BACKGROUND Recently, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been suggested to be useful in preoperative functional localization of motor cortex in patients having tumors close to the somatomotor cortex. Resection of tumors in anatomically predicted eloquent areas without adverse effects have emphasized functional plasticity elicited by intracranial pathology. OBJECTIVE To describe functional plasticity of motor cortex indicated by nTMS in two patients with epilepsy. METHODS nTMS, functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion-tensor (DT)-tractography and magnetoencephalography (MEG) were utilized to preoperatively localize motor cortical areas in the workup for epilepsy surgery. The localizations were compared with each other, with the cortical anatomical landmarks, and in one patient with invasive electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). RESULTS In two out of 19 studied patients, nTMS identified motor cortical sites that differed from those indicated by anatomical landmarks. In one patient, nTMS activated preferentially premotor cortex rather than pathways originating from the precentral gyrus. MEG and fMRI localizations conformed with nTMS whereas ECS localized finger motor function into the precentral gyrus. Resection of the area producing motor responses in biphasic nTMS did not produce a motor deficit. In the other patient, nTMS indicated abnormal ipsilateral hand motor cortex localization and confirmed the functionality of aberrant motor cortical representations of the left foot also indicated by fMRI and DT-tractography. CONCLUSION nTMS may reveal the functional plasticity and shifts of motor cortical function. Epileptic foci may modify cortical inhibition and the nTMS results. Therefore, in some patients with epilepsy, the nTMS results need to be interpreted with caution with regard to surgical planning.

Validation of head movement correction and spatiotemporal signal space separation in magnetoencephalography

OBJECTIVE Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and reliability of spatiotemporal signal space separation (tSSS) and movement correction (MC) in magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings disturbed by head movements and magnetized material on the head. METHODS We recorded MEG from 20 healthy adults in stationary (reference) head position and during controlled head movements. Nearby magnetic interference sources were simulated by attaching magnetized particles on the subjects head. Auditory and somatosensory stimuli were presented. MC, tSSS and averaging were performed to obtain auditory (AEF) and somatosensory (SEF) evoked fields. Neuronal sources were modeled as equivalent current dipoles. MC was also validated by reconstructing signals generated by current dipoles in a phantom. RESULTS After MC, the AEF and SEF responses recorded during intermittent head movements were similar in amplitude to the reference recordings and differed by 5-7mm in source location. The tSSS method removed artifacts due to the attached magnetized particles but did not affect the reference data. CONCLUSIONS The methods are able to reliably recover MEG responses contaminated by movements and magnetic artifacts on the head. SIGNIFICANCE The combination of tSSS and MC methods is especially useful in clinical measurements, where movements and magnetic disturbances are commonly present.

Effects of navigated TMS on object and action naming

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to induce speech disturbances and to affect speech performance during different naming tasks. Lately, repetitive navigated TMS (nTMS) has been used for non-invasive mapping of cortical speech-related areas. Different naming tasks may give different information that can be useful for presurgical evaluation. We studied the sensitivity of object and action naming tasks to nTMS and compared the distributions of cortical sites where nTMS produced naming errors. Eight healthy subjects named pictures of objects and actions during repetitive nTMS delivered to semi-random left-hemispheric sites. Subject-validated image stacks were obtained in the baseline naming of all pictures before nTMS. Thereafter, nTMS pulse trains were delivered while the subjects were naming the images of objects or actions. The sessions were video-recorded for offline analysis. Naming during nTMS was compared with the baseline performance. The nTMS-induced naming errors were categorized by error type and location. nTMS produced no-response errors, phonological paraphasias, and semantic paraphasias. In seven out of eight subjects, nTMS produced more errors during object than action naming. Both intrasubject and intersubject analysis showed that object naming was significantly more sensitive to nTMS. When the number of errors was compared according to a given area, nTMS to postcentral gyrus induced more errors during object than action naming. Object naming is apparently more easily disrupted by TMS than action naming. Different stimulus types can be useful for locating different aspects of speech functions. This provides new possibilities in both basic and clinical research of cortical speech representations.

Long-lasting TMS motor threshold elevation in mild traumatic brain injury

Tallus J, Lioumis P, Hämäläinen H, Kähkönen S, Tenovuo O. Long‐lasting TMS motor threshold elevation in mild traumatic brain injury. 
Acta Neurol Scand: 2012: 126: 178–182. 
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Responses in Recovered and Symptomatic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may cause diffuse damage to the brain, especially to the frontal areas, that may lead to persistent symptoms. We studied participants with past mTBI by means of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) combined with electroencephalography (EEG). Eleven symptomatic and 8 recovered participants with a history of single mTBI and 9 healthy controls participated. Average time from injury to testing was 5 years. The participants did not have abnormalities or signs of injury on brain magnetic resonance imaging, and they did not use any centrally acting medication. Left primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) were stimulated with nTMS and evoked potentials measured from the corresponding areas of both hemispheres. Delayed ipsilateral P30 and contralateral N45 peak latencies to left DLPFC nTMS were found in the symptomatic group, along with higher DLPFC N100 amplitudes compared with the control or recovered group. The recovered group had shorter P200 latencies in left DLPFC nTMS compared with the other groups. Both mTBI groups had higher motor thresholds compared with the control group. In left M1 nTMS, the mTBI groups showed less P30 amplitude increase, and the symptomatic group showed longer P60 interhemispheric latency difference with higher stimulation intensities. The results suggest altered brain reactivity and connectivity in mTBI. Some of the observed differences may be related to compensatory mechanisms of recovery. nTMS-EEG is a potentially useful tool for studying the effects of mTBI.