Paola Boccone

PARP1 expression drives the synergistic antitumor activity of trabectedin and PARP1 inhibitors in sarcoma preclinical models

BackgroundEnhancing the antitumor activity of the DNA-damaging drugs is an attractive strategy to improve current treatment options. Trabectedin is an isoquinoline alkylating agent with a peculiar mechanism of action. It binds to minor groove of DNA inducing single- and double-strand-breaks. These kinds of damage lead to the activation of PARP1, a first-line enzyme in DNA-damage response pathways. We hypothesized that PARP1 targeting could perpetuate trabectedin-induced DNA damage in tumor cells leading finally to cell death.MethodsWe investigated trabectedin and PARP1 inhibitor synergism in several tumor histotypes both in vitro and in vivo (subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor xenografts in mice). We searched for key determinants of drug synergism by comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and gene expression profiling (GEP) and validated their functional role.ResultsTrabectedin activated PARP1 enzyme and the combination with PARP1 inhibitors potentiated DNA damage, cell cycle arrest at G2/M checkpoint and apoptosis, if compared to single agents. Olaparib was the most active PARP1 inhibitor to combine with trabectedin and we confirmed the antitumor and antimetastatic activity of trabectedin/olaparib combination in mice models. However, we observed different degree of trabectedin/olaparib synergism among different cell lines. Namely, in DMR leiomyosarcoma models the combination was significantly more active than single agents, while in SJSA-1 osteosarcoma models no further advantage was obtained if compared to trabectedin alone. aCGH and GEP revealed that key components of DNA-repair pathways were involved in trabectedin/olaparib synergism. In particular, PARP1 expression dictated the degree of the synergism. Indeed, trabectedin/olaparib synergism was increased after PARP1 overexpression and reduced after PARP1 silencing.ConclusionsPARP1 inhibition potentiated trabectedin activity in a PARP1-dependent manner and PARP1 expression in tumor cells might be a useful predictive biomarker that deserves clinical evaluation.

Complete remission of paraneoplastic vanishing bile duct syndrome after the successful treatment of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature

BackgroundVanishing bile duct syndrome has been associated with different pathologic conditions (adverse drug reactions, autoimmune diseases, graft versus host disease, and cancer). Though its causes are unknown, an immune-related pathogenesis is the most likely one. Vanishing bile duct syndrome can evolve to hepatic failure and, eventually, to death. The treatment is uncertain, but it needs the resolution of the underlying pathologic condition.Case presentationWe describe the association of Hodgkin’s lymphoma with a syndrome characterized by cholestasis, aminotransferase elevation and an histological picture of bile duct loss. All other causes of hepatic function impairment were excluded (in particular, drugs, viral and autoimmune related diseases) eventually leading to the diagnosis of vanishing bile duct syndrome. Despite the fact that the dysfunction is not caused by hepatic Hodgkin’s lymphoma involvement, liver impairment can limit the optimal therapy of Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A treatment consisting of ursodeoxycholic acid, prednisone, and full dose chemotherapy restored hepatic function and achieved complete and long-lasting remission of Hodgkin’s lymphoma.ConclusionWe reviewed all case reports showing that vanishing bile duct syndrome is a dismal paraneoplastic syndrome being fatal in a high proportion of patients if not adequately treated. Indeed, this syndrome requires both an early recognition and an appropriate aggressive treatment consisting of full dose upfront chemotherapy which is the only way to achieve a resolution of the vanishing bile duct syndrome. Delayed or reduced intensity treatments unfavorably correlate with survival.

Trabectedin and olaparib in patients with advanced and non-resectable bone and soft-tissue sarcomas (TOMAS): an open-label, phase 1b study from the Italian Sarcoma Group

BACKGROUND Trabectedin is an alkylating drug with a unique mechanism of action causing single-strand and double-strand DNA breaks that activate DNA damage-response pathways. Based on our preclinical data, we hypothesised that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors might be an ideal partner of trabectedin and aimed to assess the safety, identify the recommended phase 2 dose, and explore preliminary signs of activity of trabectedin and olaparib combination treatment in patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma. METHODS We did an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study, recruiting patients from the national Italian sarcoma network aged 18 years and older with histologically confirmed bone and soft-tissue sarcoma progressing after standard treatments with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less. In a classic 3 + 3 design, patients received a 24 h infusion of trabectedin on day 1 and olaparib orally twice a day in 21-day cycles across six dose levels (trabectedin 0·675-1·3 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; olaparib 100-300 mg twice a day from day 1 to 21). Intermediate dose levels were permitted to improve safety and tolerability. The primary endpoint was determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (the maximum tolerated dose). Safety and antitumour activity were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. We report the results of the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts. The trial is still active but closed to enrolment, and follow-up for patients who completed treatment is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02398058. FINDINGS Between Nov 17, 2014, and Jan 30, 2017, of 54 patients assessed for eligibility, we enrolled 50 patients: 28 patients in the dose-escalation cohort and 22 patients in the dose-expansion cohort. Patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (IQR 2-6; range 1-17 [the patients who received the highest number of cycles are still on treatment]) with a median follow-up of 10 months (IQR 5-23). Considering all dose levels, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (32 [64%] of 50 patients), neutropenia (31 [62%]), thrombocytopenia (14 [28%]), anaemia (13 [26%]), hypophosphataemia (20 [40%]), and alanine aminotransferase concentration increase (9 [18%]). No treatment-related life-threatening adverse events or deaths occurred. One (2%) patient interrupted treatment without progression without reporting any specific toxicity. Observed dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia for more than 7 days, and febrile neutropenia. We selected intermediate dose level 4b (trabectedin 1·1 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus olaparib 150 mg twice a day) as the recommended phase 2 dose. Seven (14%; 95% CI 6-27) of 50 patients achieved a partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1. INTERPRETATION Trabectedin and olaparib in combination showed manageable toxicities at active dose levels for both drugs. Preliminary data on antitumour activity are encouraging. Two dedicated phase 2 studies are planned to assess activity of this combination in both ovarian cancer (EudraCT2018-000230-35) and soft-tissue sarcomas. FUNDING Italian Association for Cancer Research, Italian Sarcoma Group, Foundation for Research on Musculoskeletal and Rare Tumors, and Italian Ministry of Health.

Abstract 3709: PARP1 expression (PARP1expr) drives synergy between PARP1 inhibitors (PARP1-Is) and trabectedin (TR)

Purpose of study. An attractive strategy to improve antitumor treatments is to inflict cytotoxic DNA damage with chemotherapy, and then impede DNA repair by molecular targeting. TR is a new drug characterized by a peculiar mechanism of action: TR traps DNA repair machinery leading to DNA damage, particularly in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors. We speculated that TR might activate PARP1, a key player in DNA-repair, and that subsequent PARP1 inhibition perpetuates TR-induced DNA damage leading to cell death. Experimental procedures and results. We developed a preclinical platform of 31 cell lines from different histotypes to explore the potential synergy between TR and the PARP1-Is olaparib (OL) and veliparib. We demonstrated that, regardless of BRCA1/2 status, PARP1-Is significantly increased TR activity, but a 15-fold range of sensitivity to the combination was observed. OL was proven the best PARP-I to combine with TR, probably due to its PARP1 trapping activity. In selected experiments, whole-genome expression profiling and GSEA analysis comparing cells displaying high vs. low synergism of the combination (HS-C vs. LS-C) revealed that DDR, G2/M cell cycle checkpoint, and DNA repair pathways were mechanistically involved in TR+OL synergy. TR induced PARP1 activation in 3/6 cell lines and PARP1-Is completely blocked both basal and TR-induced PARP1 activation. OL enhanced DNA damage response in 6/6 cell lines, but unrepairable DNA fragmentation was obtained in cells with high PARP1expr only. In two independent cell panels TR+OL synergism was directly related to PARP1expr both at mRNA (Pearson score r: 0.70, p = 0.00079) and protein level (r: 0.71, p = 0.015). Silencing and overexpression experiments validated the functional role of PARP1expr in determining TR+OL synergism: in HS-C the downmodulation of PARP1expr reduced sensitivity to TR+OL while the overexpression of PARP1 in LS-C rose TR+OL activity to levels observed in HS-C. Subcutaneous, intravenous and orthotopic xenografts of one HS-C (DMR) and one LS-C (SJSA-1) in NOD/SCID mice revealed OL significantly increased antitumor and antimetastatic activity of TR in cells with high PARP1expr only. Finally, we demonstrated that basal PARP1expr PARP1 activation by other cytotoxics with a stronger PARP1 activation observed in cells with high vs. low PARP1expr, regardless of the considered drug. Conclusions. OL enhances and potentially broaden TR cytotoxicity. TR+OL combination is particularly attractive in tumors harboring high PARP1expr and specific DDR-R gene signatures that might become predictive biomarkers of response. Future clinical validation of TR+OL combination may extend the use of PARP1-Is beyond BRCA1/2 defective tumors. Indeed, the crucial role of PARP1expr is confirmed regardless of tumor histotype and BRCA1/2 status. Further studies of combination between PARP1-Is and other cytotoxics should consider basal PARP1expr and activation after drug exposure. Citation Format: Ymera Pignochino, Federica Capozzi, Lorenzo D’ambrosio, Carmine Dell’aglio, Marco Basirico, Paola Boccone, Erica Palesandro, Loretta Gammaitoni, Dario Sangiolo, Maria Serena Benassi, Massimo Aglietta, Giovanni Grignani. PARP1 expression (PARP1expr) drives synergy between PARP1 inhibitors (PARP1-Is) and trabectedin (TR). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3709.