Paola Fadda

Sleep deprivation in the rat: an animal model of mania

The model of sleep deprivation in rats by the platform method has been extensively studied in our laboratory as a possible animal model of mania. At the end of the period of sleep deprivation, the rat does not fall asleep as soon as it is returned to its home cage, but shows a period of wakefulness of about 30 min, during which the animal presents a cohort of symptoms that appear to mimic those present in idiopathic mania. In particular, during this period the animal displays insomnia, a high degree of hyperactivity, irritability, aggressiveness, hypersexuality and stereotypy. Haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg) was effective in reducing latency to sleep, while L-sulpiride was much weaker (< 50 mg/kg). The dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 exhibited an extremely high potency and efficacy in reducing sleep latency, a significant effect being observed with 3 micrograms/kg. The administration of the specific D1 receptor agonist SKF 38393 markedly prolonged the period of insomnia with the correlated behavioral syndrome. When lithium was added to the diet and consumed during the sleep deprivation period in adequate amounts to produce serum lithium levels of 0.7-1.0 mEq/l, sleep latency and locomotor activity were significantly reduced. The administration of naloxone (1-10 mg/kg) reduced the latency to sleep in a dose-related manner. By contrast, morphine (1 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.), beta-endorphin and [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin (i.c.v., 2 and 1 micrograms, respectively) markedly prolonged the insomnia. The model not only represents a confirmation in the rat that sleep loss often precedes and may trigger a manic episode in man, but suggests that an opioid-dopamine interaction may play a pathogenetic role in mania.

Cannabinoid self-administration in rats: sex differences and the influence of ovarian function

We recently demonstrated the existence of strain differences in self‐administration of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist WIN55,212‐2 (WIN) by Long Evans (LE) and Lister Hooded (LH) but not Sprague‐Dawley (SD) male rats. This follow‐up study is aimed at verifying whether sex and ovarian hormones might also be critical factors in the initiation, retention and extinction of WIN self‐administration.

Inhibition of anandamide hydrolysis by cyclohexyl carbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-3-yl ester (URB597) reverses abuse-related behavioral and neurochemical effects of nicotine in rats.

Emerging evidence suggests that the rewarding, abuse-related effects of nicotine are modulated by the endocannabinoid system of the brain. For example, pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion of cannabinoid CB1 receptors can reduce or eliminate many abuse-related behavioral and neurochemical effects of nicotine. Furthermore, doses of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and nicotine that are ineffective when given alone can induce conditioned place preference when given together. These previous studies have used systemically administered CB1 receptor agonists and antagonists and gene deletion techniques, which affect cannabinoid CB1 receptors throughout the brain. A more functionally selective way to alter endocannabinoid activity is to inhibit fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), thereby magnifying and prolonging the effects of the endocannabinoid anandamide only when and where it is synthesized and released on demand. Here, we combined behavioral and neurochemical approaches to evaluate whether the FAAH inhibitor URB597 (cyclohexyl carbamic acid 3′-carbamoyl-3-yl ester) could alter the abuse-related effects of nicotine in rats. We found that URB597, at a dose (0.3 mg/kg) that had no behavioral effects by itself, prevented development of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and acquisition of nicotine self-administration. URB597 also reduced nicotine-induced reinstatement in both CPP and self-administration models of relapse. Furthermore, in vivo microdialysis showed that URB597 reduced nicotine-induced dopamine elevations in the nucleus accumbens shell, the terminal area of the brains mesolimbic reward system. These findings suggest that FAAH inhibition can counteract the addictive properties of nicotine and that FAAH may serve as a new target for development of medications for treatment of tobacco dependence.

Sex differences in addictive disorders

Gender-dependent differences in the rate of initiation and frequency of misuse of addicting drugs have been widely described. Yet, men and women also differ in their propensity to become addicted to other rewarding stimuli (e.g., sex, food) or activities (e.g., gambling, exercising). The goal of the present review is to summarize current evidence for gender differences not only in drug addiction, but also in other forms of addictive behaviours. Thus, we first reviewed studies showing gender-dependent differences in drug addiction, food addiction, compulsive sexual activity, pathological gambling, Internet addiction and physical exercise addiction. Potential risk factors and underlying brain mechanisms are also examined, with particular emphasis given to the role of sex hormones in modulating addictive behaviours. Investigations on factors allowing the pursuit of non-drug rewards to become pathological in men and women are crucial for designing gender-appropriate treatments of both substance and non-substance addictions.

Endocannabinoid system and opioid addiction: Behavioural aspects

Cannabinoids produce a variety of pharmacological effects very similar to those elicited by opioids. Direct and indirect interactions with opioid system have been proposed to explain some cannabinoid effects such as analgesia and attenuation of opioid-withdrawal syndrome, and evidence has been provided in support to the notion that rewarding properties of cannabinoids and opioids might be functionally linked. In particular, a growing body of studies points to an important role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in the modulation of opioid rewarding and addictive effects. The current review examines progresses in the past few years in the elucidation of cannabinoid-opioid interactions in drug abuse and dependence, focusing on recent findings from behavioural studies using different animal models of addiction. Specifically, here we review data on the behavioural aspects (i.e., drug abuse, dependence, tolerance, sensitization, relapse and drug vulnerability) of the specific, often reciprocal, cross-talk between cannabinoids and opioids with particular reference to the role of the endocannabinoid system in opioid addiction. The potential biochemical mechanisms involved in these pharmacological interactions are discussed together with possible therapeutic implications in the pharmacotherapy of opioid dependence. However, individuation of the precise anatomical substrates and molecular mechanisms of such interaction still remains a complex and challenging field for future research.

Blockade of Nicotine Reward and Reinstatement by Activation of Alpha-Type Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

BACKGROUND Recent findings indicate that inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) counteract the rewarding effects of nicotine in rats. Inhibition of FAAH increases levels of several endogenous substances in the brain, including the endocannabinoid anandamide and the noncannabinoid fatty acid ethanolamides oleoylethanolamide (OEA) and palmitoylethanolamide, which are ligands for alpha-type peroxisome proliferator-activated nuclear receptors (PPAR-α). Here, we evaluated whether directly acting PPAR-α agonists can modulate reward-related effects of nicotine. METHODS We combined behavioral, neurochemical, and electrophysiological approaches to evaluate effects of the PPAR-α agonists [[4-Chloro-6-[(2,3-dimethylphenyl)amino]-2-pyrimidinyl]thio]acetic acid (WY14643) and methyl oleoylethanolamide (methOEA; a long-lasting form of OEA) on 1) nicotine self-administration in rats and squirrel monkeys; 2) reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behavior in rats and monkeys; 3) nicotine discrimination in rats; 4) nicotine-induced electrophysiological activity of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons in anesthetized rats; and 5) nicotine-induced elevation of dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens shell of freely moving rats. RESULTS The PPAR-α agonists dose-dependently decreased nicotine self-administration and nicotine-induced reinstatement in rats and monkeys but did not alter food- or cocaine-reinforced operant behavior or the interoceptive effects of nicotine. The PPAR-α agonists also dose-dependently decreased nicotine-induced excitation of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area and nicotine-induced elevations of dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens shell of rats. The ability of WY14643 and methOEA to counteract the behavioral, electrophysiological, and neurochemical effects of nicotine was reversed by the PPAR-α antagonist 1-[(4-Chlorophenyl)methyl]-3-[(1,1-dimethylethyl)thio]-a,a-dimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-1H-Indole-2-propanoic acid (MK886). CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that PPAR-α might provide a valuable new target for antismoking medications.

CB1 receptor agonist and heroin, but not cocaine, reinstate cannabinoid-seeking behaviour in the rat.

We recently provided evidence for a functional link between cannabinoid and opioid endogenous systems in relapse to heroin‐seeking behaviour in rats. In the present study, we aimed at investigating whether the previously observed cross‐talk between cannabinoids and opioids could be extended to mechanisms underlying relapse to cannabinoid‐seeking behaviour after a prolonged period of abstinence. In rats previously trained to intravenously self‐administer the synthetic cannabinoid receptor (CB1) agonist WIN 55,212‐2 (12.5 μg kg−1 inf−1) under a fixed ratio (FR1) schedule of reinforcement, noncontingent nonreinforced intraperitoneal (i.p.) priming injections of the previously self‐administered CB1 agonist (0.25 and 0.5 mg kg−1) as well as heroin (0.5 mg kg−1), but not cocaine (10 mg kg−1), effectively reinstate cannabinoid‐seeking behaviour following 3 weeks of extinction. The selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A (0.3 mg kg−1 i.p.) does not reinstate responding when given alone, but completely prevents the cannabinoid‐seeking behaviour triggered by WIN 55,212‐2 or heroin primings. The nonselective opioid antagonist naloxone (1 mg kg−1 i.p.) has no effect on operant behaviour per sè, but significantly blocks cannabinoid‐ and heroin‐induced reinstatement of cannabinoid‐seeking behaviour. These results provide the first evidence of drug‐induced reinstatement of cannabinoid‐seeking behaviour, and further strengthen previous findings on a cross‐talk between the endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems in relapse mechanisms to drug‐seeking.

Involvement of κ-Opioid and Endocannabinoid System on Salvinorin A-Induced Reward

Background The recreational drug, Salvinorin A, derived from the plant of Salvia divinorum, is a potent and selective κ-opioid receptor agonist. The abuse of selective k-agonists is a novel phenomenon, the mechanism of which is not fully understood. Methods We investigated salvinorin A given SC on the conditioned place preference (.05–160 μg/kg) and intracerebroventricular (ICV) self-administration (.01–1 μg/infusion) paradigms, in Wistar rats. Results The present results demonstrate the rewarding effects of Salvinorin A in a range of doses between .1 and 40 μg/kg SC for conditioned place preference test and .1–.5 μg/infusion for ICV self-administration. Highest doses (160 μg/kg for conditioned place preference test and 1 μg/infusion for ICV self-administration) were aversive. The rewarding effect was antagonized by intraperitoneal (IP) pretreatment with the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor antagonist, rimonabant [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)1-(2,4-dichloro phenyl)-4 methyl pyrazole 3-carboxamide] (1 mg/kg), and the κ-opioid receptor antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) (10 mg/kg). In the shell of nucleus accumbens, dopamine extracellular levels were increased after administration of salvinorin A (40 μg/kg SC), reaching a maximum value of about 150%. Conclusions These data provide the demonstration of the rewarding effects of Salvinorin A through an interaction between κ-opioid and (endo)cannabinoid system in rats.

Cannabinoid CB1 antagonist SR 141716A attenuates reinstatement of heroin self-administration in heroin-abstinent rats

Rats with a previous history of heroin self-administration were studied to assess interactions occurring between cannabinoids and opioids in an animal model of reinstatement of heroin-seeking behaviour. Rats were trained to self-administer heroin and after a long-term extinction were primed with one of the following non-contingent non-reinforced drug administrations: saline (or vehicle), heroin, synthetic cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists (WIN 55,212-2 or CP 55,940), opioid antagonist (naloxone) or CB(1) antagonist (SR 141716A), alone or in combination. After primings, lever-pressing activity was recorded and compared to those observed during previous phases of training and extinction. Results of this study showed that (i) priming injections of heroin (0.1 mg/kg) as well as CB(1) agonists WIN 55,212-2 (0.15 or 0.30 mg/kg) and CP 55,940 (0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg) completely restore heroin-seeking behaviour; (ii) primings of naloxone (1 mg/kg) and SR 141716A (0.3 mg/kg) had no effect when administered alone; (iii) heroin-induced reinstatement was fully prevented by pre-treatment with either naloxone or SR 141716A; (iv) pre-treatment with SR 141716A significantly reduced WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 priming effects. These results suggest that cannabinoid CB(1) receptors play an important role in the mechanisms underlying relapse to heroin-seeking and depict CB(1) antagonists as possible therapeutic agents for use in the prevention of relapse to heroin abuse.

The endocannabinoid system and nondrug rewarding behaviours

Rewarding behaviours such as sexual activity, eating, nursing, parenting, social interactions, and play activity are conserved strongly in evolution, and they are essential for development and survival. All of these behaviours are enjoyable and represent pleasant experiences with a high reward value. Remarkably, rewarding behaviours activate the same brain circuits that mediate the positive reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse and of other forms of addiction, such as gambling and food addiction. Given the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in a variety of physiological functions of the nervous system, it is not surprising that it takes part in the complex machinery that regulates gratification and perception of pleasure. In this review, we focus first on the role of the endocannabinoid system in the modulation of neural activity and synaptic functions in brain regions that are involved in natural and nonnatural rewards (namely, the ventral tegmental area, striatum, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex). Then, we examine the role of the endocannabinoid system in modulating behaviours that directly or indirectly activate these brain reward pathways. More specifically, current knowledge of the effects of the pharmacological manipulation of the endocannabinoid system on natural (eating, sexual behaviour, parenting, and social play) and pathological (gambling) rewarding behaviours is summarised and discussed.